If you're here to place a CT notice for any topic related to science, medicine, or anything that might remotely be considered a conspiracy theory, don't bother. I'm already aware. You may point to this notice if it ever comes up.

WPMED Hot Articles:

These are the articles that have been edited the most within the last seven days. Last updated 1 May 2024 by HotArticlesBot.

Shibbolethink I know you've contributed to the COVID-19 pandemic article (and talk) and therefore I'm wondering if it comes to an end (U.S. [1] already) via the WHO if you would review it once I've nominated [2] , thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would love to (and am honored by the request). I think whenever WHO rescinds the declaration is a good time to do so, as it should enter a steadier state with fewer big upsets. One hopes, anyway! — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 21:57, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you (I don't think WHO will take long)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 23:16, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• that was fast[3] should you agree w/ the prior posting and today's event let me know (I'll nominate in about 1 week),thank you--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:20, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, works for me! I think Bon courage is in some sense correct that the "pandemic goes on" but I think this is enough of a milestone that the article has achieved some stability. Any new resurgences will be a footnote in this article in all likelihood, compared to the massive stable information already here. So yes, I would agree with the nomination and I'm happy to review it. — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 15:41, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, will take a look at a couple of things on the article, it will be GA nom in a week, Ozzie--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• done (a little sooner)[4], Shibbolethink I have added/adjusted some things however should you find that anything (including text, ref, image) needs to be changed, added or deleted. I will act on it immediately, I thank you for your effort--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 00:11, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
19		Language deprivation in children with hearing loss (talk)	Add sources
63		Association for Research and Enlightenment (talk)	Add sources
2,443		Post-traumatic stress disorder (talk)	Add sources
5		John Fentress Gardner (talk)	Add sources
224		DNA vaccine (talk)	Add sources
16		Okimi (talk)	Add sources
410		Great Barrington Declaration (talk)	Cleanup
18		Mien Shiang (talk)	Cleanup
134		COVID-19 misinformation by governments (talk)	Cleanup
111		Treatment and management of COVID-19 (talk)	Expand
1,068		Antidepressant (talk)	Expand
68		History of alternative medicine (talk)	Expand
23		Osteomyology (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
1,489		Strauss–Howe generational theory (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
36		Preparedness Day Bombing (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
25		Central nervous system viral disease (talk)	Merge
57		Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on crime in the Republic of Ireland (talk)	Merge
1,153		Theosophy (talk)	Merge
3		Trauma-informed mindfulness (talk)	Wikify
9		Regulation of alternative medicine (talk)	Wikify
61		Organic movement (talk)	Wikify
6		Ricky Greenwald (talk)	Orphan
16		Imagery rescripting (talk)	Orphan
8		Psychological trauma in older adults (talk)	Orphan
36		John Todd (British biologist) (talk)	Stub
13		Bat SARS-like coronavirus WIV1 (talk)	Stub
6		Arthur Mendel (talk)	Stub
64		Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (talk)	Stub
29		Ralph S. Baric (talk)	Stub
18		Journal of Medical Virology (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Some editors are kicking around some ideas for drafting a policy proposal on infoboxes for biographies. If you have any feedback I'd love to hear it. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 13:25, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Endemic COVID-19 on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I just wanted to give you a heads up that I reverted you on Donald Trump. I agree with your addition! But an editor on that talk page has said (without much explanation) that it would be a BLP issue if the article mentions the jury finding as to the rape claim. Conversely, other editors have said it's a BLP issue if the jury findings are reported without the rape claim. The issue is currently being discussed on the talk page.--Jerome Frank Disciple 21:05, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I saw that after I made the edit. I think such disagreements usually peter off over time, it's extremely obvious we should report what most reliable sources say, and most sources report all those findings. — Shibbolethink ^{(♔ ♕)} 21:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to chime in on the talk page, I'd personally appreciate it! But I also understand if you want to avoid that mess.--Jerome Frank Disciple 21:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]