{

Archives

June 2010 May 2010 June 2010

This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hello Zhernovoi. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Chicago Catz, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: co-founding a notable band is a claim of importance. Jazzfann, 17:41, 9 June 2010 (CST)

User:Jazzfann, please sign your posts. Please do not use notifications by copying previous ones made by an Aministrator (!). — Zhernovoi (talk) 22:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jazzfan — i am asking you to not edit my posts. Also, you should consider using WP:NM as a reference for notability issues. — Zhernovoi (talk) 23:01, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• PLEASE IMMEDIATELY RE-INSTATE the page on Chicago Catz that you deleted in error as the band meets criteria number 10 of the WP:NM, as stated there: "10. Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. Please refer to the movie The Guardian http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0406816/fullcredits where the band was featured in the movie as well as the movie Holes http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0311289/soundtrack.Jazzfann (talk) 18:32, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jazzfan, i am NOT the administrator responsible for the deletion of the article. You should contact the corresponding admin and explain HIM the reasons why the article should be restored. — Zhernovoi (talk) 18:37, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I've created a Luvthecity wikipedia document to describe the listed company's details and describe who the site is hosted with, who they do business with and the impact that vertical search engines are having on the UK property market. Please can you review your suggested deletion? Kind regargs, Stepneyjack —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stepneyjack (talk • contribs) 18:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please contact the corresponding editor — i nominated the page for speedy per WP:CSD G11, which was declined and replaced by nomination per WP:CSD A7 by TransporterMan. — Zhernovoi (talk) 19:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've just written a 'mark an article patrolled' template in my talk page.But, I don't understand what does it means.Please describe me.Max Viwe —Preceding undated comment added 12:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Hello! Please review Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/patrolled_pages, it should give you some answers. — Zhernovoi (talk) 12:30, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Regarding the {refimprove} tag on the Unser Gedank article, I'm not sure how to interpret it; 1) are more sources needed for expansion of the article, or 2) are more references needed to back up the claims in its present state? --Soman (talk) 17:50, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Soman. Basically, it may be debatably if the subject meets WP:GNG. To indicate notability more references (from reliable sources) and an article expansion are needed. Otherwise a Speedy deleteion/Afd process may be started. Thank you! — Zhernovoi (talk) 18:03, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to clarify, I didn't decline your request because I don't trust you (far from it, your contributions seem excellent), but that you don't appear to need it. It's just another button for reverting bad edits quickly, so it's useless for new page patrolling. Keep up the good work- new page patrol is a thankless but essential task. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 20:10, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you again for the clarify! I will do my best :) — Zhernovoi (talk) 20:17, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Let me know if you need anything (unless it's to do with CSD A7) in future. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:34, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--Nuujinn (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome! :) — Zhernovoi (talk) 09:00, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]