Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Nthep (talk | contribs)
m Reverted edits by Jqueen1002 (talk) to last version by ClueBot III
Discussion.
Line 18: Line 18:
|}
|}
{{archive box|auto=yes}}
{{archive box|auto=yes}}

==Is cutting and pasting press releases a copyright violation?==
I have a question. A number of editors often cut-and-paste, verbatim, the plot concept for upcoming episodes of ''[[South Park]]'' into the newly-made stub articles for those episodes prior to their debut. Two different editors, for example, did so [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Friday_%28South_Park%29&diff=581189261&oldid=581146613 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Friday_%28South_Park%29&diff=581414747&oldid=581387328 here] with the episode that debuts tonight. Is this copyright infringement? Or are press released written with the expectation that they will be reproduced verbatim for promotional purposes? I tend to think that it's a copyvio, but wanted to be sure by soliciting other opinions. Granted, these additions would still violate [[WP:V]] for being unsourced and [[WP:TONE]] and [[WP:NOTADVERT]] for the way their written, but aside from those issues, I want to know if the community thinks they violate copyright if not paraphrased. [[User:Nightscream|Nightscream]] ([[User talk:Nightscream|talk]]) 15:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:27, 13 November 2013

This is the talk page for discussing the Wikipedia:Copyright violations policy.

If you wish to report an individual file or article as a copyright infringement, see Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files and Wikipedia:Copyright problems respectively. If you wish to report a contributor with a history of copyright infringement, see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.

Is cutting and pasting press releases a copyright violation?

I have a question. A number of editors often cut-and-paste, verbatim, the plot concept for upcoming episodes of South Park into the newly-made stub articles for those episodes prior to their debut. Two different editors, for example, did so here and here with the episode that debuts tonight. Is this copyright infringement? Or are press released written with the expectation that they will be reproduced verbatim for promotional purposes? I tend to think that it's a copyvio, but wanted to be sure by soliciting other opinions. Granted, these additions would still violate WP:V for being unsourced and WP:TONE and WP:NOTADVERT for the way their written, but aside from those issues, I want to know if the community thinks they violate copyright if not paraphrased. Nightscream (talk) 15:27, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply