Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin


Note: This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as CSD G6), or in articles for deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Ron Beres

You deleted the author noting that he had only self-published works. That is not so. He has a work published by Running Press: Beres & Beres, Lisa & Ron (2010). Just Green It! Simple Swaps to Save the Planet and Your Health. ISBN 0-76243-877-0. -24.9.109.146 (talk) 23:02, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jussle

Hi. in June I created a page called Jussle which was nominated for speedy deletion due to the way it was written. I have re-written the article and have included it with this message for review. I have fashioned the article similarly to Skate 3 and Cozi articles already on this site. Thanks for your consideration.

Draft article

Jussle is the name of a semantics based email to calendar software application which works with any email system and any electronic calendar system. This patent-pending SaaS (software as a service) was launched in November 2009 and the company is based in Silicon Valley, California.

Jussle software frees a user from having to retype, copy and paste schedule information received in an email, including attachments, into a calendar. Jussle also provides a premium service which allows a user to paste a website URL into email and have the schedule on the website show up on the user’s calendar. The result is game, social and cultural schedules existing on a website show up automatically on a user’s calendar with simply an email.

Jussle leverages cloud-based technology in Web 2.0

--Lee-tree (talk) 23:06, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This has already be userfied in the past to User:Lee-tree/Jussle. You may want to update that draft with above text, but it still does not show any sign of third party references or notability. If after a further rework and sourcing you need more feedback, consider WP:RFF, as there is nothing to restore here.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:42, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IJS Logo (Infant Jesus' School, Patna City)

IJS Logo -Prashant K.J. 05:00, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Not done I guess you're referring to File:IJS Logo.jpg. That has been deleted per Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2010_September_14#File:IJS_Logo.jpg, so you should contact the deleting admin, user After Midnight (talk · contribs), about it. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:49, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

scoopastar

this is a real person and rapper and the page was real if sources need i can add them -Diamondent (talk) 09:45, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Please review our policy for biographies on living persons. This was unreferenced with many dubious statements and overall inappropriate in tone. If there are sufficient sources to meet our notability guideline for musicians, you better start form scratch.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:29, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MUMBAR

-Muhammad sarfraz khan (talk) 09:47, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done As you seem to refer to MUMBAR, this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning groups of people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:33, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
But there is an existing page Mumbar which may be relevant. JohnCD (talk) 13:53, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Asian Lesbian Film and Video Festival

disputed PROD I didn't even see, what was the rationale? -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 23:24, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The concern was "Non notable film festival; official website will infect visitors with a Trojan - very undesitable". Courcelles 23:26, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, that's no bueno. Pity, one of those articles I helped improve. Win some lose some. Thanks.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The site in question currently produces a "503 internal server error". I suspect that the prodder got a warning from firefox when trying to open the site. This even happened once with the wikipedia history search feature (wiki blamer). The last archived version of the site doesn't seem to show any problems. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 11:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dian Group

This page is not a promotion. Please undelete this page and show me what's wrong in this page. Thanks! -Saintv (talk) 09:05, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marcus Evans

Please email the COMPLETE article which is pre-13th Nov 2010 so that I can review it off-Wiki -Jus naturae (talk) 14:28, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You can get it yourself; just click on the page's "History" tab and go back to the version you want to read. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:08, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caitlin Rose

I can provide references for the facts that are stated -Scottcampbell14 (talk) 15:53, 23 November 2010 (UTC)— Scottcampbell14 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Assuming you are talking about Caitlin Rose: she might actually be notable. Please create a new, clean article that doesn't read like a press release: free of peacock words like "megastar", contains no blather about "represents the future of country music", and contains references to actual articles in actual reliable sources. The version that was deleted was clearly written by somebody in an advertising-related profession. Maybe we can get an article created before those cigarettes kill her. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:19, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ketsugo jujutsu

I believe this article was deleted because the editors thought it specific to a single Jujutsu dojo, and therefore not noteworthy enough for an encyclopedia topic. However, Ketsugo jujutsu is practiced by many different dojo around the world, and has been for many years. As such, I believe that when someone looks through the wikipidia for Ketsugo jujutsu, they should be educated to the fact that it is not just a single bunch of guys that practice jujutsu, but actually an entire sub-set of jujutsu (albeit, developed within the last 60 years) that attempts to combine jujutsu with various other martial arts (e.g., Judo, Aikido, Kung Fu) for the purposes of self-defense. Unfortunately, when someone asks about the discipline, I must either tell them orally, or direct them to a Russian site that happens to have the data that was deleted from wikipedia. It would sadden me very much if the history of this particular kind of jujutsu was lost because there aren't millions of us around the world practicing the art today (thereby making it a more highly visited wikipedia page). -Cyberbisson (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Papaursa (talk · contribs), who PRODded it, in case he wishes to consider nominating it at Articles for deletion. The grounds for the PROD were "article gives no reason why subject is notable", and it could do with more independent references - the present ones seem mainly connected with the movement itself - see WP:ORG. JohnCD (talk) 19:52, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wendy Duong

dear Wiki staff:

I am Wendy Duong, the person whose biography has been listed by you in the public domain. twice I have submitted edits to rewrite the listing for accuracy and completeness. Twice, you undeleted my changes. I find this to be not comprehensible.

Considering the fact that I am the bio'd person, please allow me to edit and change the factual contents someone else has written about me and publicized by you. Please contact me at my office email address below.

Sincerely, Wendy N. Duong <redacted to thwart the spambots> - 90.2.227.41 (talk) 18:35, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page has not been deleted; if you have problems with an article about yourself, please see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help for advice on what to do. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I have emailed this user pointing her to BLP/H. JohnCD (talk) 19:12, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umesh_Babu

Need to add more details and make it available for users to read as Umesh Babu has made significant contribution to society. -203.83.248.32 (talk) 09:43, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There was only a single unsourced line in the biography. I'd suggest reading WP:FIRST and giving it another try from scratch, possibly in the article incubator to give you time to get it to where it needs to be. --Fabrictramp | talk to me 00:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viswadarsanam

Viswadarsanam is an organisation in Kerala, India which is making significant contributions to the scoiety. hence would like it to be recovered. -203.83.248.32 (talk) 09:48, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - you provided no evidence that this person or his organization have been notable in any way; this pair of articles simply said that the subject existed, without any citations to reliable sources of any kind. I would advise you to register an account, create a single article in your userspace about whichever is more notable, and then asking for some comments before trying to move them into article space. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:05, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trust Territory of Marie Byrd Land and Ellsworth Land Antarctica

This article is false. This is a fictional land that does not exist. Please see Marie Byrd Land and Antarctic Treaty System. This a hoax circulated by D. Izzo across the web. -Cêsar (talk) 21:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This is requests for undeletion. To request a page's deletion, please see WP:DEL. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:10, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States Territory of Marie Byrd Land and Ellsworth Land Antarctica; this is a perennial. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. I'm not speak English.--Cêsar (talk) 22:29, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This hoax page has been been deleted. It has been put in many times under different titles, but we delete it every time. Thank you for warning us. JohnCD (talk) 09:55, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAT_calculator_program

Not an advertisement. Information relevant to the SAT test was presented regarding calculator programs permitted for use during the mathematics sections of the SAT test. -24.101.36.21 (talk) 22:02, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

David Naughton (producer)

hi, I am the David Naughton that has been deleted. I never started the page... although over time I did amend it (and I know others I worked with did so also) Although I am not broken by its deletion - I have used it in reference to myself on occasion & this may be a minor irritation.

I have had an engineering career for over 15 years & a production career since 2004.

Is the problem that - I am listed as a producer in parenthesis and not engineer?

I wish to re-introduce myself into the world of Wiki.

There are more credits in the pipeline as producer, engineer, mixer, remixer, programmer, percussionist & bassist & guitarist.

Thanks in advance to the moderators

DN Thebhoydave (talk) 09:36, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ghil'ad Zuckermann

This academic is a full Professor of Linguistics and Endangered Languages at the University of Adelaide. He is an authority on language revitalization and language contact and meets the requirements of notability. According to the Deletion Log an article about this academic was deleted more than two years ago for notability reasons. These reasons are by now irrelevant. For example, this academic was only an Associate Professor at the time of the deletion. -Aborig (talk) 18:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced prominently at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghil'ad Zuckermann, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Stifle (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:22, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GlobalCollect

I've created honest content about GlobalCollect, page was originally deleted because of advertising -Marky555 (talk) 14:10, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done. Because of attempts to use it for advertising, the page has been salted - protected against creation. What you should do is make a draft in your user space, and then approach user Jehochman (talk · contribs), the admin who salted it, for permission to post your version. More advice on how to do that on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 18:07, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moe Pipe Organ Company

Article concerns a well known company with a wide area of coverage and a number of restoration of important pipe organs in the upper midwest -68.119.21.47 (talk) 16:59, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user All Is One (talk · contribs), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at Articles for deletion. The article needs some independent references to establish notability - at present it is mainly a list of organ repair projects with references which seem to be from the company itself describing what they did. JohnCD (talk) 18:21, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Added independent references to establish notability

Ekram Ahmed Lenin

No reasoning given. -Mrkshahin (talk) 21:58, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done The article was deleted because it was a recreation of an article that had been discussed by the community, and the result was to delete. Additional re-creations may lead to the prevention of that article ever being created. You are welcome to take the matter to deletion review (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 22:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rich Raddon

Notable for large "Yes on 8" Proposition 8 donation ($1,500) and for co-founding MovieClips.com, one of TIME magazine's Top 50 websites of 2010 -Eagleburas (talk) 03:14, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lutheran Medical Center

Article was deleted under CSD:A7 and G11 without prior discussion. The subject is a New York State recognized Level I Trauma Center and New York State Department of Health designated Stroke Center. I would like to salvage and rewrite as part of WikiProject Hospitals. Ng.j (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC) -Ng.j (talk) 17:51, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this page is a copyright violation. Essentially, all the content has been copied verbatim from the medical centre website, press releases and other on-line sources. Spartaz Humbug! 18:02, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No infobox, pictures, coordinates or anything else salvageable? If not I will start fresh. Ng.j (talk) 18:17, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Tavaria

Sorry if this is the wrong page or process, but the above link seems to have been merged with "Crimea", but I can find no reference to Northern Tavaria in that article or Wiki, or anywhere on Google. I would just like to find information about Northern Tavaria, say perhaps what was in the original article. Thanks. -119.224.58.123 (talk) 17:53, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Apparently the only revision at Northern Tavria is the creation of the redirect so there is nothing else there. [1] Spartaz Humbug! 18:05, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just Ines

This 2010 UK film is now written about quite extensively in several print magazines, including Variety and Screen Daily. -ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 19:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Ines so, as stated at the top of this page, it cannot be undeleted here. If you consider that there is new information, you should first approach user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs), the admin who closed the discussion; then, if you are not satisfied, you can take it to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 21:34, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

mark b. newbauer

I wanted to participate in the review; however was out of town-- all of the information in the article can be substantiated and the company, Mike the Pike Productions, has been featured in 'Variety', 'Hollywood Reporter', on George R.R. Martin's blog, blogged by the author himself, etc.- I would like to get this considered for undeletion as, I simply need instructions as to how to source as all sources can be provided and I want to be respectful of Wikipedia's guidelines and standards. -Filmphile (talk) 22:21, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Landcert

I created the name "LandCert" which is a registered trademark (Reg.No. 3,770,170) to establish an new ontology for evaluating land. --MSH1864 (talk) 02:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done The most recently deleted version consisted solely of "Landcert is a process of evaluating property utilizing mapping and municipal research." I'd suggest you spend some time carefully reading WP:FIRST, then make a version at a subpage of your userpage, such as at User:MSH1864/Landcert. That will give you more, but not unlimited, time to get it ready for article space. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 03:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GLKEDIA

reasoning -Odishagroup (talk) 06:46, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://www.glkedia.com/about.html. Airplaneman ✈ 07:33, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • It is total idleness on the part of Odishagroup to simply copy their web page and think they have created a Wikipedia article. A complete re-write would be needed anyway. And why on earth did you give it that strange, SHOUTED title when the guy is called Giridharilal Kedia? — [[::User:RHaworth|RHaworth]] (talk · contribs) 19:07, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Mars

