Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Warning: Edit warring on Chuckle Brothers. (TW)
→‎Public interest: new section
Line 18: Line 18:


If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|editing privileges]]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:McGeddon|McGeddon]] ([[User talk:McGeddon|talk]]) 11:59, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|editing privileges]]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|loss of editing privileges]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:McGeddon|McGeddon]] ([[User talk:McGeddon|talk]]) 11:59, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

== Public interest ==

To be honest, no, I can't see how it's in the public interest that a TV comedian once sent salacious text messages to a married woman and had a coffee with her. Clearly no non-tabloid sources ever thought it was in the public interest either.

But regardless of what I think, [[WP:BLP]] is very clear about how biography articles should be written. --[[User:McGeddon|McGeddon]] ([[User talk:McGeddon|talk]]) 12:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:14, 29 October 2015

Welcome!

Hello, Zoyetu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! McGeddon (talk) 11:28, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Chuckle Brothers. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 11:59, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Public interest

To be honest, no, I can't see how it's in the public interest that a TV comedian once sent salacious text messages to a married woman and had a coffee with her. Clearly no non-tabloid sources ever thought it was in the public interest either.

But regardless of what I think, WP:BLP is very clear about how biography articles should be written. --McGeddon (talk) 12:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply