Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
→‎BrownHairedGirl and categories: Removing request for arbitration: declined by the Committee
GabiloveAdol (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}}
<noinclude>{{ArbComOpenTasks|acotstyle=float:right}}</noinclude>{{NOINDEX}}
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=45%</noinclude>}}
{{Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=45%</noinclude>}}

== The Amhara people page lost neutrality and is being misrepresented. ==
'''Initiated by ''' [[User:GabiloveAdol|GabiloveAdol]] ([[User talk:GabiloveAdol|talk]]) '''at''' 03:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

=== Involved parties ===
<!-- Please change "userlinks" to "admin" if the party is an administrator -->
*{{userlinks|GabiloveAdol}}, ''filing party''
*{{userlinks|[[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]]}}
*{{userlinks|[[User:EthiopianHabesha|EthiopianHabesha]]}}
*{{userlinks|[[User:Soupforone|Soupforone]]}}

;Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
<!-- All parties must be notified that the request has been filed, immediately after it is posted, and confirmation posted here. -->
*[diff of notification [[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]]]
*[diff of notification [[User:EthiopianHabesha|EthiopianHabesha]]]
*[diff of notification [[User:Soupforone|Soupforone]]]

;Confirmation that other steps in [[Wikipedia:dispute resolution|dispute resolution]] have been tried
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration -->
*Link 1
*Link 2

=== Statement by GabiloveAdol ===
If you look at the page of October 23 2016 of the page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amhara_people&diff=745887231&oldid=744666745
versus now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amhara_people
You will see that '''the history section has been gutted in halve''' and that two new sections: 'Slavery' and 'Social stratification' had been added among other.

[[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]] Has added both sections.
On October 27 2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amhara_people&diff=746386729&oldid=746379295 She first named it '''Slavery and Caste'''
Then the title was changed to '''Social Stratification''' by [[User:Soupforone|Soupforone]]: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amhara_people&diff=746387935&oldid=746387072

On October 27 2016 i removed the 'Social Stratification' section when i was an ip, didn't knew how it worked, but i could just read the bias: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amhara_people&diff=746491137&oldid=746398243 didn't engage regarding the edits till january of this year.

On January 8 & 9 2017 i engaged [[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]] on the Amhara people talk page '''source by source'''
On January 9 2017 in those same discussions,[[User:Soupforone|Soupforone]] '''found out that the Amhara has not been mentioned in the source provided by''' [[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]] : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759086281&oldid=759086195

Same day [[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759126649&oldid=759124880 '''lashed out and lied and then added a second line of text saying it was mutiple peer scholarly reviewed''' https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759143441&oldid=759126649

Then [[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]] '''got caught redhanded again by using Donald Levine and passing it for the Herbert Lewis source which she earlier staunchly defended'''. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759168486&oldid=759143441

Then she went on a editing spree:

On january 9 2017 [[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]] '''added a text in the history section which also contained sentence in a present context''', and talking about a census of a group, talking about reducing reading quality of the page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amhara_people&diff=759213260&oldid=759208010

On January 10 2017 [[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]] added '''Slavery''' section https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amhara_people&diff=759307455&oldid=759257638 when social stratification(previously Slavery and Caste) just wasn't enough.

On January 13 2017 [[User:EthiopianHabesha|EthiopianHabesha]] had '''a proposal''' https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759831546&oldid=759800549
in which i agreed to moving the sections to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Ethiopia instead of opening similar sections in other ethnic groups, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759882870&oldid=759831546

[[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]] is '''the only one opposed''' https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759919460&oldid=759894107
I skipped the '''prior dispute resolution''' because of the '''time sensitivity''' which i'm happily to elaborate further, it has to do with '''upcoming protest, awareness, information war and human rights'''. People relying on wikipedia to know more about the Amhara people could get the wrong or unbalanced impression/information, reading the article as it now is. I also emailed the '''Oversight team''' because the page is defamatory to a '''group''', the previous history page has been gutted, and now two thirds of the history section is about 'Slavery' and 'Social stratification'. '''it's no longer neutral and it's misrepresenting a group of people which recently captured headlines'''!

Sincerely
[[User:GabiloveAdol|GabiloveAdol]] ([[User talk:GabiloveAdol|talk]]) 03:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
=== Statement by [[User:Ms Sarah Welch|Ms Sarah Welch]] ===

=== Statement by [[User:EthiopianHabesha|EthiopianHabesha]] ===
=== Statement by [[User:Soupforone|Soupforone]] ===
=== Statement by {Non-party} ===
Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.
<!-- * Please copy this section for the next person. * -->

=== Clerk notes ===
:''This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).''
*

=== The Amhara people page lost neutrality and is being misrepresented.: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0> ===
{{anchor|1=The Amhara people page lost neutrality and is being misrepresented.: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter}}<small>Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)</small>
*

Revision as of 03:24, 17 January 2017


Requests for arbitration

The Amhara people page lost neutrality and is being misrepresented.

Initiated by GabiloveAdol (talk) at 03:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Involved parties

Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
  • Link 1
  • Link 2

Statement by GabiloveAdol

If you look at the page of October 23 2016 of the page: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amhara_people&diff=745887231&oldid=744666745 versus now: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amhara_people You will see that the history section has been gutted in halve and that two new sections: 'Slavery' and 'Social stratification' had been added among other.

Ms Sarah Welch Has added both sections. On October 27 2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amhara_people&diff=746386729&oldid=746379295 She first named it Slavery and Caste Then the title was changed to Social Stratification by Soupforone: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amhara_people&diff=746387935&oldid=746387072

On October 27 2016 i removed the 'Social Stratification' section when i was an ip, didn't knew how it worked, but i could just read the bias: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amhara_people&diff=746491137&oldid=746398243 didn't engage regarding the edits till january of this year.

On January 8 & 9 2017 i engaged Ms Sarah Welch on the Amhara people talk page source by source On January 9 2017 in those same discussions,Soupforone found out that the Amhara has not been mentioned in the source provided by Ms Sarah Welch  : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759086281&oldid=759086195

Same day Ms Sarah Welch https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759126649&oldid=759124880 lashed out and lied and then added a second line of text saying it was mutiple peer scholarly reviewed https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759143441&oldid=759126649

Then Ms Sarah Welch got caught redhanded again by using Donald Levine and passing it for the Herbert Lewis source which she earlier staunchly defended. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759168486&oldid=759143441

Then she went on a editing spree:

On january 9 2017 Ms Sarah Welch added a text in the history section which also contained sentence in a present context, and talking about a census of a group, talking about reducing reading quality of the page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amhara_people&diff=759213260&oldid=759208010

On January 10 2017 Ms Sarah Welch added Slavery section https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Amhara_people&diff=759307455&oldid=759257638 when social stratification(previously Slavery and Caste) just wasn't enough.

On January 13 2017 EthiopianHabesha had a proposal https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759831546&oldid=759800549 in which i agreed to moving the sections to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Ethiopia instead of opening similar sections in other ethnic groups, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759882870&oldid=759831546

Ms Sarah Welch is the only one opposed https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Amhara_people&diff=759919460&oldid=759894107

I skipped the prior dispute resolution because of the time sensitivity which i'm happily to elaborate further, it has to do with upcoming protest, awareness, information war and human rights. People relying on wikipedia to know more about the Amhara people could get the wrong or unbalanced impression/information, reading the article as it now is. I also emailed the Oversight team because the page is defamatory to a group, the previous history page has been gutted, and now two thirds of the history section is about 'Slavery' and 'Social stratification'. it's no longer neutral and it's misrepresenting a group of people which recently captured headlines!

Sincerely GabiloveAdol (talk) 03:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Statement by Ms Sarah Welch

Statement by EthiopianHabesha

Statement by Soupforone

Statement by {Non-party}

Other editors are free to make relevant comments on this request as necessary. Comments here should address why or why not the Committee should accept the case request or provide additional information.

Clerk notes

This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).

The Amhara people page lost neutrality and is being misrepresented.: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0>

Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse)

Leave a Reply