Good day @Vanderwaalforces i wanted to create a wikipedia article on this subject he was an online sensation 2021 - 2022 and built notability from there on. here are his links i am creating this article because building an independent Notable career isnt something that can easily be done and since there is no conflict of interest between i and the subject too thats why i decided to send these links as you requested.

https://www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2021/02/03/mkido-ready-to-storm-the-music-industry/

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2022/09/how-mkido-is-making-wave-with-yemasa/

https://dailytimesng.com/mkido-chinko-ekun-team-up-on-new-single-yemasa/

https://guardian.ng/arts-2/mkido-set-to-release-new-ep/

https://guardian.ng/saturday-magazine/weekend-beats/mkido-set-to-drop-new-single-yemasa/

https://tribuneonlineng.com/mkido-drops-new-single-shalaye/

There are more of these, just wanted to send these so you know he has Significant press coevrage from notable Nigerian sources according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Nigeria/Nigerian sources Dahproman (talk) 06:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dahproman Just so you know, for a source to be used, it needs to pass WP:SIGCOV, WP:INDEPENDENT, and WP:RS. If it passes WP:SIGCOV and WP:RS but does not pass WP:INDEPENDENT, it should not be used. All three needs to be passed. The first-three sources you provided above do not meet all three. The last three are PRs and cannot be used either. I have also done some searches on my own and will only urge you to forget about this subject for now and focus elsewhere. There are plenty things you can engage yourself with on here. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay sir thank you @Vanderwaalforces for your feedback much appreciated Dahproman (talk) 08:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You declined a redirect request. Asking for sources for the alternate names. However, three alternate name sources had been provided. Kindly reconsider. This relates to your 16:35, 14 May 2024 refusal of the redirects for Olympic swimmer Anastasia Gorbenko. The request had been made on 17:29, 10 May 2024. The refusal struck me as unusual given they the requested for links to uses of the alternately spelled name had in fact been supplied. And in no way were the slightly different spellings of this foreign name - as you termed it - an “unlikely” term. They are both quite similar. And supported by links. 2806:261:4AD:8319:D148:52FD:29B4:A82 (talk) 06:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I do not find either "Anatasia", "Anastasiya" or "Anastasiia" as alternative names for "Anastasia". These are weird and unlikely alternative names. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These as you imagine are not imaginary concoctions. They are actual variations with the surname Gorbenko. Reflected in the links that were supplied with the request. In addition, I’m unclear what is meant when you say you “do not find” these to be other than “weird and unlikely.” Perhaps you are referring (I can’t tell) to a gut feeling rather than a fact based inquiry (beyond the links supplied in the request) In addition to the links supplied which I allude to, that comment is somewhat at odds with simple google searches. As well as simple Wikipedia searches. See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?limit=500&offset=0&profile=default&search=%22Anatasia%22&title=Special:Search&ns0=1 I would ask that you reconsider and self revert under the circumstances. Thank you. - see for example https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Anatasia%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari#ip=1 --2806:261:4AD:8319:D148:52FD:29B4:A82 (talk) 11:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you really want these redirects, kindly re-request them at the request page. I will not revert a review I made consciously. You could simply request again for another reviewer to look. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sunday Iyahen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SafariScribe -- SafariScribe (talk) 09:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Did your series of moves/edits actually end up where you intended?

At the moment:

• Running water redirects to Tap water
• Running Water also redirects to Tap water
• Running water (disambiguation) is a disambiguation page
• Running Water (disambiguation) redirects to the disambiguation page.

When I saw the start of your series of moves I thought/hoped you were going to move the disambiguation page to Running Water, which seems useful: there are a bunch of places and films with the upper case "W", and it's not a very likely search term for tap water. Was that what you intended, perhaps? (Please?) PamD 18:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see that @Bkonrad has intervened and things are looking better. Thanks. PamD 18:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, as I mentioned at my talk page, I'm not sure tap water is the best primary topic for running water, but that has been a redirect since 2005 and likely should have some discussion if there is any change. But as PamD mentions, there is no reason to force readers who intentionally type the capitalized version Running Water to go to some other article before getting to the dab page for entities that are capitalized. older ≠ wiser 18:45, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bkonrad I believe we both have a point. But like I said below, I have no prejudice against keeping it this way. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD Hi there. Perhaps, Bkonrad has the same thoughts as me "no reason whatsoever to force readers that intentionally type the capitalized version to go to the lower case article". But on the other, what if someone who actually wants Running water, which is a redirect to Tap water, and types "Running Water"?

I have no prejudice against keeping it this way though, but just wanted to point that out. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a link at the top of the dab page which will help that reader. They'll have one extra click, but many other readers will be saved a click. Thanks. PamD 18:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@PamD That's right. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:50, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You’re doing a super amazing job here on Wikipedia.

Many thanks for the review on an article I submitted (Scooby Nero). I’ve been curious as to why the article had not been reviewed but thanks to you, I’ve found some unreliable sources that may have affected the worthiness of the article. Would you mind reviewing the article again after addressing the issues you mentioned? I really hope I get a yes (smiles). Cheers! Mevoelo (talk) 17:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Mevoelo Hi there, thank you for your contributions too. If your fix is able to establish the subjects notability, then it would be accepted by me or any other reviewer. Pro tip; you do not need to remove the previous AfC review templates from the top of the article, this will allow other reviewer to see what was reviewed and what has changed. Kudos. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the correction on the AFC review. I’ll keep that in mind. I sincerely didn’t think it was anything. Thanks a lot. Well appreciated! Mevoelo (talk) 17:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]