Archives

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

User:Zhanzhao (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, My talk page is again under attack by IP range 218.186.12.2XX. This despite a previous protection[[1]][[2]] and various warnings served to the IP's talkpages. As such I'd like to request for an indefinite page protection for both my user and talk page such that only registered editors are able to edit my page. Various editors have caught such vandalism before me and reverted the edits, but the edit summaries which contain strong language as well would still remain. I've previously requested for the summary comments to be removed [[3]] but new vandal actions (with new edit summaries) would mean I have to request for new removals in the future.

Alternatively since the vandal is using dynamic IP that allows him/her to rotate among the whole range of IPs in the 218.186.12.2XX range [[4]][[5]][[6]][[7]][[8]][[9]][[10]][[11]]. If possible, I'd like to request a permanent protection from 218.186.12.2XX edits, thanks!

Also is there any way to control this editor? Other than vandalisimg my page, this editor is suspected to be a sockpuppet of the vandal Colourwolf[[12]] who switched to using IPs since his various sock accounts got identified and banned. The above action would protect my page from vandalism by this person, but would not stop this sock from further vandalising activities.Zhanzhao (talk) 03:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plimoth Plantation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Need several days semi-protect. Vandal target all of the sudden. Student7 (talk) 02:24, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. tedder (talk) 02:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biotechnology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, various ip's keep daunting the page. . South Bay (talk) 02:18, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Also note at least one of the IPs is helpful. tedder (talk) 02:29, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tiana Xiao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Continual vandalism from same anonymous IP. Gloriac2 (talk) 00:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. BLP issue. tedder (talk) 00:16, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Favonian (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, The proxies, frustrated at not being allowed access to my user page, are focusing on my talk page instead. Maybe a 24-hour semi-protection?. Favonian (talk) 00:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 00:11, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Repo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 23:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Borderline case, but based on previous history, it's worth protecting. tedder (talk) 00:12, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is the Average size dick for a 13 year old (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite create-protection Abce2|If you would like to make a call.. 23:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree this is an unlikely title for an article, it's never been created before, so why bother salting it now? It'll just take up space in a report. –xeno^talk 23:54, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it has, three times I think. Did I get the title wrong?Abce2|If you would like to make a call.. 23:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Declined I've just deleted three different variations of this title. I don't think salt will help. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 00:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, looks like you missed a "?". Concur with zzuuzz anyhow... –xeno^talk 00:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2010 NBA All-Star Game (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. IP editor keeps adding a section about promoting a particular player for the game using a blog as a reference. Martin tamb (talk) 23:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of three days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 00:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Kobe Bryant (edit | article | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection vandalism, I am tired of the page being vandalized. . Leave Message, Yellow Evan home 23:16, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Declined, not enough disruptive activity to justify protection, especially for a talk page (if it's semiprotected, anons have nowhere to discuss the article). Heimstern Läufer (talk) 23:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific opinion on climate change (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection. Edit warring, socking, etc, arising from the email hacking incident. --TS 23:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Declined Declining for now, I'll watch and warn/protect as necessary. tedder (talk) 00:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Phil Jones (climatologist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection'. I'd suggest a month or so. BLP concerns arising from the email hacking incident. --TS 23:06, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, Semi-protection would be useless here, as the editor adding the content has over 300 edits. Blocking might be a possiible solution though if disruption continues. NW (Talk) 23:50, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Ultimate Fighter: Heavyweights (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection vandalism This page has been repeatedly vandalised today. Requesting semi-protection for 3 days until the episode has aired, so that vandals will not change the tournament bracket. Paralympiakos (talk) 22:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done but I gave it 5 days to go with The finale will be held on December 5, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.^[1]. Anyone should feel free to change if this is excessive. - 2/0 (cont.) 22:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected Marking for bot. tedder (talk) 00:07, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Empire State Building (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection vandalism. A8UDI 22:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Rjd0060 (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Linux (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection, Looks like Dynamic IP's or open proxies started vandalising this page just now. Momo san ^Gespräch 21:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Zzuuzz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). Rjd0060 (talk) 21:59, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:GoPeter452 (edit | [[Talk:User:GoPeter452|talk]] | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection, I don't want this to be vandalized.GoPeter452 (talk) 00:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected. Also, I have given you 'confirmed', so that you may edit your own userpage. NW (Talk) 00:58, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

User talk:Momusufan (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

semi-protection, Open proxies have found their way onto my talk page now, a couple days should do it. Momo san ^Gespräch 20:58, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. GedUK  21:12, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Favonian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, The proxies are at it again. Favonian (talk) 20:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected indefinitely. Please contact me or another sysop if you want protection removed. NW (Talk) 20:25, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Duae Quartunciae (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

semi-protection vandalism, Being attacked by open proxies. Momo san ^Gespräch 19:57, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NW (Talk) 20:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection. Open proxy vandalism resuming on this talk page. Momo san ^Gespräch 19:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 24 hours, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NW (Talk) 20:26, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UFC 110 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Excessive IP vandalism. (Justinsane15 (talk) 19:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NW (Talk) 20:30, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Caversham, New Zealand (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. Persistent vandalism. Martin451 (talk) 19:20, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

–Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:44, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hernán Cortés (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection. High level of IP vandalism. Was previously protected for one week, November 10-17; vandalism resumed upon expiry.ShelfSkewed Talk 19:13, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Ireland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protection Vandalism continuous vandalism from unidentified IP's and/or those who hate it The C of E (talk) 19:11, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:48, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arsène Wenger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Indefinite Semi-protection vandalism The page has just come off it's 3rd (that I know of) block and it's the same problem is that its getting vandalised over and over again by unidentified IPs and supporters of opposition teams and it's very anoying to those who want to referance the page and it's going to continue happening unless the page gets some perminant proection The C of E (talk) 19:07, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for a period of 5 years, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. NW (Talk) 20:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Serious Man (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary full protection dispute. WuhWuzDat 18:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Job for a Cowboy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Temporary semi-protection vandalism, Excessive vandalism and general disruptances all by IP adresses. GunMetal Angel 17:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Tiptoety ^talk 17:51, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you joking? Look at the history; reverts go down the whole page. - GunMetal Angel 18:12, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nope, I am not joking. Looking at the page history, the vandalism is sporadic with days in between when the article is not touched. At this time there is not enough recent excessive vandalism to justify protection. Tiptoety ^talk 19:02, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

William Penn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

semi-protection vandalism. A8UDI 17:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. NW (Talk) 20:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tiana Xiao (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism from anonymous sources. The IP address can be traced to within Cornell University (most likely to be personal attack). Yl428 (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Only two recent disruptive edits from 1 user isn't enough to warrant protection - I left the IP a warning about their vandalism, and will keep an eye on the article if problems continue. Regards, JamieS93 17:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Switzerland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Following the Swiss referendum on Sunday, there has been a steady stream of IP-vandalism to the article.Jeppiz (talk) 15:34, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected for one week. Tan | 39 15:37, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Iceland (supermarket) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-protect. Persisent edit warring by dynamic IP sockpuppets of banne editor Wikipéire (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). 2 lines of K₃₀₃ 15:20, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Already protected. by Tanthalas39 for 1 week. JamieS93 17:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cytherea (person) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Semi-Protection, Requesting further protection due to continued disagreements over the content of the introduction. Article was protected for a couple days a couple weeks ago. Editors are still arguing with edits. Dismas|^(talk) 10:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Declined, If anything, it would be fully protected as there's nearly an edit war, but protection isn't required at this point GedUK  20:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]