10 May 2007

• curprev 05:0605:06, 10 May 2007‎ David Levy talk contribs‎ 1,766 bytes −177‎ Reverted. As Centrx noted, that isn't the policy's only purpose. Would you care to discuss this matter on the talk page?
• curprev 04:5604:56, 10 May 2007‎ FeloniousMonk talk contribs‎ 1,943 bytes +177‎ it should be made *clear*
• curprev 03:3103:31, 10 May 2007‎ Centrx talk contribs‎ 1,766 bytes −177‎ That is not the only purpose of IAR, and not being "reckless" or justifying any action at all is contained in the words "improving" and "maintaining"
• curprev 03:3003:30, 10 May 2007‎ FeloniousMonk talk contribs‎ 1,943 bytes +177‎ It's necessary. IAR is not carte blanche.

9 May 2007

• curprev 11:5511:55, 9 May 2007‎ Visviva talk contribs‎ 1,766 bytes −177‎ I really don't see why that's necessary.
• curprev 04:2904:29, 9 May 2007‎ FeloniousMonk talk contribs‎ 1,943 bytes +178‎ restore crucial caveat
• curprev 02:4802:48, 9 May 2007‎ Rockstar915 talk contribs‎ 1,765 bytes +2‎ maxim is far too broad of a term in reference to something as subtle and deep as this. that is, unless you want this page to become a mockery by those who are philosophically inclined.
• curprev 02:3202:32, 9 May 2007‎ Tony Sidaway talk contribs‎ 1,763 bytes −2‎ It's a maxim that expresses a number of subtle and interrelated concepts.
• curprev 02:0502:05, 9 May 2007‎ Rockstar915 talk contribs‎ 1,765 bytes +2‎ iar is a concept, not a maxim.
• curprev 00:5800:58, 9 May 2007‎ Haukurth talk contribs‎ 1,763 bytes −2‎ I doubt this is still the same 'concept'
• curprev 00:1000:10, 9 May 2007‎ PopUpPirate talk contribs‎ m 1,765 bytes −25‎ A "See Also" too many

2 May 2007

• curprev 13:2413:24, 2 May 2007‎ MalcolmGin talk contribs‎ 1,790 bytes +3‎ Wasn't a page when Sanger made it. Change "concept" to "policy" if you like, though that's not entirely accurate historically, it'd certainly do.
• curprev 09:4309:43, 2 May 2007‎ Radiant! talk contribs‎ 1,787 bytes −459‎ There has been confusion over the tag on this page (or meta-page), so let's simply use the standard one.

1 May 2007

• curprev 15:0015:00, 1 May 2007‎ FrancoGG talk contribs‎ m 2,246 bytes +2,208‎ Reverted 1 edit by 72.193.66.186 to last revision by SchuminWeb. (TW)
• curprev 15:0015:00, 1 May 2007‎ 72.193.66.186 talk‎ 38 bytes −2,208‎ re-truthing
• curprev 00:2900:29, 1 May 2007‎ SchuminWeb talk contribs‎ m 2,246 bytes 0‎ Move references below see also

30 April 2007

• curprev 23:3223:32, 30 April 2007‎ David Levy talk contribs‎ 2,246 bytes −10‎ self-reversion to "References"
• curprev 23:2523:25, 30 April 2007‎ PopUpPirate talk contribs‎ m 2,256 bytes −256‎ remove stealthy wordiness
• curprev 22:2922:29, 30 April 2007‎ Steel talk contribs‎ 2,512 bytes −137‎ Two of those are redlinks and the other has precisely one signature (yours)
• curprev 22:1222:12, 30 April 2007‎ Netesq talk contribs‎ 2,649 bytes +137‎ Rv - I disagree. Links to explanatory subpages are a "GoodThing". Besides, where's the harm?
• curprev 21:2921:29, 30 April 2007‎ Rockstar915 talk contribs‎ 2,512 bytes −137‎ →‎See also: no need for these to be here. see talk page.
• curprev 17:5117:51, 30 April 2007‎ Netesq talk contribs‎ 2,649 bytes +137‎ →‎See also: - linking to subpages for supporters, opposition, and interpretations
• curprev 14:1514:15, 30 April 2007‎ David Levy talk contribs‎ 2,512 bytes +10‎ "References" -> "Notes and references"
• curprev 13:0313:03, 30 April 2007‎ Freakofnurture talk contribs‎ m 2,502 bytes +5‎ rephrase
• curprev 11:3611:36, 30 April 2007‎ Freakofnurture talk contribs‎ 2,497 bytes +251‎ clarify

25 April 2007

• curprev 17:4817:48, 25 April 2007‎ David Levy talk contribs‎ 2,246 bytes −3,421‎ Please discuss on the talk page before radically altering a policy without consensus.
• curprev 17:4417:44, 25 April 2007‎ IBeatAnorexia talk contribs‎ 5,667 bytes +3,421‎ In regards to controversy and improper interpretations, an elaboration is given. Please discuss on talk page before removing large sections of content.
• curprev 00:4100:41, 25 April 2007‎ GTBacchus talk contribs‎ m 2,246 bytes 0‎ Unprotected Wikipedia:Ignore all rules: edit war seems to be over; user making major changes has gone away

23 April 2007

• curprev 00:4600:46, 23 April 2007‎ Centrx talk contribs‎ m 2,246 bytes 0‎ Protected Wikipedia:Ignore all rules: Edit warring. Please discuss proposed changes on the talk page. [edit=sysop:move=sysop]
• curprev 00:4500:45, 23 April 2007‎ Bkonrad talk contribs‎ 2,246 bytes −3,421‎ umm, no -- it it a policy page -- major additions should not be undertaken without discussion and consensus
• curprev 00:4100:41, 23 April 2007‎ IBeatAnorexia talk contribs‎ 5,667 bytes +3,421‎ It is best to discuss on the talk page before removing large chunks of content that you soley disagree with
• curprev 00:3700:37, 23 April 2007‎ Bkonrad talk contribs‎ 2,246 bytes −3,421‎ when making major additions to a policy page, it is best to propose and to gain consensus on the talk page first
• curprev 00:3600:36, 23 April 2007‎ GTBacchus talk contribs‎ 5,667 bytes +19‎ →‎Controversy: it's not a guideline; it's a policy
• curprev 00:3500:35, 23 April 2007‎ GTBacchus talk contribs‎ 5,648 bytes +174‎ →‎Controversy: rewrite, althoought this will probably all be reverted soon
• curprev 00:3100:31, 23 April 2007‎ 128.62.94.7 talk‎ 5,474 bytes +905‎ Added arbcom statement
• curprev 00:2400:24, 23 April 2007‎ IBeatAnorexia talk contribs‎ 4,569 bytes −2‎ →‎Controversy
• curprev 00:2300:23, 23 April 2007‎ IBeatAnorexia talk contribs‎ 4,571 bytes +2,325‎ Do not base arguments on "what has been done in the past"
• curprev 00:1000:10, 23 April 2007‎ Bkonrad talk contribs‎ 2,246 bytes −2,325‎ rv, previous such elaborations have been routinely dismissed an unbeneficial

22 April 2007

• curprev 23:5523:55, 22 April 2007‎ IBeatAnorexia talk contribs‎ 4,571 bytes +2,325‎ expansion and explaination

13 April 2007

• curprev 00:0900:09, 13 April 2007‎ Steel talk contribs‎ m 2,246 bytes −14‎ Reverted edits by 76.215.136.77 (talk) to last version by Lacrimosus
• curprev 00:0600:06, 13 April 2007‎ 76.215.136.77 talk‎ 2,260 bytes +14‎ filter off

10 April 2007

• curprev 03:5303:53, 10 April 2007‎ Ikuzaf talk contribs‎ 2,246 bytes −12‎ doesn't really help
• curprev 03:4703:47, 10 April 2007‎ Leibniz101 talk contribs‎ 2,258 bytes +12‎ No edit summary

6 April 2007

• curprev 02:2802:28, 6 April 2007‎ AKMask talk contribs‎ 2,246 bytes −178‎ no, he was right, it DOES infact read better simple
• curprev 02:2702:27, 6 April 2007‎ Minskist popper talk contribs‎ 2,424 bytes −1‎ fmt
• curprev 02:2702:27, 6 April 2007‎ Minskist popper talk contribs‎ 2,425 bytes −4‎ fmt
• curprev 02:2602:26, 6 April 2007‎ Minskist popper talk contribs‎ m 2,429 bytes +183‎ Reverted to revision 119464350 by 1337 H4XZ0R. using TW

1 April 2007

• curprev 14:2914:29, 1 April 2007‎ SchuminWeb talk contribs‎ 2,246 bytes +21‎ Cute, but the standard is worded better
• curprev 14:2714:27, 1 April 2007‎ Loof Lirpa talk contribs‎ 2,225 bytes −21‎ hee hee
• curprev 14:1214:12, 1 April 2007‎ SchuminWeb talk contribs‎ 2,246 bytes −183‎ It reads better simple...