Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
→‎User:Princess of Ara: Added full disclosure and removed double time stamp entry
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
TheChunky (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 186: Line 186:
* {{UserAFC|1=TipsyElephant}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
* {{UserAFC|1=TipsyElephant}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I've done some work with AfDs and PRODs at [[WP:POD]], but I have not done any speedy deletions. I've mostly contributed to articles relevant to [[WP:POD]], and I was hoping to go through the AfCs at the Wikiproject (I might branch out after that). I've made 20 different articles that have already passed AfC (i.e. [[Dissect (podcast)]] and [[Art Napoleon]]) and I've also made substantial edits to pre-existing articles such as [[Minjung theology]] and [[Nicholas Galanin]]. I just read over the guide to AfCs and I believe I meet the criteria for a reviewer. I'm not sure how relevant it is, but I've also created 10 different categories and I've uploaded or edited nearly every image used by articles at [[WP:POD]]. [[User:TipsyElephant|TipsyElephant]] ([[User talk:TipsyElephant|talk]]) 11:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
:I've done some work with AfDs and PRODs at [[WP:POD]], but I have not done any speedy deletions. I've mostly contributed to articles relevant to [[WP:POD]], and I was hoping to go through the AfCs at the Wikiproject (I might branch out after that). I've made 20 different articles that have already passed AfC (i.e. [[Dissect (podcast)]] and [[Art Napoleon]]) and I've also made substantial edits to pre-existing articles such as [[Minjung theology]] and [[Nicholas Galanin]]. I just read over the guide to AfCs and I believe I meet the criteria for a reviewer. I'm not sure how relevant it is, but I've also created 10 different categories and I've uploaded or edited nearly every image used by articles at [[WP:POD]]. [[User:TipsyElephant|TipsyElephant]] ([[User talk:TipsyElephant|talk]]) 11:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

====[[User:TheChunky]]====
* {{UserAFC|1=TheChunky}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I believe I meet the basic requirements, as evidenced by numerous edits and several articles written that demonstrate a thorough understanding of the criteria for inclusion. I'd like to assist whenever possible. — [[User:TheChunky|<b><i><span style="text-shadow:3px 3px 4px darkgray;"><span style="color:#0000A0">The Chunky urf <i> Al Kashmiri</i></span></span></i></b>]] [[User talk:TheChunky|<sup><i><span style="color:green">(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)</span></i></sup>]] 02:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:46, 20 July 2021

This page is for requesting access to the AFC Helper script. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or AFCH in general, please do so at the main talk page.

Requests

Note - All archived requests older than one month can be found at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests.
Please note that we generally do not notify users when their request has been reviewed, so please watch this page for updates to your request.
Please refrain from closing requests if you are not an administrator.
(add request)

June

Returning (Jun)

User:Mortee

I am currently listed as inactive and would like to be reinstated so I can help out with some reviews. I was previously approved and have written 26 articles (listed on my user page). › Mortee talk 14:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 10:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New (June)

User:Doric Loon

Greetings. I have been a Wikipedia editor since 2005 and have created over 200 articles. Until now I have mostly confined myself to content improvement but I have some experience of AfD and PROD. I would be interested in becoming involved here in AfC. I seem to meet all the general criteria, and have read the instructions. --Doric Loon (talk) 12:44, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 12:57, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nizolan

I have around 60 substantive articles and no non-procedural deletions, 8,000 edits and a decent AfD track record. I'm interested in helping to chip away at the backlog. —Nizolan (talk · c.) 19:02, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 17:22, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Laplorfill

I have been a Wikipedia editor since 2013, though more active recently, with close to 5000 edits. I have created a number of articles, including McEwan Pratt, Brockham Railway Museum, Gloddfa Ganol, Baguley 774, A. Horlock and Co, Slate industry in the Nantlle Valley, Francis Claude Blake and a dozen others. I contribute to WP:AfD, and know how to use WP:PROD and WP:CSD effectively and have recently been granted rollback rights. I often come across AfD submissions both good and ones in need of improvement, and am happy to volunteer my time to reducing the backlog. Laplorfill (talk) 05:55, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Primefac (talk) 10:27, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Trialan

Dear Sir or Madam,

I would like to apply for Articles for Creation rights on Wikipedia.

Below I will expose why I believe that I meet the criteria at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation.

My Wikipedia account has been very active in the last 106 days, in which I've made over 500 edits: correcting typos, fixing grammar, adding sources and extending articles with too little content.

Thorough understanding of the reviewing instructions

I have thoroughly read and understood the reviewing instructions. In order to give evidence of this I have written a short summary of the recommended reviewing workflow below.

Once a draft has been created and submitted, the first step is for it to go through the quick fail process: the idea is for bad drafts to be killed quickly. A quick fail consists in: irreparable copyright violation, a blank, test or nonsense article, and vandalism. If an article isn't in English it should be trans-wikified.

Then comes the standard content review phase, the key here is that content should be encyclopaedic in nature, on a notable subject, reliably sourced and adopting a neutral point of view.

Demonstration of understanding of notability guidelines and deletion policies

I have carefully read the notability guidelines and applied what I learned to contribute to multiple AfD discussions.

As evidence of my understanding and involvement in this process I have made many edits on AfD pages making the case for or against deletion based on what I read in the reviewing policies and instructions. AfD discussions taken part in include: articles on Rob Lord (software developer), the international theatre in Vienna, Time and Space Limited (theatre company), International Financing Review, Kain Rivers, ...

Willingness and ability to respond in a timely manner to questions about their reviews

I have ample time and am more than willing to respond in a timely manner to questions about my reviews.

I have the above demonstrates my enthusiasm and goodwill to contribute to the wikipedian community by becoming an AfC.

Many Thanks for your consideration. Trialan (talk) 15:07, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for various reasons, including the apparent need to make dozens of edits to make relatively minor typo fixes and a G11'd draft. Primefac (talk) 13:31, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Clearfrienda

I would like to apply for Articles for Creation rights on Wikipedia, I believe I have met all criteria, and I've created many articles (listed on my user page). I would love to help reduce the backlog of AfC articles. Thanks, Clearfrienda 💬 14:42, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:JoelleJay

I have a lot of experience with NPROF and NSPORT articles at AfD and believe my familiarity with those guidelines would be helpful here. JoelleJay (talk) 23:45, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ulubatli Hasan

Hey, I want to become a Articles for creation reviewer to help in reducing the thousands of pending submissions. I've over a thousand edits and understand all the notability guidelines and other guidelines. I think, I meet the requirements. Hasan (talk) 07:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:ECTran71

I think I meet the basic requirements, with numerous edits as well as several articles created demonstrating good understanding of the requirements for inclusion. I would like to help out whenever I can. ECTran71 (talk) 11:39, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sahaib3005

Hello I’m Sahaib3005. I think I have enough edits. I also know the importance of notability, references, neutrality, etc. Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now. There isn't any one issue that I'm seeing, but it's a bunch of tiny issues that indicate to me that you just need some more time editing. Primefac (talk) 13:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheBirdsShedTears

I have participated in NPR, AfD, and CSD. I would like to work at AfC to reduce workload. Thanks TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fade258

Hi Administrators, I humble to request this rights to reduce the number of articles which is waiting for review.Not only the reduce of those articles which is waiting for review but also for the quality establishment of articles. I had passed the criteria for this rights and i am familier with the policies, guidelines and reviewing instructions. Thank you !(Fade258 (talk) 12:36, 24 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July

Returning (July)

User:CodeLyoko

Returning after a long period due to some medical issues, would love to start reviewing AFC articles again! CodeLyokotalk 21:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
CodeLyoko, looks like you've never been removed. Primefac (talk) 13:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I guess my searching skills are terrible now I swear I did not see my name, sorry about the annoyance! CodeLyokotalk 15:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hah! No worries, I was processing a lot all at once so one more I-don't-actually-have-to-do-anything name isn't that big of a burden! Primefac (talk) 16:15, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sionk

I'm a returning AfC contributor, having previously become inactive when I moved on to other things. Would be interested in helping with keeping the backlog down. Would be handy to have the AfC Script back again :) Sionk (talk) 18:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New (July)

User:Lajmmoore

I like to give a bit back to Wikipedia and help with the AFC process. I've been editing for a couple of years and feel like it time for me to help out a bit more! Lajmmoore (talk) 07:52, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 13:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:GermanKity

I wanted to help Wikipedia by reviewing pending Drafts. I have also granted recently New page reviewer and Pending changes reviewer. GermanKity (talk) 16:20, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, you just started a 1-month trial run for NPP, one permission at a time please. signed, Rosguill talk 18:16, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Rosguill, I respect your decision. GermanKity (talk) 10:07, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Happily888

I have read and understand the criteria and reviewing instructions. I believe I meet all criteria as I have over 7000 edits made over three years, have created 30 articles and I have had experience with the deletion policy and understand the notability guidelines. Happily888 (talk) 05:30, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Reidgreg

To take part in the July 2021 backlog drive... and to improve the encyclopedia. Reidgreg (talk) 21:14, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:DocFreeman24

Hi! I'm interested in helping with the current backlog drive. I've been an active editor for a little over a year, have created around a dozen articles, and have familiarized myself with the AFC guidelines. Please let me know if you have any questions and thanks! DocFreeman24 (talk) 23:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chalst

Wikipedia would benefit from a smoother-functioning AfC system and that needs more editors participating, so a few months since I first thought about it, I'm putting my name forward. I meet all the criteria. I've been fairly active over the years at AfD (see my AfD stats) and DRV, and so I understand the "is it likely to survive AfD?" criterion reasonably well. — Charles Stewart (talk) 13:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nitesh003

I have meet the requirements. My account is more than 7 months old and I have more than 500 undeleted edits. I'm also familiar with reviewing instructions and notability guidelines. Nitesh003 (talk) 15:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; I'm mainly concerned with the number of declined drafts and deleted pages (in particular, those for copyvio concerns or pages that were draftified). Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TrangaBellam

Help with backlog. TrangaBellam (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC) TrangaBellam (talk) 17:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, concerned mostly about temperament, multiple DS alerts, and 3RR warnings. Primefac (talk) 14:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noobie anonymous

Note that Noobie anonymous has been blocked as a sockpuppet. KylieTastic (talk) 08:57, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly blocked, from the looks of it. Primefac (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Not the first time that's happend :/ KylieTastic (talk) 13:52, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Correogsk

Hi! I am a Wikipedian in Spanish, English, French, and German since 2007. I think I meet the requirements. Thanks, regards! Correogsk or Gustavo (Editrocito or Heme aquí) 19:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC) Correogsk or Gustavo (talk) 19:25, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cabrils

I've been editing since 2018, I have 550+ main space edits and have created 20+ pages. I've familiarised myself with the AfC guidelines. I'm quite active on the AfDs (particularly at improving nominated pages to meet WP:GNG where possible) and would like to help out more. Thanks very much, Cabrils (talk) 23:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:DMySon

Though i have been contributing on Wikipedia for last two years my edit counts are 12K+. I want to help Wikipedia as an AFC reviewer. Please also check my Deletion logs. CSD Log, PROD, XFD and Draftify. DMySon (talk) 00:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Princess of Ara

Hello, I will particularly like to help with reviewing Nigeria-related and entertainment drafts. I've created 40+ articles including BLPs and entertainment-related articles. One of them got draftified with good reason and I've gone ahead to learn from it. I understand notability guidelines and can identify RS. My participation in AfD can be seen here (Link added to reflect my participation with my old username; User:TheSokks). I've also read and understood the reviewing instructions. For full disclosure, I engaged in sockpupptery as a novice editor, without knowing it was against the rules. I now edit only on this account after my appeal was granted to continue editing by Arbcom. My past account is Kemmiiii. I also have an active TBAN. Kind regards, Princess of Ara(talk) 19:28, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tamingimpala

I have made more than 6000 edits, and I'm confident about my understanding of the rules and regulations of Wikipedia regarding to notability, AFD, reliable and independent sources. So far, I have created 64 articles on this wiki, and 2 of them appeared in the homepage, also I came out in the top three position at Women In Red participants list in the past two months. Prior to this one, I have applied for couple of other Wikipedia rights and have been granted so. I believe I can be an useful addition to the AFC community. If you think otherwise, please tell me what's wrong and what needs to done furthermore. Thanks. Tame (talk) 13:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TipsyElephant

I've done some work with AfDs and PRODs at WP:POD, but I have not done any speedy deletions. I've mostly contributed to articles relevant to WP:POD, and I was hoping to go through the AfCs at the Wikiproject (I might branch out after that). I've made 20 different articles that have already passed AfC (i.e. Dissect (podcast) and Art Napoleon) and I've also made substantial edits to pre-existing articles such as Minjung theology and Nicholas Galanin. I just read over the guide to AfCs and I believe I meet the criteria for a reviewer. I'm not sure how relevant it is, but I've also created 10 different categories and I've uploaded or edited nearly every image used by articles at WP:POD. TipsyElephant (talk) 11:59, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheChunky

I believe I meet the basic requirements, as evidenced by numerous edits and several articles written that demonstrate a thorough understanding of the criteria for inclusion. I'd like to assist whenever possible. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) 02:46, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply