Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Tag: CD
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)
Line 8: Line 8:
| minthreadsleft = 8
| minthreadsleft = 8
}}{{archives|banner=yes|age=181|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
}}{{archives|banner=yes|age=181|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
== New IP: 195.224.241.178 ==

*{{userlinks|195.224.241.178}} The user reverts all my edits in the same way. See also [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#The_IP_reverts_my_every_edit_and_calls_me_a_zealot here]. [[Special:Contributions/85.193.215.210|85.193.215.210]] ([[User talk:85.193.215.210|talk]]) 23:50, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

== New IP, and I am the only target so far. ==
== New IP, and I am the only target so far. ==


Line 36: Line 32:
::::::::@[[User:Bretonbanquet|Bretonbanquet]] Somebody (probably the vandal in question) accused us of mutual [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Long-term_abuse/Best_known_for_IP&diff=prev&oldid=1117559434 brown-nosing]. Well, I expressed my real emotions and do not regret anything I wrote. Best. [[Special:Contributions/85.193.215.210|85.193.215.210]] ([[User talk:85.193.215.210|talk]]) 23:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
::::::::@[[User:Bretonbanquet|Bretonbanquet]] Somebody (probably the vandal in question) accused us of mutual [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Long-term_abuse/Best_known_for_IP&diff=prev&oldid=1117559434 brown-nosing]. Well, I expressed my real emotions and do not regret anything I wrote. Best. [[Special:Contributions/85.193.215.210|85.193.215.210]] ([[User talk:85.193.215.210|talk]]) 23:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
:::::::::Well, it removes any doubt that he reads this page, at least. Other than that, his input is not worth our consideration. Cheers, [[User:Bretonbanquet|Bretonbanquet]] ([[User talk:Bretonbanquet|talk]]) 22:12, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
:::::::::Well, it removes any doubt that he reads this page, at least. Other than that, his input is not worth our consideration. Cheers, [[User:Bretonbanquet|Bretonbanquet]] ([[User talk:Bretonbanquet|talk]]) 22:12, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

== New (though similar) IP: 86.187.165.112} ==

*{{userlinks|86.187.165.112}}
The vandal keeps [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/86.187.165.112 reverting] all of my edits but now calls me an ''''immature troll'''' because I used [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Washingtonian_movement&diff=prev&oldid=1114388763 their own] absurd edit explanation:
{{brown|''Don't change meanings that you don't understand.''}}. Of course, they do understand the meaning of "almost", but I do understand the meaning of "all but". What a double standard. [[Special:Contributions/85.193.215.210|85.193.215.210]] ([[User talk:85.193.215.210|talk]]) 13:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
:Yes, this guy sets out to upset people, and belittle them, breaking every rule in the book. Don't let anything he says get to you, just keep editing. [[User:Bretonbanquet|Bretonbanquet]] ([[User talk:Bretonbanquet|talk]]) 20:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

== New IP: 109.144.219.119 ==

*{{userlinks|109.144.219.119}}
This vandal is also a [[Gaslighting|gaslighter]] and wants me to believe that I am an [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kelp_forest&diff=prev&oldid=1116773537 incompetent troll]. As a non-native English speaker, I do suffer from [[impostor syndrome]], at least to some extent, even without gaslighting. But accusing me of trolling is insulting. [[Special:Contributions/85.193.215.210|85.193.215.210]] ([[User talk:85.193.215.210|talk]]) 12:47, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

:You might want to read [[WP:DNFT]]. And [[WP:BEANS]] too. [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat|talk]]) 19:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

::@[[User:BilCat|BilCat]] I may well be a native English speaker, living in Poland, who feels compassion for non-native speakers and promotes readability and plain language. But even if I had a PhD in English at the University of Oxford and provided a reliable proof, the vandal would still accuse me of language incompetency, and do it even more passionately.
::PS. Thank you for the links, but the essays here are not written in plain language, just the opposite. The New York Times is much easier to read. [[Special:Contributions/85.193.215.210|85.193.215.210]] ([[User talk:85.193.215.210|talk]]) 15:46, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
:::Try [https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/08/technology/personaltech/internet-trolls-comments.html this] then. [[User:BilCat|BilCat]] ([[User talk:BilCat|talk]]) 15:59, 21 October 2022 (UTC)


== New IP: 85.193.144.134 (similar to mine!) ==
== New IP: 85.193.144.134 (similar to mine!) ==

Revision as of 06:42, 25 May 2023

New IP, and I am the only target so far.

The user reverts only my edits (as "unnecessary dumbing down"). Here are some of their reverts:

  • "almost" -> "all but" [1]
  • "ease" -> "assuage",   "courage" -> "fortitude [2]
  • "bad" -> "desultory" [3]
  • "of them" -> "thereof" [4]
  • "limited" -> "hamstrung" [5]
  • "instead of" -> "in lieu of" [6]

85.193.215.210 (talk) 13:13, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is definitely the guy. I've added the IP he has used to revert the OP, as it's obviously all part of the same sad pattern.

Bretonbanquet (talk) 14:31, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but that vandal has at least 11 years of experience and will keep reverting my copy edits forever. So I am considering to quit Wikipedia. By the way, what do you mean by OP? 85.193.215.210 (talk) 19:47, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep reporting him here, and admins will keep blocking him and reverting him. Don't let this ridiculous person stop you editing. OP means "original poster" – in this case, that's you :) Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:01, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
People like you keep me alive. Thank you so much :-) 85.193.215.210 (talk) 01:14, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Any time, my friend :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bretonbanquet What you wrote was more important to me than the fact that the vandal is active again. Thank you :-) 85.193.215.210 (talk) 13:55, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That's awesome to hear! My pleasure :) Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:56, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Bretonbanquet Somebody (probably the vandal in question) accused us of mutual brown-nosing. Well, I expressed my real emotions and do not regret anything I wrote. Best. 85.193.215.210 (talk) 23:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it removes any doubt that he reads this page, at least. Other than that, his input is not worth our consideration. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 22:12, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New IP: 85.193.144.134 (similar to mine!)

The vandal keeps reverting, but he cannot revert my edits because I stopped editing. I does not make any sense to me. 85.193.215.210 (talk) 16:13, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New IP: 213.133.155.137

85.193.215.210 (talk) 23:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A new modus operandi.

Though I no longer change less common words to more readable synonyms, the vandal keeps attacking me even on article talk pages, for example here you can read that I am 'not welcome here' and should move to Simple English Wikipedia, and that I am incompetent in English and maybe in general - who knows ;-) And here is his contribution to the talk about English grammar. 85.193.215.210 (talk) 19:09, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paranoia?

Is there any proof all those IPs and accounts are actually the same person? 2A02:8108:2C3F:AC2C:6C0B:27A0:8A85:BDB7 (talk) 07:29, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New IP: 86.28.234.94

Bahudhara (talk) 04:37, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

131.251.253.0/24

The IP editor blocked as a result of this ANI thread is giving me BKFIP vibes. XOR'easter (talk) 02:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harboured and IP friends

23, 2023, 08:14 - «removed unencyclopaedic crap»
17, 2023, 19:36 - «Removed infantile gallery and incompetent text.»
17, 2023, 11:36 - «‎See also: not necessary to list other similar things. Categories serve that purpose»

Anyone can take a look at these? Two IPs are from a british provider. Thanks!

AXONOV (talk) 12:57, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply