Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Hey man im josh (talk | contribs)
→‎Criteria for revocation: Actually those two points are not for this page, as this perm is view only
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
== Common use cases ==
== Common use cases ==
There are three groups of editors for whom this is useful:
There are three groups of editors for whom this is useful:
*Those interested in helping with edit filters but who do not meet the requirements for edit filter manager
*Those interested in helping with edit filters but who do not meet the requirements for the edit filter manager right.
*Those working with edit filters on another WMF wiki who want to learn from the English Wikipedia's experience and approach (anyone wanting to learn from another wiki will need permissions on that wiki and so are out of scope for this right).
*Those working with edit filters on another WMF wiki who want to learn from the English Wikipedia's experience and approach (anyone wanting to learn from another wiki will need permissions on that wiki and so are out of scope for this right).
*[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations]] ([[WP:SPI]]) clerks.
*[[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations]] ([[WP:SPI]]) clerks.
Line 12: Line 12:
== Groups that don't need edit filter helper ==
== Groups that don't need edit filter helper ==
The following groups do not need edit filter helper because they can already view private edit filters:
The following groups do not need edit filter helper because they can already view private edit filters:
* [[WP:Administrators|Administrators]] can already view private filter details, code, and logs
* [[WP:Administrators|Administrators]], [[Wikipedia:CheckUser|checkusers]], and [[Wikipedia:Oversight|oversighters]] can already view private filter details, code, and logs.
* [[WP:edit filter manager|Edit filter managers]] have read-write access to them.
* [[WP:edit filter manager|Edit filter managers]] have read-write access to them.
* [[meta:AFH|Abuse filter helpers]] have global view-only access to all filters, and by extension the English Wikipedia, and hence do not need to request this right here.
* [[meta:Abuse filter helpers|Abuse filter helpers]] and [[meta:Abuse filter maintainers|abuse filter maintainers]] have global view-only access to all filters, and by extension the English Wikipedia, and hence do not need to request this right here.
* Some other global groups, including ombuds, staff, stewards, system administrators, and WMF researchers.<ref>[[meta:Special:GlobalGroupPermissions]]</ref>
* [[meta:Abuse_filter_maintainers|Abuse filter maintainers]] have global view-only access to all filters, and by extension the English Wikipedia, and hence do not need to request this right here.


==The right==
==The right==
Line 23: Line 23:
==Granting the right==
==Granting the right==
The edit filter helper right may be granted in the following circumstances:
The edit filter helper right may be granted in the following circumstances:
#A Checkuser may, at their discretion, grant this right to a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations]] ([[WP:SPI]]) clerk or trainee clerk who:
#A checkuser may, at their discretion, grant this right to a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations]] ([[WP:SPI]]) clerk or trainee clerk who:
#*Meets the criteria in the "Requirements for granting" section
#*Meets the criteria in the "Requirements for granting" section
#*Has not had an edit filter-related right removed previously for any reason other than inactivity.
#*Has not had an edit filter-related right removed previously for any reason other than inactivity.
#By any administrator when there is consensus to promote at the [[Wikipedia:Edit filter noticeboard]] request.
#By any administrator when there is consensus to promote at the [[Wikipedia:Edit filter noticeboard|edit filter noticeboard]].
#By any administrator following a self-request from an editor in good standing to reduce the editor's access from edit-filter manager.
#By any administrator following a self-request from an editor in good standing to reduce the editor's access from edit-filter manager.


==Process for requesting==
==Process for requesting==
In a new section, make a request at [[Wikipedia:Edit filter noticeboard]] ([[WP:EFN]]).
In a new section, make a request at the [[WP:EFN|edit filter noticeboard]]. Self-nominations are a requirement.<ref name=EFN_Discussion>[[Special:Diff/1217561114]]</ref>
*If a previous application for edit filter manager or edit filter helper was unsuccessful, the following people should be notified of the new discussion:
*If a previous application for edit filter manager or edit filter helper was unsuccessful, the following people should be notified of the new discussion:
**Participants in the most recent discussion
**Participants in the most recent discussion
Line 38: Line 38:
**Participants in any discussion that resulted in the right being removed
**Participants in any discussion that resulted in the right being removed
**The Arbitration Committee, if removal was at the committee's direction
**The Arbitration Committee, if removal was at the committee's direction
*The discussion will be open at least 3 days.
*The discussion will be open at least 7 days.<ref name=EFN_Discussion/>
*The discussion will be closed by an administrator, who will grant the right if the request was successful.
*The discussion will be closed by an uninvolved administrator, who will grant the right if the request was successful.


==Requirements for granting==
==Requirements for granting==
{{shortcut|WP:EFHCRITERIA}}
*The candidate must meet ''all'' of the following criteria:
*The candidate must meet ''all'' of the following criteria:
*#Demonstrated need for access (e.g. SPI clerk, involvement with edit filters)
*#Demonstrated need for access (e.g. SPI clerk, involvement with edit filters)
*#No recent blocks or relevant sanctions
*#No recent blocks or relevant sanctions
*#At least basic understanding of account security<ref name=assertion group=note>There is no formal definition of what constitutes a "basic understanding", but by requesting this right you are asserting that you meet these criteria. Those commenting on the request should assume good faith regarding this assertion unless they have a reason to do otherwise.</ref>
*#At least a basic understanding of account security<ref name=assertion group=note>There is no formal definition of what constitutes a "basic understanding", but by requesting this right you are asserting that you meet these criteria. Those commenting on the request should assume good faith regarding this assertion unless they have a reason to do otherwise.</ref>
*#At least basic understanding of [[regular expression]]s if the intent is to assist with authoring filters<ref name=assertion group=note />
*#At least a basic understanding of [[regular expression]]s if the intent is to assist with authoring filters<ref name=assertion group=note />
*#Sufficient ability with the English language to understand notes and explanations for edit filters
*#Sufficient ability with the English language to understand notes and explanations for edit filters
*In addition to the above requirements, the candidate must also meet at least ''one'' of the following criteria:
*In addition to the above requirements, the candidate must also meet at least ''one'' of the following criteria:
Line 54: Line 55:
*#Current WMF developer or staff member who needs access for WMF-related purposes
*#Current WMF developer or staff member who needs access for WMF-related purposes


This is a highly specialized right that is routinely denied even to experienced editors. There are currently {{NUMINGROUP:abusefilter-helper}} edit filter helpers, compared with {{NUMINGROUP:rollbacker}} rollbackers. Meeting all the above criteria does not guarantee a request will obtain consensus support to pass. Above all, noticeboard regulars look for indicators that an editor can be trusted. This is a subjective measurement and the editors participating in a given request will have their own criteria to judge whether an editor is sufficiently trustworthy for this user right.
This is a highly specialized right that is routinely denied even to experienced editors. There are currently {{NUMINGROUP:abusefilter-helper}} edit filter helpers, compared with {{NUMINGROUP:rollbacker}} rollbackers. Meeting all the above criteria does not guarantee a request will obtain consensus support to pass. Above all, noticeboard regulars look for indicators that an editor can be trusted. Trust is important because private edit filters reveal the detection strategies for tracking [[Wikipedia:Long-term abuse|long-term abusers]], and also private edit filter logs often contain [[Wikipedia:Revision deletion|revision deletable]] or [[Wikipedia:Oversight|oversightable]] information. This is a subjective measurement and the editors participating in a given request will have their own criteria to judge whether an editor is sufficiently trustworthy for this user right.


==Requirements for retaining==
==Criteria for revocation==
{{shortcut|WP:EFHREVOKE}}
*Currently active on the English Wikipedia (i.e. has made edits or logged actions within the last 12 months)
The user right can be revoked for violating any of the above conduct standards and for other misconduct. Additionally, it can be revoked at any time by an administrator without any process or prior notice in any of the following circumstances:


# The editor has shared details of private filters with unauthorised parties.
==Reasons for removal (excluding inactivity)==
# The editor has blatantly misused the tool.
Note this is not an exhaustive list - removal of the right will always be considered in these circumstances, but may be considered in other circumstances too.
# The editor has been sanctioned by Arbcom or the community for actions which make the user no longer suitable for the role.
*Sharing details of private filters with unauthorised parties
# The editor has failed to report to an administrator after noticing unauthorized use of their account or otherwise neglected [[Wikipedia:User account security|account security practices]].
*Poor account security (including compromised and potentially compromised accounts)
# The editor has been inactive on the English Wikipedia for 12 months.
*Abuse of edit filters

*Sanctioned by Arbcom or the community for actions that mean continued suitability is in doubt
If your edit filter helper right was revoked and you would like to appeal the decision, first discuss with the revoking administrator. If after such an exchange you still feel the matter is unresolved and requires outside input, you may post at [[WP:AN]] to appeal the decision. Request for the right after a revocation for inactivity or self-requested removal may be made at [[WP:PERM]].


==Process for removing right==
==Process for removing right==
Line 83: Line 86:
==Notes==
==Notes==
{{reflist|group=note}}
{{reflist|group=note}}

==References==
{{Reflist}}


==See also==
==See also==

Latest revision as of 16:14, 18 April 2024

Edit filter helper is a user group that allows non-administrators to view the details, code, and logs of private edit filters, but not to edit them. The right may be granted and revoked by administrators. This page details the right, the requirements for it, and the processes involved in granting and removing it. There are currently 23 filter helpers on English Wikipedia.

Common use cases

There are three groups of editors for whom this is useful:

  • Those interested in helping with edit filters but who do not meet the requirements for the edit filter manager right.
  • Those working with edit filters on another WMF wiki who want to learn from the English Wikipedia's experience and approach (anyone wanting to learn from another wiki will need permissions on that wiki and so are out of scope for this right).
  • Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations (WP:SPI) clerks.

Groups that don't need edit filter helper

The following groups do not need edit filter helper because they can already view private edit filters:

The right

The edit-filter-helper user right gives access to

  • abusefilter-view-private which allows viewing of edit filters marked as private, as well as the ability to search and view the edit filter hit logs from those filters.

Granting the right

The edit filter helper right may be granted in the following circumstances:

  1. A checkuser may, at their discretion, grant this right to a Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations (WP:SPI) clerk or trainee clerk who:
    • Meets the criteria in the "Requirements for granting" section
    • Has not had an edit filter-related right removed previously for any reason other than inactivity.
  2. By any administrator when there is consensus to promote at the edit filter noticeboard.
  3. By any administrator following a self-request from an editor in good standing to reduce the editor's access from edit-filter manager.

Process for requesting

In a new section, make a request at the edit filter noticeboard. Self-nominations are a requirement.[2]

  • If a previous application for edit filter manager or edit filter helper was unsuccessful, the following people should be notified of the new discussion:
    • Participants in the most recent discussion
    • The closing administrator of the most recent discussion
  • If the edit filter manager or edit filter helper right was previously removed for any reason other than inactivity, the following people should be notified of the new discussion:
    • The administrator who removed the right
    • Participants in any discussion that resulted in the right being removed
    • The Arbitration Committee, if removal was at the committee's direction
  • The discussion will be open at least 7 days.[2]
  • The discussion will be closed by an uninvolved administrator, who will grant the right if the request was successful.

Requirements for granting

  • The candidate must meet all of the following criteria:
    1. Demonstrated need for access (e.g. SPI clerk, involvement with edit filters)
    2. No recent blocks or relevant sanctions
    3. At least a basic understanding of account security[note 1]
    4. At least a basic understanding of regular expressions if the intent is to assist with authoring filters[note 1]
    5. Sufficient ability with the English language to understand notes and explanations for edit filters
  • In addition to the above requirements, the candidate must also meet at least one of the following criteria:
    1. Currently-active extended confirmed editor on the English Wikipedia (i.e. has made edits or logged actions within the last 12 months)
    2. Current administrator on another WMF project
    3. Current edit filter manager on another WMF project
    4. Current WMF developer or staff member who needs access for WMF-related purposes

This is a highly specialized right that is routinely denied even to experienced editors. There are currently 23 edit filter helpers, compared with 6,825 rollbackers. Meeting all the above criteria does not guarantee a request will obtain consensus support to pass. Above all, noticeboard regulars look for indicators that an editor can be trusted. Trust is important because private edit filters reveal the detection strategies for tracking long-term abusers, and also private edit filter logs often contain revision deletable or oversightable information. This is a subjective measurement and the editors participating in a given request will have their own criteria to judge whether an editor is sufficiently trustworthy for this user right.

Criteria for revocation

The user right can be revoked for violating any of the above conduct standards and for other misconduct. Additionally, it can be revoked at any time by an administrator without any process or prior notice in any of the following circumstances:

  1. The editor has shared details of private filters with unauthorised parties.
  2. The editor has blatantly misused the tool.
  3. The editor has been sanctioned by Arbcom or the community for actions which make the user no longer suitable for the role.
  4. The editor has failed to report to an administrator after noticing unauthorized use of their account or otherwise neglected account security practices.
  5. The editor has been inactive on the English Wikipedia for 12 months.

If your edit filter helper right was revoked and you would like to appeal the decision, first discuss with the revoking administrator. If after such an exchange you still feel the matter is unresolved and requires outside input, you may post at WP:AN to appeal the decision. Request for the right after a revocation for inactivity or self-requested removal may be made at WP:PERM.

Process for removing right

For inactivity:

  • Any administrator may remove the right from any user who does not meet the activity requirement.

For other reasons:

  • If the situation is urgent:
    • Any administrator may remove the right without prior notification.
    • WP:EFN should be notified of the removal, giving reasons unless privacy or similar concerns prevent this (in which case, contact an administrator privately and note you have done this).
  • If the situation is not urgent:
    • Any user in good standing may make a request at WP:EFN for the right to be removed, giving reasons unless privacy or similar concerns prevent this (in which case, contact an administrator privately and note in the request you have done this).

In all cases:

  • The user concerned must be notified on their talk page.
  • Any discussion about the removal of the right will be closed by an administrator, who will remove the right if required and there is consensus to do so. Uncontroversial requests, including self-requests, will be closed when actioned, other requests will remain open until at least 7 days after the user was notified.

Notes

  1. ^ a b There is no formal definition of what constitutes a "basic understanding", but by requesting this right you are asserting that you meet these criteria. Those commenting on the request should assume good faith regarding this assertion unless they have a reason to do otherwise.

References

  1. ^ meta:Special:GlobalGroupPermissions
  2. ^ a b Special:Diff/1217561114

See also

Leave a Reply