Hello, Zoyetu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 11:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Chuckle Brothers. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 11:59, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Zoyetu, you have already been warned several times not to add or restore biographical content that is sourced only to the tabloid press or to other low-quality sources. If you continue to edit-war over such content, you will be blocked. Please consider this a final warning. SuperMarioMan ( talk ) 14:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, no, I can't see how it's in the public interest that a TV comedian once sent salacious text messages to a married woman and had a coffee with her. Clearly no non-tabloid sources ever thought it was in the public interest either.

But regardless of what I think, WP:BLP is very clear about how biography articles should be written. --McGeddon (talk) 12:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Chuckle Brothers. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. McGeddon (talk) 16:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Civilian WW2 Memorial Trust, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Charity Commission and Air raid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Chuckle Brothers.

Emphasis on the words "poorly sourced". If you continue to disregard WP:BLPSOURCES on the subject of tabloid journalism, I will start a discussion at WP:ANI with a view to having you topic-banned from all BLPs. There will be no further warnings. SuperMarioMan ( Talk ) 20:46, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]