Entry needs to be updated and expanded not deleted in order to meet Wiki Bio requirements. -74.87.123.162 (talk) 07:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced prominently at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Mars, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Bigtimepeace (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Tikiwont (talk) 10:10, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bitcoin

its more relevant than 90% of th crap articles on here -24.47.43.189 (talk) 11:55, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done You obviously came here to attempt to make a disruptive point rather than make a legitimate request and are well aware that this was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bitcoin and will not be acted upon, so I'll dispense with the standard response to users who make such requests in good faith.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:24, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are acting uncivil by responding to him this way. You should NOT jump to accusations of bad faith WP:AOBF. The user is simply upset and unfamiliar with Wikipedia policies. While long-time Wikipedians know that his argument is not one accepted, "most of the articles here are crap" is a common public conception. Rather than respond to an inappropriate request with an inappropriate retort, you should calmly and politely inform the user of how things work around here 67.174.39.160 (talk) 06:19, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong, wrong and wrong. Unfortunately, it's hard to gauge knowledge and skill level from anonymous editors, and the message in the statement was pure bad faith - it could be read no other way. If one thinks that articles are crap you do one of two things: go away, or fix them. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:58, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. The message is antagonistic on its face. We do not assume good faith in the presence of contrary evidence.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:24, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

La Paz

Some information about the city has recently been improperly deleted and altered. This site is a serious source of informaton and not of mockery. The entry "San Francisco Church is an ancient church where San Francisco is buried" is totally absurd. Saint Francis (San Francisco) is obviously not buried in La Paz,Bolivia The person who wrote that, deleted a t the same time some real facts. Can you undo the changes and leave the article as it was about a month ago? -69.171.176.178 (talk) 13:34, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've corrected the passage. Nevertheless it is longer around than you think and if you feel other content needs to be changed, you best do it yourself, maybe checking the page history once more. This page here is only for case where the whole page has been deleted and cannot be edited anymore.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:52, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hannu Rajaniemi

This article about a science fiction author was apparently deleted because prior to the September 2010 publication of his first novel The Quantum Thief his notability was uncertain. Now that the book has been published, creating something of a buzz[2], I think the article, a version of which is available here[3], should be restored. -Victor Chmara (talk) 18:14, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Done, in a manner of speaking. As a contested proposed deletion, the article can be immediately restored upon request. Rather than having me undelete it, you should use User:Abc10/Hannu_Rajaniemi. Leave a note at User_talk:Abc10 asking them to move it back to articlespace, if they don't respond in a few days you can move if back yourself. If you don't want to move it, make another comment here or talk to me on my talk page and I can move it for you. Protonk (talk) 18:21, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

kolotube

This article was deleted because i recreated and submitted it without any references, i plan on taking my time in recreating this article if given a second chance, to make sure all requirements are fulfilled -B0ssman89E (talk) 20:48, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bitcoin, again

I want to know more about it and it is not illegal. -222.154.234.89 (talk) 02:08, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted by consensus at AfD and salted by JohnCD (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), meaning there is nothing we can do on this page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:37, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is not illegal, but despite two deletion reviews, nobody has yet produced evidence that it is notable enough to have an article. See Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 September 26. There is a draft article at Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Bitcoin. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Afterjesus.jpg

I'm not necessarily requesting undeletion, I'm just trying to discover what happened to it. There was a photo of King of Kings (statue) at this filename, used in the article, showing the appearance of this sculpture following a fire. The photo isn't there any more, and there doesn't seem to be any deletion log or note that it was deleted for whatever reason, at least not that I can find. If it was moved, there's no redirect, and the article that pointed to it wasn't updated. A search isn't turning up any deletion discussion, so if it was deleted, it was probably speedy or prodded. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 10:06, 29 November 2010 (UTC) -cmadler (talk) 10:06, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure the photo was not at Commons? I see no history under that filename at all. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The file was deleted at Commons, as shown here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pragmatic Buddhism

The current search for Pragmatic Buddhism leads to the Center of Pragmatic Buddhism -Adartsug (talk) 12:42, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have a clue on why the page was deleted. The article had contributions from many people.

It was not deleted. The title, along with its entire editing history was moved to the new title (the prior title is now a redirect). What may have confused you is that, as can be seen in that edit history, the page was vastly shortened at about the same time, on the stated basis: "starting to fix the many problems with this article, which is arguably OR/Synthesis in its entirety" ("OR" is an abbreviation used here for original research; see Wikipedia:No original research).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:26, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I, Adartsug, originally wrote the item on Pragmatic Buddhism. I do not belong to any school or branch of Religious Buddhism; I have never been in a Buddhist temple or pagoda. I consider that there is a strong stream today toward Pragmatic Buddhism (or secular, or non-religious, or even agnostic) and Wikipedia should have an article on that trend. You should have not removed the whole entry but I agree that the self-promoting links should not be there.

