User talk:Shirt58/Archive 1
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 2
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 3
User talk:Shirt58/Archive 4

Just deleted some junk that I thought was obvious vandalism. I suppose I should have said that in the Edit Summary. - Doctorx0079 (talk) 20:27, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I'll do what I can. This isn't my area of expertise though. I was listening to Kim Edward Beazley's memoirs (narrated by his son) that I received as part of the second prize for a quiz night, and I kept on coming across this Alan Reid fellow ... so I thought he *needed* a Wikipedia article! Graham87 11:55, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, why did ya do that? Graham87 12:41, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologee-ies?. It was was an obvious mistake on my ^part?. I'll fix it up if you don't get in ^first? --Shirt58 (talk) 13:06, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed, before I found your message. Graham87 13:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries mate, I've done that plenty of times before. Graham87 12:54, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers. Didn't mean to step on your toes, but did look like it could do with a cleaner scan. --jjron (talk) 09:43, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me, my toes are completely unscathed. I sometimes review my contributions and think, hmm, I really should fix some of the book cover pix I've uploaded, but due to my short attention span am easily distracted and... ooh, just Googled up a new reliable reference for Hevisaurus! Oops, sorry, what was the question?--Shirt58 (talk) 10:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My edit summary was hardly misleading, it was lazy and empty, but the edit was hardly nonconstructive as it removed a very biased, unsourced (the only source were for statistics counterproductive to the arguement). 174.112.18.193 (talk) 03:10, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bryce Retzlaff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

late round draft pick with no senior games

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:05, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all,
The article Genesis Suite currently has a number of "see copy in the commons" mentions. Those mentions have been arguably adequately referenced in the main referencing of the article; what is needed is link/s to those commons files. So, how do I do this? {{helpme}}--Shirt58 (talk) 13:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shirt58. You can pipe a link to the commons images referred to. To pipe a link directly to a commons media file without having the file display, you simply need to prefix a colon in the link code. So, for example, where it says in the article currently "see copy in the commons", you might change this to "see [[:File:exact name file|copy in the commons]]". I assume all of the images of the documents are in the Commons category for Genesis Suite. Here I am attempting to provide a mechanical solution to your question, but I'm not 100% sure the article's in-text referral to these images is the best way to go.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:34, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, keep forgetting about this. You seem to know more abt it than I do. Though sometime I'll see if I can find out whether they're more than just a talking shop.--Misarxist 09:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryce Retzlaff until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 12:18, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. 63.131.4.149 (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Not sure how to talk back! Moner Manush was my first article and i'm still trying to figure this out. Thanks a ton for helping out. I wanted to put the poster I uploaded to commons but the resolution was weird and the pic got layered. How do I upload a pic to a page directly? Thanks again and do feel free to make corrections —Preceding unsigned comment added by Adaabata (talk • contribs) 07:33, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I make it a habit to add some standard info to species articles I come across. Cheers and keep up the good work! Ruigeroeland (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my comment on the Thames Materials Talk page. Thank you Markhamilton (talk) 10:11, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

Hello, Shirt58. You have new messages at JamesBWatson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi - someone may have told you this before, but just a heads up: you should be waiting more than a minute before tagging articles with A1 or A3, as you did in Confirm friend. I've heard on multiple occasions, that 5 minutes is a good limit on when you can tag pages with these templates. Cheers! ∙:∙:.:pepper:.:∙:∙ 12:47, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...and once again:

Hello, Shirt58. You have new messages at JamesBWatson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello! Your submission of Hevisaurus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SusanLesch (talk) 00:16, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting link. And really good. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 20:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When discussing films or actors who do not quite yet have the coverage to merit inclusion, you might consider referring to WP:TOOSOON rather that WP:HAMMER as the former deals with actors and films and the latter deals with albums. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:51, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was a tough call, since they were editing productively. I almost just left a warning, but I realized it wouldn't be fair to everyone else I've blocked for the same reason. Daniel Case (talk) 14:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The problem here is that "Crying Wind" is a notorious fraud, and the editor of the same name was desperately trying to cover up that fact by purging the article of any useful information. I've removed the unsound links, and provided links to solid reliable sources about her scamful history. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:15, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like a failure of due diligence on my part. But, much better to have made a mistake based on an excess rather than a lack of good faith, I would think.--Shirt58 (talk) 10:59, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Doc talk 11:18, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:38, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about what was somewhat of an overreaction in those discussions. My problem was that I was trying to participate constructively in the discussion, but all I saw was people attacking Dylan F, some quite rudely and irrationally. I saw no sensible response at all to what I suggested, just continued attack on someone else. I guess I misjudged you as another who was ignoring what I posted. HiLo48 (talk) 07:11, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to be appreciated! Deb (talk) 12:03, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kang Seung-Yoon(musicion) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

If there are multiple people named Kang Seung-Yoon, the answer is not to create a Redirect with a mispelled title, but to create a disambiguation page. Spelling isn't the major thing, it's just the form.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ^{(Cheers! Want Anything? Chatty?)}_babylarm 21:08, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your vandal-fighting on Messiah. Something to look out for - some IP addresses like to renew their IP mid-vandalism. This makes it so that if someone rolls back their edits, their first edit (made under a slightly different IP) doesn't get reverted. All that to say - be careful what version gets reverted/rolled back to, because they're crafty lil vandals... anyway, thank you!

-- Joren (talk) 12:59, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you added J. D. Salinger to the Deaths in 2010. Salinger actually died on January 27, 2010, not December 27, 2010! He died nearly a year ago, so I have undone the edit. Thank you. WereWolf (talk) 00:33, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's totally fine, I understand completely! There's no need to be embarrassed; we all make mistakes sometimes! WereWolf (talk) 17:59, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pete. Just a note re this edit. The prod was an ordinary one, not a blp prod, so whether in good faith or bad, the article's creator was allowed to remove it. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 12:31, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They are a Shaikh biradari, as endogamous Muslim groupings in North India are referred to. They call themselvees Bannu Israil, which is Arabic for children of Israel, while Jewish communities in India use the Hebrew Bene Israel, which also meams children of Isreal. The Arabic usage reflects the fact that they have converted to Islam.

--WALTHAM2 (talk) 01:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do not misrepresent policy. Policy states that you are "encouraged" to justify PROD removal. Not that you absolutely have to justify PROD removal under pain of death. A Nobody Has Returned From The Sea (talk) 11:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Peter.

You provided some help to me when I rewrote the article Genesis Suite which you created, and it would be greatly appreciated if you could help me with an article on another Shilkret classical composition, Trombone Concerto (Shilkret).

I wrote the article in June 2010 and included a table of concert performances of the piece. More than a dozen people have made useful small edits of the article since then. Two days ago Melodia deleted the entire table.

It is common for wikipedia articles on musical compositions to list their usages. The frequency of usage and the stature of the artists, motion pictures and other users of the work provide documentation of the importance of the composition. As an example I looked at 1931 in music (the year chosen at random from a period with which I am somewhat familiar). Links to many of the songs listed, e.g., Dream a Little Dream of Me, Heartaches, and I Don't Know Why give fairly extensive lists of recordings (with no references).

For the Concerto for Trombone, the most extensive modern usage is in concerts, where it has been performed by noted soloists and concert orchestras worldwide, and the list of performances thus provides useful documentation of the importance of the composition and belongs in the article. My stated source of information is the contracts these organizations enter into in order to perform the composition. Again using the 1931 in music article for comparison, I followed the link to Stravinsky's Violin Concerto in D to find the premiere performance was listed with no reference. I have copies of the contracts, but for privacy reasons I can not include complete copies of the contracts on the wikipedia commons.

I reverted the deletion of the table, and Melodia deleted it again. Is there a way I can appeal this? Thank you for any help or advice you might have. You are welcome to reply in my talk page or yours as you find convenient. Niel Shell (talk) 18:08, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If, as seems likely, you had a hand in starting the discussion in Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical music#Listing off all performances concerning my list of performances, thank you for giving me a forum to present my case. Niel Shell (talk) 22:05, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Cristóvão de Aguiar. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cristóvão de Aguiar has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mhiji 01:35, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shirt58. You have new messages at Chzz's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{user:chzz/tb}} template.    File:Ico specie.png

P.S. I don't think that collapsing your user talk page is a great idea; it might confuse - especially for new users.  Chzz  ►  11:17, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting talk pages is not a good plan. Please don't. FYI [1]. Please don't revert that. Aaadddaaammm (talk) 11:34, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; I would not consider those edits to be 'vandalism'; it looks to be an attempt at a discussion. Can't see anything wrong with them.  Chzz  ►  12:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]