Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
El C (talk | contribs)
El C (talk | contribs)
Line 26: Line 26:


'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]]. <span style="font-family: Georgia; background-color: maroon; padding: 2px 3px 1px 3px;">[[User:HurricaneEdgar|<span style="color: greenyellow">HurricaneEdgar</span>]] [[HurricaneEdgar|<span style="color: greenyellow"></span>]]</span> 15:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
'''Temporary semi-protection:''' Persistent [[WP:VAND|vandalism]]. <span style="font-family: Georgia; background-color: maroon; padding: 2px 3px 1px 3px;">[[User:HurricaneEdgar|<span style="color: greenyellow">HurricaneEdgar</span>]] [[HurricaneEdgar|<span style="color: greenyellow"></span>]]</span> 15:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
:[[File:Pictogram voting support.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''[[Wikipedia:Protection policy#Semi-protection|Semi-protected]]'''&#32;for a period of '''one week''', after which the page will be automatically unprotected.<!-- Template:RFPP#semi --> [[User:El_C|El_C]] 09:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)


=== [[:Star Pravah]] ===
=== [[:Star Pravah]] ===

Revision as of 09:37, 7 March 2022

Requests for page protection

You are currently viewing the subpage "Current requests for increase in protection level".
Return to Requests for page protection.

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level


Reason: vandalism from a IP user who was previously caught using a sock puppet account Persesus (talk) 13:43, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Changed target from "The Palmer Report talk page protection request" to "Talk:Palmer Report". Favonian (talk) 16:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This talk page was semiprotected three times in 2021, the longest was one month. The rationale for those protections is this thread on the talk page. (In addition to the coordinated editing campaign, an admin reported an off-wiki legal threat). One IP has been being a nuisance recently; those edits can be seen at Special:Contributions/2600:6C65:7E7F:B93E::/64. This IP range might quality for a personal attack block for accusing User:Persesus of lying. I don't know anything about Persesus' claim of sockpuppetry by the IP and don't see anywhere where Persesus has provided evidence. EdJohnston (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just look at the wording on how they write it. it's the same person EdJohnston compare it to what they said to the archived version of the sockpuppet account its nearly identical wording and speech pattern. The personal attacks from said user were uncalled for.--Persesus (talk) 16:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Persesus, who do you think the IP is a sock of? EdJohnston (talk) 22:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think its a sock puppet account or either Nora or Joe since the IP address is identical if you look at the archived talk page of PR more specially pages 4 and 5. The word styling is the same and idenitcal as well as the layout or format of it. The IP location is the exact same as well EdJohnston .--Persesus (talk) 05:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-Protection: Has been the target of an IP-hopping vandal for over a month. They have also targeted several other pages of similar types. The person has also threatened me with profanities to try and get me to stop reverting his/her vandalism. Luigitehplumber (talk) 15:18, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Checking to see if protection is necessary. so these are fake/hoax games then? Just checking as I can't see a discussion on the talk page. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Casliber - IP is also saying very mean things in their edit summaries, which to me at least suggests they may be WP:NOTHERE, especially if they are hoax games. casualdejekyll 02:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated disruptive editing by IP address(es). No response to talk page or edit summaries. Loopy30 (talk) 15:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. HurricaneEdgar 15:50, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. El_C 09:37, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced edits from IP editors. Ravensfire (talk) 16:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Jasonbres (talk) 18:33, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Repeated addition of unsourced WP:DOB by numerous IPs. Toddst1 (talk) 19:44, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Major disrupting edits from IP user(s) Hwi.padam (talk) 20:12, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations. General Ization Talk 21:01, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Trying to avoid vandalism and inaccurate evaluations of his work Animumquoque (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1 Reason: high level of vandalism, persistent harassment from the part of the editor Animumquoque (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anonymous users repeatedly add detail to the plot summaries in violation of MOS:TVPLOT. Due to the recent airing of series 6, the page will see more traffic soon. BenbowInn (talk) 23:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – sock vandalism, persistent. Pavlov2 (talk) 00:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Razali Osman (talk) 00:52, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – most recent edits other than mine have been vandalism. Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 01:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent Disruptive Editing. Second verse, same as the first. More then half of discussion on the talk page violates WP:NOTFORUM and it's very annoying to constantly respond with basically the same message because people can't be bothered to read the box at the top. Requesting Semi because most of the bothering is from IPs or very new accounts who haven't quite gotten it. casualdejekyll 01:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For example, see Talk:SCP Foundation#I would like a job here, Talk:SCP Foundation#Let me join, Talk:SCP Foundation#SCP - 84654|| The pretty Wolf, Talk:SCP Foundation#Scp 5000 the inanimate suit, Talk:SCP Foundation#Alagadda and the Lord's, Talk:SCP Foundation#I no what u are, Talk:SCP Foundation#Fun scp games for mobile, Talk:SCP Foundation#Hi, Talk:SCP Foundation#Abnormal creatures, Talk:SCP Foundation#Scp 1940 casualdejekyll 01:50, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And that's just the stuff that hasn't been archived yet casualdejekyll 01:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
tbh what I do is just revert when I see one of these comments. I'm surprised some of them are up. wizzito | say hello! 05:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. The helper5667 (talk) 02:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Anonymous user wrote it "Goat" many times. -St3095 (?) 04:55, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Should be protected. Is a target for vandalism a lot of the time, and is under a DS topic (longevity). wizzito | say hello! 05:02, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Edit warring between two editors. Trillfendi (talk) 05:03, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. General Ization Talk 05:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reason: Repeated vandalism from persistent sockpuppeteer Howtonotwin (talk) 06:16, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply