Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
there seems to have been a bit of an edit conflict. Re-adding deleted changes.
Line 1: Line 1:
{{pp|small=yes}}
<blockquote>If you wish to join the project you may add ''yourself'' to the list, don't ask here. Remember, you '''MUST have 500 <TT>ARTICLE</TT> edits!!!''' Thanks!</blockquote>
This page is for requesting access to the [[WP:AFCH|AFC Helper script]]. If you wish to ''discuss'' this list, its requirements, or AFCH in general, do so at [[WT:AFC|the main talk page]].
__NONEWSECTIONLINK__
=Requests=
* All archived requests older than one month can be found at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests]].
* We generally do not notify users of acceptances, so check back often.
* Non-admins should refrain from closing reviews.


<div class="anonymous-show boilerplate metadata" style="background:#dee; border:1px solid #00c; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;; padding: 1em; width:70%">Sorry, [[WP:IP|unregistered users]] cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. [[WP:ACCOUNT|Create an account]] to request permissions.</div><div class="user-show">
[[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Archive|Archive]]
:;(<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Participants|action=edit&section=new&nosummary=true&preload=Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:{{lc:{{#titleparts:AFC helper script}}}}}}}} add request]</span>)
{{Shortcut|WT:AFCP}}{{TOCRIGHT}}
<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background:#dee; border:1px solid #00c; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;; padding: 1em; width:70%"><noinclude>
'''Review the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants|Criteria]] before making a request.'''
*Administrators and new page reviewers are automatically approved and do not need to be added to the list.
*If approved, consider adding yourself to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/List of reviewers by subject|the list of reviewers by subject]].
</div></div>


<div style="display:flex; flex-direction:row; flex-wrap:wrap; gap:1em; justify-content:center; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em;">
=Requests=
<div>
Please add me <code><nowiki>* {{user2|Nafsadh}}</nowiki> </code> to participants list. I am interested to lend my time in reviewing AfCs. –&nbsp;''[[User:Nafsadh|<span style="color:#004F99">nafSadh</span>]] [[special:contributions/Nafsadh|did]] [[User talk:Nafsadh|say]]'' 01:14, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
<inputbox>
:{{done}} I have added your name (though at the moment you can do so yourself... '''[[User:EoRdE6|EoRdE6]]'''<sup><small>([[User talk:EoRdE6|Come Talk to Me!]])</small></sup> 01:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
type=fulltext
prefix=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests/
break=no
width=35
placeholder = Search previous requests
searchbuttonlabel = Search
</inputbox>
</div>
</div>

==April==
===NPR (April)===
====[[User:GraziePrego]]====
* {{UserAFC|1=GraziePrego}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Just noticed I'm not on the list of reviewers, but I've been a reviewer with AFCH tool usage for a while now :) Can I be added to the list please? [[User:GraziePrego|GraziePrego]] ([[User talk:GraziePrego|talk]]) 04:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC) [[User:GraziePrego|GraziePrego]] ([[User talk:GraziePrego|talk]]) 04:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
::Those with the NPR permission are given access to AFCH automatically, and don't need to be on the list. [[User:LittlePuppers|LittlePuppers]] ([[User talk:LittlePuppers|talk]]) 03:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)


===Inactive (April)===
I would like to add myself {{user|valoem}}. [[User:Valoem|<font color="DarkSlateGray">'''Valoem'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Valoem|'''<font color="blue">talk</font>''']]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Valoem|'''<font color="Green">contrib</font>''']]</sup> 21:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
====[[User:Gryllida]]====
* {{UserAFC|1=Gryllida}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Was helping previously, with access having expired due to inactivity. Keen to resume activity now. Please re-add me to participants list. Thanks [[User:Gryllida|Gryllida]] ([[User talk:Gryllida|talk]], [[Special:EmailUser/Gryllida|e-mail]]) 22:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Sahaib]]====
I still can not access the help script. [[User:Valoem|<font color="DarkSlateGray">'''Valoem'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Valoem|'''<font color="blue">talk</font>''']]</sup> <sup>[[Special:Contributions/Valoem|'''<font color="Green">contrib</font>''']]</sup> 21:08, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=Sahaib}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:{{already done}} You have already added yourself. --[[User:Biblioworm|<span style="color:#6F4E37;">'''''Biblio'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Biblioworm|<span style="color:#6F4E37;">'''''worm'''''</span>]] 02:02, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
:I used to contribute to [[WP:AFD]] and would like to review more articles. I am less busy nowadays as well, former name was [[User:Sahaib3005]]. [[User:Sahaib|Sahaib]] ([[User talk:Sahaib|talk]]) 07:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to add myself. <mark style="background:red">[[User:Bobherry|<font color="gold">Bobherry Userspace</font>]] [[User talk:Bobherry|<font color="silver">Talk to me!</font>]] [[Special:Contributions/Bobherry|<font color="gold">Stuff I have done</font>]] </mark> 19:58, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
:{{not done}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Bobherry&project=en.wikipedia.org&uselang=en You do not yet have 500 edits to ''article'' space.] --[[User:Biblioworm|<span style="color:#6F4E37;">'''''Biblio'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Biblioworm|<span style="color:#6F4E37;">'''''worm'''''</span>]] 02:02, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


====[[User:-noah-]]====
I would like to join. I have written a few articles: a few are copy-paste pages (episode pages, character list, etc.), two active articles [[Brett Dier]] and [[Dirty Grandpa]] and two drafts [[Draft:Fifty Shades (film series)]] and [[Draft:Grey (book)]] (brand new artcile). I have reviewed newly-created pages from registered users and IPs in the past. Thank you, [[User:Callmemirela|<span style="font-family:Courier New; font-size:14px; color:#a6587b">Callmemirela</span>]] ([[User talk:Callmemirela|<span style="font-family:Georgia; font-size: 12px; color:#8B2252; font-weight:bold;">Talk</span>]]) 23:01, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=-noah-}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Hi! I used to be a probationary reviewer a while ago but then I stopped being active and my permissions expired. Thanks! [[User:-noah-|<span style="font-family:sans-serif; color:#228B22; text-shadow:#009200 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''Noah'''</span>]] [[User_talk:-noah-|<sup>💬</sup>]] 00:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)


===Name change (April)===
: {{ping|Callmemirela}} You can just go ahead and add yourself, you have plenty of articlespace edits. —&nbsp;[[User:Jeraphine Gryphon|Jeraphine&nbsp;Gryphon]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:Jeraphine Gryphon|talk]])</sup> 10:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
====[[User:Xoak]]====
{{UserAFC|1=Xoak}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->


Was renamed a bit ago from Xkalponik to Xoak.[[User:Xoak|X]] ([[User talk:Xoak|talk]]) 11:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
I would like to join, although I have under 3 months (90 days) on Wikipedia. Should I come back when I have reached that requirement? '''--<span style="text-shadow:gray 0.2em 0.3em 0.2em">[[User:Anarchyte|<span style="color:red">Anar</span>]][[User talk:Anarchyte|<span style="color:green">chyte</span>]]</span>''' 11:46, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)


