Incarceration Rate, Military Spending, and Surveillance among the World Superpowers

Incarceration Rate, Military Spending, and Surveillance among the World Superpowers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A duplicate of Surveillance and Incarceration in the U.S., Russia, and China (currently on AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surveillance and Incarceration in the U.S., Russia, and China, created by a probably sockpuppet of blocked user Kikbguy (case here). Consists of almost the exact same text and information as the other AfD'ed article, only with a single sentence and ref about military spending added; this extra information doesn't increase the notability or verifiability of the claims in this article, but only increases the amount of unpublished synthesis; like the original article, this is an arbitrary cross-categorization and collection of statistics with no assertion of a relationship between them. Article was declined for speedy until other AfD is closed, and prod was removed. —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 17:10, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as original research. AfD could possibly be simply combined with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surveillance and Incarceration in the U.S., Russia, and China? --ZimZalaBim ^talk 18:43, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • (That AfD is already getting swamped and hard to follow, so I figured it would help to keep things separate. Hut 8.5 has suggested to me (here) that we just speedy this article as soon as the other AfD is successfully closed, but in the meantime I figured I should open this AfD as well). —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 18:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as attempt to circumvent the AfD process. Also, reasons for deleting other article all apply here. Ray (talk) 19:00, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and Note to Moderator Politizer and Zimzalabim have been trying to delete all of my articles because I refuse to accept their views that this article should be deleted. Zimzalabim has already abused his administrative priviliedges and had me banned under false pretenses. Politizer has a history of trying to kill wikipedia entries that he has not written. Both of them have been trying to discredit me, delete my articles, censor my comments, and block me from using wikipedia. They certainly have a conflict of interest with my articles at this point because any article I write they have and will continue to try and delete, possibly because they are threatened by the information in some way. I urge you to strongly examine both of their editing histories to see just how extensive their desire to kill information really is. (Politizer or Zimzalabim will delete this comment as soon as they see it because it contains true information which reflects poorly on them.)(They will also bring up the fact that I'm connecting through a proxy to discredit me even though I needed to connect to wikipedia through a proxy because they have abused their priviliedges to ban me.)
  • • NOTE: The above editor is the article creator and an admitted sock puppet of Kikbguy, reported here. —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 19:33, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]