I have no connection with either the Center of Pragmatic Buddhism or the Unfettered Mind organization. They included their links by their own initiative; I added the section “Organizations” to make room for the first group.

Buddhism is referred as pragmatic by scholars and writers¬ such as Edward Conze, Richard P. Hayes and Stephen Batchelor, and atheistic or agnostic by André Comte-Sponville. As a notion, Pragmatic Buddhism is as “cloudy” as agnosticism or pragmatism; the schools on these “philosophies” appeared much later than the words.

Lateral to the central issue and even stranger than your deletion of the article in question is the book I just found in Amazon.com PRAGMATIC BUDDHISM, the summary of which I copy next: “High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles! Pragmatic Buddhism is a subset of the Buddhist doctrine which leaves aside metaphysical beliefs and rituals of any kind and advocates the continuous practice of the Buddha's Teachings (Dhamma in Pali, Dharma in Sanskrit) with the primary purpose of eliminating suffering and bringing about inner peace and harmony. In the broadest sense of the word, Buddhism is a religion and a philosophical system originally proposed by Siddhattha Gotama (in Pali; Siddhartha Gautama in Sanskrit), the Buddha, in northeastern India in the sixth century B.C. As a religion, the fourth largest in the world, it has three main schools (Theravada, Mahayana, Vajrayana) and dozens of derivate branches. For the strong emphasis it places in introspection and mind states, numerous scholars also consider Buddhism a system of psychology rather than (or in addition to) a religious creed or a school of philosophy.” Are people actually taken material from Wikipedia to produce books? Adartsug, November 30, 2010

There are several issues here. First, there is no plural 'you'. As you created the artcile on one hand it was unilaterally first moved and then converted by one user, Sylvain1972 (talk · contribs), as also mentioned here.[4] Second, it is still there in the history! If you disagree, you can simply undo the title move and restore the original content to allow for a wider discussion of its merits. That would also be the place to discuss the third issue regarding the source listed at amazon. (It seems to me they pasted a generic description.) If necessary, I could help you with the technicalities. Let me know here or on my talk page. --Tikiwont (talk) 16:43, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PadovaniML/Dennis_Nackord

It was originally deemed to be self-promoting, but I changed it to remove what I thought to be offending material. -PadovaniML (talk) 21:20, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Nothing to undelete anymore. Please contact the admin who userfied it for you, Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), on a possible move back to mainspace. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caitlin Rose again

Because I have supplied the article with links which back up via evidence what the actual article says -Scottcampbell14 (talk) 23:29, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Musulin, Stella von

Nowhere on the internet contains the information I have submitted on the writer Stella von Musulin. Yet it has been unfairly deleted. Here friendship with W H Auden would be enough to include her under 'noteable' but added to this is her important publications, her role in MI6 etc, yet it was seen fit to delete this article. This is utterly beyond all reasonable editing criteria and without justification. I request that the article be reinstated in the interests of scholarship. -Natsyw (talk) 10:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Not done Well, I searched for various versions of the article, and have yet to find anything. That said, "a friendship with" does not allow someone to inherit notability. Although we don't require all references to be available on the internet, there must be some valid reliable sources that you can help point us to - with millions of editors, someone must have access to a printed copy. We also don't do things "in the interest of scholarship" - this is an encylopedia of knowledge, not a compendium of scholarship. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Södermalm.JPG

Poor transwiki, please restore the file description temporarily, I will correct the transfer and tag it for speedydeletion when finished. Thanks, -Martin H. (talk) 13:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Tikiwont (talk) 18:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Smart Distributed System

Really? Honeywell is not a notable company? I am new to this, so I'm not suprised. But to call Honeywell not a notable company is to call a farce a process. -KazooOfTheNorth (talk) 17:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I see you've meanwhile contacted the deleting admin. If you need futher help let me know.--Tikiwont (talk) 18:01, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
... and on top of that, nobody said that WP:Honeywell or even Siemens are non-notable companies. However, the product that had a poorly-referenced article shows absolutely zero signs of being considered as notable. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:03, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=399761558

Leave a Reply