This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. This notice is automatically updated by MusikBot (talk) and will hide when there are fewer than 3 requests and they are all under 7 days old.

AutoWikiBrowser

User:Joris Darlington Quarshie

• Joris Darlington Quarshie (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (edit CheckPage)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I've familiarized myself with AWB's functionalities through the English Wikipedia documentation and am confident it can significantly enhance my contributions. AWB automates repetitive tasks like adding citations, fixing formatting, and adding categories, freeing up my time to focus on higher-quality edits that require in-depth analysis and judgment. This will allow me to make more substantial contributions to English Wikipedia in a shorter timeframe.

AWB minimizes the risk of errors introduced by manual editing during repetitive tasks. This will be particularly helpful for tasks where even minor inconsistencies can be distracting or disrupt reader flow (e.g., quotation mark styles, bullet point formatting).

By granting me the rights to AWB, I will be able to dedicate more time and energy to utilizing tasks like improving the accuracy and comprehensiveness of content, adding insightful references, and expanding on under-developed sections of articles.

Lastly, once I gain experience with AWB, I can potentially mentor other editors on using the tool responsibly. This will foster a collaborative environment and empower others to make efficient and positive contributions to English Wikipedia. JDQ Joris Darlington Quarshie (talk) 19:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This text appears to have been written by a large language model. Could you please explain in your own words why you want AWB access and what you plan to do with it? * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:MrBauer24

• MrBauer24 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (edit CheckPage)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I have been helping out on Wikipedia for some time now, and I have become an active and trusted editor. I love helping out with "Wikignome" activities and have seen the features that AWB provides. After reading through the user manual, I feel that I could use it very effectively in order to do things such as fix common spelling mistakes and fix checkwiki errors.

I would love to be able to use this to help to make the editing process more efficient. Thank you so much. MrBauer24 (talk) 13:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:SamuelRiv

• SamuelRiv (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (edit CheckPage)^{(acc · ap · fm · mms · npr · pm · pcr · rb · te)}

I used AWB a little bit several years ago before permissions were required. I will be using it again to do some quick maintenance on some templates I maintain or am working on, most immediately to update {{cite act}} and to restart work on related template projects discussed at WikiProject Law. I also have a request in at Commons, where I also do template maintenance. In addition, I do an awful lot of citation cleanup on articles, and while I apparently found AWB wasn't too helpful a tool years ago, it seems better now. SamuelRiv (talk) 20:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]