It is currently 02:27 where I am

Please place any questions or comments for me at the bottom of this page. Thanks.

Archives

1 - Mostly Exra Wax, Stevertigo, and questions about Jewish articles and anti-semitism 2 - Mostly DNA and genes, WHEELER and fascism 3 - some discussion of capitalism; debates on whether Jesus existed, and the cultural and historical background for Jesus 4 - Jesus, Jesus, Jesus 5 - Cheese Dreams and Jesus; race and evolution, capitalism, circumcision 6 - BCE/CE versus BC/AD 7 - BCE/CE versus BC/AD; FT2 and Cultural and Historical Background of Jesus 8 - Jesus, Bible, anti-Semitism, Martin Luthor, and the tip of the Virago iceberg 9 10 11 12 13 - The Bible, Evolution, Filllllll, Jesus, Race, advice for new admins 14 - a lot of race and intelligence stuff 15 - Fascism, Pharisees, and Race 16 - race, ethnicity and NOR 17 September 2007 18 October & November 2007 19 December 2007 20 January-February 2008 (Figs, psychohistory, ethnicity) 21 March-April 2008, Collenthegret and Epf 22 March- May 2008, R&I, Jagz, Jews and Christians 23 24 25 26 27

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Hello, Slrubenstein. You have new messages at Doc Tropics's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Slrubenstein. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

A while back you asked if I was interested in contributing to the above. I demurred. However, I have now found it expedient to review the page and have noted the section "... Guideline... for administrators to... prevent or stop abuse..." at Wikipedia:WikiProject Administrator. You may wish to hurry over there and yank it out as not being appropriate, or decide to join in on that page, or both, or neither (or something else). I thought I should let you know of my actions. LessHeard vanU (talk)

Hello, Slrubenstein. You have new messages at Ludwigs2's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Slrubenstein. You have new messages at Maunus's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Captain Occam (talk • contribs)

Hello, Slrubenstein. You have new messages at Tomsega's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Slrubenstein. You have new messages at Talk:Jesus.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Slrubenstein. You have new messages at Talk:Jesus.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello, Slrubenstein. You have new messages at Talk:Jesus.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Informational note: this is to let you know that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Regards,

Just a quick thanks for your message. Sorry I have not had time to work on this in recent days.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 08:11, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was the first to remove your "statistical species" from Evolution. Have learnt a lot by the following discussion. Sorry and thanks. I find a comment from Danielkueh contemptuous and von obend. Was about to retort but there is a complication. I find Thompsma enormously valuable and would like him to continue contributing. But he seems to have difficulties understanding meta-messages. So I want him to feel the encouragement from the support from Danielkueh, although I think your entry that includes the comments on Shakespeare was a good one (a bit long, but correct). --Ettrig (talk) 09:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to edit your statement where you say "MathSci is one of our best articles". Johnuniq (talk) 00:57, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not stalk me. I find it highly creepy. 15:02, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

I just *hate* creepy things, don't you? Yugh. Slrubenstein | Talk 16:43, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for picking up on my faltering explanation. I did not mean that we only used sources from England. I meant something along the lines that we use a western rationalist view for preference, even when writing about a religious subject - or something of that kind. But I believe your intervention may be of more help. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Slrub, I am very disappointed in your behavior against a large number of editor support. WP policy states: "Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources; and, all majority and significant minority views that appear in these sources should be covered by these articles (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view)." You are deleting a major view with many RS. Five editors have all agreed there should be a statement in the lead about divine inspiration with a redirect to the section. Please undo your revert of my recent additions. If you don't, I plan to take this to the ANI. Sadly, WalkerThrough (talk) 18:47, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. WalkerThrough (talk) 19:26, 25 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

שנה טובה

I read the Talk page, and I've added the page to my watchlist. I don't have anything to add right now, but I'll chime in if/when necessary. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:30, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I <3 it. This made me happy to see. KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 12:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ktiva vehatima tova for 5772! A gut gebensht yor! Debresser (talk) 21:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, is there a policy/ArbCom case/guideline/etc regarding the scholarly use of the word myth, besides WP:RNPOV? I was thinking there was, but I cannot find it. Thanks - KillerChihuahua^?!?Advice 18:03, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am posting this in the hope that you would be a better judge than I of whether one editor is in any way improperly implying anti-semitism on the part of a third editor. Earlier posts on the article talk page had also included claims of anti-semitism which might also be relevant, but I hesitate to have yo wade through the verbiage. The posts at issue are [1] (et seq) which attracted the edit at [2] which for some odd reason I thought might be directed at the other editor (you forgot to mention the well known habit of "jewish bolshevik cossacks" to drink Christian infants' blood ...-Paul Siebert (talk) 03:57, 1 October 2011 (UTC)) and at [3] a comment from one editor that the post was "funny indeed." The query is - was this just Paul Siebert "making a funny comment" or (as he states at [4] that he was only quoting a novel, or does it appear to be directed at an editor, and with an implication that that editor is anti-semitic? I regard you as a gentleman and a scholar, and one who can better view this issue from a distance than I can. Cheers. And Shana Tova. Collect (talk) 00:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]