Removed: Talk:Battle of Hu? Talk:Battle of Hu?. |
Maintenance. |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{rfclistintro}} |
{{rfclistintro}} |
||
</noinclude> |
</noinclude> |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
Shall we summarize the following allegations from former MEK members: |
|||
* {{tq|"an incident which Masoud Banisadr described as changing into "ant-like human beings", i.e. following orders by their instinct."}} |
|||
* {{tq|"Allegations of cult-like characteristics in the MEK have been made by former members who have [[Defection|defected]] from the organization, including Massoud Khodabandeh and Masoud Banisadr among others."}} |
|||
*{{tq|"In 2019, more defectors related their experiences. These included a ban on romantic relationships and marriages after a major military defeat. The leadership attributed that to the members being distracted by spouses and children. Members said they had to write in a notebook any sexual moments, such as 'today in the morning, I had an erection'. They had to write in the notebook feelings such as wishing to have a child after seeing children on TV. These notebooks had to be read aloud in front of the leaders and comrades."}} |
|||
[[User:Stefka Bulgaria|Stefka Bulgaria]] ([[User talk:Stefka Bulgaria|talk]]) 10:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)}} |
|||
'''[[Talk:Lebanese Air Force#rfc_8B5CC17|Talk:Lebanese Air Force]]''' |
'''[[Talk:Lebanese Air Force#rfc_8B5CC17|Talk:Lebanese Air Force]]''' |
||
{{rfcquote|text= |
{{rfcquote|text= |
||
Line 120: | Line 128: | ||
By way of background, this issue was discussed in [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elections_and_Referendums/Archive_12#RfC_on_5%_threshold|an RfC on this page in 2017]]. The result of that RfC was ''There was strong consensus for A, "If only one candidate meets the threshold, then the second-place contender should be included.'' Since that RfC there has been discussion of this point at [[Talk:2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries]] and [[Talk:2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries#RfC_regarding_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries_infobox_template|Talk:2020 Republican Party presidential primaries]]. At least one editor there has suggested we may wish to deviate from the consensus reached in the 2017 RfC. If we are going to do so, we may also need to set a threshold for the inclusion of second place candidates if that threshold should be less than 5% but greater than some other number.--[[User:Darryl Kerrigan|Darryl Kerrigan]] ([[User talk:Darryl Kerrigan|talk]]) 18:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)}} |
By way of background, this issue was discussed in [[Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elections_and_Referendums/Archive_12#RfC_on_5%_threshold|an RfC on this page in 2017]]. The result of that RfC was ''There was strong consensus for A, "If only one candidate meets the threshold, then the second-place contender should be included.'' Since that RfC there has been discussion of this point at [[Talk:2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries]] and [[Talk:2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries#RfC_regarding_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries_infobox_template|Talk:2020 Republican Party presidential primaries]]. At least one editor there has suggested we may wish to deviate from the consensus reached in the 2017 RfC. If we are going to do so, we may also need to set a threshold for the inclusion of second place candidates if that threshold should be less than 5% but greater than some other number.--[[User:Darryl Kerrigan|Darryl Kerrigan]] ([[User talk:Darryl Kerrigan|talk]]) 18:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC)}} |
||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | |||
}} |
|||
'''[[Talk:Soomro#rfc_FFA7092|Talk:Soomro]]''' |
'''[[Talk:Soomro#rfc_FFA7092|Talk:Soomro]]''' |
||
{{rfcquote|text= |
{{rfcquote|text= |
Revision as of 11:01, 9 June 2020
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran
Shall we summarize the following allegations from former MEK members:
Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 10:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC) |
Should table of "current inventory", commonly found in Air Force pages which list air force's aircraft inventory, allowed to be filled by aircraft with "on order" status (not in the inventory yet but will be, as the contract have been signed). Ckfasdf (talk) 07:24, 4 June 2020 (UTC) |
Talk:Food and agriculture in Nazi Germany
Should the article contain the quotes found in this version? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 15:48, 2 June 2020 (UTC) |
Should the lead briefly summarize that (i) the U.S. is a prominent example of militarization of police in democracies, (ii) U.S. police departments were non-militaristic prior to the 20th century, and (iii) that influential police reformers (such as August Vollmer) introduced reforms in the early 20th century whereby US police departments adopted military tactics, techniques, and organizational templates? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 18:19, 31 May 2020 (UTC) |
Should the logos of those neo-Nazi groups which integrate the Black Sun symbol be used in the article? Beyond My Ken (talk) 02:57, 31 May 2020 (UTC) |
Should the following be added to their articles?:
References
Gleeanon409 (talk) 19:56, 26 May 2020 (UTC) |
Should the section "Alleged and acknowledged contemporary no-go areas" include a subsection on Sweden? This page previously contained such a subsection; you can see what it looked like here. Korny O'Near (talk) 15:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC) |
Should the infobox give the full name of countries (e.g. Kingdom of Romania, Independent State of Croatia) or short forms (Romania, Croatia)? Srnec (talk) 12:07, 26 May 2020 (UTC) |
Talk:Lists of state leaders by age
Should Mohammed bin Salman be added in the youngest leader lists as well as the comment: "De facto leaders are listed in italics and are not given a numbered rank"? Wykx (talk) 12:45, 24 May 2020 (UTC) |
Insight from uninvolved editors would be appreacited in the Macuto Bay raid article. Should the Analysis section be kept or removed?
|
Should the article include a sentence about how the FBI agents who interviewed Flynn said they did not spot any physical signs of deception in Flynn's tone and body language?[1] Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:42, 22 May 2020 (UTC) |
Talk:2014 Syrian presidential election
Should the lead include a sentence saying that a delegation led by officials from the authoritarian states of Iran, Russia and Venezuela concluded that the election was free and fair? (note that there's a scholarly consensus that the election was not free and fair) Snooganssnoogans (talk) 17:47, 21 May 2020 (UTC) |
Should we add a paragraph to the article that mentions: (i) that Laffer is advising the trump administration on dealing with the coronavirus, and (ii) the policies that Laffer has advocated for in dealing with the coronavirus pandemic? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:43, 21 May 2020 (UTC) |
BC "Before Christ" is a dating term with predominantly "Christian" connotations, while the article is strictly about another, entirely different religious interest, i.e. Islam. I suggest that the dating across not only this but all the Islamic articles are to be Hijri (Hj.) or Before Hijra (BH.) and then BCE/CE added in braces like; Umayyad Mosque was constructed circa 86-96 Hj. (705–715 CE).
I am aware that is going to be quite a tedious and time consuming task and may also be somewhat confusing for someone reading the article for the first time, but in the longer run it will add a new aspect to the relevant articles and content which will not only present a non-christian and neutral tone of the content but also add a the "academic touch" as well, as the BCE and CE have become more academically adopted. Please see following for a more detailed explanation; these sources can be found here (Anno_Domini#CE_and_BCE) as well
|
Talk:People's Mujahedin of Iran
Should the following content from The Intercept 2020 report be included in the "Designation as cult" section of the article?
Please say if you have suggestions for modifying the content to be included. --Mhhossein talk 07:12, 21 May 2020 (UTC) |
Since the start of May (when the article looked like this) through to 16 May (when it looked like this), substantial additions were made to the article and the structure was altered. Going forward, should the article retain these alterations or should they be reverted? Midnightblueowl (talk) 14:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC) |
Regarding the image in the infobox at Sydney: (a) What image should be displayed? |
Are citations unnecessary for foreign-language names of a topic on the English-language Wikipedia? Elizium23 (talk) 22:41, 19 May 2020 (UTC) |
Talk:Genocide of Serbs in the Independent State of Croatia
The lead section needs to be shortened (the Lead too long template). My suggestion is to remove the pre-World War II events. Do you agree? They are usually not directly related to genocide and occupy a large part of the section, as well as obviously, cause a lot of dispute and controversy among editors.--WEBDuB (talk) 17:41, 19 May 2020 (UTC) |
Talk:First Jordan Hydro-Electric Power House
Can this article include information from United States Chargé d'affaires Wells Stabler's report of May 7, 1949, published in the Foreign Relations of the United States (book series)? The book is cited for the line United States Chargé d'affaires Wells Stabler reported in a confidential despatch that when the Iraqi army arrived, the Israeli operators of the plant blew up some of the electricity generators (alternators) in the plant and the plant was subsequently looted by the Iraqi troops and for a longer quote. A discussion at WP:RSN is here. Onceinawhile (talk) 08:45, 18 May 2020 (UTC) |
Section: National bias of historians Do the sources used in the article support the claim that there is a national bias of historians (U.S., UK and Canadian) over which country won the War of 1812? TFD (talk) 12:22, 16 May 2020 (UTC) |
Please see the above section. This article has been tagged as lacking neutrality and requiring the attention of an expert. Additional view are sought on what the issues could be and what steps should be taken to rectify these issues so the tags can be removed. Norfolkbigfish (talk) 17:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC) |
This is a case from the DRN in which the filing editor did not participate. The case is located at Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Whitechapel_Murders. The following is a summation, thanks. Galendalia CVU Member \ Chat Me Up 23:36, 14 May 2020 (UTC) |
This dispute is originating from the DRN (Case Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Carlos_Gardel) which has been closed due to the opening case editor being non-responsive. There is a controversy on the date and place of birth. Thanks! Galendalia CVU Member \ Chat Me Up 23:15, 14 May 2020 (UTC) |
To what extent should the article mention that the 1684 Treaty of Tingmosgang might no longer exist? 22:17, 13 May 2020 (UTC) |
Talk:Jordanian annexation of the West Bank
Should the section titled "Jordanian occupation" be changed to "Jordanian rule"? Selfstudier (talk) 13:50, 13 May 2020 (UTC) |
Should the lead note that Black wrote a "flattering biography of Donald Trump" and that he was pardoned by President Trump? Currently, the lead says Black was pardoned but it doesn't say by whom, and it doesn't include the context that Black had just prior to the pardon released a hagiography of Trump. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 12:55, 13 May 2020 (UTC) |
Question: In a 2008 book, Richard Spence argued that Crowley worked for British intelligence from the 1890s on and that this was the reason behind several of his foreign travels. This claim was further promoted in a 2011 biography by Tobias Churton. It remains unproven. How should we best present this argument to the reader?
|
The lead image of this article was deleted on 13 April, and new ones were inserted on 22 April and 7 May. Since then, an edit-war has broken out regarding the image size, which include accusations of pro-Nazism. What size should the lead image be? DrKay (talk) 19:24, 12 May 2020 (UTC) |
Talk:Indo-Pakistani Air War of 1965
Should this article be mentioning Pakistan's edge and victory in the aerial warfare owing to the already added sources in the article and new sources in above section? USaamo (t@lk) 11:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC) |
Would the present article benefit from adopting list-defined references, to look like this? (See above section for earlier consensus-seeking discussion.) Thank you. Patrick. ツ Pdebee.(talk)(become old-fashioned!) 16:41, 10 May 2020 (UTC) |
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referendums
In all elections contested by more than one candidate, should we include at least two candidates in an infobox (ie the winner, and the second place finisher)?
A - Yes. By way of background, this issue was discussed in an RfC on this page in 2017. The result of that RfC was There was strong consensus for A, "If only one candidate meets the threshold, then the second-place contender should be included. Since that RfC there has been discussion of this point at Talk:2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries and Talk:2020 Republican Party presidential primaries. At least one editor there has suggested we may wish to deviate from the consensus reached in the 2017 RfC. If we are going to do so, we may also need to set a threshold for the inclusion of second place candidates if that threshold should be less than 5% but greater than some other number.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 18:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC) |