Palpatine

I'm nominating this. It is a comprehensive article, which is well-written, referenced, sourced, picture-ied, discussed etc. I've implemented most of Peer Review's suggestions, and I really see no reason why Palpatine couldn't be a Featured Article; it would be pretty neat- AFAIK, our first Star Wars FA. --Maru (talk) Contribs 04:51, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The additional material was really unnecessary. It was a good, though bloated, article beforehand. Today's changes have largely succeeded in making it fatter with poor grammar and a variety of short, choppy sentences in the opening segment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.15.144 (talk • contribs)

I feel I should note that the preceding comment is from an anonymous user's whose removal of references on Palpatine I've reverted twice now. --Maru (talk) Contribs 06:14, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review: Wikipedia:Peer review/Palpatine -maclean25 11:37, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - Is it not possible to fork this article out? It's so long, 100 kilobytes, and looks very text heavy. - Hahnchen 16:57, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]