Please sign your messages with four tildes ('''~~~~''') and please be as specific and concise as possible. If I reviewed your Articles for Creation submission, please read the message(s) at the draft page clearly before adding a message here. As this has happened multiple times, please ensure your message is only posted here once (not doubled).

PLEASE ADD YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM and generally, I will reply here so please watch this page for a response. Unless it's an AfC page, where I'll usually comment there and you will get a notification for that. If I have taken time reviewing your draft, please be patient and I will get to it as I am quite busy with other tasks but am certainly willing to look at it and will not need reminding.

New users: If you want to learn the basics of Wikipedia, my page for new users here contains useful information. Information such as citing sources, submitting images and changing & deleting username. If that page hasn't answered your question(s), contact me here.

Friday, 17/3/2017. Today you wrote on my Talk page that you had removed the template from the top of my new mainpage article William Nevin Tatlow Hurst. But I can still see the template. Sorry, but I don't understand the situation. Do I need to do something else? Thanks - I know you're busy. SurveyorMJF (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 1 (2008-May 2012)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 2 (May 2012-November 2015)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 3 (November 2015-March 2016)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 4 (April 2016 - present)

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.

Sam Mangubat is a local internet celebrity who rose to fame in the Philippines by joining a local siging competition. His fate is just like America's Christina Grimmie and Sam Tsui who both have wiki bio. Do not be racist. If wiki is for Americans only please add disclaimer. Do your research well before declining the edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inkmaster12 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing my article on Russian child model Kristina Pimenova! Unfortunately, you rejected my submission because you said I did not adequately prove notability. I disagree for several reasons. She is a prominent model and actress who has starred in a full length feature film with a famous costar. She has also posed for many high profile fashion companies. She has 4 million Facebook followers and 1.8 million Instagram followers. Many people believe she is a supermodel, and likely to become even more famous soon. I addressed these points in the article, and included several reputable sources to verify this information. Also, she is already the subject of many other Wikipedia articles in other languages, including Russian and Spanish. I was surprised to find that she has not been the subject of an English language article as well. My article included a similar amount of detail as the Spanish article. I am happy to expand my article further if you believe it will be accepted in the future. Thank you! Sincerely, Christopher Moore (Ctmuva2000) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ctmuva2000 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article for Dylan Collins isn't an advertisement at all. Why are you redirecting without a proper discussion? That seems very inappropriate. Please restore and propose redirect if you feel thisway . A unilateral decision is inappropriate Misterpottery (talk) 17:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Abic1991 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mobius Future Racing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have included news articles from cyclingnews.com and cyclingtips.com, both of which are major sports news outlets. Are these sufficiently important outlets? If so, I can include more references from different articles on these sites

• Alexhaddad91 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Andrew Rothschild (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Andrew Rothschild has invented the genre bluestronica. There is no published music that falls in this genre of bluestronica. Andrew Rothschild's music does not fit the blues, or electronica genre. Hence he has created a new genre. No artist has claimed their music to be apart of this genre. He has elements of both in his music. The sources are legitimate. This is not a scientific matter, he is an artist and his artwork has received notable attention.

• Jeandré du Toit (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Xenia Belmas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Several new good citations, and more information was added to the draft by user SHBCARE; and I've made some tone and MOS changes. -- Jeandré, 2017-01-16t13:22z

E.g. this Sydney Morning Herald article. -- Jeandré, 2017-01-16t13:36z

• 2601:681:4700:399C:3960:7026:53E9:AD9C (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Infinite Campus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I was researching this company for work and was surprised that they didn't have an article in wikipedia. I wanted to know who they were and what their basic business model was. I had to go to an external source to find this. I thought it would be useful to have this info in wikipedia. I don't work for them, I don't have a vested interest in their success or failure, I just found it annoying that this info wasn't available here, and wanted to fix that.

• Travish212 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:RepairQ (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your review of my draft. I have been through way too many drafts, re-writes, and deletions for this page. It has been shortened, condensed, and as many sources as are available have been cited. I have read all of the articles that have been linked. There are no other sources available on the internet, as it is a small company. There are no opinions reflected in the draft, only basic facts. I don't see how this can be changed any more. This latest draft is even a re-write from one of your moderators. Please advise.

• 86.142.251.238 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Doncaster Plant Works Amateur Boxing Club (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Appreciate the comment regarding notability, however surely an amateur gym which produces a national finalist every five years; has a host of professional boxers at its platform and trained a world heavyweight contender is defined with some element of notability? References, both past and present, throughout the history of this establishment highlight its significance?

I'd very much appreciate your feedback as to how I can make this article more robust.

• 84.222.43.99 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Enzo Minarelli (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister, after your suggestions on 28th december 2017 about Enzo Minarelli draft, I have been working about and I have submitted a new draft following what you  wrote, I think now it works, I will be very happy to know your opinion, with my best

• 124.157.106.97 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ezi Car Rental (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello SwisterTwister, I understand your point of view and the publishing rules on Wikipedia. Really, I do! The reason I decided to send the article in Wikipedia (even it doesn't respect the rules) is because Ezi Car Rental is become the first 100% Kiwi own rental company in New Zealand. New Zealand is a small country. References are not like in Europe (where I come from) or another big country in the World. With the current rules of publication only the big companies can be on Wikipedia. Is it really the most relevant point of view for an online encyclopedia? I could be wrong but I don't think so. It is not an argumentation for publishing the article about Ezi Car Rental. Your decision respect the rules. It is just my point of view about this. Now, I will wait until someone else decide that Ezi Car Rental is enough relevant to be on Wikipedia. Thank you for your time and for your participation to Wikipedia. Jeremy

• Evelynivy (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The Hot Place (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The band "The Hot Place" fits your guideline as, "an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles." The founding member and guitarist of The Hot Place, Jeff Calder, is a notable musician who is also currently active in the band "The Swimming Pool Q's". The Swimming Pool Q's are a national band, and have been recognized in Rolling Stone magazine, their most recent album "1984-1986:The A&M Years" was a Rolling Stone "Reissue of the Year", picked by David Fricke, on page 32 of the December 19-Jan 2 2014 print magazine. The Swimming Pool Q's have had five national/international album releases, on the major labels A&M, Capitol, and Bar None. The singer and other founding member of The Hot Place, Lisa King has has been a member of notable band The Glenn Phillips band, who have released albums on Virgin and Sony Records. King also played keyboards with The Swimming Pool Q's from 2003-2006. The Hot Place features guest guitarist Richard Lloyd of the band "Television", another member of a prominent 1970's band, with historical releases on Elektra records. The Hot Place has been featured in print, in significant North American publications "Georgia Music Magazine", "Stomp and Stammer", and "Creative Loafing."

• Evelynivy (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The Hot Place (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The Hot Place is directly connected to two major musical artists. One of its founding members is Jeff Calder of The Swimming Pool Q's, and guest artist Richard Lloyd of Television, who already have Wikipedia Pages. Could you please clarify how to substantiate that more? I did connect The Hot Place to The Swimming Pool Q's via internal Wikipedia linking. The sources cited, if read in detail, are more than just announcements, interviews, and mentions. They directly discuss how Jeff Calder of The Swimming Pool Q's and Richard Lloyd of Television are connected to and/or are members of the Atlanta band The Hot Place. Many of the album reviews and mentions of the band are in analog print media, though I have found several digital places where the band's members are verified and substantiated. Thank you for your help!

This article in particular substantiates The Hot Place's history and verifies the notable musicians who are members. http://www.clatl.com/music/article/13080910/new-wavers-instudio-chemistry-ignites-the-hot-place. I'm not sure how this is not a substantial source. If you could clarify, I would so appreciate it! Thank you!

• Jadis White (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Arts Project Australia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SisterTwister! Thanks for taking the time to have a look at the changes to the article... Just a quick question for clarification (so that I can get the next edit right): Is the problem that there are not enough external references? A bit confused, as the first reviewer indicated that the article was copied, so I removed all direct references to this (even though they were quoted/cited), but not that there weren't enough notable articles... Please let me know what I need to do to improve the article and have it accepted. Thanks again!

• Frank Cianciullo (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Melissa Del Pinto (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I would respectfully appreciate a review. Melissa Del Pinto has been recognized as a Canadian artist by The National Gallery of Canada and her name was added to the “Government of Canada, Canadian Heritage Database of Canadian Artists”. I have added the link. In addition, to address the points used to refuse her submission, her paintings are in the collections of notable Canadian collectors. I added the name of Irwin and Claude Lande. Mr. Lande is a noted real-estate developer living in Westmount (Montreal).

• Evelynivy (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The Hot Place (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have worked on finding more sources for my citations. The first three reference citations, are from National, credible print and digital magazines, the state run publication "Georgia Music Magazine", and a newspaper which is owned by the Atlanta Journal and Constitution, "Creative Loafing." The References directly explain how The Hot Place contains two notable international musicians in its lineup, Jeff Calder of “The Swimming Pool Q's” and Richard Lloyd of “Television.” Especially notable is source #2, Georgia Music Magazine. This is a state-run print and digital publication. Source 1 and 3 are not merely announcements, they are also detailed articles which explain The Hot Place's debut, and the notable musicians that are involved in the historic project. I also added another source that I found this morning, “Arts Talk” on Blog Talk Radio, Episode #104 Lisa King. I have also looked at other Atlanta bands Wikipedia pages. Some of these are groups which are far less notable than The Hot Place, with no notable musicians involved, and cite less reliable sources. So, I'm curious as to why those articles were approved, and this one is being rejected. Please advise! My sources all verify the notable musicians involved in The Hot Place.

Added another cited source, from "The Recoup" magazine, by Joseph Kyle, in which Jeff Calder directly speaks about being a member and producer of The Hot Place band, with musician Lisa King. https://therecoup.com/2014/04/21/swimming-pool-qs-working-at-the-nut-factory/. The article quotes Jeff Calder of The Swimming Pool Q's, "We have about 2/3 of a new album mixed, and a few basic tracks standing by in the queue, waiting to be finished. I’ve co-produced them with Tim Delaney, a talented Atlanta musician and engineer we’ve worked with as far back as Royal Academy. It certainly helps that I’m friends with a number of great recording engineers, many of whom I was fortunate to be associated with at Atlanta’s legendary Southern Tracks studio, which I helped to manage for many years and where I was on the periphery of what seems like a hundred major rock albums produced by Brendan O’Brien.I like doing new things, having recently produced and played on an album by The Hot Place, Lisa King’s band based in Atlanta. It’s a pretty cool record that has a song called “Saturn Moved” on which Richard Lloyd of Television unleashes a wild solo."

• 63.92.245.105 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jonathan Aldridge (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

we are requesting a review because the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jonathan_Aldridge page has great sources and the subject is notable

Benny Castillo managed the subject and his page has been approved.

Aldridge is just as notable as Castillo and should be approved

• Simonetech (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sanjeev Sharma (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwiser,

We are contacting you because you have raised query regarding https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sanjeev_Sharma page.

We would like to let you know that he is a famous personality that you can easily review from https://www.google.co.in/search?q=Sanjeev+Sharma&oq=Sanjeev+Sharma&aqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l2j0l2j69i59.322j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#newwindow=1&safe=active&q=Sanjeev+Sharma+Actor link.

I would like you to guide us to make it live.

Looking forward to your reply.

Regards, Simone.

• Skire913 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Acute Cardiac Unloading (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have resubmitted the article to incorporate all the changes suggested by yourself and other Wikipedia reviewers. I have made substantial changes throughout the document to get rid of any extraneous or unnecessary language, with the effect of streamlining the article. The article now only contains direct and informative language with no self-promotional or journal-like language. I believe you will find the changes I have made to be much more in line with a Wikipedia article.

• Hoovbacca (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jeff Coffey (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Obviously trying very hard to conform this to meet the criteria, but wanted to clarify what was meant by focusing on all additional major news, there is a video interview from CNN, but most of the stories tend to refer mostly back to the Chicago Facebook page that I mentioned as a primary source, which to me makes the additional sources a bit moot, but I am willing to do what is needed to get this thing done :) Any further guidance/advice you can offer would be extremely appricated...thanks for the fast review!

• Dignan00 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rene Moreno (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your time. Rene Moreno meets the notability requirements when you look at it from the angle that he is a very significant person with Down syndrome. That's key here. His documentary is commonplace in collegiate special education curriculums across the country, and has been for 17 years. Up Syndrome has been on Netflix, Hulu amongst many other major streaming outlets for many years. His movies have been the subject of reviews in major trades such as Daily Variety (which is referenced), and he has won a very prestigious award from the National Down Syndrome Congress of the USA (also referenced), which is one of the largest organizations to promote the awareness of Down syndrome that exists in the world today. I think when you look at this person with the correct angle you will understand that he is indeed notable and worthy of inclusion.

• Terry Winston (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Terry Winston (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

hey this is my first time creating a wiki page but the information is true how can i validate these sources ?

• Sean Pollock (talk · contribs)
  • User:Sean Pollock/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi please can i create this page ? i can add it in a more Wiki style?

• 129.16.140.95 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Gothenburg Award for Sustainable Development (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please be more specific as to what should be improved. The sources are all reliable and independent of the subject. The amount of, the breadth and the character of the sources, as well as the notable award winners proof that the article is about a notable subject. So if this is not enough, please be specific about what should be improved.

• Robfarago (talk · contribs)
  • User:Robfarago/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for your feedback. This is my first article. I have only ever made minor contributions to other article over the last 10 years or so. Before I wrote this article I read the pages that talk about notability and also needing independent credible sources from news/media publishers who have editors etc.. I believe the page I have drafted has merit based on the guidelines. The development of renewable energy in Australia has been significantly influenced by not for profit and grass roots groups such as Local Power. Not sure if you had a chance to read/view many of the references and if you did perhaps you are not familiar with the Australian media organisations in the references?

The TV coverage of this community initiative was made by the ABC TV network and the TEN TV network. The Australian ABC is a highly credible news organisation of journalistic integrity spanning radio, TV and online. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation The Australian TEN TV network is one of our 3 commercial news networks and comparable to perhaps NBC or CBS in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_Ten Both of these TV broadcast news services thought this was a newsworthy community initiative which had not been done before. The youtube clips are recordings of the prime time TV news article which were broadcast to audiences of over 1 million people each.

Similarly the ATA is a very credible member based organisation and magazine publisher of ReNew magazine, which has been publishing since 1980 and is not up to it's 138th quarterly magazine https://www.ata.org.au/who/history They chose to write a feature article about the Local Power project because it was something new and novel.

Finally the City South News is a local community newspaper and part of the News Corporation stable of newspapers. While I am not a big fan or Rupert Murdoch (Fox News yuk!) he did get his starts running newspapers in Australia This chain of local papers are said to have 1 million readers weekly. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quest_Community_Newspapers

I would humbly ask you to take a closer look at the references, taking into account the above information about independence, and please reconsider this rejection.

thank you.

• Westy14 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dan Kennedy (Author) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

• Russianradio (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Russkaya Reklama (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for you review! These are the references from Russian books. Can they be considered as external links? Thank you.

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Po22DQAAQBAJ&pg=PT381&dq=%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0+%D0%A0%D1%83%D1%81%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiP09ba2t3RAhWKOiYKHXzDDqQQ6AEIRzAG#v=onepage&q=%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0%20%D0%A0%D1%83%D1%81%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B0&f=false

https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=9zW4BwAAQBAJ&pg=PT600&dq=%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0+%D0%A0%D1%83%D1%81%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F+%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiP09ba2t3RAhWKOiYKHXzDDqQQ6AEIVTAI#v=onepage&q=%D0%93%D0%B0%D0%B7%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B0%20%D0%A0%D1%83%D1%81%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BA%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%B0&f=false

• Brn odisha (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Brn odisha (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please check the Government of India Website http://www.padmaawards.gov.in/PDFS/PadmaAwards-2017_25012017.pdf and http://www.sangeetnatak.gov.in/sna/Awardees.php?section=aa

Please let me know what else do I need to add.

• Mexcorp1 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Politics Nigeria (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The references site politics nigeria as a source of information. pls state in simple terms what makes a valid reference..please. thanks

• Carrie at The Fischer Group (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Fischer Homes Builder (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for reviewing our article, I really appreciate it. I want to update the article so that it meets guidelines, but wanted to know which portion specifically doesn't conform to the guidelines so I can work with that. From what I can tell, the article if not very different from the following (in words / scope) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M/I_Homes or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PulteGroup.

Fischer is in the same group as those two homebuilders (and many others already included in Wikipedia) and being in the top 50 in the nation (something that M/I mentions in their article as well) I would think that content is noteworthy as well.

The remainder of the article just lists out the areas of business (where they do business) as well as a small amount of history (founder etc...) for the company (something I see the other Homebuilders do as well.)

If you could give me a little more feedback on what is different from my article and those above (as initial examples) I would appreciate it so I can make the needed changes.

Thanks! I look forward to your help / further comments on the differences.

• Carrie at The Fischer Group (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Fischer Homes Builder (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Ok, that makes sense. So what updates do I need to make to it for it to meet the new company guidelines? I don't see any specifics on that which we have not already covered here? I'm specifically looking for "doing this would make it meet the new guidelines" kind of information.

I've re-read the following: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies) and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Companies/Guidelines and it appears from what I can see there that the article, in its current state covers the areas mentioned.

Again, as far as companies go, and looking at the other homebuilders (as well as other companies) in the space, Fischer is certainly in line with those which are included. (They have been in the top 50 home builders for many years now, they operate in multiple states nationwide, they have plenty of press on them, they are are one of the big builders for the St. Jude's dream home giveaway (which benefits less fortunate people), and the list goes on.

When you get time, let me know what I can do in the way of edits to help get this article revised and into the article space. I appreciate the info so far. It is helpful.

Thanks.

• Chadyrm (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rapidmanufactory (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, first, thanks for taking time to being a Wikipedia curator.

There are 6 main sources cited, that are serious sources (in the Middle-East, and Lebanon). Text publications are rarely digitized, but I could recollect printed articles (Can/should we add them as references and provide scanned proof? What is the procedure for such cases).

The company had a social impact, which is why it is covered. As you might have now noticed, the digital ecosystem is nearly non-existent in this region, and having publicly accessible digital manufacturing service shop with industrial 3D printers in Lebanon is a big step. Not to mention the creation of new 3D printing materials! (2 materials) and several machines.

Additional projects may be appended: Rapidmanufactory has been invited to the St-Etienne Design Biennial this coming march to exhibit: https://www.instagram.com/explore/tags/theobsessivedrafter/ . This would generate articles by "more known" media entities. A published book about manufacturing (especially digital fabrication), was created by the founder; An article in "L'Orient Le Jour", talks about it: https://www.lorientlejour.com/article/1030988/guillaume-credoz-et-son-robot.html

Looking forward to your assistance in having this article published.

Thank you, Chady

• L.schartner (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Viennacontemporary (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister, thank you for your review and suggestions for improvement. You are absolutely right, the viennacontemporary header needs to be deleted (done).

Regarding additional articles: I added an article from the NY Times from 2015: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/14/arts/international/vienna-looks-east-for-fine-art.html?_r=0

But otherwise, I would like to argue that the most important English references are already included in the article (I guess I can’t add German publications where we have a lot of press, in all the major newspapers). I have included: Forbes, Vogue, and important publications from the artworld: Wallpaper Magazine, Blouin Artinfo, Artsy, Sotheby’s blog, The Art Newspaper, artnet News, Flash Art, artforum.com, Widewalls, Cultured Mag.

Would that be fine for you?

• Hamhaugh (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Elizabeth Heery (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there,

many thanks for taking the time to review the page I created. I am new to Wikipedia so am finding my way through trial and error so would be grateful for any help to improve the chances of submission! I felt the subject worthy of an article, largely because of her role as ambassador for the Orange Tree theatre in London. The theatre is a theatre that produces new work of exceptional standard, most recently reviewed in Variety magazine Los Angeles, and acknowledged to be a forerunner in new writing. Heery was one of fourteen invited because they were considered to be 'leading figures in the Arts and beyond – who will champion the work of the Theatre.' She is also a member of the Davison/Tennant family who have a large fan base in the worldwide science fiction community, not only because of her work with Big Finish audio, but also because of her film work in the series The Tripods, and Life Force. Her son, David Tennant's step brother in law, Louis Davison, has just played Victor in Tim Burton's Miss Peregrine's Home for Peculiar Children made by Fox films. As an ambassador for theatre she is able to reach a wide audience through her body of work, regular TV work spanning twenty five years, and professional relationships within the literary world. Is any of this helpful as regards an edit?

Best Hamhaugh.

• Hazelwhicher (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:St Ives School Haslemere (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, I wasn't quite sure what you meant by 'merged to the local community's article' - could you clarify? I thought given the school's history and relationship to other wiki articles, that it would be a good candidate for a page of it's own - I don't understand why it's not notable just because it's not a secondary school. Would you mind elaborating?

Thanks, Hazel

I'm not sure how to ask, but you reviewed our page for the Hanna Boys Center last. I just found a reference to our non-profit in the United States COngressional Record at our 60th Anniversary in 2010. It's obviously old but maybe it can help as a non-local reference.

I am not sure what else I need to do here. I am happy to strip content out of my entry to get it to be non-advertising but I don't know what to remove.

This process is more than a little difficult.

Please help our non-profit do good work for at-risk teenagers!!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Hanna_Boys_Center

Christy

• 88.95.141.156 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:TigerBelly (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! Thanks for the review. Added references from a variety of news sources on multiple topics. Used other podcast pages as reference for how rigor this should be, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_Screen_Savers

Hope that's enough for approval! Thanks

• Arshad.ppd (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Misty Zannat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to thanks for your review. Unfortunately my submitted article doesn't meet wiki's guideline for notable personality article. After your firs review I have added a few more references. I think it should meet your guideline. Here I want to inform you that Bangladesh's news industry basically depends on Bengali language. A few English language Daily Newspaper or Online News portal available in here. So, Bangladeshi actress Misty Zannat's news are all around in Bengali language online and newspaper but a fewer in English newspaper and online. Before re-review my article please consider this fact.

• Marangros (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jo Piazza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi guys, thanks for the comments. I'm happy to add more reviews as there are many to choose from. Still, I'm surprised that Nick Kristoff's (arguably the most important reviewer at the NY Times) isn't alone sufficient. Is that all this needs? Just more reviews? Please advise and I will continue adding them. Thanks very much!

• 76.116.109.177 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jim Johnson (politics) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I believe the added television interviews and press accounts meet the standards for notability. Also if you look at the page for the Under Secretary of Treasury, there's a red link missing waiting for Jim's page to be added.

• Marangros (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jo Piazza (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks very much. I've just added a lot of reviews from very serious sources including multiple NYtimes, Forbes, BBC, Rolling Stone, the observer, Kirkus (major publishing industry reviewer) and quite a few more.

Hope that helps!

• Aubiaubidee (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Stock Equipment Company (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

You declined this article with the reasoning "this is simply what they would advertise to clients and it's unconvincing regardless of anything or anyone" however, it is not clear what is 'unconvincing', much less who is 'anything or anyone'. Please state coherent grounds for declining it, so that the problem can be fixed.

Also, you stated "examining the sources find they're only announcements and mentions". This did not reflect the facts at the time of the original submission, and even less so now. In the original submission, two reliable, independent sources were cited (namely Cleveland Encyclopedia and ASME), both showing that the subject of this article is both notable and worthy of inclusion. In the meantime, a second more detailed reference by ASME (which has a national audience) as well as a reference from Heartland Science (created by the Ohio Academy of Science) have been added. Both of these also discuss how the subject of this article is notable and worthy of inclusion.

Please accept the submission. Thank you for your time.

• Nbcarder (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Timothy A. Philpot (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I just need some suggestions on how to find better references. Especially on information such as his career and education. Is the LinkedIn reference the main issue? Of the references I had, which ones are acceptable?

• MichaelLeeStever (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Michael Stever (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

HI there Twisted Sister,

Many thanks for the re-review, this is Michael Stever, (filmmaker) I am NOT the person who created this initial draft, nor am I the one who has amended it the last couple times. There is no (Present) need for a re-review as my team has not had a change to make any changes/updates so clearly it's a mute point until then. I did have just a couple questions regarding the submission protocol and I've not been able to get a solid enough answer from the person doing this for me so am reaching out to you myself. I realize that you want more 'high profile' pieces added to to this draft, which I actually am in the process of providing. To date myself or my team have just not had the chance as we've been swamped with work, and other obligations.

In the meantime, if you don't mind me showing you the two pieces I'd planned on adding, it would be HUGELY helpful if you could give a heads up if you thought these two following write-ups could be helpful in pushing my listing through... Here are the two mentiones in two nationally circulated, high-profile publications. BOTH of the below write-ups are relatively new...

FEATURED MENTION IN 'ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY' http://ew.com/article/2016/09/14/fearnyc-new-york-horror-film-festival/

FEATURED WRITE-UP 'FANGORIA' magazine http://www.fangoria.com/new/winners-highlight-video-revealed-for-fearnyc-festival/

Finally, TwistedSister... if I may humbly ask, Why do the rejection notices constantly and repeatedly say that the submissions need to be ABOUT ME, not BY ME? Most of these links and such are to write-ups in noteworthy, legitimate online publications, so I (nor the person doing this for me) are clearly understanding the particulars of this important bullet point. Can you PLEASE expand on this, so I/we know? I have NEVER had the question adequately answered, and clearly we need to better understand so my team can fine tune the draft to a most acceptable level... Is it that I need to ensure ALL links to anythings tied to my own website, (MichaelStever.net) need to be fully omitted? Am also in the dark on what does, or does NOT constitute as worthy information from IMDB, as I see COUNTLESS other wiki pages that list/feature IMDB content.

ALSO, I'm worrying that this existing draft will somehow be deleted, or permenantly removed if it gets enough 'rejection' notices, so PLEASE is there any way to ensure it NOT get re-reviewed anymore until myself and my team have time regroup, and re-edit, it would be sincerely appreciated,

thank you for ANY clues you have TwistedSister..

My mom's also about to pass, so have to brace for that which leaves this pretty low on the priority list, but SO SINCERELY appreciate any help or input you could offer,

Sincerely,

Michael Stever

• MichaelLeeStever (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Michael Stever (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Apologies for the type-o's on your name SwisterTwister... Clearly I either need glasses, or am dyslexic and didn't know it,..

thank you for any thoughts/suggestions you can impart..

Michael Stever

• Swallis2014 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ask Matt (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am curious about the "notability"

Just clarifying... our having an award winning article in a peer reviewed journal does not rise to the level of "notable?"

• ankeet2580 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Avaamo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have included news articles from venturebeat.com and fortune.com, both of which are major press outlets. Are these sufficiently important outlets?

Instead of previous articles Source now I added articles from thehindu.com and Medianama.com.

• Odri567 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Odri567/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I translated, from the english to the spanish, and expanded the article about Rebecca Solnit. There is no spanish article about Rebecca Solnit in the Wikipedia. My article was rejected because "the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Rebecca Solnit instead". In english you have an article, which I did not edited, but in spanish there is nothing about the author. I am new in wikipedia and I do not know what to do, how is the correct procedure when you are translating an article from a language to another? Could you give me some information about the steps I need to follow right now?

Many thanks in advance.

• Mafar Band (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mafar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

can you please please harry up with reviewing the page? we need it for media reasons. i hope to get it soon, wikipedia and your name will be much appreciated and thanked

• Jalicandri (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Maryann Keller (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I think we got it - I hope. I edited the subject's career section to introduce the connection with the subject's books. I also added hyperlinks within some of the sections and other small edits. I've studied the subject for a while, so I think it's important to keep the critical aspects of the career history as they led to the books. Without the career section, then the subject didn't have the expertise to write the books. Thank you.

• Tammyleighkahn (talk · contribs)
  • User:Tammyleighkahn/sandbox/David Garrity (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there -- this is my first time doing this, so I would appreciate any help you can give me! David is a regular on news media, from CNBC, to BNN, to Bloomberg, even the NY Times... i'm not sure how to craft a bio that ties all that in? Are there any examples of media people you can show me so I get it right?

• Webjectives (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Paul Moran ( British Musician ) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi

Thanks for your feedback. I spent ages trying to cite everything on the page and thought it was on the right lines. I wonder if you would be so kind as to assist

I have added some references found on the web from Independent sources - is this the kind of thing I need to do to prove importance of the article ?

Sorry as a first attempt - I just need to get my head around this

From Van Morrisons Twitter page : https://twitter.com/vanmorrison/status/198010764987088896

Review of last years concert -http://entertainmenttoday.net/music/17341/2016/01/van-morrison-in-2016/

Passing Strangers - Tony Hadley[6] Article here : http://inter-jazz.com/web/artists/tony-hadley/

Paul is a Hi Profile musician and needs a page

Best wishes and thanks in advance

John

• Stephanie.sanz1932 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Chad Lefkowitz-Brown (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have added articles from the New York Daily and Time Out New York.

• Hammerheadman (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dragan Markovic (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

Just wanted to check why this article was rejected? We are starting to create Articles about Pool Players in Canberra, and this was a test account.

We would like to get it right before we proceed with others. Your assistance is much appreciated.

• Wilwyg (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Matthew Whitaker (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Could you explain what you're looking for?

• Calgarytech (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Patricia Matthews (politician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have read the Golden Rule and the requirements for significant comment from reliable sources but I do not understand what is missing to prove the notoriety of the one of the most controversial people in Alberta politics, the Mayor of Alberta's 14th largest city (Chestermere) Patricia Matthews: see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Patricia_Matthews_(politician)#cite_note-77 . Just today she was cleared of wrong doing in a year long Provincial investigation (see the last line AND the two cited independent media sources).

Is it that there are some references to 'smaller' sources like The Anchor (local newspaper) and if so should those references be removed? CBC, The Calgary Herald, The SUN, Global TV, 660 News and others are all very large scale media outlets that operate regionally or nationally with large well paid editorial staff. The article contains dozens of such references over controversies driven by Mayor Matthews and the "smaller' references help fill in the story so I would hate to remove them.

Your comments as to what is missing would be appreciated.

• Rknolton1 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Rknolton1/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

What would be the best way to fulfill the qualifications to get the article approved? After I have read your suggestions I still do not understand the rejection. I have added reference links to other pages for the notable entities. My links and references are from a university, a campaign webpage, as well as a major area newspaper. Please advise any possible solutions as this is my first submission.

Thank you

• 82.132.243.54 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Arkbound (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Requested addition by Council of Europe, project mention seen as notable in accordance with other similar listings, linked to other approved Wikipedia subjects and provides further explanation and insight for readers on international and regional projects. Please provide specification of defects requested or areas of further information,

• Coffeebagel (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Susto (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! I am new to editing Wikipedia (I have always been a regular user of course!). Thank you very much for all that you've contributed to the project. I am surprised that Susto the band is not notable enough for a page. They have two albums, were recently featured on CBS News, have been reviewed by local newspapers and music websites, and are about to go on tour with the Lumineers. I have seen them play at at packed venues twice. It seems odd to me that they would not have a page at this point.

• Nicholas Croucher (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Routenote (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey Swister. Thanks for reviewing my page. I'm just wondering if you can help with a little more advice. I've asked in the live chat for some more advice (as I'm new to this) and been advised that the main reason is our page sounding like and advertisement (as you've suggested as well that it seem like a business listing). I've done my best to avoid that by only stating facts etc. but if this isn't the case (and if you have a chance) would you be able to help me understand if there was a specific section that is still in the wrong tone? I only ask as there are two pages for competitor businesses that are similar (with the CD Baby one in particular even referencing their prices etc.) I understand it's not a case of "They have a page so you get one too", just wondering if there is something I'm missing that makes theirs okay and the RouteNote one require changes. Apologies if this sounds argumentative (it's genuinely not written that way, but tone is hard to convey in text!). Also, just in case you see this message before I manage to fix my user page, I am about to attempt to declare that I work for RouteNote (in case it wasn't already clear). Thanks again. Nick

• Nicholas Croucher (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Routenote (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey Swister, Thanks again for taking the time to answer my questions and help me with this article. I see what you mean regarding the sources being merely mentions within articles. Do you think it would help if I removed the majority of the sources with the exception of the West Briton one (which is a specific article about RouteNote) and maybe the PC Mag one (as that is a guide for other aspiring musicians on how to upload music, one where the reviewer happens to use RouteNote)? Also, if this would help, can we still keep the references to the websites that have reviewed us without specifically using the sources? Again, really appreciate your help with this. It's my first article submission for Wiki and want to get it right! Nick

• Amitpandeys0281 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Stellar Data Recovery (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister

Could you please review my submission again.

Regards,

Dear Swister Twister, thanks for having a look at the new article about Ewald Arenz. I can see that there is a problem with German and Italian sources, but those are partly printed and online encyclopaedia articles, secondary literature on the person and partly reviews by German TV and Radio stations. Since his works are increasingly published in other languages an English wikipedia site seems reasonable. Besides, there are already two articles on Ewald Arenz in the German and Arab Wikipedia. I have already and will add some more references if necessary.

• Raffael Movieman (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ewald Arenz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

• Jacksonpais (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Paulson Thomas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for reviewing my article. I would like some help as to what I am missing. Thank you in advance

• MarkBarton (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:StatCrunch (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for the prompt review! I've added about 8 more references. I'll watch to see whether you feel that is adequate, or whether more are needed.

• CelticsFan203 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:ESA Talent Agency (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I finished making the changes you talked about. I was wondering if you could take another look at my draft: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:ESA_Talent_Agency

• FictionForest (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The Zou (Band) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

What more information do I need to add for this page?

All of the sources are independent

• FictionForest (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The Zou (Band) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Example of a major review please

• FictionForest (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The Zou (Band) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Valley24 is the entertainment section if the Youngstown Vindicator newspaper and the Jambar is from Youngstown State University. Should I dig up reviews from the various cites from around the country the band has played? Any help is appreciated, Thanks!

• FictionForest (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The Zou (Band) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

FMMF is a major music festival. The announcement is from their website. Should I include record labels?

• FictionForest (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The Zou (Band) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I believe the rust belt chronicles is a verified news source in Ohio. The Jambar is THE news paper for YOungstown State University in Ohio and Valley 24 is the entertainment publication for the YOungstown Vindicator newspaper in Youngstown ohio. The Fashion Meets Music Festival lineup is an Official lineup with major acts on the bill. Please help

• Yingyi6 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Yingyi6/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

• Sabrinah75 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Riopy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Swister Twister,

I have re-submitted my article few weeks ago and it is still pending. Would you have some time to spare and maybe look at the article and tell me if it looks good?

I am wondering why it is taking so long as this is my first publishing.

Thank you in advance! Sabrina

• 49.207.184.34 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Suresh Manickavelu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have created a draft in the name of "Suresh Manickavelu". Please understand, I haven't created an article in the name of "Suresh Manickavelu", it is just a draft. Also I haven't submitted it for the review. Then why did you review it and declined. Anyone can have the wiki rights to create a draft. It is just a draft not article.

• Chukwuda (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Paul Chukwuma (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey Swister Twister, Kindly let me know what I'm doing wrong. I have updated the references many times as required.

Dear SwisterTwister, thank you for your review and suggestions for improvement. You are absolutely right, the the information mentioned was somewhere looking like a advertisement. as per your instructions, i have remove all that information and updated my article. i have resubmit my article for your valuable review.

I would also like to inform you that i have provided the all required details and links to verify my article. i request you to please review it and accept it for wikipedia.

Looking for your responce

Dear SwisterTwister, thank you for your review and suggestions for improvement. You are absolutely right, the the information mentioned was somewhere looking like a advertisement. as per your instructions, i have remove all that information and updated my article. i have resubmit my article for your valuable review.

I would also like to inform you that i have provided the all required details and links to verify my article. i request you to please review it and accept it for wikipedia.

Looking for your responce

• CelticsFan203 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:ESA Talent Agency (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I'm ready to be re-reviewed. I added more reliable sources to the page. I'm curious how other talent agencies like "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICM_Partners" are able to have to have a page but I can not get this talent agency published?

• Elliecash89 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Coronation Property Co. Pty Ltd (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

HI There, I'm just wondering which sources aren't reliable? All of them? I would have thought industry publications like these are OK: http://www.architectureanddesign.com.au/news/2016-udia-nsw-awards-for-excellence-winners-announ

Thank you :)

• Elliecash89 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Coronation Property Co. Pty Ltd (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Ok thank you, understood. If i can't find any sources to back up certain points of this article, can I just remove the sections completely? :)

• DonioHinsley (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Donio Hinsley (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I was writing this request as to why you declined my article so I can personally know what corrections I can make to have my article posted for readers like my self can read.

• ElCaminoB (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:El Camino Bracelets (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi

Thanks for taking the time to review this again, we'll get there eventually!

I understand what you say regarding the Custom Step sentence being too suggestive as an advertisement and have removed this sentence with the latest edit.

However, I'm not entirely clear on what you mean regarding your "starting company of the year" comment. El Camino Bracelets are not seeking funding or support, however, it'd be great to start with a basic Wikipedia page now, upon which can be added over time. The most similar company to El Camino Bracelets appears to be Pura Vida (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pura_Vida_Bracelets). If my latest edit does not pass, please could you give me a couple of pointers as to why the proposed El Camino Bracelets Wikipedia page would differ from their Wikipedia page, I am far from an expert in this area, however, when I compared the two, the basic principles appear to be very similar.

Thanks for your time,

David

• The1Fr33m4n (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dr. Lawrence Gordon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you please explain in detail what I might need to add, as I am trying to expand upon the Mythos of the Saw Franchise, I don't see how this is unimportant, please I would really like to post this article for the people looking to find more information about the Saw characters.

• Pratham bhagudia (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Matthew Davies Kreye (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello

I would like to have this re reviewed as i think matthew is a very important individual who is very noteworthy and his band has a lot of influence. I am sorry if my references aren't good.

• 176.199.114.13 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Withdrawn stamps (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello

I am surprised that the article has been delined. This is a very specific aspect on postage stamps, namely their withdrawal. This is nowhere being mentioned or explained on the postage stamps wikipedia page. On the German Wikipedia, there is lots of specific stamp topics accepted beside a mainstream postage stamp article.

Didibebe

• 88.95.141.156 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:TigerBelly (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Added citations from multiple notable sources, including references to subject in USA Today, Vanity Fair, Yahoo! News, Entertainment Weekly, NPR, Perez Hilton, Vulture and more.

all reliable independent sources.

• Sharon Holdstock (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Atari Games International UK (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there,

I have stripped the article of anything which could be construed of opinion or unsubstantiated facts. Would you mind reviewing it please.

Regards, Sharon

• Sharon Holdstock (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Atari Games International UK (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi again.

I am unable to find any "news" related information to support the article. I have however checked with governing bodies such as the Intellectual Property Office which is a government body https://www.ipo.gov.uk/tmcase/Results/1/UK00003135353 and Companies House https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/08638142 which are both verifiable government bodies. Does that help? I would have thought if the source was verifiable like a government agency (i.e. IRS, FBI etc), that would supersede news publications. Is that not correct?

Regards, Sharon

• Shellnyce635 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Paul J. Sekhri (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thank you very much for reviewing the article.

The references I used are all from external media, not press announcements. We used similar references for the Wiki pages for Arie Belldegrun (Kite Pharma) and Jeremy Levin (Ovid Therapeutics). Are additional sources still required?

Looking forward to hearing back from you.

Thanks!

• Epone (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ryan Gruhn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Good afternoon, David! I am requesting a re-review of this article because I added the National and International tournaments that Ryan Gruhn fought in as requested, as well as some documentaries that he was featured in. Thank you for your time, I know you are really swamped!

• JulianAdams (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Western Education (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm just not really sure what more notable reviews or write ups you are looking for. The Village Voice, Pazz and Jop, AllMusic, and Popmatters are some of the largest music publications in the business besides Rolling Stone and Spin. "We need all majorly published reviews" What does that mean? You need MORE of them, or you don't like the sources? Because the sources are very high profile and reliable sources- all of which were referenced in the references section.

• TMCornwell (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Woody Cornwell (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

---I wanted to make sure that I am on the correct path in creating the page for Woody Cornwell. There are many other articles (more recent) that I still need to add. But I wanted to know if I am on the right track with proving Woody's notability, influence, and achievements. If you have any suggestions for improving the entry please let me know.

Thank you, ---Mark

• JohnWright877 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Wright's law (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, could you please give me further information how I can improve the page I submitted to increase the chance of it getting successfully approved. Thankyou

• E.balante (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Saber Astronautics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can I ask why it is read as to advertising? I based it off of numerous other wikipedia articles. The sources include notable press coverage, university collaborations, and community outreach. I am trying to figure out what needs to be taken out in order to make it able to submit. If you could offer some insight that would be wonderful.

• Karin Jam (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:RL360° (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello [SwisterTwister]]

Many Thanks for your comments on my draft article proposal on RL360°. I have updated the page and removed most of the content but I have to say I am very confused as to how my page was rejected even though my sources were from credible publications such as the FT, Bloomberg, Independent and the New York Times. What's more puzzling is that I based my article on other pages that are on Wikipedia. I can't understand how pages with very little content, citations and notability are approved, and the one I created was not. The company I am writing about has a long history in Life Assurance / Insurance and origins from the biggest players in the business who even note the company in their on wiki pages.

Can you please check my new draft and if you are still not happy can you provide more details about which sections are not sufficient? Really apprreciate your guideance. Karin Jam(talk) 09:57 8 March 2017

• 75.148.8.45 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:MedSkl (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks so much for the review of this article - I really appreciate the quick turnaround, and your comments make sense. I have made several edits to the article, largely by removing content that seemed overly editorialized or advertisement-like; does this come closer to the appropriate level of objectivity?

Please let me know if there are any specific pieces of feedback that might be helpful to consider.

Lastly, and in the interest of full disclosure, I want to alert you to the fact that I am an outside consultant working with MedSkl.com to support their outreach efforts, and am developing this Wikipedia page as a part of that work. If the page should be submitted, or otherwise verified, by a third-party validator instead of by me or by the MedSkl.com team, please let me know and I will take the appropriate measures.

And thanks again!

• Dchaissejohnsier (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Chase Johnsey (Ballet Dancer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you please review my article that you left feedback on

• Nagarajan08 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Darez Ahamed (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The biographical article is about a permanent civil servant in India, of a level equivalent to a Brigadier-General in the armed forces or Senior Executive Service in the US. Most of thee references are from The_Times_of_India, The_Hindu which are the largest and 2nd largest selling English newspapers in India which are independent of the person, and official sources available on the Internet. He is particularly notable for winning India's award for excellence in Public Administration which only 5-10 people from over 8 million civil servants get each year. Please reconsider.

• Bartholomewjojosimpson (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jeff Hamada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello SwisterTwister - just wanted to clarify the reason for the submission being decline - the reason stated "What establishes notability is museum collections or major art reviews." makes sense for someone who is solely artist, my question is how does one prove notability as an art blogger/personality? Thanks for the help, I am new to Wikipedia.

• Icosan6 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:LeGrand Van Uitert (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't know how much more independent evidence of a person's notability you can have than the awards received, with citations and reference s to the awarding organization's websites, including the U.S. National Academy of Engineering and patents issued as independently verifiable on the USPTO website. Nevertheless, I've added further documentation with references to two published histories of the laser, from the National Academy Press and the Optical Society of America. If these are not independent evidence of notability, I must request a different reviewer.

• OIBUR0802 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Peter O'Donnell, Jr. Brain Institute (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Could I submit this as a stub?

Thanks oibur0802

• 184.161.114.110 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ramin Amiri (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

It's the real article

• John Vazquez (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Gary Goldsmith (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Our article follows closely the set up for another Advertising notable - Lee Garfinkel, who's wiki entry has 13 references vs 18 for Gary.

Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. The sources we have quoted are reliable and independent of Gary - they are The New York Times, AdWeek, The Wall Street Journal, among others. They fall in line with the references that Lee Garfinkel's entry uses, and are organizations of note, and the information they support is verifiable.

If there are questions about the content within the entry, please elaborate, and if you have any suggestions to make it more robust, I would love to hear them.

Thanks!

• Jperrylo (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Janaya Lo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there. Please note that I did include newspaper articles and other reliable sources and I have added them below. Please advise if these are acceptable.

https://www.thestar.com/entertainment/2015/10/31/arts-awards-celebrate-peter-herrndorfs-legacy.html https://www.rcmusic.ca/connecting/rcm-blog/conservatory-students-excel-radio-canada-music-competition http://www.cmcnational.com/en/select/nouv/index.php?id=7759 http://www.lapresse.ca/le-soleil/arts/chroniques/richard-therrien/201601/11/01-4938721-pas-de-juge-mechant-a-virtuose.php http://www.mississauga.com/whatson-story/4577379-music-prodigies-advance-to-national-finals/ http://www.cbcmusic.ca/posts/11704/30-hot-canadian-classical-under-30-2016 https://www.caledonenterprise.com/news-story/6132659-young-musicians-rally-to-raise-funds-to-help-peers/

I also have the magazine that she was published in.

Magazine is "ON THE UP", and the publisher is Winkreative located in Toronto. www.winkreative.com. She was featured in their Spring 2016 edition.

• Layre035 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:The Franklin Electric (band) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am requesting a re-review as the band I made the page for is not internationally known, but are quite notable in Canada. They get a lot of air time, and I believe the references do show this.

• ChrisSimandl (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:PeerTech (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello SwisterTwister(?)

I'm having a hard time understanding what you mean by: "I'm willing to accept".... and "but it specifically needs all additional significant independent sourcing; notability cannot be inherited from others."...

I've personally been through a couple of Fintech (& other (ie: Insurtech)) accelerators. These (& consulting companies (ie: PwC, KPMG, Accenture, Deloite Touche, etc.)) have referred to other such tech groups as retailTech, RegTech (Regulatory), PeerTech, and others.

My difficulty is in finding veritable references that specific expression... but it will emerge.

Please let me know if still "willing to accept" my explanation.

regards, Chris

• JinJeongHan (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:VETEMENTS (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Can you explain to me how the page "[is] too suggestive of an advertised business profile for clients, not an encyclopedia article and notability cannot be inherited" for me please?

• Sophocles1 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Infosys Consulting (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, the original decline feedback was warranted and I took it into account in this draft. I found more relevant and notable sources, as well as significantly restructured the article to primarily focus on the development/growth timelines rather than the offerings/structure.

• Ciretyp (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Hive (software) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Requesting a re-review as Hive has gained notability by way of user reviews and integration platform launches.

• Iblotter (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Tommy Ahlquist (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Do I need to add more references? What do I need to get this page live?

• Franboard90 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Julian Treasure (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you for taking the time to review my article about Julian Treasure. It’s a shame that you feel the article is unacceptable, and I’d like to discover how I can address the issues that you’ve raised.

Notability

There is significant interest in Julian’s work (such as decreasing crime rates in cities). This is represented by features in the world’s press - publications such as TIME Magazine, The BBC, The Economist, The Guardian, CNN, The Daily Mail, Vogue and The New York Times. His work has even been written about in a dedicated article on the front page of The Wall Street Journal.

I cannot understand how the article has been rejected partly on the grounds that “Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject” given that these are some of the biggest publications in the world.

Julian is also a recognised public speaker and educator. He has trained thousands of people in-person all over the world about sound and communication, and an estimated 40 million people have watched his online videos. One of Julian’s TED talks is in the 10th most watched of all time, and he’s also one of only nine people who have five talks on TED.com - others are Bill Gates, Thomas Dolby and Hans Rosling.

Whilst I appreciate that success at TED alone may not warrant a Wikipedia page, it is a strong demonstration of the popularity of his teaching and the innovation of his ideas.

“PR advertising” It was not the intention that this article read as a PR piece. Perhaps this came about partly from the fact that Julian’s company is marketing based - it’s potentially hard to highlight the significant fact that a company has increased sales, however innovative the nature of the work, without sounding like a PR article.

Secondly, as this is my first attempt at writing a Wikipedia article, it was focussed solely on facts and figures and this may have led to a lack of narrative and relevance to the piece.

Most importantly, Julian’s mission that runs throughout all his work is to “make the world sound beautiful”, and I intend to focus on this in subsequent edits.

Suggestions

I hope that this message has explained how Julian and his work is notable. I therefore suggest the following:

- I will re-write the article with more focus on narrative and relevance (see above) to tie everything together. Should I create a separate article about The Sound Agency including clients, awards etc?

- Should I remove or keep information about Julian's publishing career? He founded a notable company and received multiple recognised awards during that period; this article for those who are interested to check him out, so his background is surely relevant?

- Should I remove or keep information about his music career? This is always of interest to people who want to know from Julian “how did you get into sound?”

- I will remove reference to him being an author in the main summary. I understand that he is not widely recognised for this, and will instead mention his book only briefly. (He is currently working on a new book to be published late in 2017 and aimed at a much wider consumer audience, so this will probably change in time.)

- I can include more on the training work and workshops that Julian has done at conferences and events internationally. A lot of these are notable.

- How do I ensure 'high quality' references to publications? What are the standards? Surely major media like The Times and the BBC are high quality? Are there specific references that are degrading the standard and should be removed?

- I can add more detail about his work... how it is innovative - techniques and technology, core ideas etc, if this is useful.

I look forward to receiving your feedback, along with anything else that you think will make the article acceptable.

Many thanks.

I fleshed out the references as requested.

The subject Marine is mentioned in another Wiki article on the war in Afganistan. I would assume that the link to this article can't be made until it is approved?

• Zingasvryka (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Teel James Glenn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I believed that IMDB records are a significant enough independent listing, and the extensive list of professional publications that Mr. Glenn has sold to.

As a writer he's written and sold a number of novels. As a stunt choreographer he has an extensive list of file credits. I'm not sure I understand how these are not significant?

• Cwtyler (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ivan Vukadinov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Request for reconsideration: The rejection of this article does not take account of the fact that this artist is already the subject of a Wikipedia page in Bulgarian: https://bg.wikipedia.org/Иван Вукадинов. This was not previously cited, but the English page under consideration is essentially mirroring the existing Bulgarian page. It is therefore inappropriate to dismiss the English page as not meeting the criteria for significance.

In response to the comments about the reliability and independence of the sources of this article, this article was sourced by no fewer than four independent Bulgarian and one Italian author, publishing in English, German, Italian and Bulgarian, all of which describe the artist in glowing terms. Moreover, he is the subject of not one but two individual artist biographical surveys by the National Gallery of Art in Sofia, the central authority on Bulgarian art. By dismissing these as reliable sources, the reviewer is essentially dismissing the entire country of Bulgaria as a reputable and independent assessor of artistic merit and applying a narrow, Anglo-American definition of source relevance to the Wikipedia selection procedure. The number of referenced sources has now been nearly doubled.

I should point out that the primary source that is cited is an extremely reputable book about the artist by the doyenne of art critics in Bulgaria, Distinguished Professor Aksinia Dzhurova, who is completely independent of the artist in question. This art authority is Director of the Bulgarian Center for Slavic and Byzantine Studies, a positon she has held for four decades since 1986, and has an international reputation as indicated by her visiting professorships at the universities of Yale (USA), Jerusalem (Israel), the Sorbonne (France) and the Institute for Eurasian Studies (Italy). She has also been honored as a Foreign Member of the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts (SANU). She is the author of 25 books and hundreds of publications and on Medieval culture, Slavic and Byzantine art, Slavic codicology and Modern art. She is therefore unquestionably an established, reliable authority on the standing of Eastern European artists, and is completely independent of the artist (as am I).

A revised version of the page has been prepared, itemizing further activities and world recognition of this important artist.

• WilHutton (talk · contribs)
  • User:WilHutton/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

I'm writing this current Wikipedia article as there is a lack of knowledge regarding the AMAR foundation. I understand that Wikipedia has strict guidelines regarding writing, however, I was wondering if there is any information (specific) that I should omit in order to write a successful article?

Additionally, while the notability Wikipedia page was really helpful, I still fail to understand which source would be useful? In the UK, news papers like the Sun/the Mirror are considered tabloid and should not be noteworthy news, but would Wikipedia consider these papers worthy of reference?

Thank you in advance,

WH

• JoeySylerJush (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Terence Tan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Request assistance for help regarding Terence Tan's draft. Good Afternoon, I have been rejected twice and would like to find out from you which part seems very advertising. Is there any parts that requires urgent changes, so as to be accepted? Do let me know. ThankYou!

• Marthalewis (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Luis DH (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi!

I understand there were some sources "close" to the artist. I've put other sources, all independent from him and left the "problematic" ones out (iTunes listings, blogs, etc.).

Basically there would be two reasons to include him:

- He's been #1 on an International Independent Music chart, compiled with radio airplay of more than 90 countries.

- He's been nominated for the "independent Grammys" in Spain with his album.

He also has a long discography but I understand that's not reason enough to include him here.

Please let me know your thoughts! This is my first article and I'd like to write more after this one :)

Thank you!

Hi, I know you've been declining and accepting drafts for a very long time. I've read on the Wikipedia page on how to accept and decline drafts but I still don't understand it. I was hoping you could help me understand in your own words. Thanks

Plum3600 (talk)

• TTRECORDS (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:King P Beatz (Record Producer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi I'm getting in touch to see what other information I can provide for my artist to be considered for Wikipedia. I do have more press reviews and quotes from promo reports from Dj's etc

We included local newspaper articles about his radio station KIK RADIO links to other Wikipedia pages of the artists he produced for example promise has credited our producer on the album credits of an album that was released on e 1 entertainment / duck down music.

Thanks Andrew gribbon

• Shimitron (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Maria Cabildo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to know if the additional LA Times citations provide sufficient independent evidence of Maria's noteworthiness. Apologies, clearly I am new to this. -Simon Fraser

• E.balante (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Saber Astronautics (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey swister I Made several new edits and solved the notability with new references from several reputable publications. If you could take a look at it and let me know what you think that would be great. Also if it is still not good enough can you please tell me what it needs? I have looked at other space wiki pages such as SpaceX and Deep Space Industries and I followed their formatting and the content that they have in their pages is the same as the content in the Saber Page just with more intellectual property.

• WGH Schmitt (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Carl Simon Fried (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

<To reviewer’s talk page Hallo Swister Twister Your comment on my submission: Carl Simon Fried I would like to continue working on the submission. Resubmission will be much shorter and changed substantially. First, I will study the “golden rule” and the “guidelines on the notability of people”. I was not aware of the fact that it was necessary to speak about the notability of Carl Fried as a scientist. Subsequently I did not provide enough information about his Textbook from 1941 and all the medical authorities who noted where Fried had worked as a pioneer. My text focused on the political circumstances, which had interrupt his scientific activities Thanks for help WGH Schmitt >

WGHS

• Adharmaha (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rekhta Foundation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I am writing on behalf of the Rekhta Foundation. Our draft has been rejected thrice now despite edits being made on our end. Please throw some light on exactly where we are going wrong so we can get this page up. As for the concern that we are only three years old, we would request you to let us know what kind of sources would make us look more credible. We have been covered by a major section of the media as well academic journals, kindly suggest on what you think are the best sources to be listed. Thank you!

• I.lebediev (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Evgeny Khmara (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello SisterTwister,

thanks for your helpful contributions.

Today I removed the blog links and put in a link to the website of the Germen news-tv-station n-tv.

Iam still working to get more Wikipedia-relevat links and also for some pictures and sourches which underline the international aspects of Susen's work. I think, I will need some days more ... if that's okay! So far I will remove the blog links at first and continue later!

Have a nice weekend! (:o)

• Stevedr83 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Historic Carousel and Museum, Albany Oregon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

We're going to be completing the Carousel in June 2017, I was hoping to start a new wiki page. Any suggestions would be helpful. Here is our website. www.albanycarousel.com

• 186.179.182.222 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Suriname Standards Bureau (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please allow my article on the Suriname Standards Bureau? I have added new references...

• Mahraandbushra (talk · contribs)
  • User:Mahraandbushra/sandbox/Flash (2016 Film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I really want this article to go be published, i just want you to make it more clear to me that what did i do wrong is it the way i did the citation? can you tell me please specifically what i need to do. Because some of the information i have i got from the actual director via email is that possible? please i need to know what to do exactly thank you.

• 2A02:C7D:8495:B100:E14F:2CCC:2428:571 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Thortspace (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have compiled a list of references to notable people using thortspace. https://medium.com/thortspace/articles-and-mentions-of-thortspace-by-independent-writers-and-reviewers-edc006ebcd3d#.4dvwpof9o

Could you say if this will be enough to pass if I resubmit?

• Bluetele (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Historic Santa Fe Foundation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm such a newbie and Wikipedia is complicated for me, that I don't know if I'm communicating correctly. Your latest comment asked that "major independent news" organizations be used in references. However, we are a small 501 (c)3 organization in a small town, barely surviving on donations. Our local newspaper has 1 1/2 pages of local news each day, so the chances of getting "major independent news" references are just about non-existent. Do have any suggestions?

We put this page together since we found several Wikipedia pages that reference our organization, but a click on those links took a reader nowhere. We thought we were helping Wikipedia be more comprehensive and could get our story referenced too. If you think our submission is going nowhere, I'm willing to withdraw it.

Thanks.

• 106.208.190.208 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Thomas Kuzhinapurath (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Sir, I have updated the draft of "Thomas Kuzhinapurath" pls consider it.

• 106.208.190.208 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Thomas Kuzhinapurath (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

• Josephgalasso (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Andrew Radford (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister (is it David?) my current (today's) submission of Prof. <Andrew Radford> has been denied based on notability. Could we please use the same criterion which was used and passed for his accepted Spanish-Wiki page? The question is : why his Spanish notability should outrank his English notability? This second attempt of Andrew Radford should only be seen in the light of a translation from Spanish to English (the dominant language of his scholarly works), and to add updated materials.

thanks so much. joseph

Hi, hope I'm doing this right. You had left feedback on my submission, OvO, to add more sources/reviews. I have since added more and am hoping this will be sufficient, but welcome any further suggestion. Thank you!

rdigiglio (talk)

• Lubumbashimedia (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dj Spilulu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm requesting a re revieW because there is everything you asked for and there is a fact you shoud understand that because there is no news papers businesses in Congo, it doesn't mean thinks are not happening. I feel like because my country is poor no body cares about what we living or what we have representing the real street art in lubumbashi/katanga/R.D Congo but you only focus on the guys that has opportunity to make it in europ. While there are hero out here that are not recognize because you choose not to. I believe the article is perfect, but since you know what is wrong is there a way of fixing it for US? Because you have all the infos necessary in the article.. thank you

• Yonikasz (talk · contribs)
  • User:Yonikasz/Cambria Hotels & Suites (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I believe that I used a selection of sources independent of the company. I only used press releases to find exact dates of openings and other figures for the company, I never used it for public reception, or rankings. I primarily used business journals and independent news. I would like to understand in more detail what I need for more high quality sources.

• Andrea Montefiorino (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Bruno Maçães (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Added a few more news articles. 14 probably enough, but many more will be added once it is public

• Andrea Montefiorino (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Bruno Maçães (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Sorry, but isn't it a work in progress? Others will add. I picked afew of the main ones, but really cannot see myself putting in all news articles. There are probably 500 or 1000

• Andrea Montefiorino (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Bruno Maçães (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Added two more articles. It is now up to 16. Tell me what is enough

• Andrea Montefiorino (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Bruno Maçães (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Ok thete are how 19 articles and a few added and very significant. Hope it works. Thanks

• TGSTINT (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jennifer Turner (musician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

How are sources from world-famous and established newspapers as nytimes, theguardian or music-relevant pages like mtv or discogs are NOT reliable. What more reliable sources about a musician can there be than from newspapers everyone has heard from and world famous music pages?? I used well know newspapers or music papers for the general information and well know music databases or the music label/musician websites themself for the discography. Most of these pages even have a wikipedia article themselves... I am sorry - but when i compare this to the pages that the reviewer wrote himself - they are much less and proper referenced. There is also an artist in the list where the reviewer used exactly the same unreliable sources (mtv etc.). I may have not been writing about very well known artist - In fact i think this is the main reason.. But i wrote about one who worked with artist on albums and with producers who achieved Platinum status (often several times) - and i spend a lot of time viewing, comparing and chossing references. And to make the decline even more funny: there is a wikipedia article with a cricketeer of the same name which goes like" Jennifer Turner (born 5 September 1969) is a New Zealand former cricketer." Then one reference. And that was it. So - if i shorten my article to its first sentence "Jennifer Turner is a singer/songwriter musician and producer." and link to one "reliable source" (instead of several...) - guess it is ok and can be approved?

I may agree that the general look can be polished - but sources not reliable?? If so the reviewer himself used those unreliable sources and should decline some of the articles he has on his userpage...

So to recap: it would be kind to point out which sources are the ones who are supposed to be unreliable.

• I.lebediev (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Evgeny Khmara (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello.Thank you for your comment to my article.Actually all links in this articleAre independent reviews from popular Ukrainian internet resources. Could you be so kind to mark those which you considered not reliable. Thank you.

• TGSTINT (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jennifer Turner (musician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As comment to my improvments you wrote: "The same listed guideline also says that the listed profiles such as MTV, Bandcamp, Discogs, etc. must be removed as they are not independent or significant; while there are now headlines for the journalists, those alone are simply not enough to satisfy WP:Notability (music). Basically these profile-like sources only exist to confirm it exists, but not notability, and especially since anyone can make their own profile, it wouldn't be notable. " No it does not! First: MTV is already removed before the second review as mtv updated their page and i couldnt find the artist page anymore. Which tells me the commentor didnt really check the links. Second: All the links i did not comment further so far are ONLY related to the discography - so mainly Databases LIKE Discogs. The link you refer to refers to creating a WHOLE ARTICLE of an Album, song or whatnot - not a discography INSIDE and as part of an article in which the NOTABILITY or the artist is already proven by 17 references. Also Discogs - cleary fulfills the criteria of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Recordings - as it is not related to the musician, label or whatever. You can even see on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discogs. Significance is a word easily thrown - What makes That it is one of the biggest sources available. To underline this: in articles that probably are reviewed numerous times - like those of a small band called the Beatles Discogs CAN BE FOUND as reference. So - the person itself is already shown to be notable by 17 references spanning the musical carrer. Also no guidline disproves Discogs and other used sources for beeing wrong for the usage on the discography inside this article - even more you can find sources like these in discographys of some of the worlds most famous artists. Just to be sure i gave the Discography of Elvis Presley a try: and again - discogs can be found. 2 out of 2. So either everyone reviewing this articles is wrong. Or i am right in using those references. So please accept my well researched article.

SwisterTwister talk 20:4011, 1 April 2017 (UTC)}}

• Arni27q (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Lord Loxley (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

~I have some difficulties finding the right sources. What I could find I've already cited. I'd happily recieve some tips what sources I could cite furthermore (like seasons or episodes of the series?).~

• Abigailwise (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Donna Carpenter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thank you very much for explaining. I have, however, added several additional sources from local and national publications.

• Edenmeyer11 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Tigress of Cachtiche (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

There seems to be a request for verifiable articles on the topic. I am soooooo very new to this! This is an original script. I am trying to create this page to surprise my high school students who were the original cast in this production. This script is not, as of yet, published. I simply want to create a minor gift for those seniors who will be graduating soon. This is my script, my production, in my high school. Not sure how to verify beyond that. Any help is appreciated.

• Abhi3449 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Vector Consulting (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello SwisterTwister,

thanks for the speedy evaluation. Could you please elaborate more on the reason for rejection? I would like to work on it and resubmit it.

Is the reason for rejection:

1. You do not consider him a notable person although his has collaborated with other notable persons and has received medals, or
2. The sources that are mentioned are not considered reliable?
   

Your reply would be appreciated.

Thank you

User:Abhi3449

• Eugenious monk (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:MicroVision, Inc. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have added major independent sources; for example Optics.org. That Thomas Furness is considered the inventor of VR and VRD is an important historical milestone. The company's history dates back twenty years. Since then, the company's technology and it's significance has become part of our current vocabulary.

• CorbuleacM (talk · contribs)

Hello SwisterTwister,

I've included more relevant information about Unigma LLC and created this Draft. I want to publish it. What do you think?

Thank you very much,

• Vinmeister (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Gringo Trails (film) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! Just wondering if you could offer some advice n how I can improve my article. I removed some of the less reputable sources, and added a section on film reviews from more reputable publications (Village Voice, Criterion, Rotten Tomatoes, IMDb, etc.) Is there anything else I can contribute or edit to the article to help get it approved? Thanks!

• Massive1111 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Science Teheran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

More than a miliiom plays is not notoriety? Ok. Delete the article please. Thank you.

• Lisybil (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Kelvin Wu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister‬, I have re-edited the draft and re-submitted for review. Would you please check and let me know if you have any other question?

Mr. Wu is a legendary entrepreneur and businessman in Hong Kong, also a famous investor within the film and entertainment industry in the US. He has an approved Wikipedia page in Traditional Chinese (link) and I am now helping to create an English page for him.

Thanks.

• DayanaFabiche (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Tourico Holidays (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SwisterTwister, I saw your comment, I think I have addressed the source issue, I used sources that are not related or link back to the company in any way, but going off on your comment about the 5000 list, the link provided doesn't link to the full list, it links to what the company's standing is on that list (for the most current year and all previous years). If you could take a look at the sources again, I would greatly appreciate it (I have changed almost all of them, I evidently had to leave the ones where I got the most basic company information, everything else I changed)

Thanks again

• Jensen.evan (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Wellsource, Inc. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Help me out here. How is this submission really any different than this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RedBrick_Health Includes outside sources to verify and substantiate any claims and contributions Dr. Hall has made to public health.

• Robbieboy123 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rob Weston (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, I have reviewed your rejection comments and have revised the page and now provided better (notable) sources for the information detailed. I'm sure this should now satisfy your requirements. Many thanks.

• Sharyn Finnegan (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Marjorie Kramer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The reviewer said I did not indicate major reviews which was not correct as I indicated Kramer had reviews in the NY Times, ARTnews, and Art in America, in addition to being in a major anthology of feminist artists. I have added some of the museums her work has been shown in. I wondered if the reviewer noted that Kramer peers, the people she worked on and often led, as feminist artist pioneers all have Wikipedia websites already. Pesilikis showed less than she has.

Hi, it's me again . I was wondering your opinion on Draft:Hannah Grace? I think that having references from the BBC and (lesser so) the daily star definitely make it interesting and, barring a copyvio check (which I can't do easily on mobile but will when I am at my PC) returning that it is in violation/plagiarized, I would be tempted to accept it personally. It has some grammar issues/typos but are quite minor and I would be tempted to just fix myself and would not consider a deal breaker acceptance wise. What are your thoughts on it?

Thanks as always for your time --TheSandDoctor (talk) 00:52, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• TheSandDoctor Yes, I see the sources but additional ones would certainly help too. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 02:04, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So would you decline it for the time being saying to add more reliable references etc or? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 02:15, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TheSandDoctor Currently declining to allow additional sources would be good. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 03:48, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your time! Is your opinion the same for the one below? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:34, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion on Draft:Subterfuge (game)

What do you think of Draft:Subterfuge (game)? I am thinking that it is possibly acceptable and the having Polygon (and to a lesser extent, Gamasutra) as a references does seem to indicate at least some notability to the game. Would like to see more on the level of Polygon as well though. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 02:30, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• In this case TheSandDoctor it's not enough major news coverage. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response! Hope you dont mind my asking you these sorts of questions when I come across them and am unsure. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:39, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion on Draft:Rosenbaum Contemporary

What is your opinion on Draft:Rosenbaum Contemporary? I am thinking it possibly notable but am unsure as to if Art of the Times is a reputable source or which sources might be. Your thoughts are welcome. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• TheSandDoctor Yes, I wasn't sure about that one, but I think because of the article weight, there's enough to accept but, first additional significant sources would especially help. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 22:29, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I left an AFC comment on it and marked it as no longer under review. I might work on it myself as the editor appears inactive. It depends what I can dig up (although I can't do it tonight as it is getting pretty late here). --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:49, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion request on Draft:Adam Armstrong

On my talk page the editor who created the draft has brought it to my attention that the essay-like wording has been addressed and I said that I would get a second reviewer to take a look at it and get their opinion on it. I was wondering what you think of Draft:Adam Armstrong? I also said in my response that more/additional noteworthy citations tend to be a good way to go. The draft is interesting and does appear to have some good references behind it, although only one is digital. Copyvio isn't loading the page for me so I am not sure on its results at this time. Discussion on my talk page: User_talk:TheSandDoctor#Adam_Armstrong_pioneer_settler_Dalkeith_Western_Australia --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:55, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• TheSandDoctor Yes, and I agree, so it's currently unacceptable. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your input. What is your exact reasoning though (so I can better explain to the IP user who brought this up and for my own curiousity)? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:08, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TheSandDoctor No claims of notability and no signs of a formatted encyclopedia article. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks once again for the input! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:15, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion request on Draft:Ty J. Young

Hi again, I was wondering if I could get your input on Draft:Ty J. Young? I think that it would benefit from all additional sourcing however am 'on the fence' as to if it should be accepted or declined. What is your take on it? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 17:53, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input - based on your recommendation I declined the page as an ad with a comment to refer to the below AFC comments/messages. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 20:51, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion request on Draft:Darez Ahamed

Hi again, I was just wondering if I could get your input on Draft:Darez Ahamed? They left a message on my talk page asking why it is not notable pointing to other articles that exist on Wikipedia of similar stature. Thanks again for your time! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 14:56, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion request on Draft:Sheeba Ameer

What do you think of Draft:Sheeba Ameer? The user who created it has posted on my talk page asking for another opinion on the draft and any pointers to improve it in the event that it is not ready. Some of the citations/references do appear interesting but I am not sure if they are enough. Apparently for the books section they were unable to find any references either (see this section). What are your thoughts on it? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:32, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• TheSandDoctor It's unlikely from that page she's notable, because the sources are simply not significant. SwisterTwister talk 22:27, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your input on the draft. I have linked the creator to this thread as well so they can ask anything that they may be wondering in connection to this should they choose. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 22:30, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second opinion request on Draft:Gargoyle (band)

Hi there, I was wondering what you thought of Draft:Gargoyle (band)? It is translated by the draft creator from the Japanese Wikipedia. I am thinking that it is potentially good enough to accept however more independent/notable/reliable sources are typically always a good thing to add. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 03:56, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• TheSandDoctor Ah yes, it would need additional significant news since some of the sources are simply listed discographies or notices. Cheers, SwisterTwister talk 03:58, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That was a quick response! Thanks as always for your help! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:08, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• 181.47.215.190 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:César González (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't understand what you mean by "notability can not be inherited". Could you explain? This is my first article ever and I'm writing it because it was weird to find that there was only a spanish article in Wikipedia regarding Gonzalez.

Please bear in mind that in my submission: There are references to articles regarding González' work in cultural supplements of all major Argentinean written press: Clarin, Pagina 12, La Nacion. There is a link to a video interview from the Argentinean national TV network (Encuentro is a public signal from the Ministry of Culture: http://encuentro.gob.ar/) There are links to interviews in two highly renowned radio broadcasts in Argentina (Radio Metro, Radio Vorterix). There is a link to a disclosure by Argentinean Embassy in Germany regarding Gonzalez' visit to Berlin to show his work.

Certainly he is not internationally renowned, but his local renown is comparable to many other countercultural artists that do have a profile in Wikipedia. As an example, and for the sake of their similarities, take the case of the Brazilian writer Ferrez.

According to Wikipedia's guidelines for notability (in bold those criteria met by Gonzalez):

Basic criteria: People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published[4] secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other,[5] and independent of the subject.[6]

If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability.[7] Primary sources may be used to support content in an article, but they do not contribute toward proving the notability of a subject.

Criteria for authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, and other creative professionals:

The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors.

The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or technique. The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work. In addition, such work must have been the primary subject of an independent and notable work (for example, a book, film, or television series, but usually not a single episode of a television series) or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews.

The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.

• James at EveryDeal (talk · contribs)
  • User:James at EveryDeal/sandbox/EveryDeal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, Can you please be more specific as to what I am not allowed to have on my page? Thank you.

@James at EveryDeal: I am sorry that I apparently missed this until now. What was on the page? From what I can tell currently it was not declined by me but rather SwisterTwister. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:16, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am kind of new to wiki. My Article for Marcello Aliprandi, you decliened, is a translation from an original article in the italian wiki (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcello_Aliprandi). Translations of the article already exist in many other languages such as spanish, french and german. I thought it would be a nice thing to have it in English as well since Aliprandi had directed english speaking actors such as academy award winner Martin Balsam and Orson Wells and he certainly meets notability criteria. I did not know how to place the tags on top of the article to show that it was a translation. There are many articles on the interent and books referencing Aliprandi but I was not trying to write an original article but just post a translation of the original Italian article. The original article reference for example a work by Tullio Kezich who is a very noted italian film critic. I still need to add the filmography and the imdb reference. Please help. I look forward to your input. Stefanianj 09:42 04/11/2017 UTC

• Bapo224 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Chris Lovasz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister,

A couple of days ago you rejected our draft of a page about Chris Lovasz, and we have since improved the draft. We have added a lot of information and third party sources including (but not limited to) the Telegraph, PCGamesN and TenEighty magazine. We are of the belief that Chris Lovasz is quite notable as he has a large fanbase and a large amount of self produced content. he is, in our humble opinions, much more notable than a bunch of youtubers that do already have a wikipedia page such as a number of SourceFed hosts like William Haynes just to name an example. And equally notable as fellow Yogscast members Hat Films.

We hope that you will look at the draft again from a fair and just view and possibly provide us with feedback to improve our page. Thank you in advance,

The community from /r/sips on Reddit.

• Failingtoad (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Iron Chef Gauntlet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Iron Chef Gauntlet is just an notable as other Iron Chef shows which already have Wikipedia articles. What further information is needed? Thank you.

• Jonatanmiller (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Accreditation Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Are these ones supportive and sufficient to show the organization is notable? Would I just include them in the footnotes?

https://www.thestar.com/news/investigations/2013/02/04/star_gets_action_health_canada_announces_new_standard_for_reporting_side_effects.html http://www.muskokaregion.com/news-story/6240910-string-of-surprise-inspections-at-nursing-home-in-huntsville/ http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/time-to-lead/falling-seniors-a-preventable-problem-a-huge-health-burden/article581344/

• Jonatanmiller (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Accreditation Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Ok, thanks - I can start with those as basis of the content. When you say we would need all additional news - can you please clarify? Searching Google News for "Accreditation Canada" returns over 600 results. https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=ca&tbm=nws&authuser=0&q="accreditation+canada"

Thank you in advance for the clairifation!

• Gmmgarro12 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Downtown Lincoln Association (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! I was wondering if you could give me some pointers on how best to find relevant source material for my topic which was rejected, the Downtown Lincoln Association. I have lots of newspaper mentions and stories from modern times, but most of the history of the organization (which is linked with the history of the city itself) is in newspaper archives behind a paywall. I'm a total wiki newbie here so I'm just trying to figure out what exactly I should be aiming for here. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks so much!

• Nirajjvyas (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Christine Merlin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The page Christine Merline was not accepted due to a lack of 'notability.' Christine Merlin is a relatively young scientist but has made some monumental discoveries in monarch butterfly circadian rhythms and migration patterns, which is outlined on the page. The references cited to support that information is not from Merlin herself but from primary review sources of her materials.

Following this justification, I believe this page has been incorrectly declined.

• Asemtei (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dr Leandro Herrero (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The page Doctor Leandro Herrero was not accepted due to a lack of 'notability.'

He is a world renowned speaker with the sources of very important events independently referenced in the text. Further, he is currently leading a nation-wide health executive service revamp across all Ireland, also referenced.

Also, googling Leandro Herrero redirects to this other Mr. Herrero, who has beed dead for a while, possible confusing many out there, including myself. ( https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leandro_%C3%81ngel_Herrero )

Following this double justification, I believe this page has been incorrectly declined.

• Jbrunoii (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:D-Metal Stars (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Article in Rolling Stone Magazine http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/inside-disneys-attempt-to-go-metal-on-new-covers-compilation-w472108 This is a major release with a major label, please let us know further why this was rejected. Thank you

I noticed you've created a lot of surname disambiguations recently. This is good, but please be aware of our guidelines at MOS:DABPEOPLE: "For people, include their birth and death years (when known), and ... descriptive information...." Usually, we list the nationality, and if there are complication in that, we list them, as in this made-up example:

• John Smith (born 1983), New Zealand-born Australian footballer now playing in Fiji

Introductory lines for surname disambiguations are usually more than just "may refer to:", for example

MacArthur or Macarthur is a surname, originating with the Scottish Clan MacArthur and now spread through English-speaking countries. Notable people with the surname include:

It would have been fine to shorten this to:

MacArthur or Macarthur is a surname. Notable people with the surname include:

I also noticed a lot of inconsistency between your disambiguation entries and the main articles. For example, according to the individual biographical articles:

• Haggo
  • Allan Haggo is a cricket umpire, not a footballer.
  • David Haggo is a cricketer, not a footballer.
• Weijie
  • Jiang Weijie is a professional Go player, not an athlete. Go is a board game, not an athletic sport.
• Noppert
  • Danny Noppert is a darts player; darts is not usually considered an athletic sport.
• Dorley
  • August Dorley is German soldier as you wrote, but he is notable for having fought in the American Civil War, and he died in the United States.
• Mugabi
  • John Mugabi is a boxer, not a footballer.
• Fané
  • Lassana Fané is a Malian football player currently playing in the Saudi Professional League; he is not Kuwaiti.
• Pradyut is a given name, not a surname.

I found all this in just the first 17 of these disambiguations that I looked at, which I found at Special:ShortPages. Given this high rate of discrepancy between the biographical articles and the disambiguation pages, would you consider going back and reviewing all of your recent surname disambiguation pages? Please include include their birth and death years (when known), and descriptive information, including nationality, following the guidelines at MOS:DABPEOPLE, with info consistent with the biographical articles.

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 07:53, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You created Rokne at 23:27, 16 April 2017‎, with a link to Marianne Rokne, without her birth year, even though it's right there in the lead sentence of her article. When you create human name disambiguations, would you please put in the birth and death years, when available, in the individual entries? Anomalocaris (talk) 04:13, 17 April 2017 (UTC)bu[reply]

You created Datcu with a link to Ilie Datcu without including his birth year, even though it's right there in the lead sentence of his article. It would be easier for all concerned if you would put available birth and death years in disambiguation entries in the first place. Anomalocaris (talk) 17:00, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for putting birth years where available in your new disambiguations Tillack, Schweickart, and Rosker. And thank you for your many contributions to Wikipedia, both in editing existing articles and creating new ones. —Anomalocaris (talk) 22:11, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You created Stolow with less care than the last group I commented on. You omitted Henry Stolow's birth and death year, which were right there in the article, and you missed both of their professions. Albert Stolow is a physical and theoretical chemist, not an engineer. Henry Stolow was a stamp dealer, which is more informative than businessman, and for a Latvian it's noteworthy that he did most of his work in other countries, specifically the United States and Germany. —Anomalocaris (talk) 04:46, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the edits and edit summary I made to Candlin. —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:44, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• 36.12.104.59 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Naohiro totsuka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

　The page "Naohiro Totsuka" already exist on "Wikidata". Why this draft page doesn't link?

• Piyushdeswal12 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sangeeta Gupta (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The individual that we are creating an article for is a successful theater artist and director and we feel that she must be aptly recognized and thus efforts are made to create an article about her. She is very well known in the field throughout the country and has received the local coverage in printed media from time to time and their online portals as well. She seems appropriate to write an article about however my being new to the field of article writing on wikipedia and being just an acquaintance with referencing and tags must have given the idea that the personality is not a well recognised one. Please Help!

Hi, thank you for reviewing my draft. You wrote that my draft should wait since the book isn't released. I would like to say that articles like Annabelle: Creation is an upcoming film. Why has it been made into an article, and why can't mine be made into one? Plum3600 (talk) 20:19, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I tried looking for more news for Draft:The Empty Grave but since the book hasn't been released there isn't much. Can you make my draft into an article and when there is more information on the book I can add it? It would mean a lot to me. Plum3600 (talk) 20:40, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• BookReviewer (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Graham Brown (writer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for the comments. Added more books. He's a co-author on 4 NYT best-selling books in addition to 4 of his own from recognizable publishers (not self-published). Can you look and see if those additional books allow for publishing the entry? This is my first original page, so trying to get it right.

BookReviewer (talk) 00:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - I appreciate your feedback on the Dylan Collins page via my Talk page. I'm happy to improve the article to meet notability, but can you suggest the best method for doing that? I don't want to undo your reversion, but can you suggest a better way for me to undo and improve without looking like an edit war? I can do this all in one edit but undo felt a bit odd. Thanks Misterpottery (talk) 11:22, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• MulhollandF (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Bradley's Law (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I was hoping to have this page re-reviewed as I have now included the theory behind the Law.

• VoodooEconomics (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:IRhythm Technologies (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Could I get you to take another look at the iRhythm Technologies page? I know you get a ton of requests every day, so no rush of course. I'm just so curious. (I checked my email like every hour this weekend, even in the middle of the night...) this was my first shot at an article as I'm trying to learn the process. I was trying to be patient... but I failed....

Let me start by saying, I 100% agree that my first draft was pretty much just a "business listing". I was having a hard time figuring out what to write about a company while making sure that it didn't sound like an advertisement. To remedy this, I went and read a number of articles featured by the Companies Wikiproject and that helped to break me out of my writer's block. :) I think that I've fleshed it out a lot better.

As for the "notability", I'll admit I was a little confused because I read in WP:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Publicly_traded_corporations that things like analyst reports were valid for establishing notability, which is where I was trying to get most of my references. They weren't announcements from iRhythm, but rather articles by analysts about iRhythm. Either way, I added some references from a couple books and peer-reviewed research that discuss iRhythm and their products. So, I think that I've got notability covered now. But I am curious to get your take on what does and doesn't establish notability for companies.

Thank you so much for your contributions, and thanks in advance for your feedback! VoodooEconomics (talk) 18:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Notability (organizations and companies) might be interesting to you as you are considering my questions. It looks like there is a discussion about clarifying that each round of venture capitalism round is a "significant event". I know that this isn't approved policy yet, but I thought it worth noting. Looks like they were trying to get people to weigh in on the issue. Personally, I'm not sure that I agree that a round of VC is inherently significant, but coverage of multiple rounds from multiple sources does seem to me like it would be significant. And coverage by an independent analyst of a company going public does seem like it makes a company not just notable but noted. Just a thought as I'm exploring what makes companies "Notable". Thanks again for your time and helping me figure all of this out. I really appreciate your contributions! VoodooEconomics (talk) 18:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister,

Thanks for reviewing my article: Draft:Paul_Fox_(Singer) The reason I am trying to submit this page firstly is because if you Google 'Paul Fox Reggae' the first result is a Wikipedia page about Paul Fox of the Ruts who died a few years ago. We have the same name and this means that many people think I am dead! I am working in the same section of the reggae scene as a number of other people who have Wikipedia pages and I used their pages as a guideline to what is required as they were obviously approved. Below are a couple of examples of Wikipedia pages which either have the same level of links regarding 'notability' or less (and in some cases no working reference links at all). Please could you let me know if they were approved why my page has not been approved. Vibronics Zion_Train

Many thanks and your time is much appreciated.

Paul Bushman0187 (talk) 18:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You told me that the sources have to be notable. The daily telegraph and The Guardian are noticeable news. Can you be more specific please. Plum3600 (talk) 22:09, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note to let you know that I took the prod off of this article and fixed it. There a a LOT of very good, in-depth sources. The promotional aspect of the article has been largely eliminated.96.127.244.11 (talk) 01:03, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Hankthetank78 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Justin (JMHHACKER) Matthew (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have dozens and dozens of notable references and podcasts by people with wikipedia pages and companies how do you want me to show this

I've tried to comply to your's and Dr. Stauss's suggestions (he is out till July). Please take a look and hopefully accept. Min-on is a huge international concert association and shouldn't fly under Wikipedia radar.Stgrlee16 (talk) 16:22, 18 April 2017 (UTC) I may have screwed up the previous post by accident. If so apologies.Stgrlee16 (talk) 16:28, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am a bit confused, I got a notification saying that you mentioned me in Draft:Peter Clossick however you did not? --TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• TheSandDoctor Ah, yes, I got them several times this morning myself so I believe it's mistake on the AfC system itself. SwisterTwister talk 18:29, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weird but glad I am not alone haha. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:34, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It happened again lol Draft:Зографов --TheSandDoctor (talk) 18:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Desireia Valteau (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Professor Olufemi Vaughan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Desireia Valteau (talk) 01:13, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I do not understand the rejection for the article submitted on Prof. Olufemi Vaughn. You said, "This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject..." What references should the professor have? As for the latter question, not sure of the reliable sources independent of the subject? Do you mean, for example, a colleague not in African studies? A college president? Help:) Thanks! Desireia Valteau (talk) 01:51, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Desireia[reply]

• Pedro dreamcheaper (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:DreamCheaper (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there,

I would like to know how I could write this article in order to remain legal and have the quality required. In order to write it, I have read several articles in Wikipedia about similar booking platforms. I think my article is aligned with the articles I reviewed.

It is not the first time I am trying to submit this draft, and I don't know how to make it even more neutral. Before you answer, I have already read several "how to write an article in Wikipedia" kind of articles.

Last but not least, it's true that the article is based on other interviews, press releases, notices and so on. I would like to know which are the differences between the references of the article of booking.com (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Booking.com) and my article. In fact, these two are aligned in so many ways, not only references - although it's true that DreamCheaper is not as big as booking.com. Same happens with momondo (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Momondo) and Trivago (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivago), and some other articles.

Could you please help me out here at writing this and get it published?

Best regards, Pedro

Pedro dreamcheaper (talk) 07:21, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Alessandra Diana (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Amber Lounge (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! I need help, as I have already been changing the text several times and it still doesn't seem to be respecting the criteria. I would like to know exactly what is wrong, so that I can finally make the right adjustments and get the page back on Wikipedia as it was before.

I have had this comment from you: 'Too suggestive of an advertised client business profile.' Can you please tell me more precisely what is wrong and how should it be modified?

Thank you.

Alessandra Diana (talk) 11:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Florine Calleen (talk) 12:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC) Hello SwisterTwister,[reply]

I hope, you had a good Easter time.

Did you see the latests changes to the article about Johannes Susen I did some weeks ago?

Are the relevance criteria now fulfilled? I have now mainly left TV and radio sources as well as the official site of the World Puzzle Federation.

I am looking forward to an answer thank you so much for your help and my best regards Florine Florine Calleen (talk) 12:24, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to let you know that this article that you added a PROD tag to is now being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LaunchDon. Edgeweyes (talk) 19:32, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• 64.207.226.28 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Major League Fishing (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

• Smntstatus (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Elie Abadie (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm new to creating a new submission, but I'm confused as to why the submission was declined. Elie Abadie is not a professor, he is one of the world's most prominent Sefardi rabbis who was the head rabbi for years at one of NYC's most prominent synagogues. He was recently ousted in a very public and bitter split with the synagogue's main funder. He is also on the boards of several large Sefardi organizations and received the highest civil decoration from the King of Spain. The sources I used included the Forward and New York Post, which are prominent publications. What else can I do to make it better? Smntstatus (talk) 21:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• 123.126.249.170 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Matthew A. Murphy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

How is a QUT press release as to the prestigious China Australia Award not reliable and independent? Also if you Google the subject's name along with MMLC (the law firm he works for and which I work for) or arbitrator, hundreds of articles, news items, scholarly works can be seen.

• 123.126.249.170 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Matthew A. Murphy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I'm sorry. I do not understand your comments. And how about all of the World Bank, book articles, Uan reports referring to the subject, that you can see if you Google the subject name and the law firm he founded? Still not notable? Or the judgments he had issued in relation to many of the world's leading brands and companies, that haven written up. And widely reported - all can be seen on a quick search.

• 123.126.249.170 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Matthew A. Murphy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't want to add in all of the books he has written, UN projects he has done and judgments he has issued as it would take months. It was also make this entry look very spammy indeed. However, simple searches reveal notability, without a shadow of a doubt.

Hello, you have declined this page... rightly as it stands... However, I had done a bit of tidying earlier and my last 3 edits seem to have been removed when you added the declinature notice. Is this just an 'anomaly', or am I missing something? Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 23:05, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Michael L. Bower (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Harold Gleason (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello!

I am trying to submit this article. I've cited the sources, and I'm not sure what the next step is. Do I need to cite particular sentences or items?

Thanks MUCH for your help!!

Michael````Michael L. Bower (talk) 02:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Lexoverall (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Synchron Stage Vienna (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello & many thanks for your review! You requested more sources to constitute this topic for Wikipedia. In my opinion the feature of this facility is the history of this building (it's landmarked) in combination with their modern usage. I have more articles and sources about Synchron Stage Vienna but they are in German (I used them for the German article on Wikipedia), can I also use them for citation? Would you agree a publication on Wikipedia then? greets, Lex--Lexoverall (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lexoverall (talk) 09:16, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for looking through and commenting on the draft qualitative software article for Quirkos - as requested I've had some help and added an additional dozen references from research articles, peer reviewed journals and textbooks, hope this helps but any further suggestions welcome! Danfreak (talk) 10:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thanks for looking at the article, you left the message 'Conceivably notable but needs all additional major independent news.' and this was quoted when the article was declined by TheSandDoctor. I have added many new references from the sources suggested and hoped you could take the time to look it over again to see if it now at a standard to be accepted. Thanks and your time, it is much appreciated. Ron Whitenstall at Ashley Mark Publishing (talk) 11:56, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Mdcash (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Timothy Dowling (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi i made this article for a course and need to have it up soon, i understood that i needed more sources but where do i stop. I found several interviews red carpet pictures and other media content. I believe i've shown that he has accomplished a lot and is a rising producer in the industry with a growing fan base. He wrote the scripts for biggest movies of the last few years and has been invited to work with bigger organisations like dreamworks on future movies. I believe this entitles him to some notability, I only say this because he wrote many of these scripts and for him to receive no credit is a little cruel, if not i can keep adding articles till you are satisfied just let me know, how many sources you think is reasonable. Thanks for the help

Dear SwisterTwister,

i have added several references to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ladyvette with the names of well known journalists of several Italian and international well known media press agencies such as Panorama, RAI and Corriere della Sera trying to demonstrate the notability level of Ladyvette

Best Regards

37.227.194.160 (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC) a fan of Ladyvette but, really, also a fan of Wikipedia... 37.227.194.160 (talk) 17:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Mdcash (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Timothy Dowling (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi thanks for the feedback i believe i fulfilled your request, i just ask that you keep in mind he wrote these movies so articles praise him but as usual focus on the big stars that act in his movies, i added magazine and news articles from around the world mostly america and the UK which talk about him and his work, all the movies listed where either written by him or co-authored . I have resubmitted my article,with updated references that portray notability. thanks for the help

• LWinn (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Aliza Nisenbaum (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Aliza Nisenbaum's work is currently on display at the Whitney Biennial. This exhibition is considered to be one of the most prestigious and important in the art world, as it foreshadows trends for the future of contemporary art. The author of the article cited primary source information and quotes in the form of interviews and information from Art in America, a respected peer-reviewed source for contemporary art. LWinn (talk) 19:36, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SwisterTwister. You moved Contemporary Politics (Journal) from draft to article and I'm wondering if the "j" is "Journal" should be lower case. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:44, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Thomasjjsullivan (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Sullivan's Slide Rule: Approximating the Pythagorean Theorem (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My new submission - Sullivan's Slide Rule: Approximating the Pythagorean Theorem - has been rejected due to a lack of references to prove notability. I do agree that this is a fair first assessment. However, in this case, I think my method's connection to the Pythagorean Theorem - probably, the most famous equation in the world - could substitute for this shortfall. The method I've devised is broadly applicable and deceivingly simple - you can do it "in your Head" (no squares or square roots).

Would it be possible to ask a reviewer with a mathematical background to spend just 2 minutes reviewing my YouTube video - A Pythagorean Shortcut? It's 12 minutes long but a review of the first 2 minutes by someone familiar with the theorem would be enough to assess its relationship and the notability, I believe, that affords.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6D-ZWX4w2s

I'll say Thanks, in advance, because I truly appreciate your time and effort with this.

Sincerely......tom sullivan

Thomasjjsullivan (talk) 09:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thomasjjsullivan (talk) 09:46, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nasser Kehtarnavaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sistertwister,

first off, thank you for reading through my entry draft and for your constructive criticism. I have now added some evidence to the notability of my subject, Isaiah Michalski, and was wondering whether you are satisfied with my changes? I hope I was able to improve the article and I look forward to hearing back from you.

Best, Sevenseas Sevenseassixlands (talk) 12:04, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Mdcash (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Timothy Dowling (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hey I accidentally moved my draft so I'm not sure if it's still in for review my a wiki stub so forgive my idiocy. It moved from my sandbox to drafts, would that cause it to get kicked from the review line up . Thanks for the help

• Barabakos13 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Nicoletta Momigliano (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As to the evidence (and ‘professor test’) given in the wiki link you kindly sent me, I noticed that this says that “Academics/professors meeting any one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, are notable”. I wrote in italic the evidence that could be used to substantiate the case.

1. The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources. [NUMEROUS PUBLICATIONS ATTEST TO THIS. MOREOVER SEVERAL PUBLICATIONS ARE ALREADY CITED IN WIKIPEDIA ARTICLES, E.G. NM’s BOOK ON MACKENZIE CITED IN WIKIPEDIA ENTRY ON MACKENZIE; NM’s BOOK ON IASOS CITED IN WIKIPEDIA ENTRY ON IASOS, ETC.]

2. The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level. Received the Michael Ventris Memorial Award in 1991 (see page 14 of this document: https://www.sas.ac.uk/sites/default/files/files/Annual%20Reports/98-99_AnnualReport.pdf

3. The person is or has been an elected member of a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association (e.g., a National Academy of Sciences or the Royal Society) or a fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor (e.g., Fellow of the IEEE).[ 2] . NM was Elected Fellow of the Society of Antiquaries of London in 2003: see https://www.sal.org.uk/about-us/fellows-directory/M/page/11/

4. The person's academic work has made a significant impact in the area of higher education, affecting a substantial number of academic institutions. NM has taught at Oxford, Bradford, and Bristol universities, at the latter for over 18 years. Has also been Visiting Professor at University of Milan. Has also been Senior Research Fellow at Cincinnati, Istanbul and Istituto per gli studi Egeo-Anatolici (CNR, Rome). In 2014 was recipient of one of the Bristol University Teaching Awards. Evidence for this: her university webpages and http://www.bristol.ac.uk/classics/news/2014/94.html

5. The person holds or has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research (or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon). [not applicable]

6. The person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society. [Director of Institute of Greece, Rome, and the Classical Tradition at the University of Bristol: see http://www.bristol.ac.uk/arts/research/collaborations/igrct/people/ ]

7. The person has had a substantial impact outside academia in their academic capacity [NOT APPLICABLE].

8. The person is or has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area. [Former EDITOR OF ANNUAL OF THE BRITISH SCHOOL AT ATHENS 2007-2010, a journal rated of the highest international standard by the European Reference Index for the Humanities in three subjects: Classical Studies, History, and Archaeology]. See http://www.bsa.ac.uk/doc_store/Publications/PUB2009_7.pdf

9. The person is in a field of literature (e.g., writer or poet) or the fine arts (e.g., musician, composer, artist), and meets the standards for notability in that art, such asWP:CREATIVE or WP:MUSIC. [NOT APPLICABLE] --Barabakos13 (talk) 16:15, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Corazon70 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Charlie Kerr (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there. I received the message about my draft being declined for submission. I understand what you mean about notability but based on the draft itself can you be a bit more specific where I need to add stronger notability based on what I've written so far? Thanks in advance. Corazon70 (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Corazon70 (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• 50.136.161.139 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ethan Paisley (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

What kind of sources do I need to validate my Wikipedia page?

All of the sources I provided I have not created myself.

Please let mr know

Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. SwisterTwister, thanks for creating F. Zabriskie!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Since the person belongs to AAAS a reference from there is not independent. We need independent references to show notability

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:59, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• The tag is not relevant because WP:PROF applies here, which is not exchangeable and the page is clear by "elected to a major society"; also, this person is from the last early-century and no other sourcing is available. SwisterTwister talk 00:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider giving your opinion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaise Jose (3rd nomination), as you voted in a previous AfD nomination. Jupitus Smart 04:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Neilchristopher100 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Francesco Ventriglia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks so much for your super quick review! impressive. Your comment is that I have not provided enough significant independent news, but my cited references are reviews, interviews and articles published by Stuff (the on-line website for the Dominion Post, New Zealands national newspaper), La Stampa (one of the most important national Italian newspapers akin to the NY Times, London Times, Sydney Morning Herald), the London Telegraph, international dance journals (Giornal della Danza and Dancelines), major on-line journal Teatro Critica and Radio New Zealand. The articles cited are all independent news items or interviews. When I compare the references to similar pages one in particular has only 5 citations with 3 being his employers website, a video on youtube and a single review. I really would appreciate some guidance as to why these are not recognised as significant independent news items.

Thanks so much

Looking in, I think there is enough, and I'm going yo accept it -- he holds an artistic director position with a national company. DGG ( talk ) 08:36, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Prostrup (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ubiquitech (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

You state that the article is simply a marketing stunt. You have accepted this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PaperCut which is an ordinary company completely without any uniqueness. Ubiquitech on the other hand can claim 3 areas of uniqueness (IBM mainframe compatibility, one-driver technology and secure public cloud technology). So, 1) if you have a mainframe computer and would like to have secure printing and never hear of Ubiquitech, then your are forced to buy Windows Server technology, 2) if you spend/waste hours and hours on numerous printer drivers you'll waste even more time and 3) if you would like to be more lean and utilize (cheap) public cloud technology, you will need to know of Ubiquitech.

Of course there is an overlap between the notability and Ubiquitech's commercial interest. But how can you avoid this? And are Google, Microsoft, IBM, Oracle etc. avoiding this?

Ubiquitech has some patents also unique and actually violated by nearly all competitors. Would it help to add these to the article?

You also write in your review: "sources are only announcements or notices". This please explain based on · Ref 1 is a general an independent article, setting the scene. · Refs no 2,4 and 5 are directed only to Ubiquitech and direct proof of text. · Ref 3, 6 are general relevant information. Prostrup (talk) 08:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Danfdeblasio (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:International Society for Computational Biology Student Council (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

(My colleague posted this on my talk page, but I belive it is supposed to go here).

Dear TwistedSister,

Thank you for taking the time to review our article and provide feedback.

With respect to your comment “Perhaps notable but will still need all available major significant sourcing.”, this is not a simple requirement since we are an organization that is strongly linked to the International Society for Computational Biology (ISCB) and as such, most of the sources are related to it. We have done our best to address your concerns, please see in particular the addition of the new section on the page “In the Press”.

We want to note that most of the articles that are published with regards to the Student Council are in the forms of results for our Conferences and Symposia as well as editorial articles regarding soft skills and different ways of outreaching bioinformatics for non-specialized scientific audiences. These articles have been published as peer-reviewed articles in some of the most important journals in the field like BMC Bioinformatics and PLoS Computational Biology. Being in these journals means that these articles have passed all the required filters that are necessary to be published as any other article submitted from other authors or organizations. In addition, The Student Council has also a channel in the F1000Research open access journal where two editorial articles are published yearly where annual activities from the organization can be summarized.

Given all the aforementioned reasons, we feel our organization not only is supported by the ISCB, our parent organization, but also by the editorial boards of all these scientific journals that have given us the space to publish our activities which are most of the times reviewed by external scientists and editors in the field.

Thank you again for your time and let us know if there are any other questions you have for me or any of the SC Leadership.

Regards,
The ISCB Student Council Executive Team
Farzana Rahman (User:Propicee)
Nazeefa Fatima (User:NazeefaFatima)
R. Gonzalo Parra
Aishwarya Alex Namasivayam
Dan DeBlasio (User:DanFDeBlasio)
Sayane Shome (User:Sayaneshome123)

• Gonzaparra (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:International Society for Computational Biology Student Council (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear reviewers,

We are grateful for your comments and suggestions. We answer the following comment about the last edition about our article: Comment: Yes, I see but I will mention that (1) it would highly benefit from all additional news and (2) the Executive Team section must be removed as it's too guide-like. SwisterTwister talk 13:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

1) As a scientific organization, we do not have interactions with the press, so news in the traditional channels are rare. Instead, our channels for communication are through scientific journals as the ones we included as references. All these articles are submitted to internationally recognized journals that are independent of our organization and evaluated by recognized experts and editors in the field before their publication. We have included more than 20 references to our projects and editorials that were published in some of the most recognized international journals from the field (Plos Computational Biology, BMC Bioinformatics, F1000Research), along the last decade as a collective effort from many different leaders around the world, that have run the Student Council, many of them being recognized scientists nowadays.

2) We agree with the reviewer's comment and we have deleted the Executive Team section.

Gonzaparra (talk) 19:05, 24 April 2017 (UTC)Gonzaparra[reply]

The draft: Valencia Ballroom was rejected because "Perhaps notable but needs all additional significant sourcing for enhancement." Does this mean I have to start all over again? There were no specifics given. Are all of the Newspapers used in the draft insignificant? I have never posted a page on Wikipedia before. I just thought this subject was significant and have seen other ballrooms on Wikipedia. Perhaps there is too much detail. Tass AH 1234 (talk) 19:25, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	You are amazing at taking care of {{helpme}} templates! :) The garmine (talk) 05:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Gonzaparra (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:International Society for Computational Biology Student Council (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear SisterTwister, We do not fully understand your last comment. Could you please be more clear about it?

Gonzaparra (talk) 14:19, 25 April 2017 (UTC)Gonzaparra[reply]

• LannaM (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mauricio De Maio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi! I'd like to know more information about why my submissions have been declined. I'm new on creating pages on wikipedia. Thanks a lot!

• Tralfam (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Ellis Douek (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have completely rewritten and sourced this article in line with recommendations; I would welcome any comments.

Two things I was not sure about;

a) for his career I have used the same source (Who's Who) and referenced it repeatedly. This is inelegant but I wasn't sure the correct way when multiple items have the same source b) I wasn't sure that quotes are formatted correctly but couldn't find how to do that.

Thanks

• Renato455 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Cristian Sulser (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTwister I am trying to translate the german article about a well-known person from Switzerland, Cristian Sulser, for the English Wikipedia page. Unfortunately I don't know too much about writing articles in Wikipedia. What would be your suggestion to verify the article? What kind of references would be suitable and where would I have to put it? Thank you very much for your help. Renato

Hi Swister Twister

I have added some news links under Awards and Biography. Is this what you have in mind by adding verifiable information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Renato455 (talk • contribs) 01:15, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Thakkart (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:JetPrivilege (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Swister,

Thanks for your feedback. To make a case for JetPrivilege I would like to let you know that it is the primary frequent flyer program of India's second largest airlinesJet Airways.It has also been covered on India's popular news websites such as Economic Times,Business Wire and also western media such as USA Today and many more websites. It is also a legitimate corporation and has its listing on many corporate directories. Are not the sources listed in the reference enough to establish notability? They have been retrieved from popular websites in India.

Also on the issue of advertising, I have referred to many frequent flyer pages present on Wikipedia such as EuroBonus,KrisFlyer,Velocity Frequent Flyer & MileagePlus. They too have included similar topics like history, partners, program changes that were negative to customers and a little information about the program structure.

It would be very helpful if you could guide me on where am I going wrong here and what changes to make in order to conform to Wikipedia's policies.

Thanks in advance

• Lukeostapchuk (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Frank Curzio (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Greetings. Thanks for reviewing my Frank Curzio post.

I am requesting a re-review because I simply confused. I'm mostly concerned with what links/ any specific sections do not fit the Wikipedia content criteria. I was told this post was simply a business, marketing incentivized post. However, I presented all of the information from credible links provided... along with no opinions whatsoever. Being the right hand man behind Jim Cramer (Host on the nationally televised and widely popular show - Mad Money), I figured Frank Curzio was credible enough to write about.

I understand that a few links may be un-credible, but can those be pointed out? From my understanding, the reviewer feel my entire post is from unreliable sources.

Thanks for all the help!

Lukeostapchuk (talk) 18:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)LukeLukeostapchuk (talk) 18:33, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing. I'm a little confused as to why my sources aren't good enough or verifiable. I referenced VICE and Its Going Down, two reputable sources. The band also shares members with Iskra, a notable band in the underground punk scene. Storm of Sedition is also distributed by one of the most well known record labels in the underground punk scene, Profane Existence. So do I just need to add more references? As far as I can tell, they fit these guidelines:

"Musicians or ensembles (this category includes bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists, etc.) may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria.

Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.[note 1] This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following: Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.[note 3] Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories. Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases."--Wuthepo34 (talk) 01:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Wuthepo34 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Storm of Sedition (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for reviewing. I'm a little confused as to why my sources aren't good enough or verifiable. I referenced VICE and Its Going Down, two reputable sources. The band also shares members with Iskra, a notable band in the underground punk scene. Storm of Sedition is also distributed by one of the most well known record labels in the underground punk scene, Profane Existence. So do I just need to add more references? As far as I can tell, they fit these guidelines:

"Musicians or ensembles (this category includes bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists, etc.) may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria.

Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.[note 1] This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following: Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.[note 3] Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories. Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases."--Wuthepo34 (talk) 01:28, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wuthepo34 (talk) 01:28, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, many thanks for the help and guidance in getting the above article approved. Ron Whitenstall at Ashley Mark Publishing (talk) 11:06, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The page on Brain Chase that I made was rejected for not being notable. However, I referenced sources from New York times, Huffington Post, Fox News, and the Washington Times. These were not press releases, but articles written about the company. Any feedback on what kinds of sources would be considered 'notable' would be appreciated. Thanks! Jyanker (talk) 15:13, 26 April 2017 (UTC)jyanker[reply]

Thank you for your comment! I'm still not sure what is wrong with my sources though. They aren't press releases or announcements, and I have many independent articles from significant news sources such as The New York Times, Huffington Post, and The Washington Times that were written about Brain Chase. Just trying to understand so that I can make the article better :) Jyanker (talk) 14:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)jyanker[reply]

• Grindlechee (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:GRNLR (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for the feedback - how do I proceed?

Greetings!! Thank you for taking the time to review my draft. I'm at a bit of a loss on how to proceed; let me explain :)

Other trailer music companies with published wikipedia pages also lack the kind of 3rd party, in depth references that you recommended for GRNLR. They seem to rely on announcements, youtube links, and social media pages. For example:

• The_Hit_House_Music
• Sencit_Music
• X-Ray_Dog
• Immediate_Music
• Future_World_Music
• LiquidCinema

GRNLR is as legitimately established in the Trailer Music industry as any of these companies, and I believe that anyone researching the topic would have a valid interest in at least seeing some kind of page on wikipedia. What is it about these other pages that passed the review stage?

Interestingly, there don't seem to be a lot of magazine, book, or newspaper articles on trailer music companies, generally. But these sort of music production entities have sufficient notability to merit an existence on wikipedia; how is this seeming paradox to be resolved?

Anyhow, thanks for your input, I appreciate it. Cheers, and all the best!

Grindlechee (talk) 18:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grindlechee (talk) 18:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! (:

I'm having a little trouble organizing my drafts. The pages that are now in play are these:

• Draft:College of Psychiatric and Neurologic Pharmacists (2) -- Most up-to-date version.
• Draft:College of Psychiatric and Neurologic Pharmacists Edit: on advice from Wiki-en-help, I've wiped the draft clean for deletion. Biochemistry&Love (talk) 20:59, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• User:Biochemistry&Love/College of Psychiatric and Neurologic Pharmacists -- Edit: per more advice from Wiki-en-help, I've also wiped this draft clean for deletion. Biochemistry&Love (talk) 21:05, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You mentioned on the User space article that the article "May actually be notable but we need a better focus in all additional major independent news." Could you please explain to me what you mean by that? Biochemistry&Love (talk) 20:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have added many notability citations/references - could the page be moved from Draft status? Many thanks 185.62.85.43 (talk) 03:14, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Ashalily91 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mark Middleton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, do you have any suggestions on what sources would be considered more reliable, or is it a quantity issue? Mark Middleton is a well known Australian business men and international speaker.

• Ashalily91 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Mark Middleton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for your advice. Would it be more appropriate to focus on his research advancements and include references to publications advancing the field of radiation therapy, rather than primarily his business profile to avoid being considered a business profile? Although they are somewhat hand in hand.

I received your message sent 01:15, 15 April 2017 (UTC) that the article has been assessed as Start-Class with an improvement banner for the lead paragraph. I have now summarised Manion's positions and major publications in the lead. Would you please review the lead and let me know if it conforms. Thanks. Pergameno (talk) 05:55, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions! I have added several new sources. If you could take a second look it would be highly appreciated.

Lthp (talk) 08:45, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Timopomer (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Beth-El Industries (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have tried to made this article as objective/advertising free and factual as possible, could i know which lines pose an issue for the articles creation? Thank you very much

• Timopomer (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Beth-El Industries (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have tried to made this article as objective/advertising free and factual as possible, could i know which lines pose an issue for the articles creation? Thank you very much Timopomer (talk) 09:03, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Messengero (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Victoria Nixon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, review requested as a fair amount of additional data has shown up in terms of accuracy and extent of references and type of references - e.g. published articles that were not per-se publicity.Also some substantive pre-digital references.

Problem is I - Michael Messenger, was deleted for interfering and clash of interest, but in discussion with sarahj2107, who actually performed the deletion, seem to have agreed that the article can be re-written and resubmitted. Problem is A) can I do that legitimately and B) if so how, on what page and in what way as I cant cope with the edited text style, and dont want to get the wrong side of 'you lot' again? Can it be done in plain text and where will I find that? How do I resubmit it for checking? Are you able to provide a dummy's link - go to X > click on Y > edit etc...?

thanks Messengero (talk) 14:41, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, I've just stub-sorted several articles you've recently created such as Robert Henricks.

Do you know the {{L}} template? You can type {{subst:L|1943||Henricks, Robert}} to create the birth category, death category or "Living people" (death date or "missing" goes in 2nd parameter) and DEFAULTSORT, all in one line of typing. I find it useful. I'd picked your stubs out to stub-sort as being ones which were currently filing wrongly in Category:Stubs. (eg Henricks under "R" for Robert). PamD 07:11, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

David Lyle Jeffrey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to University of International Business and Economics

Fofanah (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Isatu Fofanah

Jeffrey Wilusz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Wiley

Maria Elena Bottazzi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Springer

Terry Alfriend (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Springer

William Zamer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Association for the Advancement of Science

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• GeorgieLucas (talk · contribs)
  • User:GeorgieLucas/sandbox/Sophie Hulme (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi there, thank you for editing my piece. I would be very grateful if you could give me a little more feedback on how to better reference this piece, or make it fall within the Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you so much, Georgie GeorgieLucas (talk) 12:02, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• WGH Schmitt (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Carl Simon Fried (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WGH Schmitt 28. April 2017

Dear Swister Twister,

Regarding our article about „Carl Fried“, we will send you a renewed version soon. It’s much shorter and focuses on his notability mainly in the field of radiotherapy.We would like to point out that it is a unusual situation due to the fact that many documents have been destroyed.

Sincerely yours Wolfgang

WGH Schmitt (talk) 14:40, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SisterTwister,

Thanks for the review and the edit of a new article on "David Morgan".

I have resubmitted with a few reviews of his very important textbook. finding 'notable sources' seems to be an arbitrary requirement from Wikipedia. Does the sheer volume of work this man has produced not make him notable in his own right? Thus, worthy of a Wiki page? Genuinely curious as to what constitutes a 'notable source' considering some of the Wiki pages I've read.

Thanks again, you guys do great work.

Baron

• Realityinspector (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Big Rock Falls (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi - my post was denied because it has the same title as a different page on Wikipedia. They are both waterfalls, but the Big Rock Falls I posted is in North Carolina in the US and the Big Rock Falls provided as the same content is in Belize. So same name but different places.

What do I need to do to update it to be approved?

Realityinspector (talk) 21:54, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Could you confirm that the title of "Trelawny:, Soldiers Hill, Ballarat is as intended, and you didn't intend something more like Trelawny, Soldiers Hill, Ballarat or Trelawny (Soldiers Hill, Ballarat). TheDragonFire (talk) 09:47, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• HiveBeenThere (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Laura Petrovich-Cheney (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Petrovich-Cheney is currently at the Fuller Craft Museum (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuller_Craft_Museum) with a solo show -http://fullercraft.org/event/what-remains-wooden-quilt-sculptures-of-laura-petrovich-cheney/

She one of the artists selected to represent New JErsey at the Delaware Art Museum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delaware_Art_Museum for its Centennial Show -http://www.delart.org/exhibits/centennial-juried-exhibition/

Her solo exhibit at Kean University https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kean_University was so well receieved that it appeared on and appeared on TV News 12 -https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kofkg7be1E&feature=youtu.be and the Weather Channel - https://vimeo.com/144004504 and was in print - https://njmonthly.com/articles/jersey-living/creating-art-from-sandys-wreckage/

The show Databodies (Moore College of Art) was listed as a must see exhibit in Philadelphia - http://www.phillyvoice.com/five-philly-art-shows-see-june/

She was at the James A Michener Museum (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_A._Michener_Art_Museum)  http://www.michenerartmuseum.org/exhibition/pattern-pieces-can-you-make-a-quilt-out-of-wood/  and the show was extended -and http://www.michenerartmuseum.org/article/476/pattern-pieces-has-been-extended/

I am wondering why these places are not considered museums?

• Lshea96 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Henrik Linder (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi SwisterTiwster. I was wondering if you could offer some advice for what I should do regarding my article on Henrik Linder. I know that you commented saying some the articles/ resources were not reliable, but I was wondering if there is any way I can fix that. I am trying to write this page for a class, and wanted to eventually connect it to the Dirty Loops Wikipedia page. Henrik Linder is a signifigant member of the band.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Henrik_Linder

If you could let me know, I would really appreciate it! Thanks. Lshea96 (talk) 20:06, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lshea96 (talk) 20:06, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• 2602:306:CCB9:B390:FD9C:DACF:F51C:B2B9 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Minerva Koenig (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not necessarily requesting a re-review, but what's the "line" for whether or not someone is 'notable?' I (Minerva Koenig) have two critically-acclaimed, nationally-published novels -- I gather that alone isn't considered sufficient for notability? Minerva9 (talk) 23:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fig Tree Hall, University of New South Wales. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:47, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Preciouse.gross (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:SafeCharge (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello, I have tried countless times to upload a Wikipedia page based on the criteria provided, editing, and referencing and the page will still not be published. I am now requesting assistance from someone within Wikipedia that can write the page on my behalf in order to have it published. Please let me know how to move forward with this request.

Thank you. Preciouse.gross (talk) 05:57, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Zppix: Hello, After countless attempts to edit, reference and re-write the page I am trying to get published, I am now requesting a Wikipedia expert to write it on my behalf. Can someone please contact me regarding a write-up of the page. Thank you Preciouse Preciouse.gross (talk) 06:00, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Yuvaltassa (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Emanuel Todorov (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello! You're right I forgot two important bits!

1) A New York Times article where the subject is interviewed. 2) A a counter-arguing publication, by an academic opponent (Friston), whose first line is literally "Optimal control theory is currently the dominant paradigm for understanding motor behavior in formal or computational terms.", i.e. he acknowledges the impact of the subject's theory.