The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:WATCHMAN15/Mark Lloyd Article

Delete content fork of Mark Lloyd created during a minor skirmish around controversial content. Pichpich (talk) 23:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Now 18 months old. --Kleinzach 03:11, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, abandoned. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:UP#COPIES states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion.

  Because this page violates WP:UP#COPIES and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 07:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Powertrio/Greg tanoose

Delete Stale draft with promotional tone. Twice speedy deleted as non-notable. Pichpich (talk) 23:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above, non-notable, WP:STALEDRAFT. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:19, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion.

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 07:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:12, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Whowantstobeamillionaire/Sandbox

Delete Unused copy of an old revision of Now That's What I Call Music! 30 (U.S. series). Pichpich (talk) 23:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above, abandoned userspace draft. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:19, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion.

Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 07:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:11, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Whowantstobeamillionaire/directtv

Delete abandoned copy of Donovan Patton created while vandalizing that same page. Pichpich (talk) 23:06, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above, abandoned userspace draft. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:19, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion.

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 07:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:10, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jakewayd

Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE with misleading infobox and a small history of vandalism. Pichpich (talk) 22:59, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:19, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion.

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 07:02, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete both.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Chase Fonteno

User:Dallasceo

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:MyraSendak/Luke

Delete Once deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Heron. Userfied two years ago and hasn't been touched since. Pichpich (talk) 22:32, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion.

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 07:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 02:15, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alexej66/Giovanni Mascellaro

Delete Previously deleted through Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giovanni Mascellaro. Author has basically no other contributions and has been reinserting content categories to this draft/fake article. Pichpich (talk) 18:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I cannot see a problem apart from the categories. So lets just remove them and let the draft stay. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:39, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It still falls under WP:FAKEARTICLE and hasn't been edited in a year (save the reinsertion of categories) It's also a clear conflict of interest and pretty darn close to spam. The user's sole other contribution is this revealing edit. The same article was also deleted as spam on it.wiki. I'm all for giving users the benefit of the doubt but this is not in the acceptable range. Pichpich (talk) 20:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion.

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 06:59, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with Pichpich (talk · contribs)'s comments above about this draft of a deleted article being spam. Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Alexej66/Giovanni Mascellaro reveals 3 links to this page: User talk:Alexej66, Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alexej66/Giovanni Mascellaro. These 3 links were generated after Pichpich (talk · contribs)'s MfD nomination on 18:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC). Yet, this page was viewed 76 times in February 2011 and 77 times in March 2011. Prior to the MfD nomination, the page had been last edited on 10:03, 11 October 2010 (UTC) by Alexej66 (talk · contribs). Because the pageviews could not have come from recent changes patrol and because the pageviews could not have come through Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Alexej66/Giovanni Mascellaro which was empty prior to the nomination, it is likely that this userpage draft is linked to from an off-wiki website. This abuse of Wikipedia should not be tolerated. Delete per WP:NOTADVERTISING. Cunard (talk) 06:59, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 02:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alefehad/Danny Waxman

Delete Abandoned draft for BLP of (at best) questionable notability. Pichpich (talk) 18:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- per nom. --E♴(talk) 23:44, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, abandoned userspace draft of a person whose notability I doubt. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:27, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 02:12, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Albertinaillen/sandbox

Delete unused (and basically never used) copy of Eenhana. Pichpich (talk) 18:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- it is just an old copy of Eenhana. --E♴(talk) 23:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, abandoned copy of another article. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deleted as a hoax. --RL0919 (talk) 15:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:GZizzone

Per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Sisson Independent Party was speedily deleted three times per G3 as a hoax; the page creator has now recreated the same article on his userpage. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 14:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The article is largely a copy of Conservative Party (UK), with the name of this fake party replacing the Conservative Party name. Not sure what the user is trying to accomplish with this, but it seems best to nip it in the bud. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:02, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- per above. --E♴(talk) 23:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- per above. --Kleinzach 03:18, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete From the userpage: ... SIP MP's hold a varying record ... => Hoax. Per WP:FAKEARTICLE. --Ben Ben (talk) 09:34, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I would think the party contains no more than its founders - if even that. No MPs, as Ben Ben points out. Hoax. Too persistent for test. Salted in mainspace. Peridon (talk) 18:36, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per above. Unnecessary WP:FAKEARTICLE. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Has re-appeared in mainspace as The sisson independent party. I've salted that version. Peridon (talk) 00:32, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 02:10, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Holsmi

Delete abandoned resume. User has no other contributions. Pichpich (talk) 13:15, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Wikipedia is not a webhost for peoples resumes. duffbeerforme (talk) 13:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- WP:NOTWEBHOST. --E♴(talk) 13:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, abandoned page, and as per above, WP:NOTWEBHOST. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 17:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 02:09, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Article Incubator/R. H. Sankhala

