Cannabis Ruderalis

thcscience_admin
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArbComNav}}
{{NOINDEX}}
This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. The Arbitrators, parties to the case, and other editors may draft proposals and post them to this page for review and comments. Proposals may include proposed general principles, findings of fact, remedies, and enforcement provisions—the same format as is used in Arbitration Committee decisions. The bottom of the page may be used for overall analysis of the [[../Evidence|/Evidence]] and for general discussion of the case.


{| id="mp-topbanner" style="width:100%; -moz-border-radius: 1em; background:#fcfcfc; border:1px solid #ccc; margin-bottom: 7px;"
Any user may edit this workshop page. Please sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they believe should be part of the final decision on the [[../Proposed decision|/Proposed decision]] page, which only Arbitrators and clerks may edit, for voting, clarification as well as implementation purposes.
| style="font-size:95%; text-align: center;" |

This page has been [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Courtesy blanking|blanked as a courtesy]].<p> The version of this page before blanking is still available in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Workshop&action=history page history], and can be seen [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William_M._Connolley/Workshop&oldid=311599558 here].<p> For the other pages in this case, including the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William M. Connolley#Final decision|final decision]], please see:<p> [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William M. Connolley|Main case page]] <small>([[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William M. Connolley|Talk]])</small> — [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William M. Connolley/Evidence|Evidence]] <small>([[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William M. Connolley/Evidence|Talk]])</small> — [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William M. Connolley/Workshop|Workshop]] <small>([[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William M. Connolley/Workshop|Talk]])</small> — [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William M. Connolley/Proposed decision|Proposed decision]] <small>([[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Abd-William M. Connolley/Proposed decision|Talk]])</small>
==Motions and requests by the parties==
|}
===Hipocrite and Mathsci are added as parties===
1) Please add the following parties:
*{{userlinks|Hipocrite}}
<s>*{{userlinks|Mathsci}}</s>
::This addition is solely with respect to actions related to the ban of Abd from [[Cold fusion]], the underlying causes or conditions, or the use of administrative tools by [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]], while involved or showing favoritism, in this or other incidents.
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::*'''Proposed.''' A number of involved editors commented extensively on the Request page, showing strong support for banning they had previously advocated, and for the rejection of this case as frivolous. I have not presented evidence of this beyond their own display on the Request page, however, that should be sufficient to establish a risk to them of admonishment or sanction, and therefore of their right to notice and special participation as parties. The above editors were added to the list of parties by me, <s>before the acceptance of the Request,</s> and were notified, but Mathsci edit warred to remove his name, and [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] reverted Hipocrite's insertion, then edit warred at [[User talk:Hipocrite]] over the notice, which seems to have been a last-straw incident leading to the retirement of [[User:Rootology|Rootology]]. <s>These parties</s> Hipocrite should be added <s>and their comments restored to the Request page,</s> and notice to Hipocrite should be restored as well.
::*Hipocrite did not comment on the Request page, having "retired," but previously retired under a cloud, returned, was extraordinarily disruptive while active, and was the primary cause of the two recent protections of [[Cold fusion]] and thus of the actions of WMC leading to this case, aside from whatever prior agenda WMC may have had. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 13:20, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
::*Having now realized that it's reasonable to consider the case accepted when there were four net votes, instead of when acceptance was declared and the case pages set up, and for simplicity, I have withdrawn the proposed motion to add Mathsci, and '''I ask that Verbal and Stephan Schulz's comments be removed from the Request page, unless they desire to be parties,''' and I apologize to the committee and the community for disruption that resulted. <small>(It would have been quite enough if someone had suggested to me: once there were four net votes, the case was to be considered accepted and no changes made -- and this should be made clear in general.</small>
::*'''To Bilby.''' Hipocrite was centrally involved in the events leading up to the ban, and I do not believe that a voluntary, reversible, very recent retirement should be suffice to exclude oneself from consideration. It was an error for me not to include Hipocrite from the start. --[[User:Abd|Abd]] ([[User talk:Abd|talk]]) 19:16, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

:'''Comment by others:'''
::* I'm quite opposed to expanding the list of involved parties at this point. Hipocrite, being retired, is unable to be involved in proceedings, and therefore cannot present his case. I agree that he was involved in the events, but I'd be very uncomfortable with including someone in his situation, and in my view that involvement was not central to what is being discussed here. In regard to MathSci, he has strong opinions about Abd, as expressed, but the case is in regard to Abd and WMC's actions. It's likely to be messy enough as it is - it would be far better to keep to focus as narrow as possible. - [[User:Bilby|Bilby]] ([[User talk:Bilby|talk]]) 15:27, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
::*I suggest that Abd email ArbCom directly requesting the removal by the clerks of the other names which he added to the list. If Hipocrite has retired and nobody has so far mentioned problems with his behaviour that need to be examined, why add his name? Please drop the motion entirely to keep things simple.

===Template===
2)

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Template===
3)

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::


==Proposed temporary injunctions==

===Template===
1)

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Template===
2)

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Template===
3)

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Template===
4)

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

==Questions to the parties==

=Proposed final decision=

==Proposals by User:X==
===Proposed principles===
====Template====
1) {text of Proposed principle}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

====Template====
2) {text of Proposed principle}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::


=== Proposed findings of fact ===

====Template====
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

====Template====
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Proposed remedies===
<small>''Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.''</small>

====Template====
1) {text of proposed remedy}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

====Template====
2) {text of proposed remedy}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Proposed enforcement===

====Template====
1) {text of proposed enforcement}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

====Template====
2) {text of proposed enforcement}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::


==Proposals by User:Y==
===Proposed principles===
====Template====
1) {text of Proposed principle}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

====Template====
2) {text of Proposed principle}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::


=== Proposed findings of fact ===

====Template====
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

====Template====
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Proposed remedies===
<small>''Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.''</small>

====Template====
1) {text of proposed remedy}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

====Template====
2) {text of proposed remedy}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Proposed enforcement===

====Template====
1) {text of proposed enforcement}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

====Template====
2) {text of proposed enforcement}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::


==Proposals by User:Z==
===Proposed principles===
====Template====
1) {text of Proposed principle}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

====Template====
2) {text of Proposed principle}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::


=== Proposed findings of fact ===

====Template====
1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

====Template====
2) {text of proposed finding of fact}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Proposed remedies===
<small>''Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.''</small>

====Template====
1) {text of proposed remedy}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

====Template====
2) {text of proposed remedy}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Proposed enforcement===

====Template====
1) {text of proposed enforcement}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

====Template====
2) {text of proposed enforcement}

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

==Analysis of evidence==
Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis

===Template===

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Template===

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Template===

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Template===

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Template===

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Template===

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

===Template===

:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

==General discussion==
:'''Comment by Arbitrators:'''
::

:'''Comment by parties:'''
::

:'''Comment by others:'''
::

Latest revision as of 01:26, 24 March 2012


This page has been blanked as a courtesy.

The version of this page before blanking is still available in the page history, and can be seen here.

For the other pages in this case, including the final decision, please see:

Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk)

source: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Cold_fusion_2/Workshop&diff=483621701&oldid=302347638

Leave a Reply