Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 11) (bot |
→Arbitration motion regarding The Rambling Man: new section |
||
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
: Discuss this at: '''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#ARBPIA "consensus" provision modified]]''' |
: Discuss this at: '''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#ARBPIA "consensus" provision modified]]''' |
||
== Arbitration motion regarding The Rambling Man == |
|||
{{ivmbox|1=After discussion with both parties, the Committee resolves that {{user|The Rambling Man}} be indefinitely [[WP:IBAN|banned from interacting]] with, or commenting on {{user|Bishonen}} anywhere on the English Wikipedia. This is subject to the [[WP:BANEX|usual exceptions]]. |
|||
;Support |
|||
:Euryalus, DGG, Doug Weller, GorillaWarfare, Opabinia regalis, Mkdw |
|||
;Recused: |
|||
:Casliber, Ks0stm, Newyorkbrad |
|||
;Inactive: |
|||
:DeltaQuad, Drmies, Callanecc, Kelapstick |
|||
For the Arbitration Committee, -- [[User:Euryalus|Euryalus]] ([[User talk:Euryalus|talk]]) 13:05, 24 May 2017 (UTC)}} |
|||
: Discuss this at: '''[[Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration motion regarding The Rambling Man]]''' |
|||
Revision as of 13:05, 24 May 2017
| Wikipedia Arbitration |
|---|
 |
|
|
| Track related changes |
This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.
Arbitration motion to standardise arbitration enforcement procedures
An arbitration motion has been proposed that would amend the discretionary sanctions procedure by moving some of those provisions into the Committee's arbitration enforcement policy to standardise enforcement of all Committee and discretionary sanctions. The community is encouraged to reviewed and commented on the motion here. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
OccultZone siteban rescinded
The indefinite siteban of OccultZone (talk · contribs) imposed in remedy 1 of the "OccultZone and others" arbitration case is rescinded with the following restrictions:
- OccultZone's topic ban from remedy 2 and one account restriction from remedy 3 in the "OccultZone and others" case remain in effect.
- OccultZone is indefinitely topic banned from filing, commenting in or discussing sockpuppet investigations. If OccultZone has a reasonable suspicion that a user may be engaging in sockpuppetry, they should raise the issue with the functionaries, an admin, or a sockpuppet investigations clerk, who can then file a sockpuppet investigation if, in their opinion, one is warranted.
- OccultZone is indefinitely topic banned from making any edits related to, or editing any page about South Asian topics, broadly construed.
- OccultZone is indefinitely subject to a 1RR editing restriction.
- OccultZone is indefinitely restricted from:
- Raising any issue at more than one venue, whatever that venue is (with the exception of bringing a case or clarification/amendment request to ArbCom).
- Raising any issue at a venue other than where it is being discussed.
- For clarity, OccultZone is not restricted from:
- Commenting in multiple venues if an issue is moved (by himself or others).
- Commenting in multiple venues if a single issue has been raised in multiple places by other users.
- Notifying users or pages of discussions in other venues.
These restrictions may be appealed to the Committee in no less than six months.
- Passed 8 to 0 by motion at 17:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 17:18, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 34#OccultZone siteban rescinded
Standardising arbitration enforcement procedures
The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:
The following sections are moved (word for word) from the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions procedure to the Committee's procedures page (under the "Enforcement" heading) and as such apply to all arbitration enforcement actions (including discretionary sanctions and actions enforcing arbitration case remedies):
- The "Expectations of administrators" section
- The "Dismissing an enforcement request" section
A note is to be placed prominently on the discretionary sanctions procedure noting that the Enforcement provisions on the Committee's procedures page also apply to the application and enforcement of discretionary sanctions.
The "Appeals and modifications" in the discretionary sanctions procedure is modified to reflect the current version standard provision for appeals and modifications, including changes made to it in future amendments (Template:Arbitration standard provisions may be used).
For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 19:10, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
- Archived discussion
- Archived discussion at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard/Archive 34#Standardising arbitration enforcement procedures
ARBPIA "consensus" provision modified
The consensus required restriction in the Palestine-Israel articles case is modified to read as follows:
Editors are limited to one revert per page per day on any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. In addition, editors are required to obtain consensus through discussion before restoring a reverted edit.Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. If an edit is reverted by another editor, its original author may not restore it within 24 hours. Reverts made to enforce the General Prohibition are exempt fromthe revert limitthe provisions of this motion. Also, the normal exemptions apply. Editors who violate this restriction may be blockedwithout warningby any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.- Passed 9 to 0 by motion at 00:22, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 00:32, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
- Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#ARBPIA "consensus" provision modified
Arbitration motion regarding The Rambling Man
After discussion with both parties, the Committee resolves that The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) be indefinitely banned from interacting with, or commenting on Bishonen (talk · contribs) anywhere on the English Wikipedia. This is subject to the usual exceptions.
- Support
- Euryalus, DGG, Doug Weller, GorillaWarfare, Opabinia regalis, Mkdw
- Recused
- Casliber, Ks0stm, Newyorkbrad
- Inactive
- DeltaQuad, Drmies, Callanecc, Kelapstick
For the Arbitration Committee, -- Euryalus (talk) 13:05, 24 May 2017 (UTC)