Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Line 27: Line 27:
*{{Endorse}} - Misconceptions2 has been pushing for an unblock, so let's see if these accounts are his. There won't be a comment on the IPs. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 13:17, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
*{{Endorse}} - Misconceptions2 has been pushing for an unblock, so let's see if these accounts are his. There won't be a comment on the IPs. — [[User:HelloAnnyong|'''<span style="color: #aaa">Hello</span><span style="color: #666">Annyong</span>''']] <sup>[[User talk:HelloAnnyong|(say whaaat?!)]]</sup> 13:17, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
:* Technical evidence suggests that the accounts are {{Unrelated}}. [[User talk:AGK|<font color="black">'''AGK'''</font>]]<small> <nowiki>[</nowikI>[[User:AGK|&bull;]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></small> 23:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
:* Technical evidence suggests that the accounts are {{Unrelated}}. [[User talk:AGK|<font color="black">'''AGK'''</font>]]<small> <nowiki>[</nowikI>[[User:AGK|&bull;]]<nowiki>]</nowiki></small> 23:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
::*We were digging at the same time. Concur. [[User:Courcelles|Courcelles]] 23:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
----
----
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->
<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. -->

Revision as of 23:33, 4 September 2011

Misconceptions2

Misconceptions2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

– An SPI clerk has endorsed a request for CheckUser. A checkuser will shortly review the case.

04 September 2011
Suspected sockpuppets
Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Aside from the AfD, there are no articles which all of these accounts have edited, but several of them overlap with at least one other, generally in substance as well as location (eg. Misconceptions2 and 86.170.120.224 at Talk:Islam both focusing on whether or not "Islam" is derived from the same root as "salaam," Irvinga04 and 86.170.120.224 both removing "far-right" from English Defence League). 71.207.217.11 has made no edits apart from the AfD, but that's suspicious in and of itself; 24.62.162.28 has a couple of other edits which are problematic for different reasons, but is less likely than the others to be a sock of this particular user. (Note that MrSantaClaws's edit to The Farewell Sermon, linked above, also contains the same spelling error in the edit sum as Misconceptions2's, besides being the same.) –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 06:17, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
  •  Clerk endorsed - Misconceptions2 has been pushing for an unblock, so let's see if these accounts are his. There won't be a comment on the IPs. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 13:17, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Technical evidence suggests that the accounts are Red X Unrelated. AGK [] 23:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • We were digging at the same time. Concur. Courcelles 23:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply