Archives

Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20

This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

And there is also This archive.

Thx 4 d barnstar :D. WIll do my best to make articles nicer to see and read. Ssven2 (talk

Dude now check the main lead. Every thing mentioned is sourced and all sources are reliable. please check before reverting. myself cleaned unwanted content.now the article looks perfect. Thanks Harirajmohanhrm ^talk (talk)‎ 14:40, 26 September 2014 (UTC).

Why did you remove my added content from the Joust video game article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Widowman88s (talk • contribs)

Please correct / delete unreferenced comments such as 'Hence all corruptions are tucked away under the cupboard.[3]' The citations are to blogs hosted by specific individuals / interest groups.

Many thanks for cleaning up the errors on the Presidency page. A few still remain but I'm not yet confident enough to make the changes on my own.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Wilayat_Kirkuk_(ISIL)

Dear TheRedPenOfDoom,
HAPPY NEW YEAR Hoping 2015 will be a great year for you! Thank you for your contributions!
From a fellow editor,
--FWiW Bzuk (talk)

This message promotes WikiLove. Originally created by Nahnah4 (see "invisible note").

Dear TheRedPenofDoom, please don't delete any data which really has reliable references. The guest appearances and awards sections should be present in the article . For verification please check videos of the star jalsha awards on youtube. Hope youtube is a reliable resource. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.21.79.252 (talk) 14:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know we haven't seen eye to eye of late, but I wanted you to know I appreciate the work you did against Gamergate, and I hope the reprisals weren't too bad. Serendi^podous 19:55, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

HERE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackthomas321 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, while I generally think "drive by tagging" of articles is more disruptive than anything, if you are going to do it, could you please use the multiple issues tag instead of just having a ton of tags at the top of each article? Thanks, Hobit (talk) 03:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

what is your problem?why did u undid my edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ejaz92 (talk • contribs) 13:49, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you my reverted edit again on that article. I thought I would show you the WP:PROVEIT. I don't care if we wait until the date of the show actually airing to link on the next season page. But I thought I would let you know the first episode of season five is titled "Into The Canyons" and is scheduled to air on January 21, 2015. [1]

On the above page I did attempt to revert to the same edits that you reverted to but I am guessing it has something to do with the pending changes protection why my edits did not go though. Its just you said there was no source for claim so I got a bit confused by that one.Daniel298289 (talk) 06:13, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"If you choose to be anonymous on the Internet dont expect to be taken seriously" -TheRedPenOfDoom

LOL noted. 166.171.186.190 (talk) 20:51, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Red Pen, so mid-way through my discussion at Talk:PK (film) with The Indian Yosemite Sam, I realized that I had misinterpreted his first post--I mistakenly thought he was arguing for the inclusion of non-noteworthy 2nd and 3rd week box office totals, which is why I wrote, "If nothing noteworthy happened in the second and third weeks, I don't see the value of listing the collections" and also why I pointed to an earlier discussion I'd raised at Talk:Drishyam. I chalk up this interpretive mistake to a natural human resistance to read carefully what the editor was writing, because I'd twice encountered him acting irrationally hot-headed in the days prior and had to reprimand him thusly. Sort of an "oh boy, what's he complaining about now" reaction. Mea culpa. By the time I realized that I had misinterpreted his proposal, he had launched into a tirade and that then became the new focus. In the interest of integrity, I should probably say that I don't outright object to the inclusion of box office records that were achieved in the second and third week. While it is an "other stuff exists" argument, while looking at the Avatar article (not the list of ridiculous records) it seemed there was some coverage of this info, and is arguably worth including since it helps to convey reception. I do also realize the inherent difficulty of tracking Bollywood "records" given Bollywood's obvious history of corrupt box office data. One argument against the inclusion might be that although PK is being tracked by Rentrak now, how do we accurately compare that to films from the past that have not been properly monitored? And I also recognize the validity of an argument that including this information now might serve to promote the film. A bit of a rant, I know, and I'm not really proposing any specific change, but I needed a little closure on this and I wanted to clarify my position on the record. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:00, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know that this comment needed to be copy/pasted to the PK talk page. I would have been happy to post anew. The "Indian Yosemite Sam" was meant for your amusement. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:40, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

oops sorry. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, looks like you removed the image of the man's face from the infobox on Stevens–Johnson syndrome. I'm curious about why you did that. I thought it was important to understanding the disease. BakerStMD T|C 01:42, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baal Veer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vishal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

have a close and a deeper look into my article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hera_Pheri_3--Alynaa (talk) 18:30, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That comment wasn't at all helpful. The reason I have been deleted 3 times is that I clearly don't know where the appropriate place to post 1st drafts is. I am genuinely trying to post an objective, informative article (which you have never read) and would like somewhere to post it where it won't be deleted post haste in order to get help improving it. Flip suggestions like yours don't help. Can you be of any constructive help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moseley101 (talk • contribs) 19:49, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I declined speedy delete on this: File:Qubool Hai Taj scene.png but see if you can add back the appropriate db template with the date specified so as to give the 2 days chance to justify a fair use. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you're aware of this. Dreadstar ☥ 22:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me. Apologies if I was terse, but this procedure is starting to get frustrating. I appreciate that the tone I have been using in the article may be overly ornate (a symptom of being an English teacher), and yes, I am connected with the organisation in a volunteer capacity. I saw a need for the students that I am tutoring to research the organisation that is responsible for (on one level or another) every conference they attend as MUN delegates. It is in that capacity that I am trying to write this article. The problem is, after several revisions, I am starting to go 'register-blind', and can no longer accurately assess if the tone is appropriate or not. This is where I could really do with some constructive pointers instead of just having the piece deleted ad infinitum. Is there a way that I can post the draft and get some constructive feedback without it being deleted immediately? I have a feeling that I risk being banned if my drafts keep getting deletedMoseley101 (talk) 23:15, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While I understand the need to stay on top of COI, I think this caveat probably applies to me: [[2]]

"Consultants for mission-aligned organizations: When an organization like an educational non-profit – one that largely shares our mission of sharing knowledge – seeks someone to help facilitate an informal collaborative relationship, that is often a mutually beneficial situation. These positions may be for-profit. Be careful of areas where missions are not aligned. Avoid even the appearance of impropriety by limiting scope to mission-aligned areas and using full disclosure for any potential areas of concern.

Employees at cultural and academic institutions: We want experts editing Wikipedia articles. Merely being employed by an institution is not a conflict of interest."
Moseley101 (talk) 00:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let me edit Ileana D'Cruz

I have blocked you for 48 hours for edit-warring on Draft:Gamergate controversy (on a draft for crying out loud!) and for your extremely hostile tone on the talk page, which severely affects the atmosphere and the productiveness of the discussion. This block is made in accordance with the GamerGate community sanctions and may only be lifted with my consent or as a result of consensus at ANI. You may use the {{adminhelp}} or {{unblock}} templates or ping me to request that your appeal be copied to ANI. As an aside, you are going to have to start taking a more collaborative approach to editing in this topic area, otherwise longer blocks and/or a topic ban are the likely result. May I suggest you take this an opportunity to do something else for the weekend and regain a sense of perspective? HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]