Cyberbot I (talk | contribs) Automated comment: AfD was not correctly transcluded. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8)) |
m Pppery moved page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchu studies (2rd nomination) to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manchu studies (2nd nomination): Uh ... |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 01:51, 28 February 2018
Manchu studies
AfDs for this article:
- Manchu studies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a one-sentence sub-stub which has been tagged for lack of references for eight months and nobody's bothered to find any sources. It was brought to AfD by @TheGracefulSlick: at which point I noticed it and tried to save everybody some time by WP:A7-ing it. But, based on the number of complaints that people have left on my talk page, I guess folks just want to spend the next week arguing about this, so I've restored it and brought it back here. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:12, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- delete There are papers in Manchu studies, but we need an article that says something more about it than that people do this sort of research. At the moment we're stuck at a WP:DICTDEF. Mangoe (talk) 21:01, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Per my original nom statement. Sorry we have to waste seven days on this.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 00:06, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- The topic is clearly notable, so deletion would make sense only as a WP:REDLINK incentive for people to write an article about it. – Uanfala (talk) 00:19, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2018 February 28. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 00:25, 28 February 2018 (UTC)