===New (Apr)===
:Close enough to 90 days with a cursory look at edits, so I've added you to the list {{U|Anarchyte}} [[User:Mdann52|Mdann52]] ([[User talk:Mdann52|talk]]) 12:41, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
====[[User:Idunnox3]]====
* {{UserAFC|1=Idunnox3}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Hi! I'd like to contribute to [[WP:AfC]] project and now I have enough time for it. I've read the rules, and I have some [[WP:AFD]] experience to start with. [[User:Idunnox3|Idunnox3]] ([[User talk:Idunnox3|talk]]) 12:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{not done}}, fails minimum requirements. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Shonyx]]====
I would like to join the project. I have helped to create articles in the mainspace and i would see the opportunity as a worthy extension to my wp editing.[[User:Rhumidian|Rhumidian]] ([[User talk:Rhumidian|talk]]) 22:49, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=Shonyx}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:{{already done}} You have already added yourself. - [[User:Mcmatter|McMatter]] <sup>([[User talk:Mcmatter|talk]])</sup>/<sub>([[Special:Contributions/Mcmatter|contrib]])</sub> 00:03, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
:I have an experience with [[WP:AFD]] and reverting articles. As a participator of WikiProject Articles for creation, I have now the experience of:
:{{ec}}:{{U|Rhumidian}}, judging by [https://tools.wmflabs.org/supercount/index.php?project=en.wikipedia.org&user=Rhumidian this], I think it is safe to assue that you fully meet with the required criteria for reviewing AfC submissions. There is therefore nothing to prevent you from adding yourself to the list. Happy reviewing! [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 00:06, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
*reject/decline the draft if the draft has low on citations and no notable support between [[independent sources]] and the draft itself.
*approve of these drafts and move them to article space if theres a connection between independent sources, affiliated sources and the draft must have a inline citations. If does the article had 1550 letters, then I slapped (means 'nominate deletion of the article) and copyright violation.
*declining of the draft submitted because breaks the [[WP:GNG]], [[WP:BIO]], etc.
I have more than 500 edits and I have low on undeleted edits, see my [[Special:Contributions/Shonyx|contributions]] [[User:Shonyx|<b style="border-radius:1em;padding:6px;background:#b106a6;color:white;">‍ Shonyx </b>]]<span style="display:inline-block;margin-bottom:-0.3em;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1.2em;font-size:80%;text-align:left"></span> 06:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)


:'''and one last thing I mentioned''' that my account is more than 90 days [[User:Shonyx|<b style="border-radius:1em;padding:6px;background:#b106a6;color:white;">‍ Shonyx </b>]]<span style="display:inline-block;margin-bottom:-0.3em;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1.2em;font-size:80%;text-align:left"></span> 06:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
I would like to join this project. I have over 1600 edits and frequently monitor the new pages and tag them when necessary. I also use huggle to perform many of my duties. Thanks! -[[User:PotatoNinja|<span style="color:#fa0;font-family: sans-serif;">'''Potato</span><span style="color:#000080;font-family: helvetica">Ninja</span>]]<sup><span style="font-weight: bold;color: #fa0; ">([[User talk:PotatoNinja|Talk to me!]])</span></sup> 14:22, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
:{{done}} [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:27, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
::{{not done}}, fails minimum requirements. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Primefac|Primefac]] What requirements I failed? [[User:Shonyx|<b style="border-radius:1em;padding:6px;background:#b106a6;color:white;">‍ Shonyx </b>]]<span style="display:inline-block;margin-bottom:-0.3em;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1.2em;font-size:80%;text-align:left"></span> 05:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
::::Your account is more than 90 days old, but that is the only requirement you seem to have met at the moment. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 06:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:AWN08]]====
Am I eligible to join this project? If yes, please add me.[[User:AnanthanarayanaSharma]] <span style="font-size:smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 19:49, 5 October 2015 (UTC)</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* {{UserAFC|1=AWN08}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:{{done}}. <big>[[User:-- -- --|'''--''']] [[User talk:-- -- --|'''--''']] [[Special:Contributions/-- -- --|'''--''']]</big> 04:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
:I would like to review AfC primarily on British non-profit organisations, international relations, militaries and politics. [[User:AWN08|AWN08]] ([[User talk:AWN08|talk]]) 22:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{not done}} for now; a bit more content creation experience and/or deletion-related experience will help. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:NegativeMP1]]====
User:111.250.56.144, I want to join, <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/111.250.56.144|111.250.56.144]] ([[User talk:111.250.56.144|talk]]) 14:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* {{UserAFC|1=NegativeMP1}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Hello, IP editor. One of the requirements to join the AfC reviewing team is a Wikipedia account. IP editors are precluded from reviewing. However, you are welcome to register an account and try again once you have met the four criteria at [[WP:WPAFC/P]]. Thanks, [[User:Wiae|/wiae]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Wiae|<small>/tlk</small>]] 14:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
:Requesting AfC reviewer to help out in more general areas of Wikipedia, which includes decreasing the backlog. My account is about a year old, and while I've created very few articles overall (25~), I would say I have pretty good comprehension of the notability guidelines. I have plenty of experience in AfD, [https://afdstats.toolforge.org/afdstats.py?name=NegativeMP1 having participated in it nearly as long as I've been on Wikipedia] with a 62% success rate (+ more if you count merges). I also have a general idea of other notability guidelines, but I only say "general idea" because I don't write articles for, say, sports players. I would respond to questions quickly as I am very active on-wiki. <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' [[User:NegativeMP1|<span style="color:#264e85">'''Negative'''</span>]][[User talk:NegativeMP1|<span style="color:#7d43b5">'''MP1'''</span>]]</span> 04:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC) <span style="border:#000000;border:2px solid #000000;padding:2px">'''λ''' [[User:NegativeMP1|<span style="color:#264e85">'''Negative'''</span>]][[User talk:NegativeMP1|<span style="color:#7d43b5">'''MP1'''</span>]]</span> 04:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{WP:AFCP/P}} [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


==== [[User:Xkalponik]] ====
I would like to join. Thanks! [[User:Delta13C|Delta13C]] ([[User talk:Delta13C|talk]]) 11:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=Xkalponik}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I just realized I can add myself! [[User:Delta13C|Delta13C]] ([[User talk:Delta13C|talk]]) 15:49, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
: I've been a longtime editor with 3.5k+ edits, created (out of the 4 deleted articles 3 were self-delete) and contributed to a fair number of articles, having GA, and passed DYKs. I've participated in various WikiProjects, most notably WIR and WikiProject:Fungi. I've experience with AFDs and noticeboard discussions. For quite some time now, I'm almost regular to the wiki and if able, I hope to respond promptly to questions about my reviews. I have a good grasp of the policies and guidelines mentioned in the reviewing instructions, especially the various notability guidelines.


I'd like to help the AFC backlogs, especially with biological nomenclature articles, as I'm more often than not somewhat familiar with and passionate about these fields. [[User:Xkalponik|X]] ([[User talk:Xkalponik|talk]]) 14:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC) [[User:Xkalponik|X]] ([[User talk:Xkalponik|talk]]) 14:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Please re add me to the project.[[User:TucsonDavid|'''TucsonDavid<font color="red">U</font>.<font color="black">S</font>.<font color="Blue">A</font>.''']] 16:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
::{{WP:AFCP/P}} [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:::@[[User:Primefac|Primefac]], Hi, my account was renamed and I got removed from the list. Could you put me back on? Thanks. (Scroll up a bit and I've formally placed a request creating a Name Change sub-section.) [[User:Xoak|X]] ([[User talk:Xoak|talk]]) 12:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
::::Yup. For what it's worth, there was no need for a separate post. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Staraction]]====
= General discussion =
* {{UserAFC|1=Staraction}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
== Edit request ==
:I want to be able to help with the AfC backlog! I've been working with creating new articles through AfC for a while now, so I have a good idea of the requirements, especially [[WP:NOTABILITY]] (which I've learned through experience). I believe I meet the minimum requirements and would like to help more. Thanks for considering! [[User:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">Star</span><span style="color: purple">action</span>]] ([[User_talk:Staraction|<span style="color: #FF9079">talk</span>]] &#124; [[Special:Contribs/Staraction|<span style="color: purple">contribs</span>]]) 22:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{WP:AFCP/P}} [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Futuristicediting]]====
{{protected edit|ans=y}}
* {{UserAFC|1=Futuristicediting}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
Please change <code>If you participate in this WikiProject</code> to <code>If you want to participate in this WikiProject</code>, as they cannot use the helper tool until they are on the list. --[[User:George.Edward.C|George]] <small>([[User_talk:George.Edward.C|Talk]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/George.Edward.C|Contribs]] &middot; [[Special:CentralAuth/George.Edward.C|CentralAuth]] &middot; [[Special:Log/George.Edward.C|Log]])</small> 08:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
:To start a new beginning [[User:Futuristicediting|Futuristicediting]] ([[User talk:Futuristicediting|talk]]) 11:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
:You can make changes to [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/header]] which is not protected. I've made a few changes myself. &mdash;&nbsp;Martin <small>([[User:MSGJ|MSGJ]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:MSGJ|talk]])</small> 12:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
::{{not done}}. You were just blocked from moving pages, which will make it impossible to be a reviewer. Additionally, the recent series of rapid, useless edits to your talk page does not give me any confidence. If you continue editing disruptively, you will be blocked sitewide. —&nbsp;[[User:Ingenuity|Ingenuity]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Ingenuity#top|talk]]&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[Special:Contribs/Ingenuity|contribs]]) 15:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
::I didn't realise that! Cheers Martin, --[[User:George.Edward.C|George]] <small>([[User_talk:George.Edward.C|Talk]] &middot; [[Special:Contributions/George.Edward.C|Contribs]] &middot; [[Special:CentralAuth/George.Edward.C|CentralAuth]] &middot; [[Special:Log/George.Edward.C|Log]])</small> 12:58, 18 February 2015 (UTC)