This was an article which was deleted on 3 November 2011, as a result of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. H. Sankhala. It was then incubated following comments on the talk page of the deleting administrator. The incubated article has not had any significant edits since incubation. This diff shows the full extent of changes from the version that was deleted to now. The last edit to the page was for its incubator status to be changed from "eval" to "start" because it did not pass its eval review. (That edit was on 15 November 2010.) It is clear that this is not on its way to becoming a usable article. Incubation is a temporary measure to enable an article to be worked on, not a long term way of keeping an article which consensus has decided should be deleted. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:59, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment The objecting editor may not be able to edit the page after he was blocked following a sockpuppetry investigation; Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dashing boy31/Archive. My opinions about the subject, however, are unchanged. delete Catfish Jim & the soapdish 12:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment All the more reason to delete it, if the only person who ever wanted it has been indefinitely blocked, so that there is no question of their ever being able to edit it. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:42, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. The incubator is not for indefinite storage of deleted content. MER-C 01:56, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Little hope of anybody reviving this. In any case, no real sign that the subject is notable and the current draft is not good enough to be of much use to anyone. Pichpich (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 02:07, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mimimovie/Paul J. Alessi

Abandoned copy of article Paul J. Alessi deleted at afd (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul J. Alessi (3rd nomination), endorsed at drv Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2010 September 13). Previous version deleted at afd (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul J. Alessi (2nd nomination)). WP:FAKEARTICLE. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. Little or no improvment since the AfD. --E♴(talk) 13:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 02:06, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Maurice Strong

Delete as stale draft and BLP of questionable notability anyways. Pichpich (talk) 02:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Kleinzach 09:16, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non-notable, abandoned userspace draft. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 02:05, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Wharfboy/Sandbox

Delete Abandoned draft for BLP of questionable notability. Pichpich (talk) 02:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Kleinzach 01:16, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, abandoned userspace draft, seems non-notable. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:28, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G7.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 13:21, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Mary G. Enig/Proposed changes

Was used to propose changes to a locked article for consensus building. The article is now unlocked so the page is redundant Colincbn (talk) 01:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as nom. Colincbn (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - Why is there such a pressing need to remove the history of these proposed changes? Shouldn't they be kept so that future editors to the article can check them out? Graham87 01:47, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. However I think I was the only one who ended up using it (other than one editor who took it off the search engine lists and added the workspace tag). When the page was unlocked I made my proposed changes and they have so far stuck. I don't really mind if the page stays, it just seems that as it no longer has any use we might as well trash it. Colincbn (talk) 02:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- per nom's explanation. --E♴(talk) 13:53, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• History merge as a rule for this sort of thing, but with Colincbn (talk · contribs) as the only substantive author of the subpage, he may tag it for speedy deletion per CSD#G7. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:17, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If I was to tag for a speedy delete, what would I need to do to this discussion page? Colincbn (talk) 01:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you just let us know that you have tagged it, that would be very good. Better to not try to close this MfD just in case the speedy is contested or refused. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I tagged it. Colincbn (talk) 02:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 19:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Zakmonix/Nutricate Corporation

Delete Abandoned draft that borders on spam. Pichpich (talk) 22:35, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. --E♴(talk) 00:27, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. --Kleinzach 00:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this abandoned WP:STALEDRAFT. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:29, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 19:37, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Arnoutf/sandbox/FG

Delete Unused content fork. Pichpich (talk) 22:31, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:UP#COPIES states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion.

Because this page violates WP:UP#COPIES and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 06:43, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was history merge.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 19:43, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Marsdan1953/Gary W. Kronk

Delete Stale draft. Appears to be completely independent of the later creation of Gary W. Kronk. Pichpich (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• History Merge Looking at page histories, it does indeed appear that they are completely independent. Reading the articles, however, there is no question that Gary W. Kronk is largely based on User:Marsdan1953/Gary W. Kronk. Thus, we need a history merge. (It is worth noting that they could both be independently based on a third source which would make them both copyvios, but I really doubt that). --E♴(talk) 00:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• History merge User:Marsdan1953/Gary W. Kronk and Gary W. Kronk per e2eamon (talk · contribs). A review of the contents of each article article strongly indicates that the article is based on the userspace draft. To satisfy the GFDL attribution requirements, the userspace draft should be history merged with the article. Cunard (talk) 06:41, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:17, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vj71985/Luda Mesropian

Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Autopromotional bio. Article was deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ludmila Mesropian. Pichpich (talk) 15:26, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. No change after AfD. --E♴(talk) 00:20, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, WP:STALEDRAFT, has been already deleted at AfD. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:16, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:BFTrick/Patrick Rauland

Delete abandoned autobio. Article was speedy deleted in 2009. Pichpich (talk) 15:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. Little or no improvement since it was speedied.--E♴(talk) 00:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT, per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:15, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Thormadsen/Thor Madsen

Delete Stale draft and likely autobiography. Notability seems a little thin anyway. Pichpich (talk) 15:21, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. --E♴(talk) 00:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:STALEDRAFT. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:36, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hyun Sung Kim

Delete Stale draft and likely autobiography. Subject does not seem notable in any case and user has no other contributions to the project. Pichpich (talk) 15:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. --E♴(talk) 00:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. --Kleinzach 09:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this WP:STALEDRAFT, the subject seems rather non-notable. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jsmahesh

Delete Wikipedia is not a resume service. User has no other contributions to the project. Pichpich (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- per nom. --E♴(talk) 00:13, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, WP:RESUME. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:14, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Duncan A. Borg Ellul

Delete Stale autobiography. User was blocked as a sockpuppet trying to insert this info into mainspace under various accounts. Pichpich (talk) 14:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. --E♴(talk) 00:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, WP:STALEDRAFT. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:NOTADVERTISING.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 02:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Agadabagada/The Turdpercy Gang

Per WP:NOTWEBHOST. No indication that this band will meet WP:BAND any time soon or that this article will survive in the main space. -- Mufka ^{(u) (t) (c)} 11:11, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe, but I think you have to let him try for a lot longer time than has been allowed. --Bduke (Discussion) 11:22, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. There isn't a chance that this band will become notable within the reasonable time period we allow for article development in userspace. WP:HAMMER, WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST all apply here. Thryduulf (talk) 12:29, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'm preparing this article for publication when the band are notable enough to qualify for a mainspace page. You must be allowed one subpage, surely? I've seen people prepare articles for publication through making subpages and waiting until the article matter is notable enough before. Agadabagada (talk) 13:15, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Blank, don't delete. The page is currently looking like a typical non-wikipedia-notable band without any independent references that is probably only posted here as promotion. However, as the author is new, active, and talking to us, give him more time, but tell him to keep the page blanked while he is not actually working on it. I have added {{NOINDEX}}. Agadabagada, there is no limit to the number of subpages, or time limits, but we are particularly sensitive about being used for promotion. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:09, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not trying to use Wikipedia as a promotion tool. I've been here before you know, as a user who made over 500 edits. I know how this thing works. Agadabagada (talk) 09:18, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should understand that we don't allow premature articles to exist in userspace indefinitely. It is likely going to be several years before this band are going to be notable enough for an article. Read the pages linked above, particularly Wikipedia:Notability (music)#Criteria for musicians and ensembles (also known by the shortcut WP:NBAND) to see what is required before they'll be considered notable enough. Thryduulf (talk) 10:49, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion. Short term hosting of potentially valid articles and other reasonable content under development or in active use is usually acceptable..."

  A band that "performed together for the very first time on Friday 8th April 2011" is highly unlikely to become notable within six months. This is not a "potentially valid articl[e]" as required by FAKEARTICLE. I strongly agree with Thryduulf (talk · contribs)'s incisive comments about how WP:NOTWEBHOST is applicable here. Delete also per WP:NOTADVERTISING. Cunard (talk) 06:36, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, this is Andrew Racklyeft, the rhythm guitarist of The Turdpercy Gang. Just like to say that we are a valid and real band. :) 94.2.184.89 (talk) 13:52, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tishiro

Wikipedia is not a social networking site. The creation of this page in 2007 represents the user's only edit. MER-C 10:38, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This page is social networking, pure and simple. Wikipedia is not MySpace. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 23:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- per nom. --E♴(talk) 00:11, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, doesn't really belong to Wikipedia. Seems like some social network profile. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:41, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:12, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Unused templates

Four member project started in My 2006 and declared inactive two months later. Project page has 31 sections of which half are empty. Only 1 message posted on talk page. In short, nothing worth keeping. (Subpage: Wikipedia:WikiProject Unused templates/Subst). --Kleinzach 09:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete never really got started, far too narrow in scope and redundant to WP:TFD. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:17, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- per above. --E♴(talk) 23:09, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, has been inactive for ages. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:40, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep and move to mainspace. --RL0919 (talk) 16:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Bolman Deal/Martyn Minns

Relisted. 01:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Stale draft for 4 years. See WP:FAKEARTICLE Magioladitis (talk) 07:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Unsure-- WP:STALEDRAFT applies, but I think he may be notable enough for mainspace.[1] --E♴(talk) 23:06, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to mainspace This looks like a viable article about a notable bishop, and it looks like it can be sourced. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 22:26, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to mainspace. The mainspace title Martyn Minns (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has a trivial history and no talk page. It redirects to Convocation of Anglicans in North America where the subject is prominently mentioned. Note the author's statement at User talk:Bolman Deal/Martyn Minns dated "13:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)". The references look OK. Further discussion belongs at AfD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:46, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• The default redirect created will serve as a pointer for User:Bolman Deal and the couple of significant incoming links. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:47, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Move to mainspace per A Stop at Willoughby. --BlueMoonlet (t/c) 14:54, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to mainspace and delete redirect. It is notable so it would not be speedy deleted by A7, it is also very good. It shouldn't stay in userspace, and User:Bolman Deal/Martyn Minns would be put in speedy deletion criterion R2 and when used 1 time, R3. ~~EBE123~~ ^talk_Contribs 22:02, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to mainspace and keep the redirect as there is no reason to remove a userspace-to-mainspace redirect. This will also make sure that anyone who goes looking for where it used to be will find it. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 18:16, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:08, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Gnarpsbaden

Delete stale draft and probably weird autobio. Pichpich (talk) 02:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- WP:STALEDRAFT and WP:FAKEARTICLE. User has made no edits aside from the three he made to this page in 2009. --E♴(talk) 23:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, WP:STALEDRAFT. Abandoned userspace draft, not really any other edits by the user. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:07, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:EdrevEpac/Pickup Podcast

Delete Abandoned draft. No real sign that the podcast is notable anyways and plenty of signs that the author has a serious COI. Pichpich (talk) 01:47, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- WP:STALEDRAFT certainly applies and notability is questionable at best. --E♴(talk) 22:58, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this abandoned WP:STALEDRAFT, doesn't really seem notable. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:44, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:06, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:EdrevEpac/Jordan Harbinger

Delete abandoned copy of BLP deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Harbinger. Pichpich (talk) 01:45, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. Little or no change since the AfD. --E♴(talk) 22:56, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, abandoned WP:STALEDRAFT, copy of a deleted BLP.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:05, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:EdrevEpac/Johnny Dzubak

Delete abandoned copy of BLP deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Dzubak. Pichpich (talk) 01:44, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. Little, if any, change since the AfD. --E♴(talk) 22:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:EdrevEpac/Joshua Pellicer

Delete Abandoned copy of BLP deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joshua Pellicer (2nd nomination). Pichpich (talk) 01:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. --E♴(talk) 23:07, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:ChrisFG3

Delete Stale draft of BLP for individual of questionable notability. Pichpich (talk) 01:35, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete--WP:STALEDRAFT. --E♴(talk) 03:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT, non-notable BLP. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:03, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:JhanCRUSH/Heath Herring

Delete unused (or should I say never used) copy of a by now oldish revision of Heath Herring. Pichpich (talk) 01:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:CONTENTFORK. --E♴(talk) 03:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, abandoned userspace draft. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:46, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Userfy to User:Trap The Drum Wonder/WP:Crytek. I'll be the poor admin for the sake of cleaning up the project, and hopefully this does not break any guidelines since I nominated it. However, I'm just going to copy-paste the content of the subpages to the main page, and attribute the content to the single user who created all of it, who also happens to be inactive. Let me know if there is anything wrong with this, and I'll fix it. MrKIA11 (talk) 02:18, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Crytek

Project has not had any activity for over a year, after having little activity to begin with, and under 3 different names. Only 1 of the 3 members is even still active. There are less than 10 pages that fall under the project's scope. There was never a single discussion on the talk page. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:36, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- per nom. --E♴(talk) 03:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- per nom. --Kleinzach 03:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video Games per MFD guidelines. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 15:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video Games. As the owner, it'll be sad to see it go, alas, I must agree it has been dormant for quite a while. As you quite rightly say, neither of the other two 'contributors' weren't fulfilling their role. Granted, I had no other interest than the page being there, posing much like a fan page of the soon-to-be TimeSplitters 4 creators. TDW ✉ 19:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per established process within WP:VG (see WP:VG/IPC). There is not a substantial page history here on either the main page or the talk page, which is one of the primary metrics which should be used (and which I use) to differentiate between deletion and redirection. Also, this is unlikely to serve as a good candidate for redirection because it is within the WP:VG "namespace". --Izno (talk) 19:43, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Izno is right. Why redirect Video games/Crytek to Video games? --Kleinzach 01:24, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Change page name. Well, if I'm allowed to do so, I'd just like to cut the embarrassment of deletion, and put the same page under a subpage. This would most likely be called, "User:Trap The Drum Wonder/WPCrytek" or something or other. Please don't welcome this comment with the same old cyber Draconian reply. TDW ✉ 20:23, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  I wouldn't object to that. Just the main page? --Izno (talk) 22:23, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  The 3 subpages are all so small that I think the content can just be merged directly onto the main page, and then they can be deleted. MrKIA11 (talk) 20:57, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Per MrKIA11 Userfy would be fine IMO. --Kleinzach 10:16, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Doing that would require a history merge, which I also have no objection to, but some poor admin has to spend some time to do so. --Izno (talk) 00:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Sometimes it's difficult to work towards a consensus and give admin an easy life. This may be one of them. --Kleinzach 08:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Merge and redirect is the easiest and most common solution. Redirects are cheap, certainly cheaper than admin time. History merging backwater trivial project space pages of no continuing interest is busywork. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 15:03, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Indeed, which is why I initially !voted to delete. There is no reason to redirect pages which are not likely search terms and which do not have significant contribution and collaboration. If there is admin who would like to take the time to histmerge the pages, then that's a fine result by me. Otherwise, we should move the main page and the main talk page to userspace (without redirects) and delete the other pages. --Izno (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:32, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Mrspencer2003/Sandbox

Delete abandoned (and awkward) biography of individual whose notability is at best questionable. Pichpich (talk) 23:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. --E♴(talk) 23:41, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Orduna

Delete Wikipedia is not a resume service. Inactive user. Pichpich (talk) 22:37, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- per nom. --E♴(talk) 22:50, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, WP:RESUME. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:47, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:34, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jennagruhala

Delete Wikipedia is not a resume service. Inactive user. Pichpich (talk) 22:34, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- per nom. User has no edits outside of this page. --E♴(talk) 22:49, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, WP:RESUME. No edits by the user elsewhere. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:48, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 01:52, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sclarkson/Sandbox

Relisted. 00:30, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete abandoned autobiography. Probably falls just short of WP:GNG anyways. Pichpich (talk) 18:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Not Sure-- The article looks like it could be moved to mainspace if the subject meets WP:JUDGE. (Sadly, my legal knowledge is such that I don't know if he does.) --E♴(talk) 20:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep has not been abandoned for too long, and could make an article in the future. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:56, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• A Google News Archive search returns merely passing mentions. According to the article, the subject is a lawyer. There is no mention of the subject's being a judge, so the failed notability proposal WP:JUDGE would not apply. Created in September 2007 and last edited in July 2010, this draft has been abandoned for 9 months. Because the subject is non-notable, the page should be deleted as it will not survive in mainspace. Cunard (talk) 18:12, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:30, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete While nine months of abandonment isn't terribly long, I'm nudged towards supporting deletion by the fact that this page has existed in userspace since 2007. That leads me to believe that this is a WP:FAKEARTICLE, intended to remain in userspace indefinitely. Moreover, I looked for sources to help establish the notability of the subject of this old draft, but to no avail. As best I can tell, Scott C. Clarkson fails WP:BIO; therefore, moving this to mainspace would be inappropriate. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 21:49, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per A Stop at Willoughby. --Kleinzach 02:59, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Cunard. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Britside

Delete stale copy of article since deleted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Stowell. Pichpich (talk) 18:42, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete--per nom. --E♴(talk) 20:00, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:STALEDRAFT, abandoned copy of a previously deleted article. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Noahpaulfardo/new article name here

Delete abandoned autobiography. Notability of subject is questionable in any case. Pichpich (talk) 16:08, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete--WP:STALEDRAFT. --E♴(talk) 19:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom, WP:STALEDRAFT. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:48, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:28, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Christopher Everard-Jurquet

Delete this and the similar User:Christopher Everard-Jurquet/Template:CHRISTOPHER EVERARD. Wikipedia is not a resume service. User's sole contribution to the project and last edited two years ago. Pichpich (talk) 15:29, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete--per nom. --E♴(talk) 19:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:26, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Vtpolitics/Dominic Etli

Delete Abandoned draft (mainspace article was deleted way back when). Pichpich (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete--WP:STALEDRAFT --E♴(talk) 19:56, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per WP:STALEDRAFT. Abandoned userspace draft. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:49, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and related guidelines. --RL0919 (talk) 00:12, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Prof.feldman

Is an autobiography. Jasper Deng (talk) 02:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Abandoned, autobiographical, unsourced BLP WP:FAKEARTICLE. MER-C 03:15, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep WP has no rules against writing about oneself in userspace as long as it is not excessive. 4K is not excessive. "Abandoned" means "no one has been here" - but edits as recently as yesterday belie that claim. Are personal c.v.s required to be sourced? Nope. Is there anything remotely "contentious" in it? Nope. Reasons for deletion? None. Collect (talk) 12:18, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not abandoned, but yes unsourced WP:FAKEARTICLE. Users who are contributing to the project are allowed to add some autobiographical information on their userpage. It helps establish COI's and allows users to get to know each other a little. If, however, a user's only edits are to write an autobiographical userpage, then it serves no purpose to the project, and WP:NOTWEBHOST comes into play. Also, the fact that the page has only been edited by an IP for the last year implies to me that the user forgot the password to his account. It doesn't look like he plans on using the account for anything other than hosting that userpage.--E♴(talk) 15:09, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Do you know of any rule that says "IPs are second class editors, who are presumed not to be capable of making any real articles"? Of any rule that says "Registered users who forget their password are forbidden to edit on Wikipedia"? I thought not. Page is not "abandoned" which removes that from the table utterly. Userspace is not requied to be "sourced" in any event. And absent the remotest belief that anything "contentious" is in it (which would be proper grounds for removal), I fail to see acual grounds for deletion. Collect (talk) 15:59, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Most of the content was written by the user, not the IP.Jasper Deng (talk) 17:30, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • The IP is welcome to edit whatever he likes. The editor, weather he lost his password or not, is welcome to edit. The point I was trying to make is that the particular account User:Prof.feldman hasn't edited in a long time, and may never edit again. With that in mind, does he need a detailed userpage? He doesn't seem to be working on collaborating with other editors or establishing COI's or anything else related to establishing an encyclopedia. I agree that the page does not qualify as abandoned. However, WP:NOTMYSPACE says:

"Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they may be used only to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account. The focus of user pages should not be social networking, or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration." (I added the bolding). --E♴(talk) 19:50, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged it for deletion per WP:Autobiographies. I feel little of the page content is relevant to Wikipedia.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:52, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per Collect, and, in fact, per nom. WP:USER says, "User pages mainly are for interpersonal discussion, notices, testing and drafts, and, if desired, limited autobiographical and personal content." Thus, being an autobiography is not a reason to delete a user page. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:02, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." User:Prof.feldman reads like an unwikified, unreferenced Wikipedia article. An unsourced BLP would be deleted in the mainspace. The same ought to apply to an unsourced userspace draft that has existed since 20:33, 2 July 2010 (UTC).[reply]
  
  WP:USERBIO prohibits, "Inappropriate or excessive personal information unrelated to Wikipedia." The userspace draft includes promotional content such as "he received the ORT award for his creative ideas". The entire page reads like a résumé, which is prohibited by WP:NOTADVERTISING. Because neither Prof.feldman (talk · contribs) nor the IP addresses 86.145.221.138 (talk · contribs), 86.145.18.162 (talk · contribs), 86.154.149.2 (talk · contribs), 86.151.127.52 (talk · contribs), and 86.151.123.235 (talk · contribs) have shown an interest in contributing to the encyclopedia, the leeway usually given to established editors should not be given to this single-purpose account.
  
  In February 2011, this page was viewed 61 times. In March 2011, this page was viewed 62 times. Special:WhatLinksHere/User:Prof.feldman includes the pages User:AlexNewArtBot/PhysicsSearchResult/archive11 and Wikipedia:WikiProject Spam/COIReports/2010, Jul 2. (The remaining three links are Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, User talk:Prof.feldman, and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Prof.feldman. These three links to User:Prof.feldman existed only after this MfD was initiated on 02:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC). As such, they could not have led viewers to this page in February or March 2011.)[reply]

  The likely explanation this page has been receiving so many views is that it is linked to off-site and is used to store Prof.feldman (talk · contribs)'s résumé. A patent violation of WP:NOTWEBHOST.
  
  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE, WP:NOTWEBHOST, and WP:NOTADVERTISING, because the userspace draft is tantamount to an unreferenced BLP, because this unreferenced BLP has had deficient sourcing since July 2010, because the page was created and maintained to circumvent the deletion of Professor raymond feldman, and because the page is linked to off-wiki as a storage of the user's résumé, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 00:14, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Wikipedia is not the place where you keep track of your career achievements. Frankly, I don't see how anyone could read Wikipedia:User pages and come to the conclusion that this page is fine. Pichpich (talk) 02:09, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per e2eamon, and Cunard, especially where he explains that it looks like the page is being hosted for external reference, and, Userpage content should be limited to be in proportion to the editors project contributions, which would mean noting the user's date of registration. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:18, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:34, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Serepax/PhannyDuong

Delete per WP:NOTLINKEDIN and WP:FAKEARTICLE. Pichpich (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. MER-C 03:14, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Userspace is not mainspace. Userspace does not require notability. Userspace is not required to be articles. Page is three months old. ELs now removed (which is the right way to handle this sort of thing). Collect (talk) 12:21, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- unsourced biographical WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:STALEDRAFT. WP:NOTWEBHOST. --E♴(talk) 15:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 18:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above, WP:FAKEARTICLE. Userspace is not for forever storing fake articles. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:33, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dsrobinette/daniel robinette

Delete Abandoned autobiography. Pichpich (talk) 20:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- unsourced biographical WP:STALEDRAFT. --E♴(talk) 15:02, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 18:02, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT, unsourced BLP. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:52, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:32, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Deathspeaker – moved to User:Deathspeaker/Galaxy Online II - Newbie Guide

Relisted as IP blanked page. — Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 19:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a game guide. WP:GAMEGUIDE E♴(talk) 23:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. --Kleinzach 00:37, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep because it's a user talk page, and deleting would mean deleting the warning to the user that their user talk page was up for deletion, but blank all the game guide content. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:05, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Recommendation withdrawn due to page move. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:25, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST. I have moved the page to User:Deathspeaker/Galaxy Online II - Newbie Guide so the page's merits can be discussed without worrying about deleting the user's talk page. Cunard (talk) 00:27, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:29, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Donnells/Sandbox

Delete Stale draft. Pichpich (talk) 13:54, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- WP:STALEDRAFT. --E♴(talk) 15:18, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:STALEDRAFT states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

Because this page violates WP:STALEDRAFT and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:56, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:28, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Spyder2242

Delete abandoned self-promotion. User has no other edits. Pichpich (talk) 13:42, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- promotional WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:STALEDRAFT. This doesn't have a chance that it will ever be a mainspace article. --E♴(talk) 15:17, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Peridon (talk) 19:03, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Abandoned, promotional, unsourced BLP WP:FAKEARTICLE. Wikipedia is not myspace. MER-C 03:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 18:01, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, abandoned WP:FAKEARTICLE. As mentioned above, sounds a bit like a promotional, unsourced BLP. User has no other edits outside the subject. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:24, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 10:27, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Angelusdemonus

Copy of content deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mcroll'd and Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 May 20#Mcroll'd. Userspace is not for indefinite storage of deleted content. User has no live edits outside of this page and has not edited since 2008. MER-C 09:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete if no one wants to move it to mainspace. I see that the user did work on the content and sourcing. AfD-ed content should not be allowed in userspace indefinitely. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:51, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. SmokeyJoe, I think you meant AfD-ed content should not be allowed in userspace indefinitely. --E♴(talk) 15:15, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:56, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, includes only some previously deleted content. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:53, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 11:55, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Powergate92/Guestbook

WP:NOTMYSPACE. Also had a massive header that actually prevented editing it. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 05:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I created the "Guestbook" page after seeing that another user had a "Guestbook", at the time I didn't know about WP:NOTMYSPACE. Anyway, if an Administrator thinks the page should be deleted per WP:NOTMYSPACE then they can delete it. Powergate92Talk 05:34, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per user's agreement. --Kleinzach 06:16, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep with header removed. The header interferred with the MediaWiki_interface and may not be used. See Wikipedia:User_pages#Simulation_and_disruption_of_the_MediaWiki_interface. No administrator should say that a guestbook should be deleted per policy. There is no policy or consensus against guestbooks, subject to caveats (eg must be used primarily by genuine wikipedians, and comments are primarily related to the project). Guestbooks are not secret age games or other silly games, but for some are a useful tool in support of collaboration and editor support. Even Jimbo has one. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I still don't see how they don't fall into using Wikipedia as a social network, even when signed for things related to the project. Two of the three entries were "hi, thanks for article X", which can easily be put on a "regular" talk page. And the fact that Jimbo has one is immaterial; he could put the entire Goatse series on his user page and no one'd bat an eye. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 05:44, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• I think we can distinguish between social networking, and project networking. I see signing someones guestbook as saying "Hi, I like what you do, and would like to work with you, although without specifics at this stage". I personally don't make or sign guestbooks, and don't feel that strongly on their merits (better to just work with the people whose work you like), but they are on the OK side NOTMYSPACE at this time. On the other hand, we should be clear that the massive header you referred to is absolutely not OK. Please don't remind me of goatses. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:11, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Name of page is not instant grounds for deletion. The use of the page violates nothing, hence has no actual grounds for deletion. And saying "but all of this would be ok on a regular talk page" is, in fact, an argument for "keep." Collect (talk) 12:24, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:54, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:OptionsNewBritain

Promotional, unsourced WP:FAKEARTICLE whose creation in 2009 constitutes the user's only edit. MER-C 03:41, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as promotion. No prejudice against someone creating a real article on the subject, but it must be based on independent third party sources, and this draft is a bad start. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:33, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I find no rule saying "all drafts must be good" and, amazingly enough, most drafts are not perfect. I wonder what "draft" means? Collect (talk) 12:26, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Abandoned draft, too promotional in tone to move to mainspace (notability notwithstanding). If this is kept, it's pretty clear that it will stay right there and continue to gather dust until it's renominated. Pichpich (talk) 02:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Pichpich. --Kleinzach 01:01, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Unsourced, sounds like promotion, and seems that the user hasn't edited at all outside the subject. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:54, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:24, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Louis D Dickson

Unsourced userspace draft article existing at this title for over a year for an artist with no verifiable evidence of notability. Treating it like an article, I notice it claims that one of his songs reached #1 on Amazon ... on a list of search results for the artist's name. The artist's official website is a facebook page which tells us that he's male. —Soap— 03:06, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Abandoned, autobiographical, promotional, unsourced BLP WP:FAKEARTICLE. Wikipedia is not myspace. The creation of this page represents the user's only edit, which was made in March 2010. MER-C 04:07, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. per above. --Kleinzach 06:19, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - We aren't a social network, and we shouldn't have userpages masquerading as articles. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 07:37, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above, abandoned, very promotional userspace draft article. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:26, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:21, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yellowdough2001/Minh do

Delete abandoned content fork. Pichpich (talk) 03:05, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Looking at it, it seems that it would fulfill Wikipedia:Notability if it were sourced better. Could it be moved to a main article space instead? With the proper capitalization, of course. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:16, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Scratch that. It is a copy and past job with a different name. Delete. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:18, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:UP#COPIES states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:UP#COPIES and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:17, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Djhibrid/Dj Hibrid

Delete Wikipedia is not MySpace. This is clear self-promotion and user has shown no interest in participating in other areas of the wiki. Pichpich (talk) 03:00, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The faux article format is deceptive and could cause confusion. Any information the user wants other editors to know should be on his own userpage. Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. This is an unsourced BLP WP:FAKEARTICLE. MER-C 04:08, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per above, per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Obviously self-promotion. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:55, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:18, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Djcraver

Delete self-promotion, fake article, long abandoned. Pichpich (talk) 02:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Abandoned, autobiographical, unsourced BLP WP:FAKEARTICLE. The creation of this page represents the user's only edit, which was in July 2010. MER-C 04:09, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, for the same reasons as MER-C. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:22, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this self-promotional WP:FAKEARTICLE. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:56, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Spreaderofmeh

Delete stale draft on individuals of questionable notability. Pichpich (talk) 02:37, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Draft fake article that serves no purpose except as advertisement. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:20, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:53, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, non-notable. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 20:57, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Barcakidd/Denzel Bazard

Delete confusing fake article. Pichpich (talk) 02:28, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:06, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Ancestors of modern games

Two member project that never got going in 2007. Discussions consisted of two words; "Someone help!". No subpages identified. Nothing worth saving. --Kleinzach 03:43, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, far too specific a wikiproject, nothing worth keeping. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:59, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – Being from WP:VG, I never even heard of this, but anyways, it's redundant to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Retro games. –MuZemike 23:58, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- nothing worth keeping here. --E♴(talk) 02:22, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Retro games per MFD guidelines. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WikiProject Japan! 15:39, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above, very little content and participants, per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 21:08, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:35, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Toekneeu

Delete Oddly enough, same spam article as the one nominated just below. Different user who also has no other edits on the wiki. Pichpich (talk) 21:38, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Promotional, unsourced BLP WP:FAKEARTICLE. Wikipedia is not a resume service. MER-C 08:00, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- WP:NOTWEBHOST. --E♴(talk) 02:21, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• The spam article to which Pichpich (talk · contribs) refers is nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Anthonydawes. Cunard (talk) 17:52, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:34, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anthonydawes

Delete as promotional autobiography posing as a real article. User has no other edits on the project. Pichpich (talk) 21:36, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Promotional, unsourced BLP WP:FAKEARTICLE. Wikipedia is not a resume service. MER-C 08:00, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete-- WP:NOTWEBHOST. --E♴(talk) 02:20, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:50, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Cyrus Maxwell

Delete Copy of user's favorite version of the Saud bin Saqr al Qasimi article. In particular, it details a sexual assault complaint which is absent from the mainspace article. Pichpich (talk) 16:23, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete-- per WP:CONTENTFORK. --E♴(talk) 02:19, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:UP#COPIES states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:UP#COPIES and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:50, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:32, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yvonne Lenard

Delete Stale draft. In French. About a non-notable individual. Consisting of a copy of the fr.wiki article on Wes Craven. Using an image of Michele Bachelet. Pichpich (talk) 13:44, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is a WP:FAKEARTICLE written in French... MER-C 08:23, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• This is a WP:FAKEARTICLE written in very bad French that goes well beyond just typos. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:25, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:STALEDRAFT states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:STALEDRAFT and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:50, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete.  Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 00:31, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dantwann

Delete Autobiography of inactive user. Pichpich (talk) 13:40, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Per WP:USERBIO, this would probably be excessive detail even for an active user. But the only thing Dantwann did on Wikipedia is write about himself; his autobiographical article was deleted by unanimous consensus in this AfD. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 23:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion."

  Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete also per the user's circumvention of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dantwann crane and per WP:USERBIO. Cunard (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.