Hello, Tbhotch! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! fetchcomms 04:09, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Languages es Este usuario tiene el español como lengua materna. en-2 This user can contribute with an intermediate level of English.

Archives

1.- December 2009 - July 2010 2.- August 2010 - October 2010 3.- November 2010 - January 2011 4.- February 2011 - May 2011

The FAC brought up a query about researching print sources. Here are a few scanned magazines you might wanna take a look at (not sure how relevant): [1][2] (I can't view this one) [3] (Jivesh might be able to help you with French) [4] and [5] (in German). Good luck with the FAC!! :D Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:14, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes Tbhotch . Feel free to ask. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article is only about that she knelt down in Australia 10 October 2009 to sing "Halo" to a girl she brought onstage. Barely 3 lines. Do you still want me to translate it? Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:12, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, i would love to help me. First tell me what type of information you need? Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The link you gave me is great. It has plenty of information that will be of great help to expand other articles of Beyonce. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reply whenever you get time. Take care. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:24, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To tell you frankly, editors at FAC are too demanding. The composition section is already great. By the way, i do not think he was talking about the composition section only. He wanted to verify if the article contains all the information that can be found on it on reliable sources. Just tell him a YES. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:30, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wait i just figured out what he means. I think that he wants more information on recording and production (of course only if there is) and the information should not be from magazines. I will try find some. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:32, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are most welcome. This is the least i can do after that you have helped me so much in the past.

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For supporting me, keeping me company, believing me, and for being my friend. And kind as well as patient, obviously. I would not have acquired such good editing skills without your your help. Thanks! Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:39, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A notable cover of Halo. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another. This one has enough information on the particular cover. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:50, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Information about alternate video. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for telling me that. You are a true friend. I really wanted to give you that barn-star. I will keep on posting links. I have not finished. Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:00, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will continue my research tomorrow. i am going to bed for now. By the way, i hope you know that the new single of Beyonce is coming out in April 2011? Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my God. I am happy that she did not really sang like this. It was a false (tricked) tape only. If she starts singing like that, that would be a complete disaster. You are most welcome. See you tomorrow. Jivesh • Talk2Me 17:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my friend, i hope you are fine. Didn't you get more reviews for "Halo"? Jivesh • Talk2Me 13:49, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-assess Talk:Fighting Temptation. Jivesh • Talk2Me 18:29, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It might be worth mentioning that Halo was released in other European countries on 20 March 2009? Eg Italy. Adabow (talk · contribs) 09:53, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Is iTunes permitted for use? I mean, Tbhotch, you might have seen my FAC. Amazon was deemed unreliable, so iTunes must be the same too, I guess. Novice7 (talk) 17:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ask me for any help. I will be very happy to help you. Jivesh • Talk2Me 18:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@Novice, neither iTunes or Amazon are "unreliable", and you had to argue otherwise. Neither source is unreliable unless it has a characteristic listed here or it is blacklisted. Here, Nikki argued that Yahoo! "blog" is unreliable because of the use of the word "blog", I denoted her that this was not true at all, so you have to do two things a) Defend the article the most you can and b) Still being flexible about reviewers.

@Jivesh, thank you boy, I'll do it without any doubt. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 04:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. Listen, it's better you ignore User:indopug at the FA. He is being ridiculous and way too demanding. Jivesh • Talk2Me 09:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you have read my message above. Tbhotch, i want to ask you something but i am a bit scared. Please do not get me wrong. You count a lot for me, more than you think. I mean that you are a very good friend on Wikipedia and everyone here on Wikipedia is like my second family. What i want to ask is that, are you sure Nathan vandalize your talk-page? I mean, don't you suspect someone else... Someone with whom you had a fight, other than Nathan. Please do not be angry Tbhotch. I just wanted to ask. I know you consider me as a good friend (I saw it here and i feel very happy to be in that short list) and i do not want to lose your friendship. Try to think about what i told you with a cool mind. Trust me, you are not the only one to have had problems with Nathan. I have suffered from kind of a fate (February 11, 2011 but was not so serious). I am not taking his side. I just want you both to clear your misunderstandings (if there is any). I am telling you once again my friend, i left you this message with a good intention. Try to think about it. I will wait patiently. Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:16, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For the first point, I believe I'll request a copy-edit, could you recommend me one? I remember an user has helped you before with those things. For the second, as I said at his SPI, I like to know why an IP vandaiize my page. I immediately recognize if I already know that user, for example, if this IP starts with 86.xxx.... I know he is CharlieJS13 (talk · contribs), but this IP has nothing to do with me (apparently) until I saw his edits to Theuhohreo page. You better than no one knows that he has done nothing to no one. Peter argued he never had contact with him, but he is in the same Wikiproject that Nathan used to participate. After I saw that the IP comes from Miami, I first thought in him, but well, I was not sure until I saw that "I come from Miami Beach", and all fit. I'm not angry with this Jivesh, and in some measure an indef block (which is not the same as infinite) is excessive, but a kind of action had to be done he has a long-term sockpuppetry abuse. According to the SPI, he was caught on the IP autoblock, so, I have nothing to say about this. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 19:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay my friend. As for the c/e, i will be happy to help and i will also recommend you User talk:Reaper Eternal. He is very kind. Jivesh • Talk2Me 09:56, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. Unfortunately, he is busy. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 03:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Jivesh • Talk2Me 07:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to know why There Are Rules got a C rating. (This sounds like a bitchy "This article deserves better than this!" post, but trust me, it's not.) It has a fair deal of prose and sources already, but I trust your judgement. Mostly I'm interested in what you feel I can do to fix it up going forward. Thanks! Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 19:26, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Thanks! Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 19:43, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please comment at Talk:Heat (EP)#Split Fever? Thanks. Adabow (talk · contribs) 07:44, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate here. Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:32, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He wasn't in the film that IP added: this user has caused a major problem creating fake characters and assigning actors to them. I'm having a hell of a time cleaning up after his considerable messes, and I don't want to screw up your table on that page. Could you remove that film from his filmography? I'd appreciate it :> Doc talk 08:00, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of citing WP:SPS, look down one paragraph, to he relevant policy for the Carlos Slim issues, WP:SELFPUB. Please also be careful not to bite the newcomers. Courcelles 05:20, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, unless you read the sources, you won't know whether or not they have valuable information you might need, be it about the songwriting or recording or promotion of the record. It's up to you to determine if those sources have something you might need or if all there is is just miscellany--my main concern was to make sure you you can exhausted all source options before we proceed further during the FAC process. If you still need to research sources, I suggest withdrawing the FAC at this point. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:59, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sorry about that. I accidentally pushed the undo button while reading this revision.--115.75.132.17 (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for stopping 85.210.103.45 (talk). My talk page was also subjected to vandalism, and thank you for deleting the affected revisions as well. DRAGON 280 (TALK/CONTRIBS) 21:47, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For looking after my articles. Sorry for this burden. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:46, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I have nothing better to do ;) Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 19:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC).[reply]

His block has been shortened after he confessed and agreed not to repeat. Can you explain to me what is going on? What is he so angry with you about?—Kww(talk) 21:27, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as with the article rebetiko the same vandals/sockpuppets are constantly attacking Music of Greece, Laïkó, Zeibekiko, Çiftetelli, Skiladiko, Larissa and other Greek music articles. It get's better: After several warnings one of them(User:Plouton2 most likely a sockpuppet) made a new article (Zeimbekiko) and copy-pasted there all the previously reverted "text" from the vandalized Zeibekiko article!!! Then User:Rchard2scout came by (a "real" user, no sockpuppet) and proposed a merge of the two articles!!!!! the users are:User:Plouton2, User:79.129.15.249, User:62.38.21.106, User:94.69.227.28 and another one was allready blocked for 24h. If you have some time or suggestions on the matter please help! thanks! (ps:I' am sending this message to you and User:Airplaneman as you both seem to check these articles out)-Yangula (talk) 01:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please follow up at Talk:The Fame Monster#TFM, World's best-selling album of 2010. PART 2? I'm not too sure about the reliability. Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:45, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate it if you took part in this discussion about the deletion of all of the articles of Ellie Goulding's singles. Thank you so much! ℥^nding·start 00:43, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tbhotch, I don't want to bother you, but I'd like to make a question, if you don't mind. Portuguese naming convention is the same as in the United States: the first name is the given name, then (usually) comes the surname of his mother and lastly the father's surname. Why an explanation in the article, then? Regards, --Lecen (talk) 11:30, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that, but does that means that we will have to add this kind of note to every single article about a Brazilian or a Portuguese? --Lecen (talk) 19:25, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not, it's ok. I just wanted to understand the reason. Thanks for telling me. Regards, --Lecen (talk) 19:28, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After your latest edit's Fleetham went and deleted most of the citations and then claimed that there were no citations. This type of behavior is highly disruptive and is hostile in this case. If you view the Lanix history you can see that Fleethan has had some type of long standing disdain for this company for whatever reason and he has also gone and removed refrences sourced even from the Lanix website. Multiple users have asked him yo stop yet he continues with blatant disregard to other opinions. You can see that other users have tried with no luck to negociate with him but he refuses to accept their views. And the sources he says are illigitimate are not "weird blogs" SPK (Sputnik) is Mexico's largest and most respected electronics information network and one of the largest and most repected in latin America And if their text isnt enough proof you can simply watch the videos in their articles used in the citations which feature Lanix emlpoyees themselves stating what is also in the text. While i don enjoy Fleethams input around wikipedia, this type of behavior is unacceptable 75.80.58.122 (talk) 03:32, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, that was an interesting outcome! Tough place. May I suggest that you list it at WP:GOCE/REQ, and that when you start the next FAC you comment about how Yahoo and About.com are reliable, as the prose quality and reliability of sources were the only major concerns? Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:51, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• rolls eyes* Something really needs to be done with FAC. I mean, it's not like there are going to be fewer candidates in the future. It's a shame that so many articles fail because there aren't enough reviewers. Anyway, good luck...! Adabow (talk · contribs) 06:15, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've posted on the Lanix talk page in an attempt to resolve content issues. If you still have content issues, let's resolve them! Thanks, Fleetham (talk) 14:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The behind of the scenes video from the platinum edition of I am... Sasha Fierce has some information about "Halo". Jivesh • Talk2Me 16:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She talks about the song (composition) and the music video. I will type the message and i will give it to you. Jivesh • Talk2Me 10:20, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Halo, ummm i feel like it is angelic, you know it feels like you can see angels when you hear it and anyone, it's just like you see their face instantly when you hear it. (Day 2)... The music video is very intimate, romantic and the house in which we are shooting is beautiful. And i am trying to make sure that we can get to the pool because i think it could be really beautiful. I have never open my eyes in the water ever in my life. I have always been afraid. Halo, it's very simple but it has a lot of strings and it also has interesting drums , ummm it is a great mixture of hip hop and R&B and it is basically saying that you know i had these walls built up about love and you completely tore that down and you know when i look at you i see your halo, it's really beautiful."

Listen Tbhotch, i really have no idea whether this is going to be useful but i did it because you do a lot for me and it is kind of a way through which i can thank you. Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you read it. Jivesh • Talk2Me 05:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome my friend. It is between 9:10 and 10:50 Jivesh • Talk2Me 06:22, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you again, but could you perhaps give me a quick bit of assistance here Talk:Lanix. Thankfully an adminstrator has reverted Fleethams constant edits and the page is currently blocked from editing but Fleetham is has shown no sign that he is planning to accept what numerous other users have written. 75.80.58.122 (talk) 16:47, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On the Lanix talk page we are now voting on a concensous to see what to do with the Lanix article. We need you to prove that our view is correct. If Fleetham honors the concensous then we can simply get him to stop the edit war by coming to a concensous that we are correct simply by having both of us explain why our position is correct. Please Help here Talk:Lanix. 75.80.58.122 (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have several ongoing arguments (six months long) with this user (fleetham) and his actions always follow the same patterns. I would recommend reporting him, this style of editing (deleting nearly an entire page and replacing it with chopped up tiny sections, studded with references but wothout any real content) is a persistent habit of his.  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 15:31, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I want to avoid an edit war with you. But I've reviewed your edit history and this leads me to an assumption that you are a Lady Gaga fan writing with a bias. Please cease undoing my edit or I will report you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.63.238.198 (talk) 04:13, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Was this supposed to be a response to my comment? — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 04:39, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh fairplay. I've left him/her a lengthy response about copyrights and reported to WP:AIV anyway. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 04:43, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad start to the week? Bad date last night? There was no oomph-oomph? Here's something to cheer you up. Courtesy L-|-CLK-| — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:13, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I somehow forgot your suggestion. Damn. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:15, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In that order: yes, fortunately no and no :( (XD), and I don't know why he still here, Kevin's good faith should end someday, do we need really people like this? I don't think so. Anyway, he gives a crap about polices, why we have to continue with this? And I think the hit you had helped you to forgot your pals' advices, hadn't it? Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 08:21, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In truth I feel bad for Kevin because that guy has trusted him so many times. Its everytime Kev is the one who feels perturbed by it. And yeah, I thought of explaining about the policy things, but then I noticed those heinous comments. Whoosh goes my faith! And when the hell will Jivesh learn what is joke and what isn't? And hmmm hmm, mail me bout the oomp oomph.. :) — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:38, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure that his next block will be from Mr. Will, for the best. Jiv, he is learning, you know, you have been here more time than me and him, and I still remember the days when I used to AGF of everything, RCP has changed my POV of everything and everyone, so someday it can change. And the third ©2011 Tbhotch^Talk Reserved rights ;) Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 08:45, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Legolas, i respect you a lot for what you do for all of us but i sincerely feel that you have a big problem with me. You always have something to say about me. Well, i swear it does not affect me in any way when you tell something about me but please keep Beyonce away. I really do not like it when you or anyone else compare her to a banshee or something similar. Even when it is a joke. Jivesh • Talk2Me 08:52, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then is Beyonce a hag Jivesh? Grow up. Axl, I still remember when American Life failed you had said "Now Legolas will be happy", lol I was like wtf is this dude talking? And I'm impressed you kept your hoe copyright shut :P — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:56, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. I will definitely grow up but i will never become like you. Simply because i am not like you. I mean, you can tel people things straightforward but will never be able to do so. I always try to be very polite (i do not know if this is the right word). Anyway, thanks for the advice again. Jivesh • Talk2Me 09:00, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well Legolas, I was trying to improve that crappy article and instead of help me with it, you started to bite this newbie ad ABF about me. What did you expected, chocolates? Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 03:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wooo why is your talk page semied? Did the recent socking of a certaion sumbody prompted you to do it? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:04, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why you did not pay much attention, did you? The page was protected because an user was attacking me. At first I didn't recognize him, but after I realized that this was a geek (click here for know why). So, well, that's why. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 05:10, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oopsies, now geeks are targeting us too? I thought Gleeks were enough :P Hey Bee's new song "Girl" sounds hot! I'm scared to talk about it with Jivesh though. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, we have to do something with Halo, WoW and GoW, those bastards will pay!!! And I didn't know about that, you know, in my country when a song is released elsewhere most of time it arrives 2 months later, excepting with highly (but very highly) known artists. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 05:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Girl" has this amazing sample by Diplo called "Pon de Floor". You can find it in YouTube. Have you heard the "Born This Way" Indian remixes? They are great! — Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, the Dabangg Legolas is *scared* to talk with me. That's hilarious. Jivesh • Talk2Me 06:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, nowadays artist calls everything a sample when it is a blatant plagarism. And generally, I don't like remixes, but exist very few exceptions like "Scream Louder" and "Naturally (Dave Audé Remix)/(Dave Audé Club Mix)". And it's me or Jiv is gagging? Oh and by the way, Jiv I added the information you gave me, do you have the location? Thank you so much. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 07:38, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's really me. Lol. Tbhotch, you do not have top thank me so much. Trust me, you are most welcome. I will always be happy to help, especially when it concerns Beyonce. Sorry, i do not have the location. Try to ask Adabow. Jivesh • Talk2Me 10:27, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not strictly a remix, but Tbhotch have you heard Love in This Club Part II? Also sampling isn't really plagarism coz the original artist must agree to the sample first. And OMG Diplo song first Legolas? I've wanted to hear what the BK vs Diplo track sounds like... and it's a "club banger"? I wouldn't expect him to produce a dancey song? Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's what artists say at night to sleep ;), BTW, Andy (if I call you Andy), do you have the I Am... Platinum?, if you, could you please bring me the location of the "Behind the scenes"? Thank you so much. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 18:51, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice until after you removed the attempt at protection for Canadian Pacific that I either did it wrong or don't have permission to do it. The page seems to be getting a lot of vandalism lately. As such, I would like to request protection for the page as it is a page that children may visit and material added at times has been vulgar or offensive. Thank you. Daffydavid (talk) 08:30, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CSD A3--good call! I was typing out a PROD, but you beat me to it, with a much better proposition. Drmies (talk) 03:34, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. I'll keep that on mind next time. Magiciandude (talk) 09:56, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I never properly thanked you for reassessing articles for Latin American music articles. So, thank you very much! I really appreciate it! Magiciandude (talk) 01:52, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tbhotch! I've been uploading music samples for album and song articles. I think I've followed the WP:Music samples right. I just wanted to make sure. Thanks. Magiciandude (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha! So something like this would have a proper summary to the samples right? I also that example posted on the guide was odd where it said: "16 second sample from Bob Dylan's "All Along the Watchtower". I've added more description for the samples on Romances. Also, I don't know why it does it twice. I selected the "audio sample" from the licensing tag selection. Magiciandude (talk) 01:53, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's odd, because I haven't copy/pasted anything. What I've done is fill out the form in the template, and selected the correct licensing form. I meant to say in the earlier post that the above article is another good example, I'll use that as well. Magiciandude (talk) 02:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That was strange, I semi'd it and it obviously didn't take. I deleted it after I semi'd it, so that must have removed protection. Will wait and watch... Dreadstar ☥ 18:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ys, that's the reason, if you delete a page, you delete everything. Tbhotch* ۩ ۞ 18:51, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I actually forgot I deleted it twice, and then didn't reestablish the protection after the second one. D'oh! :) Dreadstar ☥ 19:02, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ho, Tbhotch. Shouldn't the article about Pedro Álvares Cabral have its level of protection raised? There are unknown editors vandalizing it all time. --Lecen (talk) 01:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I meant only for 24h, that is, as long as the article it is in the main page. --Lecen (talk) 01:58, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your huge efforts in fixing vandalism. However, I was surprised to see that you didn't completely fix the vandalism on Burj Khalifa. I have fixed it now, but please take care that vandalism may be made on top vandalism. Rather than simply revert the last edit, it is often best to go back to the last good version. watchlisted Astronaut (talk) 08:59, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't know about the other edit. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 18:37, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gee that was fast! ;) hang onto your hat, next week hubby and I are exploring Chiapas.... so lots of pics coming and articles to be (re)written!Thelmadatter (talk) 18:51, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 19:21, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi my friend. I hope you are in good health. Nobody is commenting at FLC. What should i do? Can i ask someone to do so? Jivesh • Talk2Me 10:38, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since apparently you are watching my age I'll reply here. I personally do not like to invite people to review my GANs, FLCs and FACs because it would be considered as a canvassing vote. You should wait people to comment, it's normal when no one comments, very few people review featured candidates. Anyway you withdrew its nomination, so for now, you have to work more on it. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 19:29, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Tbhotch and thanks for everything. Jivesh • Talk2Me 12:08, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! In reviewing our discussion on my talk page, I regret that I responded curtly to the objection you raised to my disambiguating talk page comments. I could have engaged you more respectfully, and I apologize for not having done so. Since you raise an interesting point, I will seek consensus of the community regarding my interpretation of talk-page editing policy before I make additional edits of this nature. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This douchebaggery will continue is it? I wonder sometimes why people don't bother to review articles. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:53, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, can you check Talk:Haus of Gaga? A number of editors are apparently writing there that it is an A-class article. I'm completely baffled because the article is just shit. Are these all socks? Youu are better at it. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:39, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, I'm absolutely sure all of them are socks. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:46, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lol for the first, and for the second, probably. Either way, it hardly meets the C-class criteria of either Wikiproject. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 15:23, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the socks are indeed disrupting isn't it? By making false claims. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 16:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's the reason why socks must not edit. Open an SPI if you believe you have enough evidence. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 16:43, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tbhotch, I understand that SVG is preferred but If you go to the official website you can see the logo exactly as the version I uploaded, so this SVG version is a bad version, thanks for worry about Real Madrid logo but I think that is preferred an official version than a non-official SVG format against PNG. Also, for reasons of copyright is better a low resolution, my image complies this and is not the intention of Wikipedia to facilitate higher versions of non-free logos as SVG allows. A salomonic solution is to upload a SVG version of the image that I uploaded (you can download the EPS image at the source url that I put in the summary description: http://www.vflnet.com/infos/spain/real_madrid_cf/) but I don't know how to convert an EPS file to an SVG file, if you can do it for me, I will appreciate. Greetings tot-futbol talk 19:55, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw your request on the GOCE page and reworked the section so it should flow a lot better now. You'll note that I've removed a few sentences as some of them seemed to be somewhat synthy and the same refs were cited several times. I've added your talk page to my watchlist so it will be easier to keep the thread here if you have any comments. --Blackmane (talk) 00:03, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for doing it, and I have not problem with the changes, I didn't write that section, it was a friend of mine, I hope he does not get mad for it. Again, thanks. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 02:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I notice you've been judiciously adding protection tags to articles when I (often) neglect to do so after protecting an article. Much appreciated! But I must say, this seems like drudge work suited to a bot. There's a bot to remove the tags. Isn't there a bot that can auto-tag protected articles?

You can reply here; I am watching this page. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, it isn't exist. Only DUMBot remove templates, but there's no bot for add them. Anyway, I have not problem with it, I've done it by months. Just one of the thing very few humans still doing here. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 04:35, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure how I managed to reinstate the vandalism on lazzi - somehow my undoing the vandalism undid your undo. Sorry about that. DionysosProteus (talk) 19:37, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there again. I've already made a few changes to the article for the 83rd Academy Awards. If you noticed, I've added information on the production ceremony including how AMPAS and ABC decided to give unprecedented access to interactive content for the ceremony. I also addede the international broadcasters.

I've removed several bits of information in the "Voting Trends and Summary" sections that I feel are unverifiable or are irrelevant to the article.

Any other ideas?Birdienest81 (talk) 22:17, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tbhotch! I have nominated the above song article for an FA (third time). Since you commented on the first nom, I thought I should let you know about the third nom. Fee free to comment or o/s. Thank you. Novice7 (talk) 03:17, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, do you know how many supports would an article need to pass? I'm thinking "Irresistible" would fail this time too :( Novice7 (talk) 04:05, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea, I think at least three with no objections. Anyway, what's the problem, the fourth, the fifth, the sixth... will always exist, and, someday, they'll get tired of you and you'll be blocked ;). Just kidding, they will pass it, they are not to mean to let an editor open the 99th archive. When the article is ready, it'll pass. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 04:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. The article will pass when it's ready. Thank you so much for your support and encouragement. Novice7 (talk) 04:18, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to your concerns. Please see. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 21:25, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Responded to you comment about the italics. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 17:01, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An IP is griping about you and failed to notify you. Just FYI. ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 10:41, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this,[6] is there actually a malware issue, or is the IP just being a troll? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 19:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Did you report that blatant threat of violence and racial slur to anyone? ←Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} carrots→ 19:34, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. A usual case - range too long to block, articles too many to sprotect. Materialscientist (talk) 04:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I found alternative sources for most of the dead links. Trouble with the TV Guide review. I know truthfully it was mentioned in one of the March issues of the magazine.

I've found an article regarding Melissa Leo's utterance of 'fuck' during her Oscar speech.[http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1658810/melissa-leo-oscars-speech.jhtml ] Also, there was controversy regarding the Best Picture nominees montage shown at the end of the broadcast because it had dialogue from The King Speech being played over the montage which had clips for ALL ten best pic nominees. Several bloggers and columnists like Nikki Finke and Tom O'Neil lambasted the Academy for that decision.

Here is the link again: [7]

How can I have the 83rd Oscars article peer reviewed?Birdienest81 (talk) 22:43, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tbhotch :) I can see that you're a great ALT editor, so I was wondering if you could add it to "Thank God I Found You"? Thanks in advance. Novice7 (talk) 07:27, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Feel free copyediting it, always something is wrong :S Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 19:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks heaps! It's perfect :) Novice7 (talk) 05:34, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Too racist? lol Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 05:44, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I changed it :D Yours was really great, but I thought of making it a bit specific. Novice7 (talk) 05:51, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also thought on "Afro-American", and actually I always use that term, I don't know why use the color instead. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 05:53, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay. Thank you infinity for helping me out :) Novice7 (talk) 05:57, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, you can ask me for everything. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 06:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again :) Novice7 (talk) 06:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tbhotch. Being the Laker fan that I am :), I'm trying to give a crack at enhancing the quality of the 2010 NBA Finals article. Do you know any Wikipedia editor that specializes in sports? And do you have any tips in helping me improve that article?Birdienest81 (talk) 23:41, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it not constructive? Cowik (talk) 04:44, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• A) The most important point, you are NOT the TFA director. I've never heard of TFA directors
• B) You are choosing a GA not a FA. So? A lot of GA's are FA's.
• C) You are creating coyright violations. How? The Album is under CC and so is the article, besides, Why do we have this.
• D) You, in your life, has edited that article. Nothing wrong with that
• E) You are changing an already choosen article for add your disruptive edit, do you want me to continue? Don't see a problem here

And for the record, why are you being an ass to me? I was just simply asking why. Cowik (talk) 04:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch, don't you thin that was a little harsh, mate? Cowik is obviously not familiar with the intimate processes of TFA and didn't realise he was doing anything wrong. Please do try to explain what the problem is first, beofre taking someone's head off. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's impossible to me to try to explain people what's wrong with their edits, I do not speak your language, you know, so I cannot going throughout being polite when I don't know how to be polite. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 18:21, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm with RCP, and I couldn't help but notice the little battle you were having with 86.183.217.14 when the page Jizz (birding) appeared on my Huggle feed. With all due respect, I don't see an issue with the edit that 86.183.217.14 made. Possibly you could provide me with an explanation? Thanks Bped1985 (talk) 19:27, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I posted my question before the IP user had posted that "I think it's funny" excuse. I fully understand now. Another question though, if you don't mind my asking, how is it that you got those warnings above this text box when someone goes to edit your talk page? I've seen this all over the place but have no clue on how to accomplish it. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you! Bped1985 (talk) 20:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your various anti-vandalism efforts today. I have reverted your final correction, not because I disagree with your logic but because I've checked and the anon editor, whether they know it or not, has got it right. The site I took the results from has made an error. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 00:12, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The image I added was not uploaded by me, it was already on commons, ready for use. I assumed it was perfectly acceptable to use the image as similar images are used in the same article. I think the edit block warning is a bit much. Yonskii (talk) 01:36, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What I meant was that it was available for use. I was using it in a relevant section of the article, just as Template:Non-free character specifies.Yonskii (talk) 01:45, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

:D Thanksss!!! Adabow (talk · contribs) 05:09, 3 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have removed Template:Golden Globe Award for Best Original Song 1980–1999 from Celine Dion. I was going by Golden Globe Award for Best Original Song. Are you suggesting that the page is wrong or that the award goes to the composer as opposed to the performer?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:28, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I got slightly confused on User talk:75.15.229.223 and undid your warning as I thought it was warning for the same thing. Duh. Still waking up! —Tom Morris (talk) 04:29, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is to notify you that an RfC has been opened regarding proposed edits in Chevrolet Vega. The discussion is located here.

You star, thanks. You can work out the "For" statement via talk pages, or just be BOLD and work it out iteratively.

My thoughts are that in these respects, the Vega article should be significantly edited: it should reflect clearly the Vega's legacy, it's role in the US auto industry and it's marred track record. It should be considerably more concise. It should rely less on fan trivia and less than transparent sources. And it should include less of one editors photographs, personal vehicles and promo photos from General Motors. That's the basic thrust for me. 842U (talk) 21:30, 6 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll think about undoing some of those. What I've been doing is matching the length of the pending changes protection, and on the BLPs, that wound up indefinite. One of the BLPs and some of the non-BLPs I've removed protection completely. To answer your main question, yes, after 11 months, the two-month trial is finally over.—Kww(talk) 02:17, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the heck out of the Chiapas article. I dont think it makes 5x for DYK but it might deserve a bump in it article rating.Thelmadatter (talk) 01:16, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You verified the title as "Yoü and I" yet requested a deletion of its talk page? I am confused. --Another Believer _(Talk) 22:52, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for tracking me down and notifying me about the impending TFA for Edward III of England. I wrote it about five years ago, and it was in pretty bad shape by current standards. Fortunately I had the chance to go over it and get it ready for the big day. Had I not, it could have been embarrassing both for me and for Wikipedia. Lampman (talk) 00:26, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at User talk:Σ/Hash.js's talk page. --Σ _☭^★ 06:02, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CharlieWhatever? — Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:56, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he is, and I wonder when this annoying boomerang will stop. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 21:30, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have full support from the Dzogchen people on wikipedia. See the discussions. You are the one who needs to be blocked from wikipedia. Thigle (talk) 03:55, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• a. there are no "discussions". I've looked at the talk pages of the articles you've been editing, and I don't see anything there. b. Your edits were simply not helpful and not in agreement with our guidelines. Calling Tbhotch and myself clowns or vandals is not going to help your case either; you can't strong-arm your way around here. Drmies (talk) 04:27, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey TB: Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.. See you there. Drmies (talk) 04:39, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Long time no talk! How have you been lately? And congrats on the FLs and GAs. Regards Crystal Clear x3 21:59, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Clear x3 05:17, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Crystal Clear x3 05:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] Crystal Clear x3 06:04, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my good friend. I see you have reverted my edits to the page on rainbows due to lack of sources.

Unfortunately at this time I cannot chase down a reference on the internet (my original source is from a natural world almanac), but I was able to find this picture of the Qingdai shootdown incident which shows the intruder making contact with the terrain.

http://i51.tinypic.com/jjtbtl.jpg

I note that English is not your first language. In my tongue we have an idiom: "a picture is worth a thousand words". Perhaps this is better than a written source?

For the other incident I have nothing as yet, but will try my best to investigate this strange and troubling anomaly.

Best Wishes,

Lance Jack —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.197.249.57 (talk) 02:17, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much my friend. And remember that it's never too late. Jivesh • Talk2Me 15:10, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've reverted my edit in the Norway-Culture section, as being unsourced http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Norway&diff=next&oldid=428290630. I've re-entered my edits now with a reference to the Norwegian Constitution, Article 6 ^[1]. Other pages on Wikipedia will also tell the same thing, e.g., the page on the Crown Prince, the general page on primogeniture and the monarchy of Norway page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.166.224.120 (talk) 17:32, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tbhotch! Can you re-assess "Just a Kiss" for me? Also, can you add alt text too? Thanks in advance. Novice7 (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done and  Done, feel free copy-editing it. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 00:26, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! Novice7 (talk) 02:06, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

--60.243.239.25 (talk) 05:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC) I have edited this article , removed few things from the article which was poorly sourced to make article more reliable . Please do not add such things because there is no references for those facts .[reply]

thank you .

A bit overdone, wouldn't you say? Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 08:21, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why aren't you dead yet, you piece of shit?