SchroCat (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

02 December 2022

– An SPI clerk has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.

Suspected sockpuppets

• 2A02:C7E:2A55:1500:4DF6:503D:BC76:8165 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 2A00:23C7:2B86:9801:57A:A859:B924:3CDD (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 2A00:23C7:2B86:9801:3DB0:202C:6615:774E (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 2A00:23C7:2B86:9801:395B:F891:FFDB:DAF9 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 2A00:23C7:2B86:9801:DC25:E731:33F0:64FA (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• 2A00:23C7:2B86:9801:6562:A1FC:F7F2:51BF (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · spi block · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
• Tools: Editor interaction utility • Interaction Timeline • SPI Tools

These IP editors comment mostly or solely in Talk:Laurence Olivier regarding infobox content. Furthermore, the user identified oneself as Schrocat. One IP address who made this comment was blocked last month, but possibly the same user whose IP address was blocked has been using other IP addresses to possibly evade blocks. Furthermore, one editor revealed oneself to have edited FAs and GAs. Manners possibly similar: [1][2][3][4][5]

Unsure about 37.205.58.148 (talk · contribs · WHOIS), who made this comment, but it's possibly the same editor who used those IPs. I could be wrong George Ho (talk) 21:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• I am the editor who has made comments on the Olivier talk page. I have made no secret of my identity and signed some of my posts with my former name. I gave up the SchroCat account some time ago and scrambled the password. As a user who left in good standing and one who is not blocked or barred from editing, I am entitled to edit as an IP. See the comment left by HJ Mitchell here that explains what is not sockpuppetry. (And this is not me, as even a cursory glance at the Geolocate data will show - that IP was blocked after a checkuser by RoySmith, who should be able to clarify that I am not the same user he blocked. 2A00:23C7:2B86:9801:358D:5BA:AB1A:CE0E (talk) 21:52, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• CU  Check declined – Checkusers will not link accounts to IPs, per the privacy policy. Spicy (talk) 21:47, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]