Content deleted Content added
Colonel Warden (talk | contribs) revert |
A Man In Black (talk | contribs) Feel free to join the discussion on the talk page and form a consensus to add these to the FAQ, but no such consensus has ever been formed. |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
#'''Why are non-articles tagged with {{tl|rescue}}? I thought this was the ''article'' rescue squadron.''' |
#'''Why are non-articles tagged with {{tl|rescue}}? I thought this was the ''article'' rescue squadron.''' |
||
#:While articles are the main focus, badly-formed encyclopedia content can be found in other namespaces. If article content up for deletion, such as a template or image, is badly-formed and you feel it can be fixed, go ahead and tag it with {{tl|rescue}}, to see if it can be fixed. |
#:While articles are the main focus, badly-formed encyclopedia content can be found in other namespaces. If article content up for deletion, such as a template or image, is badly-formed and you feel it can be fixed, go ahead and tag it with {{tl|rescue}}, to see if it can be fixed. |
||
# '''What if I object to what Article Rescue Squadron (ARS) is doing?''' |
|||
#: ARS is no different from any of the hundreds of Wikiprojects in that we collaborate to improve content as a maintenance project. Our scope is not subject focussed as much as policy-focussed to determine if content adheres to Wikipedia's policies on sourcing and notability. Any editor committed to improving the encyclopedia is welcome to help here as well as at any of the [[:Category:WikiProjects|other projects]] representing a variety of views and interests. |
|||
#'''So you'll save ''my'' article from deletion?''' |
#'''So you'll save ''my'' article from deletion?''' |
||
#:Not exactly. First off, Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia and articles can be changed by anyone and no individual exclusively controls any specific article. Secondly, if an article meets Wikipedia's policies on [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]] and [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|reliable sourcing]] it likely will not be deleted. There are also [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion|alternatives to deletion]] which may be appropriate. The project members will do what they can as time allows. We suggest that you reference the '''[[Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron/How to|Article Rescue Squadron guide to saving articles]]''' ''(Currently in development)''. |
#:Not exactly. First off, Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia and articles can be changed by anyone and no individual exclusively controls any specific article. Secondly, if an article meets Wikipedia's policies on [[Wikipedia:Notability|notability]] and [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|reliable sourcing]] it likely will not be deleted. There are also [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion|alternatives to deletion]] which may be appropriate. The project members will do what they can as time allows. We suggest that you reference the '''[[Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron/How to|Article Rescue Squadron guide to saving articles]]''' ''(Currently in development)''. |
||
#'''Will you help fix the rest of the article problems after the deletion discussion?''' |
#'''Will you help fix the rest of the article problems after the deletion discussion?''' |
||
#:In theory? No. Often, however, individual members will assist after the discussion has closed. You may want to contact a related [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] to see if someone there can assist. Sometimes project members completely overhaul an article but in practice most changes are incremental and you should take initiative to add sourcing and improve the article yourself. Many times other editors will post sources to the deletion discussion, if they meet our sourcing standards then feel free to apply them to the article. |
#:In theory? No. Often, however, individual members will assist after the discussion has closed. You may want to contact a related [[Wikipedia:WikiProject|WikiProject]] to see if someone there can assist. Sometimes project members completely overhaul an article but in practice most changes are incremental and you should take initiative to add sourcing and improve the article yourself. Many times other editors will post sources to the deletion discussion, if they meet our sourcing standards then feel free to apply them to the article. |
||
# '''How can I get ARS to help win ''my'' policy discussion?''' |
|||
#:First off, like articles, policies and content are not exclusively controlled by any individual(s). If you think ARS should know about a policy discussion you can post a neutral notification like "There is a discussion about ''foo'' at _____." Avoid the appearance of telling anyone how to think of the discussion - you are inviting people to participate, not to think or vote a certain way. See [[WP:Canvassing]] for clarification on this. |
|||
Revision as of 10:03, 18 May 2009
- Why is this project canvassing a bunch of editors to come keep articles?
- Ideally, it isn't. The goal of the Article Rescue Squadron (ARS) is to clean up content that would otherwise be deleted. By necessity, this involves examining the deletion discussion to see what the problems with the article are, and then remedying them. If done correctly, this article cleanup improves the encyclopedia. If an article you put up for deletion is improved through this process by addressing your concerns and thus kept, you haven't lost. Rather, the encyclopedia has won.
- Why are non-articles tagged with {{rescue}}? I thought this was the article rescue squadron.
- While articles are the main focus, badly-formed encyclopedia content can be found in other namespaces. If article content up for deletion, such as a template or image, is badly-formed and you feel it can be fixed, go ahead and tag it with {{rescue}}, to see if it can be fixed.
- So you'll save my article from deletion?
- Not exactly. First off, Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia and articles can be changed by anyone and no individual exclusively controls any specific article. Secondly, if an article meets Wikipedia's policies on notability and reliable sourcing it likely will not be deleted. There are also alternatives to deletion which may be appropriate. The project members will do what they can as time allows. We suggest that you reference the Article Rescue Squadron guide to saving articles (Currently in development).
- Will you help fix the rest of the article problems after the deletion discussion?
- In theory? No. Often, however, individual members will assist after the discussion has closed. You may want to contact a related WikiProject to see if someone there can assist. Sometimes project members completely overhaul an article but in practice most changes are incremental and you should take initiative to add sourcing and improve the article yourself. Many times other editors will post sources to the deletion discussion, if they meet our sourcing standards then feel free to apply them to the article.