Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Orientls (talk | contribs)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 27: Line 27:
I hope you would avoid [[WP:GAMING]] the system like you have just tried to do [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tabiti&diff=928914125&oldid=928572211 here]. Krakkos has an obsession for Tirgil34[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Tirgil34&diff=870328923&oldid=870325151] and as such he continues to make deceptive excuses for reverting anything he personally deems as edits by Tigril34. Article wasn't even created by Tigril34.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Tabiti] You should also read [[WP:STICK]]. [[User:Orientls|Orientls]] ([[User talk:Orientls|talk]]) 16:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
I hope you would avoid [[WP:GAMING]] the system like you have just tried to do [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tabiti&diff=928914125&oldid=928572211 here]. Krakkos has an obsession for Tirgil34[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Tirgil34&diff=870328923&oldid=870325151] and as such he continues to make deceptive excuses for reverting anything he personally deems as edits by Tigril34. Article wasn't even created by Tigril34.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Tabiti] You should also read [[WP:STICK]]. [[User:Orientls|Orientls]] ([[User talk:Orientls|talk]]) 16:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
:[[User:Orientls|Orientls]] , the majority on the talk page indicated a page merge was appropriate, which is why it was done several months ago. There is literally no text on that page that is not duplicated elsewhere, nor has any argument been presented for retention of this separate page. This specific page has been a target of multiple sockpuppets and continues to attract new accounts from the same person while providing not specific value. If you have a compelling reason to retain this page, post it on the talk page and convince people to agree with you rather than engaging in an edit war. [[User:Squatch347|Squatch347]] ([[User talk:Squatch347#top|talk]]) 13:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
:[[User:Orientls|Orientls]] , the majority on the talk page indicated a page merge was appropriate, which is why it was done several months ago. There is literally no text on that page that is not duplicated elsewhere, nor has any argument been presented for retention of this separate page. This specific page has been a target of multiple sockpuppets and continues to attract new accounts from the same person while providing not specific value. If you have a compelling reason to retain this page, post it on the talk page and convince people to agree with you rather than engaging in an edit war. [[User:Squatch347|Squatch347]] ([[User talk:Squatch347#top|talk]]) 13:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
::You are still edit warring and falsely smearing the article as landmark for socks[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tabiti&diff=929681722&oldid=929402063] even after you are the only one who is edit warring and you are the only one who '''socked yourself to get the article deleted and failed'''. Consensus on talk page is already against any merge. This is recurring [[WP:CIR]] issue with you needs to stop now. [[User:Orientls|Orientls]] ([[User talk:Orientls|talk]]) 17:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:38, 7 December 2019

Page Refresh part vier

Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced

G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark

G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tabiti

I hope you would avoid WP:GAMING the system like you have just tried to do here. Krakkos has an obsession for Tirgil34[1] and as such he continues to make deceptive excuses for reverting anything he personally deems as edits by Tigril34. Article wasn't even created by Tigril34.[2] You should also read WP:STICK. Orientls (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orientls , the majority on the talk page indicated a page merge was appropriate, which is why it was done several months ago. There is literally no text on that page that is not duplicated elsewhere, nor has any argument been presented for retention of this separate page. This specific page has been a target of multiple sockpuppets and continues to attract new accounts from the same person while providing not specific value. If you have a compelling reason to retain this page, post it on the talk page and convince people to agree with you rather than engaging in an edit war. Squatch347 (talk) 13:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You are still edit warring and falsely smearing the article as landmark for socks[3] even after you are the only one who is edit warring and you are the only one who socked yourself to get the article deleted and failed. Consensus on talk page is already against any merge. This is recurring WP:CIR issue with you needs to stop now. Orientls (talk) 17:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply