Page

One Piece (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)Panda619 (talk) 00:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User being reported

QuestFour (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 22:40, 14 August 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on One Piece. (TW)"
2. 22:43, 14 August 2019 (UTC) ""
3. 22:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 910855132 by QuestFour (talk) don't remove recent active discussions"
4. 22:49, 14 August 2019 (UTC) "/* July 2019 Edit war */"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

I wanted to have discussion about a edit war, but user seems to be deleting the discussion itself and making abusive comments in the edit summary of his own talk page while removing the discussion itself, like "can you f off". Panda619 (talk) 00:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Not a single diff listed. QuestFour hasn't edited the article since July 30.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:49, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, the user did many reverts before that, which I noticed today and wanted to discuss, but the user behavior is abusive. --Panda619 (talk) 00:55, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pages:

• Communion and Liberation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
• Rimini Meeting (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  

User being reported: Kitcatx (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Communion_and_Liberation&oldid=910059505

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Communion_and_Liberation&oldid=910087551
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Communion_and_Liberation&oldid=910675023
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Communion_and_Liberation&oldid=910800616
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Communion_and_Liberation&oldid=910804375
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Communion_and_Liberation&oldid=910938881

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [1]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Communion_and_Liberation

Comments:
{User Kitcatx has been vandalizing two affiliated pages, Communion and Liberation and Rimini Meeting. They were warned twice and merely deleted the warnings from their talk page. They keep inserting biased criticism, controversies, and conspiracies against Communion and Liberation in the description of the organization, rather than limiting those entries to the "Controversies and Criticism" section. A few times they have also deleted a good amount of information on the organization, replacing it with criticism and providing misleading information attacking the organization. Lzzy303 (talk) 16:00, 15 August 2019 (UTC)Lzzy303}}[reply]

Hi, I've used the talk pages, there is no need to be such aggressive. Kitcatx (talk) 16:01, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• No violation – there must be four or more reverts within a 24 hour period for the 3-Revert Rule to apply; the links you have provided do not meet these criteria. Continue to use the talk pages to discuss your differences, and seek dispute resolution if necessary. – bradv🍁 16:12, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page

Mirpur, Pakistan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Kashmiri Human (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 23:41, 15 August 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 911002584 by AnUnnamedUser (talk)unacceptable fiction being imposed on the world"
2. 23:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 910998749 by AnUnnamed juUser (talk)Just plain reality. Edits from a country virtually declared as a Terrorist one, ruled by a Military with control of Terrorist organisations, are unaccepatable by a civilized world. Stop begging for food,"
3. 22:47, 15 August 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 910997214 by Aranya (talk)there is is obviously a gang of persons bent on spreading untruth. Pl check the situation on the ground and as supported by the United Nations Security councilresolutions"
4. 22:30, 15 August 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 910996668 by Donner60 (talk)"
5. 22:27, 15 August 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 910996008 b my changes reflected facts. Ever... seems to be sponsored Everedux (talk)"
6. 22:20, 15 August 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 910994621 by AnUnnamedUser (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

A vandalism-only account. Warned 5 times on talk today, disruptive editing continued afterwards. Page is under 1RR discretionary sanctions. Definitely WP:NOTHERE to build an encyclopaedia. — kashmīrī ^TALK 00:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked - Indef by User:Bbb23 as a vandalism-only account. EdJohnston (talk) 03:46, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page: Regional power (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Collebud88 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Regional_power&diff=911109443&oldid=911083955
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Regional_power&diff=911109627&oldid=911109443
3. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Regional_power&diff=911138518&oldid=911133594
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Regional_power&diff=911144029&oldid=911142784
5. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Regional_power&diff=911144767&oldid=911144638

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [2]

Comments: That's five reverts in the space of five hours, but I'm less concerned about the letter of the rule, than with what appears to be a persistent pattern. The prelude to the above was in the history of Colombia, concerning pretty much the same content. I started a discussion at Talk:Colombia#Transcontinental, and nudged Collebud88 to participate several times. They refused to engage and simply reverted, again and again. I guess CIR is also involved here: this edit warring revolves around content that they're trying to buttress with citations that don't actually support the claims made (for example, the claim that Colombia is the most ethnically diverse country in the world with a website that only talks about diversity of wildlife, or the claim that it's a regional power first with raw GDP statistics, then with a magazine article about the country being that magazine' country of the year at the time). – Uanfala (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page

Chad (slang) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Anonywiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 15:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC) "/* History */ I managed to view the page and none of that stuff about "the term originated from a satirical website" is in any way part of the article. You're performing original research yourself. Meanwhile the outer limits episode was interested, well-sourced and not disputed."
2. 18:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 910560702 by OrgoneBox (talk) Rubbish. The term is being used the exact same way as it is on the website, except it's "satirical" there, the exact same. I can't even see that website because I live in europe and it's blocked here. If anything should be removed it's that link."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 01:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC) "/* Your edits = */"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Editor has a long block record for disruption and a talk page full of warnings for this type of behavior. Persistently editing the Chad (slang) article to insert synthesis source to a non WP:RS, refuses to accept and is instead responding with belligerence and stale revert warring against long established consensus. The third edit is from days ago [3]. OrgoneBox There is a persistent problem with this editor over many years regarding misuse of sources and edit warring to force his preferred versions. (talk) 23:12, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• No violation.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:55, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page

Mahathir Mohamad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

[4], [5], [6], [7]

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

[8]

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

On my user talk page I have suggested that the editor self-revert. He has not availed himself of that opportunity.—Mkativerata (talk) 07:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

Declined – malformed report. Please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this page, which gives a template report, and provide complete diffs. Your report is virtually blank — what gives? El_C 07:02, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - fixed now. --Mkativerata (talk) 07:29, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have added sources from notable Bangladeshi dailies like Bangladesh Pratidin, Kaler Kantho, Amader Shomoy. The are in 1st, 3rd and 8th by circulation in Bangladesh. But, Mkativerata has mentioned my edit as "nationalist rubbish". My question is will prominent 3 newspapers of a country will publish article about "nationalist rubbish"? Even I have given source of Malaysiakini and Dailyhunt (India) about his grandfather's home. But he had said, I should not edit on those topic that I have no knowledge.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 07:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're reverting against a massive number of sources including Mahathir's biography and other academic literature. See, for example, [9], [10], [11], [12], [13] (somewhere in 'southern India' but Kerala uncertain), [14]. But as bad as that is, the key point for this report is that you've reverted four times in 24 hours, which you know is against the rules, because I've pointed it out to you twice, but you still won't self-revert. The fact that you won't self-revert shows that you are not serious about editing collegially, and paying deference to a long-standing sourced version of an article, and instead are hell-bent on edit-warring to push a weakly-sourced view about the ancestry of a serving head of government --Mkativerata (talk) 07:50, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will do self revert. But I don't find option as I edit Wikipedia from Mobile phone. It is complex edit Wikipedia on Smartphone. It should be discussed about his ancestor. I have references too.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks -- I note for passing admins that S. M. Nazmus Shakib has now self-reverted.--Mkativerata (talk) 08:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Self revert done. But in Bangladesh Pratidin (most circulated Bangladeshi daily), Shomoy (8th most circulated Bangladeshi daily), Kaler Kantho (3rd most circulated Bangladeshi daily), Janakantha, (6th most circulated newspaper in Bangladesh) Nayadiganta (15th most circulated newspaper in Bangladesh), Azadi (newspaper's sub editorial) it was mentioned about his Bangladeshi ancestors. Even in Malaysiakini and Dailyhunt it was mentioned too.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:18, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page

Augusto Fernandez (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Fcbjuvenil (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 13:33, 17 August 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 911231953 by 21 Lilac Street (talk)"
2. 13:05, 17 August 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 911169922 by 21 Lilac Street (talk)"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 13:38, 17 August 2019 (UTC) "Only warning: Adding unreferenced controversial information about living persons. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments: