Content deleted Content added
→Truism: new section |
William M. Connolley (talk | contribs) →Blocked: new section |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
Good one. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 09:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC) |
Good one. [[User:Viriditas|Viriditas]] ([[User talk:Viriditas|talk]]) 09:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
== Blocked == |
|||
You're blocked for disruptive editing [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allegations_of_state_terrorism_by_the_United_States&diff=206123341&oldid=206099051] elading to the page being protected. Stop it [[User:William M. Connolley|William M. Connolley]] ([[User talk:William M. Connolley|talk]]) 19:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:50, 17 April 2008
User:Travb/Travb Template:User talk:Travb/r
Makes me smile
Some of the best humor I have seen lately. [1] Thanks for the smile!TheRedPenOfDoom (talk) 04:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, thanks. Wikipedia is a love hate thing for me, lately it has been mostly hate. I have a lot of long essays on my user page about the hypocricy and bullying on wikipedia. I keep trying to leave, but like the Godfather, they pull my back in...Inclusionist (talk) 04:15, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Truism
...everyone always argues that their side has "consensus", it is the most abused word on wikipedia. Personally, I find that people usually point out consensus when there is none.
Good one. Viriditas (talk) 09:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
You're blocked for disruptive editing [2] elading to the page being protected. Stop it William M. Connolley (talk) 19:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)