====[[User:SafariScribe]]====
== question ==
* {{UserAFC|1=SafariScribe}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Hi, I'm requesting the AFC reviewing right after reading more of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions|reviewing instructions]] to volunteer in [[WP:AFC]]. Furthermore, I have participated actively in AFD, and from my contibs, helped out in certain tasks of the encyclopedia. I have also helped in some draft reviewing, so it's a good way of helping the backlog (since it do rise each time I look at it). Thanks for the consideration.<span id="SafariScribe:1713047688991:Wikipedia_talkFTTCLNWikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Participants" class="FTTCmt">—&nbsp;<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:SafariScribe|Safari Scribe]]</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/SafariScribe|'''''Edits!''''']] [[User talk:SafariScribe|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 22:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)</span>
::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Shadow311]]====
Does anyone know how "a minimum of 500 undeleted edits to articles" is checked? Is there a script that does that and is the code available? I've been wanting something like that for purposes completely unrelated to AFC. Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/50.0.205.75|50.0.205.75]] ([[User talk:50.0.205.75|talk]]) 17:31, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=Shadow311}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Hi 50.0.205.75. Go the person's contributions page and scroll to the box at the very bottom. Inside that box click on '''Edit count''' and it will produce that information and much more. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=50.0.205.75&project=en.wikipedia.org Here's yours], for example. [[Help:User contributions]] has some other tips. [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 17:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
:I would like to help lower the backlog. [[User:Shadow311|Shadow311]] ([[User talk:Shadow311|talk]]) 19:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
:PS. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/pages/ This tool] allows you to see all the articles an editor has created including the deleted ones (if any). Just type the user name in the box without the "User:" prefix. [https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/pages/?user=Lyndasim&project=en.wikipedia.org&namespace=all&redirects=none Here's an example] showing a user with both live articles and deleted articles. [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 17:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
::{{WP:AFCP/P}} Noting this is mainly because of the AFD stats. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
::Oh, I see, thanks, yeah, that's less useful than what I was hoping for though. I misread "undeleted edits" as "unreverted edits", i.e. the person contributed info to an article that actually stayed in the article. I didn't realize "deleted" meant the page that the edits were on had been deleted. [[Special:Contributions/50.0.205.75|50.0.205.75]] ([[User talk:50.0.205.75|talk]]) 18:12, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
:::Well, that first tool will tell you how many edits have been outright reverted. Take a look at the one for me [https://tools.wmflabs.org/xtools-ec/?user=Voceditenore&project=en.wikipedia.org]. Under the '''Live Edits''' heading it shows 33 reverted edits (scroll down). But I think that tool only picks up straightforward reverts. It won't pick additions that get removed or drastically altered after intervening edits by other users. [[User:Voceditenore|Voceditenore]] ([[User talk:Voceditenore|talk]]) 19:16, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
::::Oh that is interesting, I didn't know about it, it's still not what I'm looking for but it's a start. Thanks! [[Special:Contributions/50.0.205.75|50.0.205.75]] ([[User talk:50.0.205.75|talk]]) 20:25, 18 February 2015 (UTC)


====[[User:CanonNi]]====
== Some questions ==
* {{UserAFC|1=CanonNi}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Hello. I would like to request access to the AfC Helper Script to help review new articles (and lower the backlog). I have over 4500 edits, with over 1500 in the mainspace, and have participated in the deletion process through CSD and AfD (though I've only started logging CSD recently). I have also created several articles and have helped others create theirs. I have thoroughly read the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions|reviewing instructions]] and will start reviewing carefully right away, if access is given. Thank you for considering my request! <code><nowiki>'''[[</nowiki>'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> ([[User talk:CanonNi|talk]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/CanonNi|contribs]]) 23:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
:::Thank you so much! <code><nowiki>'''[[</nowiki>'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> ([[User talk:CanonNi|talk]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/CanonNi|contribs]]) 11:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:HistoryTheorist]]====
So, since it appears that the RfC to fully protect this page will succeed, there are a few questions I want to ask:
* {{UserAFC|1=HistoryTheorist}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
#Will admins be able to reject editors even if they meet the requirements?
:I would like to help move promising drafts into the mainspace and return the cruddier drafts back to their authors. I don't plan on using the tools much as writing/reviewing GAs is where my interests are at, though. As a content creator, I have created a few articles myself and have light AfD experience. I also got a crash course on notability from NPP school (on which I feel pretty confident about now) but never finished as my teacher went inactive. [[user:HistoryTheorist|<span style="font-family:Courier;color:#2F7E98">❤History</span>]][[User talk:HistoryTheorist|<span style="font-family:Courier;color:lightpurple">Theorist❤</span>]] 04:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
#Will non-admins have any part in the approval process, or is it an admin-only area?
::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
#Will this page be attended to, or will requests stay around for days? I already see a request that was made on the 24th and hasn't been answered.
#What will happen if a reviewer is inactive? Will he be removed from the list, and forced to reapply? --[[User:Biblioworm|<span style="color:#6F4E37;">'''''Biblio'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Biblioworm|<span style="color:#6F4E37;">'''''worm'''''</span>]] 01:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


====[[User:Samoht27]]====
:::{{reply|Biblioworm}} In reply to #3, if and when the PP happens, editors will be instructed to use [[Template:AFC Request]], which will automagically add a Edit protected request template to draw admin attention. '''[[User:EoRdE6|EoRdE6]]'''<sup><small>([[User talk:EoRdE6|Come Talk to Me!]])</small></sup> 04:33, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=Samoht27}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I wish to provide help to AfC, as it serves an important role in making sure Wikipedia's information is kept up to its standards of quality, notability, and maintaining a neutral point of view. In other words, I want to help the encyclopedia be a useful collection of information, rather than an indiscriminate collection of information. [[User:Samoht27|Samoht27]] ([[User talk:Samoht27|talk]]) 17:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{WP:AFCP/P}} [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Nokia621]]====
== Why full protection is not needed ==
* {{UserAFC|1=Nokia621}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Hi, first time applying here. I'd love to help out! [[User:Nokia621|Nokia621]] ([[User talk:Nokia621|talk]]) 19:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{WP:AFCP/P}} [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Kp2016rockin]]====
It seems that [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/RfC to physically restrict access to the Helper Script|the RfC to fully protect the participants page]] will succeed. However, I think it is important for others to hear a detailed case on the other side of the story. There are several reasons why the page should not be fully protected.
* {{UserAFC|1=Kp2016rockin}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
*Wikipedia is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit. As I once read, the goal of a wiki is not to make mistakes difficult to make, but rather to make it easy to correct them when they happen. Protection should be avoided whenever possible. To quote [[WP:PROTECT]]: "Wikipedia is built around the principle that anyone can edit it, and it therefore aims to have as many of its pages as possible open for public editing so that anyone can add material and correct errors." Unqualified users adding their names to the AfC participation list is not an ''critically'' urgent matter, and I fail to understand what is so difficult about pressing the [[WP:UNDO|undo]] button with a quick explanation in the edit summary. I don't see an unmanageable situation. Over the span of three months, for instance (December 2014—February 2015), there were about 20 unqualified additions that were forcefully reverted. That averages to roughly one unqualified addition once every 4.5 days. Surely, we're not so lazy that we couldn't simply ask more experienced users to add the page to their watchlist and occasionally revert unqualified additions, right? Of course, there were some days when there were more unqualified additions than usual, but temporary protection for a few hours should be enough to fix that. ''The point is that supporters of the indefinite full protection are exaggerating the severity of the problem by making it seem that it takes a lot of trouble to deal with unqualified entries.''
:I 've been inactive on Wikipedia for a while and have since returned. I was a participant [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants/Old Requests/2022#User:Kp2016rockin|here]] before being idle. With my return, I would like to help clear up the backlog more. [[User:Kp2016rockin|kpgamingz]] ([[User talk:Kp2016rockin|rant me]]) 00:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
*An approval process adds more complication and bureaucracy to a simple WikiProject. Signing up to review submissions is not like applying for RfPERM/RfA/ArbCom. The trouble of going through this approval-by-admins process will cause more trouble than it's worth, because users who just want to help may be discouraged by being forced to write some application and then letting it sit for a few days on the approval page. (Let's not kid ourselves; everyone should know perfectly well that bureaucracy is always slow.) This will decrease the amount of new reviewers and will encourage the backlog to grow. Also, I must say that it is my personal opinion that the importance of AfC is being exaggerated. From what I gather, AfC was the process introduced as a result of the [[Wikipedia Seigenthaler biography incident|Seigenthaler incident]] so that IP users could still (indirectly) create articles. In my opinion, AfC should simply be the process by which it is ensured that there are not critical problems with an article, such as BLP issues, vandalism, or something that qualifies for [[WP:CSD|speedy deletion]]. If a person wants to directly create an article, all they have to do is create an account, which doesn't take but a few seconds, so AfC is not especially preventative.
::{{done}} (as probationary per previous). [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
*An approval process opens up an opportunity for the approving user to impose their own criteria upon the applying user. For instance, a person handling applications could refuse to add a user they simply dislike, because they could come up with an excuse which says that the applying user hasn't shown satisfactory knowledge of the AfC guidelines, or something similar. (Besides, I think that particular requirement is rather silly, anyway, because we'll never know how good a person is at anything unless we give them a chance.)


====[[User:Captbloodrock]]====
Thanks, --[[User:Biblioworm|<span style="color:#6F4E37;">'''''Biblio'''''</span>]][[User_talk:Biblioworm|<span style="color:#6F4E37;">'''''worm'''''</span>]] 15:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=Captbloodrock}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I've been a dedicated Wikipedian for several years now in terms of creating new articles and editing existing ones, and would like to expand my responsibilities by also being able to review new articles. [[User:Captbloodrock|Captbloodrock]] ([[User talk:Captbloodrock|talk]]) 18:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
::{{WP:AFCP/P}} [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 12:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)


== May ==
== Include Draft: namespace articles in search results for editors creating new pages ==
===Inactive (May)===
====[[User:Félix An]]====
* {{UserAFC|1=Félix An}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I did some AfC reviewing in the past, and I would like to start reviewing again. Thanks! [[User:Félix An|Félix An]] ([[User talk:Félix An|talk]]) 06:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 07:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Mdann52]]====
Draft articles are great. But they lose a lot of their potential if other people with the same topic idea for a
* {{UserAFC|1=Mdann52}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
new article don't notice them. I think the search box at
:Trying to return to (some!) activity again, and keen to start reviewing submissions again and helping those getting the up to standard. I've reviewed the relevant guidelines and hopefully know where to find stuff out to check if needed! [[User:Mdann52|Mdann52]] ([[User talk:Mdann52|talk]]) 10:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:Article_wizard/Subject]] for the selected subject should show Draft:
::{{done}}, welcome back. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 07:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
namespace articles by default. And so should landing at a page that doesn't exist. Current example: [[Alice_Bowman]] doesn't note that there is an existing
draft: [[Draft:Alice_Bowman]].<small><span class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Nealmcb|Nealmcb]] ([[User talk:Nealmcb|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nealmcb|contribs]]) 15:42, 16 July 2015 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
:As a point on your last point - we can't have a note at *every* page that there is a draft that might at some point resemble a reasonable article. This is (in particular) because not every draft will become an article, but also because it would mean creating thousands of new pages that only said "someone's making a draft on this subject." [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:45, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
::Should be able to do this on the fly next to 'You may create the page "Foolandffaseq"' on a search for a string. So instead of 'You may create the page "Foolandffaseq"'. , it says 'You may create the page "Foolandffaseq". A draft has been created at "Draft:Foolandffaseq", do you want to look at that?' or something similar.[[User:Naraht|Naraht]] ([[User talk:Naraht|talk]]) 16:36, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
:::Primefac, sorry for the confusion. Thanks, Naraht - that's exactly what I was thinking of. Essentially 1) changing the search box, when used under such circumstances, to include Drafts. Then 2) be sure to enable searching drafts when the search is done from pages that don't exist yet. If that seems to be working, it would be straightforward to 3) have the auto-generated page for nonexistant articles include the search results for the exact same page title in the Draft namespace, without actually creating any pages. Of course there would be some performance impact, and I don't know how much, for doing step 3. [[User:Nealmcb|★NealMcB★]] ([[User talk:Nealmcb|talk]]) 17:38, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


=== New (May) ===
== Argumentative and Wiki-litigious potential reviewer ==


====[[User:Matthew Wellington]]====
Please see [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Primefac_reported_by_User:Olowe2011_.28Result:_.29|WP:AN3 Report 1]] and [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Olowe2011_reported_by_User:David_Biddulph_.28Result:_.29|WP:AN3 report 2]]. Report 2 may be merged into report 1 or vice versa at some future time.
* {{UserAFC|1=Matthew Wellington}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I would like to help out at AfC as recommended by Hey man im josh, while I had requested for perms here: [[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/New_page_reviewer#User:Matthew_Wellington]] [[User:Matthew Wellington|Matthew Wellington]] ([[User talk:Matthew Wellington|talk]]) 12:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
::{{not done}}, sock. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 20:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:MAINEiac4434]]====
I am expressing concern that an editor with small track record of edits is insisting in a combative manner on forcing their way into becoming a reviewer rather than waiting to serve their necessary number of edits. I feel that a combative and argumentative attitude is counter to our requirements of a reviewer, someone from whom we require a collegial way of working and empathy with new editors over their often rather challenging submissions.
* {{UserAFC|1=MAINEiac4434}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I'd like to help the backlog, and improve Wikipedia! I have over 13,000 edits in over 13 years contributing, including a handful of page creations. If given access, I can start reviewing right away, as I've just familiarized myself with the AfC guidelines. [[User:MAINEiac4434|MAINEiac4434]] ([[User talk:MAINEiac4434|talk]]) 16:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 07:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Iwaqarhashmi]]====
I will be inviting {{U|Olowe2011}} here formally in addition to pinging them and also placing an invitation on relevant AFC fora for editors to offer opinions. I am making no proposal here at this stage, simply expressing concern. [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span>]] 13:39, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=Iwaqarhashmi}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Just to get it out of the way up front, I did not handle this as well as I could have. While the discussion about this user should take place here, the move to actually ''direct'' them here should have been done on their talk page. My apologies for all of the hassle this has caused. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 13:49, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
:I would be happy to assist with reviewing drafts and managing the backlog. I have thoroughly reviewed the provided criteria and instructions, and I believe I'm experienced enough to have this permission. [[User:Iwaqarhashmi|'''<span style="background:#FF0000;color:white;padding:5px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 lightgray">Waqar</span>''']][[User talk:Iwaqarhashmi|<span style="background:#0000FF;padding:2px;box-shadow:0 1px 1px 0 rgba(0,0,0,0.2)">💬</span>]] 19:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
::Thank you for being so up front about that, {{U|Primefac}}. However, one has the right to expect someone wishing to join a project handling the submissions of inexperienced editors to have the inherent ability to determine where, how, and whether to continue with a course of action. While your actions may have been a contributing factor to the unpleasant behaviour I do not think anyone can see them as the cause, with the possible exception of the editor concerned, of course! [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span>]] 14:06, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 07:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
:{{ec}}I have now invited them, and placed relevant invitations, including one at AN3 Report 1 (above). [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span>]] 13:50, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
::Really an ''unpleasant'' behavior I should say. Particularly concerning considering the area of work (AfC), where there's a lot of dealing with new, potentially ignorant editors, which requires a significant amount of patience and cooperation. The requirement to be a reviewer is very meager. I'm not sure how an editor not patient enough to meet this meager requirement will be patient enough to handle newbies... *sigh* Regards --[[User:Jaaron95|<font color="CornflowerBlue" face="Times">'''JAaron95'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jaaron95|<font color="Green" face= "Times">Talk</font>]]</sup> 13:53, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
* Pray tell how I might have initiated a combative stance when I made a clear representation that I was prepared to open up amicable discussions on the issue [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Articles_for_creation%2FParticipants&type=revision&diff=674514273&oldid=674513910|here] I don't understand why you keep using my number of edits to define my level of editorial skill to be honest, I feel that is rather judgemental and it isn't exactly conducive of a proper "non combative" discussion. The facts are that one or a group of people thought it was decent and acting in good faith to revert my name contribution to the list so that I am able to use the tool despite the fact I offered to open up amicable discussions. It's not exactly showing of a "non combative stance" when editors decide to relentlessly revert my contributions simply because they seem to judge me as ill experienced based on ? It's not my intention to bulldoze in here and get what I want by throwing policy around, I am acting in Good faith. My only desire is access to the tool so that it can help me make constructive edits on Wikipedia. I'm not subscribing to a cartel community simply because it's forcing it's way onto me. I appreciate that my edits and contributions are subject to editor review and even reconstruction ect however I simply won't accept that I am being refused access to a tool that can make my Wikipedia life simpler simply because I want to curtail my direct involvement with a community formed around the tool. I've shown my ability to make non disruptive edits. You guys are slightly scary I have to say, I've not used Wikipedia in quite some time and when I return I get caught up in editors seemingly hell-bent on expelling anyone other than "pro editors." There should be room for new people to come in and make useful contributions while being supported by the community ... Not set out against by it. [[User:Olowe2011|olowe2011]] ([[User talk:Olowe2011|talk]]) 13:55, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
:*This shows the difficulty. [[WP:AFC]] requires substantial tact and diplomacy, something we all fall short of at times. Most folk when wanting to join a particular area with rules await their full compliance with those rules, rules made clear on the joining page. Most folk do not attempt to bulldoze their way through the door and then complain to whatever they perceive the authorities to be when the tracks are removed from their bulldozer.
::Expelling? Not so. You have not joined. And you are not the victim here. My worry is that the attitude you are continuing to show will be expressed in any reviews you might make of submissions by new and vulnerable editors.
::In short, at present, my view, one you have just reinforced, is that you are unsuitable for this project. [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span>]] 14:00, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
:In my opinion, Olowe2011 should thoroughly read relevant policies and guidelines of wikipedia. Recent actions indicate that they are not (fully) familiar with the main policies. I would also say that they should wait until they have enough experience in mainspace before reviewing drafts. I think this behavior is not suitable to this project. [[User:Supdiop|Supdiop]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Supdiop|<small>Talk</small>]]🔹[[Special:Contributions/Supdiop|<small>Contribs</small>]]) 14:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
:{{ping|Olowe2011}} I can see the reason behind your opinions, but I am also beginning to doubt your experience. There are many tools with requirements as to how many mainspace edits an editor must have, for example, AWB, Twinkle and STiki. Requests for bureaucratship and adminship also require reviewing the editor's edits. Even if an editor shows a clean track record, concluding that he or she will therefore use the tool properly does not seem very wise if he or she has very few edits. In your case, you have less than 300 mainspace edits, and editors at your "age" are usually "immature". It is perfect sensible that there is such a requirement. Furthermore, it is difficult to find proof that you are an experienced editor. Then comes the matter of principle. It doesn't seem right for editors to be allowed just because they have a strong stance and insist that they are capable. Just like a court case, a bad example is to be avoided. These are just my personal opinions. [[User:The Average Wikipedian|The Average Wikipedian]] ([[User talk:The Average Wikipedian|talk]]) 14:14, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
*'''Note''' Please note that Olowe2011 is starting a 24 hour block, whose details may be seen at the AN3 links above, at least until they are archived. [[User:Timtrent|<span style="color:#800">Fiddle</span>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style="color:#070">Faddle</span>]] 14:16, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
:{{ec}}Hello {{re|Olowe2011}} Seems like you are caught up in a disagreement with other editors. We all make mistakes and we correct it. I should make one thing clear. No one here is a ''PRO'' editor and no one is trying to scare you off! In fact we want you to stay here and make Wikipedia, a better place. All are equal. We gotta abide by some policies and guidelines and that's it! There are many policies and guidelines in Wikipedia and I'll point you to the relevant guideline (answer to 'why you were reverted?').
:#First off, article for creation is a place/wikiproject, where new editors (I mean 'new' not you!) submit articles they've created for review, and reviewers (the people in the list where you were trying to add your name) review the article and publish them to mainspace (ordinary articles) if it passes all the Wikipedia guidelines or decline them stating that the article cannot be accepted at that time and requires further improvement.
:#B, to be a reviewer there are some minimum requirements. Your account must be 90 days old (which you clearly pass! {{smiley}}) and your account must have atleast 500 mainspace edits (which BTW sadly you don't). Don't believe me? See for yourself! Go to this [http://tools.wmflabs.org/supercount/index.php?user=olowe2011&project=en.wikipedia link] and the red portion on the pie chart is the number of mainspace edits you have (you had 232 edits when I saw). '''Isn't it less than 500?''' Unfortunately you don't pass the requirement now and I request you to kindly abstain from re-adding your name to the list. But, there's a good news! You are forever free to add or remove your name to the list, once you pass the 500 mainspace edits mark!
:We count on you, and I hope you'll understand! Regards--[[User:Jaaron95|<font color="CornflowerBlue" face="Times">'''JAaron95'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Jaaron95|<font color="Green" face= "Times">Talk</font>]]</sup> 14:19, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
::Good teaching appears to be virtual education. [[User:Nannadeem|Nannadeem]] ([[User talk:Nannadeem|talk]]) 18:05, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
*Hi {{U|Olowe2011}}, and welcome to AfC. I understand your frustration, and I've never personally supported the editcountedis system, but it recieved consensus to be enforced, because it was better than any other system proposed at the discussion. A few points:
:*Accusations of misconduct should be supported with diffs or other evidence at every level of dispute resolution, including the informal "holding a discussion with the editor". This makes your argument stronger, allows the user in question to refute the diffs individually instead of on a general "I wasn't doing it" way, and allows neutral third parties to evaluate.
:*To be perfectly clear, the "30 days/500 mainspace" rule is not a policy or guideline; it received consensus and '''can be enforced''', but has never been designated a policy or guideline.
:*Edit-warring is ''never'' ok, and will get your arguments ignored, even if your argument is good.
:*As many of us have stated, it's very usual to make mistakes sooner or later on WIkipedia; don't fret it or anything. I appreciate the attitude you've usually used in these discussions.
:I realize you've already been told the majority of advice here, but I wanted to reinforce it, if you don't mind. Thanks for your time. '''[[User:L235|L235]]''' ([[User talk:L235#top|t]] / [[Special:Contribs/L235|c]] / [[User:L235/siginfo|<small>ping in reply</small>]]) 19:39, 6 August 2015 (UTC)


====[[User:Dclemens1971]]====
==Review of a reviewer==
* {{UserAFC|1=Dclemens1971}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
I am requesting a second opinion on a recent addition to the AFCH list, {{u|Arifjwadder}}. While they meet the 500 edits criteria (barely), I believe that their grasp of notability is not suitable for reviewing drafts. This is due to the seven pages they have created and have since been deleted, as well as a draft that has been declined multiple times. Rather than engage in another edit war, I thought I would get opinions from other experienced editors. I welcome Arifjwadder to give comment as to why they feel that they should be an AFC reviewer. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 18:57, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
:I have extensive experience with new page creation, reliable source guidelines, notability policies and participation at AfD, and I'd love to help out with reducing the AfC backlog. Thanks! [[User:Dclemens1971|Dclemens1971]] ([[User talk:Dclemens1971|talk]]) 12:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 07:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Grabup]]====
: the pages which were deleted was the initial pages i created. The draft page has not been created by me. My total page creation is 19 so far and not seven. [[User:Arifjwadder|Arifjwadder]] ([[User talk:Arifjwadder|talk]]) 19:01, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=Grabup}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
::{{u|Arifjwadder}}, I did not say ''all'' of your pages were deleted. However, I did notice that a good number of the remaining pages are tagged as potentially being non-notable themselves. My question to you was mostly questioning why you want to be a draft reviewer, and if you feel you are comfortable with the different reasons a draft can be declined or accepted. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 19:04, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
:This tool is invaluable for editors like me who enjoy reviewing articles. Although I haven't been granted the New Page Reviewer right, I still want to contribute by helping to reduce the backlog. The tool was suggested to me by Admin Extraordinary Writ to my Request of New Pages Reviewers. This tool will greatly help me in reviewing articles that are ready and not ready for acceptance. [[User:Grabup|Grabup]] ([[User talk:Grabup|talk]]) 16:04, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
::I did [[Special:Diff/1221265378|suggest in passing]] that AfC made more sense than NPP, but I have no opinion on whether Grabup is ready for it at this time. (Cf. Spicy's comment [[Special:Diff/1221391571|here]].) [[User:Extraordinary Writ|Extraordinary Writ]] ([[User talk:Extraordinary Writ|talk]]) 03:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
:::I hope this won't result in my request being denied. At least I might receive probation for a while. [[User:Grabup|Grabup]] ([[User talk:Grabup|talk]]) 04:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
::::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 07:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
::::: Thanks for this. [[User:Grabup|Grabup]] ([[User talk:Grabup|talk]]) 07:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Avs5221]]====
::: Rest of the articles have been tagged non-notable by only one person who tags whatever i work on.[[User:Arifjwadder|Arifjwadder]] ([[User talk:Arifjwadder|talk]]) 19:17, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=Avs5221}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Requesting reinstatement after an extended wikibreak. [[User:Avs5221|avs5221]]<sup>([[User talk:Avs5221|talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Avs5221|contrib]])</sup> 04:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
::{{u|Avs5221}}, you'll have to forgive me, but I'm not seeing any evidence you were formerly an AFC helper. When were you last active with the project? [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 20:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
:::No problem, it's been several years at least. If I need to reestablish a track record, I understand. I chose to take a more passive role in editing as real life got busier, but my knowledge of Wikipedia rules and policies is still pretty [[User:Avs5221|avs5221]]<sup>([[User talk:Avs5221|talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Avs5221|contrib]])</sup> 05:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
::::{{not done}} for now; you were last active in 2013, and the guidelines and policies have changed quite dramatically since then. A bit more activity, especially in areas such as XfD and CSD, will help to show that you're up-to-date on all the relevant criteria. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 07:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::Will do, thank you! [[User:Avs5221|avs5221]]<sup>([[User talk:Avs5221|talk]]&#124;[[Special:Contributions/Avs5221|contrib]])</sup> 16:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:The Sharpest Lives]]====
:Concur. Latest creations, poorly/doesn't comply with the policy. When my article doesn't meet the criteria, how come I'll be able to judge other articles? I would like to see a bit more experience from this user. Regards—[[WP:☮|<font color="Green ">☮</font>]][[User:JAaron95|<font color="CornflowerBlue" face="Times">'''JAaron95'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:JAaron95|<font color="Green" face= "Times">Talk</font>]]</sup> 19:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=The Sharpest Lives}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Requesting afc helper rights to help review articles. I think it would be a good use of my time. I have put 3 articles through the AfC process, so I generally understand how it is supposed to go. [[User:The Sharpest Lives|The Sharpest Lives]] 15:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
::{{WP:AFCP/P}} [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:MKsLifeInANutshell]]====
==Question==
* {{UserAFC|1=MKsLifeInANutshell}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
I was removed from the Participants list. I'm assuming this is because I have fewer than 500 article edits. I have two questions. One: is there a way I can demonstrate that I don't need 500 edits to be responsible enough to review? Two: if not, will I be welcomed back once I attain this goal? Thanks, and I admire your guys's work, [[User:Fritzmann2002|Fritzmann2002]] 23:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
:I would love to assist in reviewing articles. I had talked to a few reviewers such as KylieTastic before applying, who said I am eligible and can go ahead and apply. I have good enough AfD experience. I have created a lot of articles through AfC. I would also love to help with managing the backlog.<br>I had submitted an application earlier, but at the time I didn't meet the requirements, but now I believe I am worth having this permission. [[User:MKsLifeInANutshell|MKsLifeInANutshell]] ([[User talk:MKsLifeInANutshell|talk]]) 11:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
#You need 500 edits.
#Yes, you will be more than welcome! <big>[[User:-- -- --|'''--''']] [[User talk:-- -- --|'''--''']] [[Special:Contributions/-- -- --|'''--''']]</big> 23:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
::{{WP:AFCP/P}} [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:TheNuggeteer]]====
== Something to look at ==
* {{UserAFC|1=TheNuggeteer}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I applied because I have an account which is:
*90 days old (my account age is more than 11 months)
*at least 500 undeleted edits (according to XTools I have 762 Live edits)
*thoroughly read the reading instructions
(I read the reviewing instructions thoroughly, the notability guidelines, and the AFD guidelines)
*a willingness and ability to respond in a timely manner to questions about their reviews. (I have time on my hands, and I can respond to questions) [[User:TheNuggeteer|TheNuggeteer]] ([[User talk:TheNuggeteer|talk]]) 13:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
::{{WP:AFCP/P}} [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 14:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Jlwoodwa]]====
With the new protection level created [[Wikipedia:Protection_policy#Arbitration_30.2F500_protection|30/500]] which requires users to have the extended confirmed user right. This right automatically granted after 30 days and 500 edits. The requirements to be a reviewer is beyond or equal to those standards. Understanding that currently this protection is a type of arbcom protection, I feel it may have some uses in project space, would it be beneficial to look into having the protection of the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants]] page increased from Semi to 30/500? [[User:Mcmatter|McMatter]] <sup>([[User talk:Mcmatter|talk]])</sup>/<sub>([[Special:Contributions/Mcmatter|contrib]])</sub> 16:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=Jlwoodwa}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:I think that's a good idea. Would save us a lot of reverts (and hurt feelings). [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 20:25, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
:I've been on Wikipedia for a year and made 30k undeleted edits. As I understand the reviewing instructions, AfC is preemptive, conservative AfD: rejecting articles that would ''very likely'', and for ''good reason'', be deleted at AfD. (And outside of CSD material, notability is the main such reason.) I've spent some time participating in/reading deletion discussions, as well as reviewing/applying deletion and notability policy, and I think I have a decent grasp of these.{{pb}}I want to participate because it's discouraging for a new editor to have their draft sit in pending for months. Keeping the AfC process running smoothly and correctly isn't just about the articles themselves, it's also about keeping Wikipedia welcoming to newcomers without sacrificing encyclopedic standards. [[User:Jlwoodwa|jlwoodwa]] ([[User talk:Jlwoodwa|talk]]) 05:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
: Agreed. Excellent suggestion. [[User:Quinto Simmaco|Quinto Simmaco]] ([[User talk:Quinto Simmaco|talk]]) 14:39, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
::{{done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 07:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Vlest]]====
== New review of a reviewer ==
* {{UserAFC|1=Vlest}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Reason for requesting afc helper script rights [[User:Vlest|Vlest]] ([[User talk:Vlest|talk]]) 22:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
::{{not done}}. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 11:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:Twinkle1990]]====
There have been a few notes left at [[User talk:Tseung Kwan O#AfC problems|Tseung Kwan O's user talk]] regarding their reviewing record and some of the issues associated with it. As a brief summary, they seem to be mechanically declining (or accepting) drafts simply based on the number of references, they have missed copyvios, they give poor feedback, and in general they seem to be discouraging new users due to a lack of advice and/or replies.
* {{UserAFC|1=Twinkle1990}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:Hi. Please evaluate my probationary period and let me know if I'm eligible to get in as full time or not. [[User:Twinkle1990|Twinkle1990]] ([[User talk:Twinkle1990|talk]]) 16:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
::I will do it when I do it. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 07:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)


====[[User:TheGoldenArmor375]]====
I know we don't often kick people off the project, but I was wondering if I could get opinions from other helpers. I'm pinging {{u|DGG}}, {{u|Jimfbleak}}, and {{u|Soni}} as they were involved in the original discussion, {{u|Kudpung}} since it appears they are involved in the "cleanup" effort, and {{u|Tseung Kwan O}} as it is their AFC future we are discussing. <s>I should mention that Tseung Kwan O has not responded to any messages left for them, either from AFC members or draft submitters.</s> [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 18:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
* {{UserAFC|1=TheGoldenArmor375}}<!--WP:AFC/P/R-->
:missing blatant spam too, and counting, but not checking, references. This user really needs to do more editing to see how things work. Good intentions aren't enough if there are half a dozen experienced editors clearing up the mess. [[User:Jimfbleak|<b style="font-family:chiller;color:red">Jimfbleak</b>]] - [[User talk:Jimfbleak|<span style="font-family:arial;color:green">talk to me?</span>]] 19:23, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
:Reason for requesting afc helper script rights, and I have understood all guidelines to be followed for the sports and esports community notability, and I have experience in editing stub articles/incomplete articles too, and I would love to help reviewing pending submitted esports and sports articles in the Wikipedia community, to help reduce AfC backlogs. Thank you! [[User:TheGoldenArmor375|TheGoldenArmor375]] ([[User talk:TheGoldenArmor375|talk]]) 04:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
* I would note that {{u|Tseung Kwan O}} has been responsive on their talk page, as is evident on their [[User_talk:Tseung_Kwan_O/Archive_2|talk archives]]. A lot of the talk page sections on their page, including the current notes in question, are likely written after their latest editing session. So we cannot be sure if they are being unresponsive.
::{{WP:AFCP/P}} [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 07:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
: I agree with everything else that {{u|Primefac}} said though.
: [[User:Soni|Soni]] ([[User talk:Soni|talk]]) 18:56, 19 July 2016 (UTC)
::You make a good point, and I should have noticed that they have not been on-wiki for a few days. I have stricken my above comment. [[User:Primefac|Primefac]] ([[User talk:Primefac|talk]]) 19:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:18, 20 May 2024

This page is for requesting access to the AFC Helper script. If you wish to discuss this list, its requirements, or AFCH in general, do so at the main talk page.

Requests

(add request)

April

NPR (April)

User:GraziePrego

Just noticed I'm not on the list of reviewers, but I've been a reviewer with AFCH tool usage for a while now :) Can I be added to the list please? GraziePrego (talk) 04:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC) GraziePrego (talk) 04:09, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Those with the NPR permission are given access to AFCH automatically, and don't need to be on the list. LittlePuppers (talk) 03:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Inactive (April)

User:Gryllida

Was helping previously, with access having expired due to inactivity. Keen to resume activity now. Please re-add me to participants list. Thanks Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 22:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sahaib

I used to contribute to WP:AFD and would like to review more articles. I am less busy nowadays as well, former name was User:Sahaib3005. Sahaib (talk) 07:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:-noah-

Hi! I used to be a probationary reviewer a while ago but then I stopped being active and my permissions expired. Thanks! Noah 💬 00:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Name change (April)

User:Xoak

Xoak (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs (block • csd • prod) · afd) (add user)

Was renamed a bit ago from Xkalponik to Xoak.X (talk) 11:28, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New (Apr)

User:Idunnox3

Hi! I'd like to contribute to WP:AfC project and now I have enough time for it. I've read the rules, and I have some WP:AFD experience to start with. Idunnox3 (talk) 12:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 11:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shonyx

I have an experience with WP:AFD and reverting articles. As a participator of WikiProject Articles for creation, I have now the experience of:
  • reject/decline the draft if the draft has low on citations and no notable support between independent sources and the draft itself.
  • approve of these drafts and move them to article space if theres a connection between independent sources, affiliated sources and the draft must have a inline citations. If does the article had 1550 letters, then I slapped (means 'nominate deletion of the article) and copyright violation.
  • declining of the draft submitted because breaks the WP:GNG, WP:BIO, etc.

I have more than 500 edits and I have low on undeleted edits, see my contributions ‍ Shonyx 06:06, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and one last thing I mentioned that my account is more than 90 days ‍ Shonyx 06:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, fails minimum requirements. Primefac (talk) 11:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac What requirements I failed? ‍ Shonyx 05:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your account is more than 90 days old, but that is the only requirement you seem to have met at the moment. Primefac (talk) 06:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:AWN08

I would like to review AfC primarily on British non-profit organisations, international relations, militaries and politics. AWN08 (talk) 22:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; a bit more content creation experience and/or deletion-related experience will help. Primefac (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:NegativeMP1

Requesting AfC reviewer to help out in more general areas of Wikipedia, which includes decreasing the backlog. My account is about a year old, and while I've created very few articles overall (25~), I would say I have pretty good comprehension of the notability guidelines. I have plenty of experience in AfD, having participated in it nearly as long as I've been on Wikipedia with a 62% success rate (+ more if you count merges). I also have a general idea of other notability guidelines, but I only say "general idea" because I don't write articles for, say, sports players. I would respond to questions quickly as I am very active on-wiki. λ NegativeMP1 04:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC) λ NegativeMP1 04:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Xkalponik

I've been a longtime editor with 3.5k+ edits, created (out of the 4 deleted articles 3 were self-delete) and contributed to a fair number of articles, having GA, and passed DYKs. I've participated in various WikiProjects, most notably WIR and WikiProject:Fungi. I've experience with AFDs and noticeboard discussions. For quite some time now, I'm almost regular to the wiki and if able, I hope to respond promptly to questions about my reviews. I have a good grasp of the policies and guidelines mentioned in the reviewing instructions, especially the various notability guidelines.

I'd like to help the AFC backlogs, especially with biological nomenclature articles, as I'm more often than not somewhat familiar with and passionate about these fields. X (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC) X (talk) 14:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Primefac, Hi, my account was renamed and I got removed from the list. Could you put me back on? Thanks. (Scroll up a bit and I've formally placed a request creating a Name Change sub-section.) X (talk) 12:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yup. For what it's worth, there was no need for a separate post. Primefac (talk) 11:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Staraction

I want to be able to help with the AfC backlog! I've been working with creating new articles through AfC for a while now, so I have a good idea of the requirements, especially WP:NOTABILITY (which I've learned through experience). I believe I meet the minimum requirements and would like to help more. Thanks for considering! Staraction (talk | contribs) 22:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Futuristicediting

To start a new beginning Futuristicediting (talk) 11:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. You were just blocked from moving pages, which will make it impossible to be a reviewer. Additionally, the recent series of rapid, useless edits to your talk page does not give me any confidence. If you continue editing disruptively, you will be blocked sitewide. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 15:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:SafariScribe

Hi, I'm requesting the AFC reviewing right after reading more of the reviewing instructions to volunteer in WP:AFC. Furthermore, I have participated actively in AFD, and from my contibs, helped out in certain tasks of the encyclopedia. I have also helped in some draft reviewing, so it's a good way of helping the backlog (since it do rise each time I look at it). Thanks for the consideration.— Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 22:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shadow311

I would like to help lower the backlog. Shadow311 (talk) 19:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Noting this is mainly because of the AFD stats. Primefac (talk) 11:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:CanonNi

Hello. I would like to request access to the AfC Helper Script to help review new articles (and lower the backlog). I have over 4500 edits, with over 1500 in the mainspace, and have participated in the deletion process through CSD and AfD (though I've only started logging CSD recently). I have also created several articles and have helped others create theirs. I have thoroughly read the reviewing instructions and will start reviewing carefully right away, if access is given. Thank you for considering my request! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 23:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 11:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:HistoryTheorist

I would like to help move promising drafts into the mainspace and return the cruddier drafts back to their authors. I don't plan on using the tools much as writing/reviewing GAs is where my interests are at, though. As a content creator, I have created a few articles myself and have light AfD experience. I also got a crash course on notability from NPP school (on which I feel pretty confident about now) but never finished as my teacher went inactive. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 04:23, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 11:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Samoht27

I wish to provide help to AfC, as it serves an important role in making sure Wikipedia's information is kept up to its standards of quality, notability, and maintaining a neutral point of view. In other words, I want to help the encyclopedia be a useful collection of information, rather than an indiscriminate collection of information. Samoht27 (talk) 17:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Nokia621

Hi, first time applying here. I'd love to help out! Nokia621 (talk) 19:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kp2016rockin

I 've been inactive on Wikipedia for a while and have since returned. I was a participant here before being idle. With my return, I would like to help clear up the backlog more. kpgamingz (rant me) 00:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done (as probationary per previous). Primefac (talk) 12:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Captbloodrock

I've been a dedicated Wikipedian for several years now in terms of creating new articles and editing existing ones, and would like to expand my responsibilities by also being able to review new articles. Captbloodrock (talk) 18:02, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 12:16, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May

Inactive (May)

User:Félix An

I did some AfC reviewing in the past, and I would like to start reviewing again. Thanks! Félix An (talk) 06:44, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mdann52

Trying to return to (some!) activity again, and keen to start reviewing submissions again and helping those getting the up to standard. I've reviewed the relevant guidelines and hopefully know where to find stuff out to check if needed! Mdann52 (talk) 10:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done, welcome back. Primefac (talk) 07:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New (May)

User:Matthew Wellington

I would like to help out at AfC as recommended by Hey man im josh, while I had requested for perms here: [[1]] Matthew Wellington (talk) 12:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done, sock. Primefac (talk) 20:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:MAINEiac4434

I'd like to help the backlog, and improve Wikipedia! I have over 13,000 edits in over 13 years contributing, including a handful of page creations. If given access, I can start reviewing right away, as I've just familiarized myself with the AfC guidelines. MAINEiac4434 (talk) 16:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Iwaqarhashmi

I would be happy to assist with reviewing drafts and managing the backlog. I have thoroughly reviewed the provided criteria and instructions, and I believe I'm experienced enough to have this permission. Waqar💬 19:51, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dclemens1971

I have extensive experience with new page creation, reliable source guidelines, notability policies and participation at AfD, and I'd love to help out with reducing the AfC backlog. Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Grabup

This tool is invaluable for editors like me who enjoy reviewing articles. Although I haven't been granted the New Page Reviewer right, I still want to contribute by helping to reduce the backlog. The tool was suggested to me by Admin Extraordinary Writ to my Request of New Pages Reviewers. This tool will greatly help me in reviewing articles that are ready and not ready for acceptance. Grabup (talk) 16:04, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did suggest in passing that AfC made more sense than NPP, but I have no opinion on whether Grabup is ready for it at this time. (Cf. Spicy's comment here.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I hope this won't result in my request being denied. At least I might receive probation for a while. Grabup (talk) 04:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for this. Grabup (talk) 07:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Avs5221

Requesting reinstatement after an extended wikibreak. avs5221(talk|contrib) 04:43, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Avs5221, you'll have to forgive me, but I'm not seeing any evidence you were formerly an AFC helper. When were you last active with the project? Primefac (talk) 20:04, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, it's been several years at least. If I need to reestablish a track record, I understand. I chose to take a more passive role in editing as real life got busier, but my knowledge of Wikipedia rules and policies is still pretty avs5221(talk|contrib) 05:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done for now; you were last active in 2013, and the guidelines and policies have changed quite dramatically since then. A bit more activity, especially in areas such as XfD and CSD, will help to show that you're up-to-date on all the relevant criteria. Primefac (talk) 07:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Will do, thank you! avs5221(talk|contrib) 16:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:The Sharpest Lives

Requesting afc helper rights to help review articles. I think it would be a good use of my time. I have put 3 articles through the AfC process, so I generally understand how it is supposed to go. The Sharpest Lives 15:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:MKsLifeInANutshell

I would love to assist in reviewing articles. I had talked to a few reviewers such as KylieTastic before applying, who said I am eligible and can go ahead and apply. I have good enough AfD experience. I have created a lot of articles through AfC. I would also love to help with managing the backlog.
I had submitted an application earlier, but at the time I didn't meet the requirements, but now I believe I am worth having this permission. MKsLifeInANutshell (talk) 11:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheNuggeteer

I applied because I have an account which is:
  • 90 days old (my account age is more than 11 months)
  • at least 500 undeleted edits (according to XTools I have 762 Live edits)
  • thoroughly read the reading instructions

(I read the reviewing instructions thoroughly, the notability guidelines, and the AFD guidelines)

  • a willingness and ability to respond in a timely manner to questions about their reviews. (I have time on my hands, and I can respond to questions) TheNuggeteer (talk) 13:20, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 14:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jlwoodwa

I've been on Wikipedia for a year and made 30k undeleted edits. As I understand the reviewing instructions, AfC is preemptive, conservative AfD: rejecting articles that would very likely, and for good reason, be deleted at AfD. (And outside of CSD material, notability is the main such reason.) I've spent some time participating in/reading deletion discussions, as well as reviewing/applying deletion and notability policy, and I think I have a decent grasp of these.
I want to participate because it's discouraging for a new editor to have their draft sit in pending for months. Keeping the AfC process running smoothly and correctly isn't just about the articles themselves, it's also about keeping Wikipedia welcoming to newcomers without sacrificing encyclopedic standards. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Primefac (talk) 07:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vlest

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights Vlest (talk) 22:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Primefac (talk) 11:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:Twinkle1990

Hi. Please evaluate my probationary period and let me know if I'm eligible to get in as full time or not. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I will do it when I do it. Primefac (talk) 07:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheGoldenArmor375

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights, and I have understood all guidelines to be followed for the sports and esports community notability, and I have experience in editing stub articles/incomplete articles too, and I would love to help reviewing pending submitted esports and sports articles in the Wikipedia community, to help reduce AfC backlogs. Thank you! TheGoldenArmor375 (talk) 04:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Probation, which will be evaluated in 3-6 months. Being on probation only means that you can be removed from the list for any reason without prior discussion. Primefac (talk) 07:18, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply