Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
InedibleHulk (talk | contribs)
→‎USS Eisenhower height: The first rule of boating is stay on the boat. The second rule is don't call it a boat.
Line 192: Line 192:
:::::::I wonder if pilot survival has anything to do with why it isn't lower. [[User:Sagittarian Milky Way|Sagittarian Milky Way]] ([[User talk:Sagittarian Milky Way|talk]]) 09:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
:::::::I wonder if pilot survival has anything to do with why it isn't lower. [[User:Sagittarian Milky Way|Sagittarian Milky Way]] ([[User talk:Sagittarian Milky Way|talk]]) 09:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
::::::::Not sure, but [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVQP6h7psXM this] doesn't seem very safe, and that's 64 feet. Seems every inch the sea stays away is a good inch for airmen. Waves aside, it's extra split-seconds to either correct a poor takeoff or eject a terrible one. Simply falling off gets a bit deadlier, though. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] [[User_Talk:InedibleHulk|(talk)]] 10:12, [[July 15]], [[2016]] (UTC)
::::::::Not sure, but [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVQP6h7psXM this] doesn't seem very safe, and that's 64 feet. Seems every inch the sea stays away is a good inch for airmen. Waves aside, it's extra split-seconds to either correct a poor takeoff or eject a terrible one. Simply falling off gets a bit deadlier, though. [[User:InedibleHulk|InedibleHulk]] [[User_Talk:InedibleHulk|(talk)]] 10:12, [[July 15]], [[2016]] (UTC)

=== Runny nose ===

Why is my nose always runny and stuffed up in the morning when I wake up, but fine for the rest of the day?--[[User:WaltCip|WaltCip]] ([[User talk:WaltCip|talk]]) 13:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:38, 15 July 2016


Welcome to the miscellaneous section
of the Wikipedia reference desk.
Select a section:
Want a faster answer?

Main page: Help searching Wikipedia

   

How can I get my question answered?

  • Select the section of the desk that best fits the general topic of your question (see the navigation column to the right).
  • Post your question to only one section, providing a short header that gives the topic of your question.
  • Type '~~~~' (that is, four tilde characters) at the end – this signs and dates your contribution so we know who wrote what and when.
  • Don't post personal contact information – it will be removed. Any answers will be provided here.
  • Please be as specific as possible, and include all relevant context – the usefulness of answers may depend on the context.
  • Note:
    • We don't answer (and may remove) questions that require medical diagnosis or legal advice.
    • We don't answer requests for opinions, predictions or debate.
    • We don't do your homework for you, though we'll help you past the stuck point.
    • We don't conduct original research or provide a free source of ideas, but we'll help you find information you need.



How do I answer a question?

Main page: Wikipedia:Reference desk/Guidelines

  • The best answers address the question directly, and back up facts with wikilinks and links to sources. Do not edit others' comments and do not give any medical or legal advice.
See also:


July 10

sleeping on trains

Where can I learn about train travel in Europe in sleeper cars. I am especially interested in longer, multi-night travel ThomBombadil (talk) 00:37, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Moving from sci RD. Llaanngg (talk) 01:19, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to start at Sleeping_car#Europe.--Shantavira|feed me 06:50, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See also raileurope.com, www.eurail.com and www.seat61.com. Alansplodge (talk) 09:15, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, one point I'll add: there are not many multi-night sleeper trains in Europe, just because Europe a) is relatively compact, b) has fast trains and c) has several incompatible track gauges, so there aren't many non-stop routes that take more than a day or so (the longest I know of is the EuroNight 17/18 from Moscow to Nice, which takes two nights). If you want a long journey, you've got three options: go for a dedicated railtour service like the Venice-Simplon Orient Express, travel on several different trains (say, get a night train from Paris to Barcelona, then a different night train from Barcelona to Lisbon), or take one of the Moscow-France trains. Of course, from Moscow you can then catch the Trans-Siberian - now that's a long distance train journey. Smurrayinchester 09:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Why is there no Moscow to Paris train? Now Gibraltar or Lisbon to Malmo would be a long trip by European standards (if it exists and there's no rail crossing from Denmark). Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 05:23, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is a Paris-Moscow train (EuroNight 452), but it's not as long (since it just has cut across Germany rather than weaving around the Alps). For the most part, it's not possible to go from Lisbon (or anywhere in Iberia) to France or beyond, because Spain and Portugal use wider tracks than the rest of Europe (there was a sleeper train - the Sud Express, but they had to lift the carriages up and change their bogies at the border, which was a pain. Now, you have to change trains somewhere along the way (either Barcelona or Irun, most likely). There is incidentally a direct rail crossing to Malmö: the Oresund Bridge. Smurrayinchester 07:54, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That seems to me an outstandingly helpful reply. I'd come across that website years ago and forgotten all about it. Thincat (talk) 13:23, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kindle books

Why is it sometimes kindle books only come in e-readers and not as novels? 50.68.118.24 (talk) 04:38, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fairly confused by what you mean. If you want to know why some books are only available in digital format and not available as printed copies, this will generally be because of the rights owner or publisher. For books that are either self-published or published by either a vanity or "indie" publisher; while various print on demand and low volume printing systems enable authors and small time publishers to make printed copies of their books available at a fairly low cost, there may still be some upfront cost. Even if there isn't, authors or publishers may still prefer to only publish digital versions for various reasons such as money earned per copy sold, simplicity, perception of print on demand or other low volume publishing etc. In cases where more traditional publishers are involved, they may have quite significant minimum copies they will print, and may only do so if they think there is sufficient demand. But again, this doesn't apply to digital copies so they will have lower requirements before releasing it (presuming they either have or can get the permission of the copyright holder). Nil Einne (talk) 05:03, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

writing a book

I have an idea for a book or television series ,problem ,I have never written a book before and do not know were to start if I give the idea to a ghost writer do I still retain the rights, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.236.229.251 (talk) 10:34, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How the rights (and potential profits) would be shared if you use a ghost-writer would depend entirely on the terms of the contract you enter into with them. You might be able to pay them a lot of money to do the work, then keep all of the rights - just make sure what you negotiate is clear and watertight. Wymspen (talk) 10:48, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Our article at ghostwriter has some information. Work for hire is also appropriate, particularly in the US. Matt Deres (talk) 15:45, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You can not be said to have started on a professional writing career until after you begin exposing your ideas and drafts to critical views. For example, a critical reader may tell you that your own posting contains multiple errors of punctuation and spelling. Scripts for TV series invariably go through many rewrites before transmission and literary "ideas" are seldom marketable until they have been incorporated in a significant work of original composition. AllBestFaith (talk) 16:07, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[EC] It's a common misconception of people who aren't writers that the ideas are the most important component and the skills, craft and application needed to turn them into a finished work are lesser matters that can be delegated to a hireling.
[Disclosure: I'm a former professional non-fiction editor (which itself entails some writing), and have actively studied the craft of fiction writing.]
In reality, for any competent writer ideas are easy to come by – it's the ability to turn them into publishable quality prose (or script) that is difficult to master.
Writing for hire does occur, but it's usually done for people who are prominent for some other reason: ghosting an athlete's "auto"biography, for example, or turning a film producer's scenario into a full script. It's also not cheap: the professional writer has to make a living, which means earning the equivalent of a reasonable hourly rate, which most people with just an idea are unlikely to be able to afford to pay. The proposition of splitting the assumed future earnings of such a collaboration are a much poorer bet than working on something of their own more likely to sell, or writing something commissioned by a publisher. [I myself have worked on the publisher side of such arrangements.]
There are also a good many scam artists around, who will promise much and take money in advance, but may not actually try (or be able) to produce a truly professional-level result. The OP (though not themselves a writer) might benefit from investigating sites such as Writer Beware (scroll down to "Advocacy and support") that warn of such practices and practitioners. {The poster formerly known as 87.81.230.195} 2.123.26.60 (talk) 23:41, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The OP might like to peruse some issues of Writer's Digest or the annual Writer's Market, both of which provide much information about the ins and outs of writing and publishing. Textorus (talk) 03:37, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Castile's car

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Miscellaneous&action=submit# Shooting of Philando Castile. If Castile was driving, then Diamond Reynolds's video, which shows him in the right seat, must be reversed. Why?

Another possibility, of course, is that it's a right-drive car, but that's contradicted by this image (note the plate). —Tamfang (talk) 23:39, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It definitely looks like the video was showing a mirror image. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 01:38, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Various sources suggest it's either because it was shot using the front facing camera http://boards.4chan .org/pol/thread/80141302 [1] or with the rear facing camera option set in Facebook's settings [2] (I presume still shot with the front facing camera). I guess it could also be the rear facing camera with the front facing camera option set. Nil Einne (talk) 07:46, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
off-topic
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The question itself implies the images are of questionable provenance, the response was ironic. μηδείς (talk) 20:55, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Or that the OP is unfamiliar with the nuances of “phone” cameras. —Tamfang (talk) 08:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 12

Diabetic Prime Ministers

Is Theresa May the first Type-I diabetic to become Prime Minister of a G-7 nation? RomanSpa (talk) 22:10, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We always assume questioners' questions matter to them.-- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 05:47, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Does it matter?--86.187.170.21 (talk) 22:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It does to my Type-I diabetic nephew. RomanSpa (talk) 00:50, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Your selection seems extraordinarily specific. I assume the Chancellor of Germany is counted as the Prime Minister, but you're still excluding the President of the US and any US leader. And for France, you're including the Prime Minister of France but not the President of France. In addition, it's not clear whether you want to include the G7 countries during the time they were G7+1 or G8 or before they were G7. This source [3] does claim that she's the first world leader, but I somewhat doubt they'be actually looked into every world leader for the past 50-100 years. (Of course if you go back far enough, it will not be clear if it was type 1 or 2. 2 may be more likely but Theresa May herself perhaps illustrates the risk of assuming which one by factors such as age rather than a proper diagnosis.) Nil Einne (talk) 05:51, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I selected the G-7 because it restricted the search area to a manageable size, and because I did not want to precipitate one of the Reference Desk's discussions on "what would constitute a 'major' country". If you wish to include non-Prime Ministerial heads of government, that would be helpful. RomanSpa (talk) 00:53, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this list. As you said, many of these appear to be Type-2, but (although not a Prime Minister) it was interesting to read that Sonia Sotomayor is the first Type-1 Supreme Court Justice. RomanSpa (talk) 01:01, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
According to diabetes.org.uk, diabetes.co.uk and jdrf.org.uk she is the first world leader with type 1 and not just a G7 PM. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, this is exactly what I wanted to know. In case you're interested, my nephew now has a picture of Theresa May pinned to his bedroom wall! Thank you for your help with this. RomanSpa (talk) 10:39, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 13

Louis Farrakahn

not a forum--please take concerns about articles to their talk pages
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Why is it that a society of veterans, fire fighters, and policeman known as the Oathkeepers are labeled I. Your website as an extremist group? Yet Louis Farrakahn is labeled simply as a religious leader of NOI? Really? While he promotes and preaches the murder od white men and their families. This website is a disgrace. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.8.106.74 (talk) 04:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You should discuss problems you have with articles on article talk pages. However wikipedia does not label Oath Keepers as an extremist group, at least not in the article itself, so perhaps you need to take another read. Alternatively if you have problems with some other "website" you should take it up with them, since there's nothing we can do to help you with other websites. Edit: If the problem is with another article and not Oath Keepers, I'm not going to check every single article mentioning the organisation, and this is why it's helpful to use article talk pages. Sometimes you may need to take the issue somewhere else appropriate (not here), in which case you do need to mention what article, just as you always need to specify what you're complaining about when it's unclear in any other aspect of life. Our article does say the ADL and SPLC have labelled various elements of the Oath Keepers as extremist which is a different thing entirely. I assume this is a factual description, and the ADL and SPLC are organisations who's tracking of such things is generally considered significant; so will resonably be included in an encyclopaedia such as wikipedia. The Nation of Islam article likewise says it has been called as "black supremacist and antisemitic" and "a hate group" by named others. Louis Farrakhan is a WP:BLP and the standards are stricter, still our article does say he has been described as "antisemitic and a proponent of an anti-white theology" by named others. Note that many sources are not going to consider the members of a group particularly relevant into how they are describedas to whether to call a group extremist/hategroup/whatever, rather go simply by their ideology edit: and especially actions, and rightly so. In fact an extremist group of the people you've described is frankly much more scary then one of random people. (Especially in a country with more gun control, which admittedly isn't the US.) So I'm not sure how "society of veterans, fire fighters, and policeman" is supposed to reassure anyonerelevant. Nil Einne (talk) 05:23, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Farrakahn once described Judaism as "a dirty religion". ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 06:02, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Right, probably one of the reasons various groups have labelled him anti-semitic which our article mentions. Nil Einne (talk) 08:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
To be fair, while our article only mentions extremism in quotes from the ADL and SPLC, the lede sentence currently does call it "an American radical organization", with "radical" referenced by this SLPC article, without the term used elsewhere in our article. It could be argued that, lacking supporting references to mainstream media, this violates WP:NPOV, Of course, the place to make this argument would be in the article's talk page or edit history. -- ToE 14:33, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help

referred to WP:BLP/N
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Hello - my name is Alan Major. I have a current wiki page and wanted to know how to eliminate pictures and images. Thank you for your assistance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.183.98 (talk) 10:53, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You will probably have better luck asking this sort of question over at the Wikipedia Help Desk. —Steve Summit (talk) 11:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The Help Desk is fine, although in this particular case I'd recommend you try WP:BLP/N. However presuming you mean Alan Major, the answer may be that you can't as it sounds like you were in a job where public appearance were common, so photos to be expected and the photo itself doesn't seem to have been a significant privacy violation. Nil Einne (talk) 14:38, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have mentioned this here Wikipedia:Biographies of living_persons/Noticeboard#Alan Major Nil Einne (talk) 14:41, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see any indication of a connection between the coach and the IP's location in Kansas. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 17:11, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I probably shouldn't bother, given that this question is hatted and the remark is off-topic anyway, but just for @Baseball Bugs:' edification (or anyone else's who doesn't know), when an IP address geolocates to the United States, but not to any more specific location than that, the geolocate page puts it in Kansas, which is the geographic center of the Lower 48. --Trovatore (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Our article also suggests the coach took medical leave in January last year and as per one of the sources used, permanently left the NC team in March of last year. Even ignoring geolocation issues, I don't see how we know where the coach is or what they're doing in July 2016. Although as with many here I'm sure, I hope they're doing well. (If someone does find something, unless it's well sourced please don't add it to the article.) Nil Einne (talk) 23:03, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wine questions

First, I have been told that the colour of wine is not a product of the colour of the grapes used, but the presence or absence of the skins (skins lead to red wine). Is this quite correct?

Second, I generally prefer New World wines, but particularly enjoy sparkling wines, such as Champagne, Prosecco and Cava, which are Old World wines. Are New World equivalents (equivalent in the sense of being sparkling) available in the UK, and what are they called?--Leon (talk) 17:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1) No, that's not entirely correct. If you use white grapes, which actually look green, but their juice is clear, you won't get a red wine. But, the color is indeed in the skin, so you will need to include the skins from black or red grapes to get red wine.
2) "Sparkling wine" is the general term for that type of wine that avoids any legal consequences of calling it Champagne, which, understandably, those in the Champagne region of France think should be only used for their sparkling wines. StuRat (talk) 19:07, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but do we get sparkling New World wines in the UK, and what are their names? I would like to try some.--Leon (talk) 19:30, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I googled '"new world" sparkling wine site:.uk' and found lots of ads. However I also found this and, rather less relevant, this. Thincat (talk) 20:08, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I like this wine https://www.wolfblass.com/en-gb/wines/sparkling-brut/pinot-noir-chardonnay and it's easily obtained in supermarkets and wine shops. --TrogWoolley (talk) 11:35, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It has been shown that experts can fail to identify the origins of various wines (they are all made grapes from species, Vitis vinefera grapes). For real New World wines, look for wines made from New World species of grapes which have distinctly different tastes (mostly Vitis labrusca but also Vitis rotundifolia and others). These are less commonly available. Rmhermen (talk) 21:34, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DICE

В надежде увидеть в проекте DICE историчность. А так-же не допустить несправедливого передела ролей стран Антанты и Тройственного Союза на фронтах ПМВ. Российская Империя, а позже Республика Россия вместе с Францией являлись главенствующими державами в данном конфликте, наравне с Британской империей, Автро-Венгрией, Германией, Италией и Турцией. Я считаю крайним проявлением варварства и кощунства обходить одну сторону конфликта в угоду другой. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.42.208.137 (talk) 18:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If Google Translate is to be trusted, this posting is about the Entente Cordiale and the Triple Alliance (1882), but it doesn't appear to contain a question. If there is a question here, please can you ask it in English? A machine translation will probably be enough for us to work with. Tevildo (talk) 20:40, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Or maybe ask it at the Reference Desk in the appropriate language, if one exists. Our ref desk front page has links to other languages. --71.110.8.102 (talk) 22:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I translate thus: "I wish to see the historical concept used on Russian TV-Tsentr television (which should not allow) unfair revision of the roles of the Entente countries and the Triple Alliance on the PRC fronts. The Russian Empire and later the Republic of Russia, together with France were the main powers in this conflict, along with the British Empire, CPS(?), Austro-Hungary, Germany, Italy and Turkey. I believe the extreme manifestation of the conflict's barbarism is biased one-sidedly in favor of one side." AllBestFaith (talk) 23:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bedroll

I visited a few days ago after being directed here from somewhere else (don't ask me where, at this point), and discovered a page about Old West bedrolls. I wanted to improve upon it because the West is my major area of expertise. Now all I can find is a redirect page that takes me to "sleeping bag," which is not the same thing. What became of the entry? I distinctly remember it; it even had a picture. If it's gone, how can I create one myself?

I suppose you have some way of knowing who I am, but if you don't, I'm chrijeff.

Chrijeff (talk) 20:05, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bedroll has been a redirect to sleeping bag since August 2007 — see the history. So it's hard to guess what you found.
Definitely you can change the redirect to a standalone article if you like. There's always the possibility that others won't agree and will merge it back into the sleeping bag article, but you can do it.
For an article, even a very short one, you should have at least one reliable source backing up whatever claims you make. That might not be enough to save it from getting merged, if others don't agree that the topic has independent notability. --Trovatore (talk) 20:12, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We have an article Cowboy Bedroll with a picture. Could that be what you were looking at? Thincat (talk) 22:00, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I took the liberty of adding Cowboy bedroll to 'See also' section of Sleeping bag. Should Bedroll redirect to Cowboy bedroll instead of Sleeping bag (my vote is "yes")? --2606:A000:4C0C:E200:3994:3C44:6154:DBD2 (talk) 02:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I changed redirect (as above). 02:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:4C0C:E200:3994:3C44:6154:DBD2 (talk)

July 14

What fruit is this?

I'm from India and I've never seen this fruit before. I found this in my office in Poland and picked it up thinking it's an apple. But it had fuzzy skin and a hard stone inside (you can see it in the bottom corner of the photo here https://s31.postimg.org/hjlqnfjd7/20160714_073058_1.jpg). It was kept in a basket along with bananas in the kitchen. Can anybody identify the fruit? It got soft and mushy when I started cutting into it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.254.226.113 (talk) 05:42, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A peach. ---Sluzzelin talk 05:55, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just looking at the picture, I would have said a nectarine (on the basis of the dark skin colour) - though fuzzy skin would suggest a peach. Wymspen (talk) 08:23, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality of life

Where can I find evidence that the quality of life of an average person in soviet russia was worse the US, at its peak. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.207.186.185 (talk) 18:29, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm reminded of something Will Rogers said: "In Russia, they ain't got no income tax. But they ain't got no income!" ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 18:32, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm reminded of something German comedian (yes, that's a thing) Volker Pispers said – roughly translated: "We all remember those terrible images of homeless people with no teeth. Oh, I'm sorry, that was the US. In the GDR, people had no bananas." Rgds  hugarheimur 19:11, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So, has BB ever lived in, or even visited, Russia?--86.187.174.181 (talk) 23:28, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Soviet Union and some subarticles has some information. It was a violent authoritarian spartan country where most would be better off American but there must be a minority of Americans who would've been better off there. Might be better to be born in Moscow than Compton. Maybe. In Soviet Russia, life qualities YOU! Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 01:32, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I gather that life in Russia is not so bad as it was in the USSR. For example, people can actually leave voluntarily. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 07:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You're going to need to decide how to measure quality of life. A very crude method is to take GDP per capita; this places the USA way ahead of the Soviet Union throughout its history. The Human Development Index is popular, but unfortunately didn't cover the Soviet Union. This paper attempts to do so; you can judge how reliable you think it is; they place the Soviet Union fairly high in 1950, but the USA right near the top. It's also worth noting that the USA was similarly ahead of Russia, before the Soviet Union emerged. But there are lots of criticisms of the HDI; the things which you consider contribute to your quality of life may not be easily measured, and might even depend on where you grow up. Warofdreams talk 02:07, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Due to the completely different economical and political systems between the nations, it will be hard to directly compare, with any statistic. Also, your question is not stated correctly, you are seeking evidence to support your position, rather than asking for the facts. I would say you are on the whole probably right, but it's still the wrong way to ask the question if you are trying to approach this in a scientific and objective manner. Fgf10 (talk) 07:35, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
We have an article on Happiness economics, in which you can find links to some indices used to measure quality of life. Sjö (talk) 08:55, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have a question about dyeing my hair

If I do a high lift on my hair colour it dark blond; is there a way I can add pink and blue streaks in it and have it last for six months? My hair is naturally brown. 50.68.118.24 (talk) 22:33, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nobody here can answer your question because the coloring of a person's hair depends on its texture, tenacity, and porosity; also on the particular coloring agent(s) used. You need to have an experienced hair colorist examine your hair and advise what can be done with it. But even with the best color job in the world - your hair still grows about 1/2 inch a month, so in 6 months, you'll have 3 inches of your natural hair color showing from the roots out. Which makes the idea of a dye job that lasts for six months rather pointless. All artificially colored hair has to be renewed every few weeks to look consistent. Textorus (talk) 23:13, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


July 15

USS Eisenhower height

How far is the deck of the USS Dwight D. Eisenhower from the water (assuming there are no waves)? InedibleHulk (talk) 01:35, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

I can't easily find it but this measurement is called freeboard. (height (the scraping suspension bridges kind) has a cool name called "air draft"). Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 02:36, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Not knowing the nautical terms made it trickier for me. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:16, July 15, 2016 (UTC)
You do realize this depends on how it's laden? μηδείς (talk) 02:39, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Design waterline. Oh, and of course. Also water temperature and salinity. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 02:53, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Let's just say everything's average. Mediterranean Sea average, anyway. And it's just sitting there. InedibleHulk (talk) 04:16, July 15, 2016 (UTC)
Why the Mediterranean? Contemplating a US-ISIS war? Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 04:34, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's just where it is lately. The war's past the contemplation part. My wonder comes from watching a video of a plane snapping the catchwire upon landing and falling off. It flew back up again, but there were a couple of tense seconds. InedibleHulk (talk) 06:49, July 15, 2016 (UTC)
@μηδείς: the load of those war-machines like an aircraft carrier it seems has to be optimized, notably, their propulsion does not affect their charge. Not so with the aircrafts themselves however, I once tried a fighter-bomber flight simulator and repeatedly crashed at take-off because of the load of the machine. --Askedonty (talk) 05:29, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Using a very old-fashioned way of working it out (a photo and a ruler) it is around 30 metres from deck level to the water line. Wymspen (talk) 08:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think I own a ruler, but pinching a presumably six-foot-tall man for reference, I can scoot down about 15 units. That's close enough to verified for me. Thanks! InedibleHulk (talk) 09:08, July 15, 2016 (UTC)
I wonder if pilot survival has anything to do with why it isn't lower. Sagittarian Milky Way (talk) 09:11, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure, but this doesn't seem very safe, and that's 64 feet. Seems every inch the sea stays away is a good inch for airmen. Waves aside, it's extra split-seconds to either correct a poor takeoff or eject a terrible one. Simply falling off gets a bit deadlier, though. InedibleHulk (talk) 10:12, July 15, 2016 (UTC)

Runny nose

Why is my nose always runny and stuffed up in the morning when I wake up, but fine for the rest of the day?--WaltCip (talk) 13:38, 15 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply