FreeatlastChitchat (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

28 February 2018

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Elektricity (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

A new account created in 31 October 2017, and FreeatlastChitchat edited for the last time in 1 August 2017. FreeatlastChitchat was heavily watched, reported, blocked for his topic ban violations that's why he quit that account and created a new sock for continuing his disruption.

Elektricity has been totally disruptive from the get-go, just like FreeatlastChitchat.

• Both tried to get Homafaran allegiance deleted.[1][2]
• Rapidly nominating articles of Saff V. for deletion on both accounts,[3][4][5][6] [7] which is harassment since none of these GNG passing articles were ever deleted and it was a bad nomination.
• FreeatlastChitchat engaged in battle with Mhhossein, constantly harassing him.[8][9][10][11] Elektricity secretively asked Doug Weller that Mhossein should be "restricted to 1 revert per 24 hours".[12]
• Same writing style while pinging the next person as "@[[user:User]]"[13][14][15][16]
• "no hard feelings",[17][18][19] "Blp vio."[20][21]
• "As per TP discussion"[22][23][24]
• Restored similar alleged atrocities of army on Indian Army[25][26] by reverting other editor.

Prefers making revenge reverts and clarify in edit summary that he will fix the problem in "next edit".[27][28][29][30][31]

On ANEW, FreeatlastChitchat started his comment with "Defence"[32], while Elektricity started with "defence".[33]

Wikihounds long-term editors while spewing his incompetence and then call them a sock puppet to justify his disruption.

He is wikihounding MapSGV and just called him a "throwaway sleeper"[34], just like FreeatlastChitchat had wikihounded[35] D4iNa4 and called him a "sockpuppet account".[36] Despite both these accounts D4iNa4 and MapSGV are much older than his all accounts and they are far more competent than him. Given the fallacy of these remarks, Spartaz had called this comment of FreeatlastChitchat, "well poisoning".[37]

FreeatlastChitchat: "grand total of "actual" edits in indo-Pak articles", "but they want to be involved in the indo-pak articles"[38]

Eletricity: "I think the Indo pak articles need a look see by an admin".[39]

Elektricity is harassing MapSGV, by going through pages that he edits[40][41][42] because FreeatlastChitchat had worked real hard to censor Indian victory on Siachen conflict[43][44][45] and MapSGV has made efforts to restore the result.[46][47] Since Elektricity is intentionally avoiding this article to evade scrutiny, he is engaging in battle with MapSGV by wikihounding him elsewhere.

Some other similarities:

• Adminshopping NeilN for help.[48][49]
• Tells people to read his edit before reverting.[50][51] Illogical, since these editors carefully read before reverting.
• WP:IDHT regarding AFDs on The Bushranger's talk page.[52][53]
• Canvassing Drmies for help.[54][55][56]
• Often puts a dot in the end of edit summary[57][58][59][60]
• Writes a particular word in caps during edit war.[61][62]
• Switches to visual editor.[63][64][65][66]

Clear WP:DUCK. Capitals00 (talk) 12:12, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

 Looks like a duck to me. I used to think what happened to him since he seemed too rigid even during his last days when he was trying to change policies to continue his topic ban violation[67], seems like he never quit and has been using this sock for evading his topic ban. D4iNa4 (talk) 17:51, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

He abandoned his account in 1 August and after 90 days were elapsed in 31 October he created a new account (Elektricity). He was committed to evading CU. A check on 19 December seems too late. — MapSGV (talk) 01:05, 1 March 2018 (UTC) defence I see that a user checker has already checked my IP against Freelastchitchat and has given his verdict. The nom should have perhaps informed me ? I think that is given on the top of most reporting boards. The diffs provided by the nominator show that me and the banned abuser only share one edit and that is the deletion of Homafaran allegiance. There is no other edit of the banned user and I have in common. The nom himself admits that I have not even edited in the banned abusers battleground, the article on "Siachen Conflict". Most of my edits are not even on India-Pak articles as you can see from the contributions on my account. Without editing in the banned users area, and without following his pattern of disruption and without being close to his IP, a user cannot be another's sockpuppet. Elektricity (talk) 07:01, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

See this report.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]