Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Delete
Tag: Reply
Keep
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Line 25: Line 25:
* '''Keep''' - as useful. Wikipedia is also a user-generated site that can include misinformation or copyrighted material. Remove/prevent offending instances as-needed instead of blanket removal. &nbsp;&nbsp;<b>~</b>&nbsp;<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</span>&nbsp; 21:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' - as useful. Wikipedia is also a user-generated site that can include misinformation or copyrighted material. Remove/prevent offending instances as-needed instead of blanket removal. &nbsp;&nbsp;<b>~</b>&nbsp;<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:16px;">[[User:Tom.Reding|Tom.Reding]] ([[User talk:Tom.Reding|talk]] ⋅[[WP:DGAF|dgaf]])</span>&nbsp; 21:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
* '''Keep''' - the fact that it usually is unsuitable as source is nothing new, however the template is suited for the external links section. ...[[User:GELongstreet|GELongstreet]] ([[User talk:GELongstreet|talk]])
* '''Keep''' - the fact that it usually is unsuitable as source is nothing new, however the template is suited for the external links section. ...[[User:GELongstreet|GELongstreet]] ([[User talk:GELongstreet|talk]])

* '''Keep''' per others. [[User:Shushugah|Shushugah]]&nbsp;(he/him&nbsp;•&nbsp;[[User talk:Shushugah|talk]]) 22:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)


==== [[Template:First cabinet of Ana Brnabić]] ====
==== [[Template:First cabinet of Ana Brnabić]] ====

Revision as of 22:07, 22 August 2021

August 22

Template:P.S.

Unused template, and I genuinely cannot see why or where it would be used. Primefac (talk) 21:29, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P.S., it opens itself up to boiler-template puns. Support deleting. Shushugah (he/him • talk) 22:06, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Find a Grave

Find a grave is an unreliable user generated site that often includes misinformation or copyrighted material. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. We shouldn't be encouraging its use on wikipedia through a template. Note to other users, as Template:Find a Grave was permanently protected, I couldn't nominate it directly so I placed it on the related subpage. Apologies if this was improperly done. 4meter4 (talk) 16:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - As with IMDB, it can be used as an external link. (WP:FINDAGRAVE-EL qualifies this as "rarely", but "rarely" is not "never".)--NapoliRoma (talk) 17:34, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - as useful. Wikipedia is also a user-generated site that can include misinformation or copyrighted material. Remove/prevent offending instances as-needed instead of blanket removal.   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  21:33, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - the fact that it usually is unsuitable as source is nothing new, however the template is suited for the external links section. ...GELongstreet (talk)

Template:First cabinet of Ana Brnabić

Unused template as First cabinet of Ana Brnabić uses a different table. Gonnym (talk) 11:25, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Government of Vojvodina

Tables which are only used at Government of Vojvodina and should be subst to it. Gonnym (talk) 11:22, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Substitute on the government article then delete. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:11, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Pellegrini's Cabinet

Table which is used only at Pellegrini's Cabinet. Should be subst into article. Gonnym (talk) 11:14, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: As a creator of this template, I am not against having it removed, and instead having the information it contains set within the article. I created the template by copying the template of the previous government, for the sole reason that I do not have sufficient wiki markup skills to create a sufficiently well looking table into the article. Thus, if someone transfers the template into a table in the article, I do not see a reason to reatain this template. If, however, the template is deleted before the information it contains is transfered into the article, I will consider it as a loss of information.
    • The information is important and there is no reason at all to remove it from the wiki, just to place it inside the article instead of in a template.

Template:Fico's Third Cabinet

Table which is used only at Fico's Third Cabinet. Should be subst into article. Gonnym (talk) 11:10, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cabinet of Igor Matovič

Table which is used only at Matovič's Cabinet. Should be subst into article. Gonnym (talk) 11:07, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2018 Sri Lankan constitutional crisis cabinet

Infobox which is used only at 2018 Sri Lankan constitutional crisis and should be subst. Gonnym (talk) 10:38, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Swedish political officeholders table start

Unused template created 11 years ago. Probably would have been in use by now if useful. Gonnym (talk) 10:36, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Legislative Yuan election labelled map 2016

Unused election map. Also seems broken as some of the numbers are above the water. Gonnym (talk) 10:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sub judice

This is a quite scary template (created Dec. 2018) that seems to be advising (in a very non-specific manner) to defer to the government and not publish anything on the page the courts might not want. That sort of deference is totally misaligned with Wikipedia's values, where we write an encyclopedia based on verifiable reliable sources, regardless of what anyone in power wants. In practice, this template probably discourages negative information, even when it's well-sourced, which is not desirable. We have WP:NOLEGALTHREATS protecting editors against legal action, and any edit so slanderous as to not be covered by that is surely in violation of BLP or other notices on the page, making this redundant. I'm also nominating some forked templates in the same family, where the same concerns apply. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 04:51, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I hope editors remember that we have an awful banner blindness problem on talk pages; the question is not "could any editor possibly find this at all helpful", but rather "is this essential to have on every page related to legal proceedings when most will presumably already have lots of other banners"? {{u|Sdkb}}talk 04:58, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have dug up the circumstances behind my re-creation of this template, and it appears to have been related to a high-profile ongoing criminal prosecution which had an extremely strict suppression order in place in the relevant jurisdiction. Several large media organisations had just been hauled into court over breaches and many local Wikipedia editors may have breached the order unknowingly, placing themselves at risk. The intent of the template, rather than to intimidate anyone, was simply to alert local editors to an unusual and temporary risk within their jurisdiction. It is in the interest of the proper administration of the encyclopedia that our editors not get sued into oblivion.
Having said this, I can understand that subtlety may not be realised by all editors who add the template to a talk page, and that the template may remain in place for a period exceeding that which is necessary. In this respect it has a time-sensitive and limited scope in the same way as {{Current}}. For these reasons I am comfortable to support Delete or redesign if that is what people would prefer. Cheers. TheDragonFire (talk) 08:03, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that context—the impetus for creating this in the context of the George Pell case makes sense. I remember that that case ignited a firestorm of criticism from free press advocates, so hopefully nothing like it will come up again, and if it does, we'll likely want to have a conversation about whether we should abide by the orders or not.
To give my own context, I came across this at Talk:Marilyn Manson, which might give an indication of how it's currently being used. Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}talk 20:22, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Wikipedia should not have something like this. Contrary to the views and policy of this site. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MTV artist

Delete The mtv.com website has been restructured, and so this template no longer produces working artist-specific links; all default to a high-level page on the site. Research reveals no edits to the template code that would solve this issue. Only 32 mainspace transclusions. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:12, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Information from Jeremy Cuss, son of Eileen

One-off template used a single time to annotate a detail in Herbert Cecil Potter and no likely other use-case. Proposing subst-and-delete. DMacks (talk) 03:55, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Welsh Constituency Election box begin

Both redundant now after I made the fix to the coding on the articles where these were used. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply