Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Squatch347 (talk | contribs) Tag: 2017 wikitext editor |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:[[User:Orientls|Orientls]] , the majority on the talk page indicated a page merge was appropriate, which is why it was done several months ago. There is literally no text on that page that is not duplicated elsewhere, nor has any argument been presented for retention of this separate page. This specific page has been a target of multiple sockpuppets and continues to attract new accounts from the same person while providing not specific value. If you have a compelling reason to retain this page, post it on the talk page and convince people to agree with you rather than engaging in an edit war. [[User:Squatch347|Squatch347]] ([[User talk:Squatch347#top|talk]]) 13:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC) |
:[[User:Orientls|Orientls]] , the majority on the talk page indicated a page merge was appropriate, which is why it was done several months ago. There is literally no text on that page that is not duplicated elsewhere, nor has any argument been presented for retention of this separate page. This specific page has been a target of multiple sockpuppets and continues to attract new accounts from the same person while providing not specific value. If you have a compelling reason to retain this page, post it on the talk page and convince people to agree with you rather than engaging in an edit war. [[User:Squatch347|Squatch347]] ([[User talk:Squatch347#top|talk]]) 13:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
::You are still edit warring and falsely smearing the article as landmark for socks[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tabiti&diff=929681722&oldid=929402063] even after you are the only one who is edit warring and you are the only one who '''socked yourself to get the article deleted and failed'''. Consensus on talk page is already against any merge. This is recurring [[WP:CIR]] issue with you needs to stop now. [[User:Orientls|Orientls]] ([[User talk:Orientls|talk]]) 17:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC) |
::You are still edit warring and falsely smearing the article as landmark for socks[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tabiti&diff=929681722&oldid=929402063] even after you are the only one who is edit warring and you are the only one who '''socked yourself to get the article deleted and failed'''. Consensus on talk page is already against any merge. This is recurring [[WP:CIR]] issue with you needs to stop now. [[User:Orientls|Orientls]] ([[User talk:Orientls|talk]]) 17:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
:::[[User:Orientls|Orientls]] literally nothing you have said is accurate. This page (including the talk discussion) has had 4 identified socks, all of which were for the retain vote, you can see three of them on the talk page struck through with validated sock puppet investigation links. Tabiti, the page's creator, is a known sock of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Tirgil34/Archive| Tigril] I have never socked, there was an accusation, which was reversed by the admin after doing an investigation. Finally, you've incorrectly assessed the state of the discussion. There are currently 5 votes to merge, including all recent votes, and only two for retain, one from you. Continually reverting this against the consensus of the majority of editors on the talk page without engaging in discussion is clearly a violation of policy. [[User:Squatch347|Squatch347]] ([[User talk:Squatch347#top|talk]]) 18:13, 7 December 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:13, 7 December 2019
Page Refresh part vier
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2019 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
Wikiproject Military history coordinator election half-way mark
G'day everyone, the voting for the XIX Coordinator Tranche is at the halfway mark. The candidates have answered various questions, and you can check them out to see why they are running and decide whether you support them. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 07:37, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Tabiti
I hope you would avoid WP:GAMING the system like you have just tried to do here. Krakkos has an obsession for Tirgil34[1] and as such he continues to make deceptive excuses for reverting anything he personally deems as edits by Tigril34. Article wasn't even created by Tigril34.[2] You should also read WP:STICK. Orientls (talk) 16:22, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
- Orientls , the majority on the talk page indicated a page merge was appropriate, which is why it was done several months ago. There is literally no text on that page that is not duplicated elsewhere, nor has any argument been presented for retention of this separate page. This specific page has been a target of multiple sockpuppets and continues to attract new accounts from the same person while providing not specific value. If you have a compelling reason to retain this page, post it on the talk page and convince people to agree with you rather than engaging in an edit war. Squatch347 (talk) 13:54, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- You are still edit warring and falsely smearing the article as landmark for socks[3] even after you are the only one who is edit warring and you are the only one who socked yourself to get the article deleted and failed. Consensus on talk page is already against any merge. This is recurring WP:CIR issue with you needs to stop now. Orientls (talk) 17:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- Orientls literally nothing you have said is accurate. This page (including the talk discussion) has had 4 identified socks, all of which were for the retain vote, you can see three of them on the talk page struck through with validated sock puppet investigation links. Tabiti, the page's creator, is a known sock of Tigril I have never socked, there was an accusation, which was reversed by the admin after doing an investigation. Finally, you've incorrectly assessed the state of the discussion. There are currently 5 votes to merge, including all recent votes, and only two for retain, one from you. Continually reverting this against the consensus of the majority of editors on the talk page without engaging in discussion is clearly a violation of policy. Squatch347 (talk) 18:13, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
- You are still edit warring and falsely smearing the article as landmark for socks[3] even after you are the only one who is edit warring and you are the only one who socked yourself to get the article deleted and failed. Consensus on talk page is already against any merge. This is recurring WP:CIR issue with you needs to stop now. Orientls (talk) 17:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)