Crispy Gamer

Crispy Gamer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

• Featured article candidates/Crispy Gamer/archive1

Nominator(s): Gamingforfun³⁶⁵ (talk) 01:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Give every credit to GamerPro64. Gamingforfun³⁶⁵ (talk) 01:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi there. I'm the person who nominated the article for GA to begin with. I did not tell the nominator for this FAC to nominate it. He didn't even consult me about this nomination. I do not like that someone else is trying to claim credit for an article I worked on. I personally do not think it would survive an FAC. That being said, I would like to see this FAC continued just to see if it would pass the nomination. At the same time, I want Gamingforfun to not take credit in the event it does pass. I find this lack of communication to be unprofessional and rude. GamerPro64 02:36, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I deny that I was being rude, as I was not trying to steal GamerPro64's credit by lying. I had no clue that I was to communicate. Gamingforfun³⁶⁵ (talk) 02:49, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

From FAC: "Nominators who are not significant contributors to the article should consult regular editors of the article before nominating it." If you are not going to take the time to read the full page, you probably shouldn't be worried about FACs. -- ferret (talk) 02:55, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

*frustrated laughter* When will this argument end? I am only trying to end the disastrous incident by deleting offensive content as well as the section at WT:VG. I am actually having fun from how lousy this discussion is going (EDIT: and by that, I meant that the discussion is disruptively distracting me from actually improving the encyclopedia). Gamingforfun³⁶⁵ (talk) 04:30, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]