Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, vfd comments

They are being deleted b/c they are illegal, breach copyright and therefore must deleted. Destryoed. Exterminate. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DalekBot (talk • contribs) 10:04, 5 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

You have dealings, would you like to perform the username block? Viridae^Talk 10:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't attack the user clown, generally, I was just trying to help wikipedia, the reason I added the page for deletion, is because it contained "All I know is that he's a bad motherfucker" Also that the userclown, hasn't edited for a while know. Sorry about all this.--Rasillon 17:39, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following three pages are in my view violating Wikipedia:Content forking.

1. List of countries by date of statehood
2. List of states by date of self-determination
3. List of countries by date of independence

I have not been able to dig up what to do. These three pages should be merged into one or two of them deleted. Now it is just a less than desirable situation created by people who couldn't agree. The topic itself is really too complexe to be handled by a simple list. But in my opinion the first one is the best one and should be kept. It gives a short explanation to each entry and allows for multiple listings to reflect the shifting nature of what we today regard as a nation's status as independent. The second one was even created as Alternative List of countries by date of independence. I had a long conversation with the main creator of that page on my talk page here which let to almost nothing. What do you think?Inge 12:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See user:rollaround. Check Battle of Budapest Looks link you old friend. DMorpheus 13:22, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support in my not-so-recent RfA, which succeeded with a final tally of (97/4/4)! I've never been able to accept compliments gracefully, and the heavy support from this outstanding community left me at a complete loss for words -- so, a very belated thank you for all of your kind words. I have done and will continue to do the utmost to serve the community in this new capacity, wherever it may take me, and to set an example others might wish to follow in. With a little luck and a lot of advice, this may be enough. Maybe someday the enwiki admins of the future will look back and say, "Yeah, that guy was an admin." Hopefully then they don't start talking about the explosive ArbComm case I got tied into and oh what a drama that was, but we'll see, won't we? Surely some of you have seen me in action by now; with that in mind, I openly invite and welcome any feedback here or here -- help me become the best editor and sysop I can be. Again, thank you. –Luna Santin

Glad to see you around, now and then. Truth be told, I still look up to you, even if the locale of our first meeting is essentially deleted, these days. That's life on the wiki, eh? ;) Chin up, and such. Luna Santin 12:28, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just to let you know a known sockpuppet acoount which you recently blocked has returned and now continues to mke the same edit (on the Lesnar article) which he was blocked for in the first place as well as uploading unsourced photos of the subject --- Paulley

I'm a 'phone-based tech support person' too! Wouldn't mind your shift, bet it pays more than normal hours!;o)Halbared 18:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scilit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Spam only sock account for actionbioscience.org Hu12 08:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Though controversial, I would have argued the links were useful. The site seems to be non-profit and each individual link goes to a relevant article. Asterion^talk 08:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your rationale. The editor still has the chance to request an unblock and explain their reasons. Regards, Asterion^talk 09:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. Fingers crossed! Asterion^talk 09:08, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The ext. reference

• Evidence and the Cambrian Explosion — ActionBioscience.org interview

was deleted by User:Woohookitty. It reads like a perfectly mainstream, though rather basic, explication of the Cambrian explosion and the kinds of evidence available, presented by Jeffrey S. Levinton, Ph.D., State University of New York, and including a useful series of responsible webite links. Is there a factor here that we ignore? This note is copied at Talk:Cambrian explosion. --Wetman 11:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is wrong with you people. What is so hard to understand here. Firestone is an International Company with plants in many countries. The article Firestone Tire and Rubber Company is about Firestone USA. It has been hijacked by user Travb to try to force attention towards political agendas such as the Liberian Controvesy, Roll Over deaths and other items from the Stop Firestone.com website. This page has been in an edit war because user Travb refuses to accept majority discussion on these items.

I have tried to discuss these issues as well as user Travb having that article blocked. User Travb is not interested in discussion. To stop the edit war, a New Higher Level page was developed titled Firestone, on this page were links to everything firestone related, including people named firestone, schools, libraries, countys, golf clubs etc etc. At the top under the section Tires, were two links, One to the page Firestone International and 1 to the Travb version Firestone Tire and Rubber Company.

To create Firestone International I used the other page as a starting point and I was reworking it to remove non relevant information and expanded to include Firestone Indy car racing and a 100 year History Page plus the other Firestone Plants around the world. User Travb did not like this comprimise and so deleted all My work on these pages pointing everything back to his version and then had the page protected.

This I have tried to correct today, only to have you come along and revert it all back again. Please explain why you have done this, and why this compromise is being deleted in favour of user Travb and their political agenda.

Surely you should be able to see what is going on here and realise that these articles are being used to further a political agenda and not provide true and unbiased information on this company. Take the time to look at what I created and what is being placed on the Firestone Tire and Rubber Company article. Mobile 01 23:53, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]