• Coordinates of (active) Armenian Monastery in Bikfaya, Lebanon: 33°54′58.57″N 35°39′46.42″E / 33.9162694°N 35.6628944°E / 33.9162694; 35.6628944
• Coordinates of Armenian Genocide Memorial in Bikfaya, Lebanon: 33°54′56.76″N 35°39′46.36″E / 33.9157667°N 35.6628778°E / 33.9157667; 35.6628778

Newspapers

• The Armenian Weekly, Boston, MA (1899).
• Horizon Weekly, Montreal, Canada (1979).
• Aztag, Beirut, Lebanon.
• Alik, Tehran, Iran.
• Asbarez, Los Angeles, CA.
• Agos, Istanbul, Turkey.

Radio

• Voice of Van, Beirut, Lebanon.

Television

• Horizon Television, Glendale, CA.

Magazines

Hi there. I found this picture, Image:Bourj Hammoud01.jpg, and I learnt that you posted it for Wikipedia. I am yet to create Arabic and Simple English articles for Bourj Hammoud, so I wish to urgently ask if you could make the picture "common" - or available at all time. You can do that by uploading it to this website:

• http://commons.wikimedia.org

But, of course, you'd need to obtain a Wikimedia.org account. Thanks a lot. - Omar 180 12:17, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Aram06.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytfin 23:29, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Aram05.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytfin 23:32, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Aram03.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytfin 23:34, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Aram02.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytfin 23:35, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Aram-poster.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytfin 23:36, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Aram10.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ytfin 23:38, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Documentaries alleging war crimes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. mitrebox (talk) 06:36, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see you've survived the mess in Yerevan.

When you get the chance, could you check out Sargis Baghdasaryan, and ensure that I didn't make any mistakes or omit anything important? Thanks. DS (talk) 03:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is not for any purpose but my own, could I ask you to tell me what this means?

Քո Մայր Լեզուն Չմոռանաս

Thanks. ALTON .ıl 08:32, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. It was in a newspaper I picked up. ALTON .ıl 06:09, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Zvartnots Cathedral, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Zvartnots. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:36, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Serouj

Skzbiz petqe asel vor shat Uraxanali e tenal dzer nman Hayer Wikipediyayum... Dzer Yerevan_in_mid-May.jpg nkar@ shat hin nkare u vat tpavorutyune toxum mer gexeziq mayreniqi masin. Inch verabervume Yerevan-night22.jpg nkarin ays nkar@ chuni vochmi licansayin problemayin drutyun u mot 1 tariye ays nkarner arachutyun haytnum Yerevan teamayum.

Dzezaniz shat nerexutyun haytnelov noriz poxoadrutyunem anum Yerevan_in_mid-May.jpg nkar@ AOnline (talk) 09:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes for sure we have got a difference opinions about Yerevan Article. I think you didin't check carefully other articles. Republic Squre is symbol of Yerevan so there is no problem for put Squre picture to Settlement Infobox. And also your skyline picture is very old. ArmeniaOnline (talk) 08:22, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check your email (the one given on Նայիրի). Hakob (talk) 02:04, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A category that you created (Armenian political prisoners) was suggested to be deleted (please see end of this discussion).Biophys (talk) 22:27, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You had participated back in February in this CfD regarding the Category:Documentaries alleging war crimes, which ended in no consensus. A new proposal has been made to eliminate this category and merge its contents to Category:War documentaries which is now going on at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2008 September 24#Category:Documentaries alleging war crimes. You are encouraged to reconsider the original CfD, revisit your opinion in that discussion and participate again in this latest CfD. Alansohn (talk) 20:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serouj,

Could you explain your last edit in Serzh Sargsyan article?

Talk:Serzh_Sargsyan

-Սահակ/Sahak (talk) 12:31, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Բարեւ Serouj, thanks for the links. It's a great model for Armenia to follow so long as we learn from their problems.

Too bad the Renewable Energy in Armenia site is down, would've been very useful and interesting to see what other steps Armenia is taking to become less dependent on outdated energy sources like gas and oil. I hope the Danes will release the information soon. In the meantime, I found this. I was actually pleasantly surprised myself to see that Armenia's got a wind farm, albeit a small one... the one which you snapped a picture of. And the geothermal plant is just great news as well. Hopefully, the sources are accurate. - Fedayee (talk) 18:55, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Social issues in Armenia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Social issues in Armenia

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Vianello (talk) 01:52, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Serouj,

The references that I removed were either not relevant or very remotely relevant to the sentence that they were referencing, and were placed there primarily for promotional reasons. In each case I provided a more relevant link. -Սահակ/Sahak (talk) 14:09, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Modification of the original source based on what you think is injection of POV. We go with what the source says. Removing the Kurdish Genocide, though listed in the original source, is a "Sneaky vandalism." --Ahmetsaatalti (talk) 01:01, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What "original source" are you talking about with your proposed "Kurdish Genocide" that you claim occurred contemporaneously with the Armenian Genocide? I have yet to come across a reputable academic source which claims a Kurdish Genocide at the same time of the Armenian, Pontic Greek, and Assyrian genocides. If anything, there is evidence of Kurdish involvement in the massacres of the above peoples during the genocide. Your intra-wiki link to Kurdish Genocide on the Armenian Genocide page will be removed. Thanks. Serouj (talk) 03:00, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The last sentence of the first paragraph cites the article: Schaller, Dominik J. and Zimmerer, Jürgen (2008) 'Late Ottoman genocides: the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire and Young Turkish population and extermination policies – introduction', Journal of Genocide Research, 10:1, 7–14. This article references the first three genocides that is stated in the article which I guess you have not problem with. But the original text do not stop with the first three and continues with the one you reject. You are selecting what to include and what to reject from the article. This is "Sneaky vandalism." The evidence you are asking is in the article. --Ahmetsaatalti (talk) 03:08, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've uploaded File:The Armenian Genocide (2006 film poster).jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Documentaries alleging war crimes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Documentary films about alleged war crimes (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:07, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider joining the CFD, as the possible deletion of this category is also under discussion. Cgingold (talk) 15:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is my understanding that the photo was taken in Van. What source do you have that says it was taken in Yerevan? Meowy 17:43, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An Article for Deletion request has been created for this article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Kurdish_genocide_(WWI) Meowy 17:34, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Բարեւ Սէրուժ, ինչպե՞ս ես։ Դրի վայրը նկարին։ Այս վէրջինը իմ քոյրս նկարած է անցեալ ամառ երբ Հայաստան այցելեց, առիթը ունեցաւ այս ռազմական դպրոցը երդալ եւ ուրիշ շատ հետաքրքրական տեղեր։ Յուսամ օգտակար եղայ, նորեն կը խօսինք։ - Fedayee (talk) 22:57, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed you changed the pronunciation of these consonants in Eastern Armenian to ejectives. However, those are not ejectives but plain voiceless consonants, like Russian п, т, к. Hear this ejective here. I'm sure you've never heard an Armenian making that sound. At least not the ones speaking literary Eastern Armenian or Ararat valley dialect. Anyway, I'm going to change the pronunciations in Eastern Armenian and Armenian alphabet when I have time, just wanted to let you know. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 20:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, another question. How do you pronounce ռ in Western Armenian? Is it really an alveolar tap? Then don't you distinguish between ր and ռ? Because in Eastern Armenian ր is an alveolar tap and ռ is an alveolar trill. --Vahagn Petrosyan (talk) 22:13, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serouj! That's an interesting subject. I think I will create it soon on wk:fr. Moreover, I will use Donabédian, who commented on the building. Sardur (talk) 23:16, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Donabédian has Banak has well. Sardur (talk) 07:06, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Serouj. I noticed your clash with an ip over the Bana cathedral article. While the anon was incorrect when eliminating the Armenian origin of the church, Bana’s Georgian renovators should also be mentioned. I don’t know whether your sources speak of its Georgian connections, but I can provide you with the sources, including those by Armenian authors, about how Bana was restored by the Georgian Bagratids from Arab devastation in the 9th century and then was a venue for coronation of a couple of Georgian monarchs. I think we can cooperate and improve the article. I’m also suggesting renaming the article back to Bana, for its being the most frequently used name in both Armenian and Georgian sources. Best, Kober^Talk 18:53, 10 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serouj! Actually, Donabédian, while recognising the Armenian type of the cathedral, disagrees on its dating:

"Rangée par quelques auteurs parmi les constructions du VIIe siècle, elle est en réalité précisément datée par un témoignage historique (chronique géorgienne du XIe siècle) du règne du prince Adrnérsé II (881-923) et rien n'autorise à mettre en doute cette datation."

Patrick Donabédian, L'âge d'or de l'architecture arménienne, Parenthèses, Marseille, 2008, ISBN 978-2-86364-172-9, p. 199.

Sardur (talk) 05:46, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your thoughts are offensive, If I wanted something to change, I'd do so, without being anonymous! The only change I made to "Banak Cathedral" is the move to Bana Cathedral over redirect. That's all! I don't understand who gave you right to name the article “Banak”?! If you agree with Kober about restoration of the Cathedral, after which Armenians are unrelated to it, then it must be named Bana!--Rastrelli F (talk) 05:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

who are you to ban anyway i removed unsourced unrelated excess info ok if you want to type about armenians type it in the history section of elazig —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mystery.sin (talk • contribs) 16:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serouj! There's always a risk with these old pictures. It must have been published before 1923 and in the US (which seems to be the case for this one). I would advise some research before uploading any other. Sardur (talk) 08:21, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, by the way, I saw you had some problems with uploading a picture of Dzordzor. I tried to fix it: File:Dzor Dzor church.jpg. Sardur (talk) 08:24, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

They are putting the propaganda map 'again' in the Democratic Republic of Azerbaijan page. Please revert it. 76.250.9.176 (talk) 17:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I wont be able to activate it by the time May 28. Atleast put the other map they had, it is less corrupt. 76.238.247.227 (talk) 19:02, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just feel it would better to combine the two, because the 'History of the Armenian Language' can only go as far as literally describing the history of the Armenian language. By combining the two, people can not only find the history of the language, but also links to other articles describing grammar, orthography, etc. Consider it, and just a personal note, I think a template like the one I created is larger and more eye-catching. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Montyofarabia (talk • contribs) 06:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you think it's getting too big? The Armenian Church, Singapore (which is older than the Saint Gregory the Illuminator church of Baku) might well be added and the template will take up even more space. TA-ME (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serouj I think I will soon try to nominate Gochavank article on wk:fr for consideration as a GA. I however don't have a lot of information on the very last renovation (the famous glass roofs). Given that you're quite active on Armenian churches and monasteries, I wonder if you would have such information. Sardur (talk) 08:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okido, and thanks Sardur (talk) 15:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Հարգելի Սերուժ, Ձեր կատարած փոփոխությունների մեջ պարունակվում է վիրավորական գրառումներ Գագիկ Ծառուկյանի վերաբերյալ: Դա շատ տգեղ է և խախտում է Վիքիպեդիայի կանոնները: Խնդրում եմ չխանգարել և թողնել պատրաստելու և ամբողջական տեսքի բերելու Գ.Ծառուկյանի էջը:

Հարցերի դեպքում թողեք Ձեր հեռախոսահամար կզանգահարեմLenagroup (talk) 10:59, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To Seruj

As you can check, radio station Radio Free Europe has already taken out the offending words addressed to Gagik Tsarukyan. Even more, newspaper “Haykakan Zhamanak”(from which Radio Free Europe radio station took the source and translated the information into English) also has taken out these offending words from its archive text(You can check it easily, the text is in Armenian). So after this I think you should delete the nickname addressed to Gagik Tsarukyan. (Otherwise I can do it myself) Thank You for attention.

Hey there. I've provided an alternative link as well as the quote from the article. I don't see what your problem with the nickname is, as it is a widely used nickname and it is reasonable to have it in this article. Serouj (talk) 16:16, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, So you should distinguish that one thing is nickname, another thing is the OFFENDING nickname. According to Wikipedia rules, you cant use offending, and also non-formal words. The nickname you mantioned is not only Non-formal word, but also an offending one.Lenagroup (talk) 06:28, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Let's understand the situation dear Serouj. One thing is nickname(Margaret Thetcher-iron lady) BUT another thing is offending nickname with slang words. Even more, ArmeniaNow media(the one to that Serouj posted the link) already edited the article. What I want to tell, is that I think all self-respectful Armenian medias would edit this horrible slang addressed to Gagik Tsarukyan if they know that it will serve as link to Wikipedia. Right now, dear Serouj, please understand that no matter what kind of political views you have. No one has the right to harm other person. Lenagroup (talk) 10:06, 30 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.103.30.132 (talk)

All of the mafia / crime family / brotherhood bosses in Armenia have nicknames. Tsarukyan is no exception. Serouj (talk)

Please comment on talkpage before reverting anything. Assume good faith. Keep in mind that being rigid and uncompromising on Wikipedia does not help at all in discussing controversial topics. Parishan (talk) 02:33, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please refrain from repeatedly reverting the article, like you did in Church of Kish. Please be aware that the article in question is subject to the general restrictions of the arbitration case Armenia-Azerbaijan 2. Thanks. Grandmaster 04:53, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Could I ask you how you found these coordinates? I searched for them certainly for half an hour... Sardur (talk) 21:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if needed, I can always try to translate. And also in case, I can send you info from Hovannisian's Armenian Baghesh/Bitlis and Taron/Mush and Armenian Van/Vaspourakan.

Thierry and Donabédian is a wonderful book (though old, 1989). But now I have to update several articles I wrote, though.

Good work for the coordinates! Sardur (talk) 21:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An excellent news, indeed! I don't have time to have a look at it right now (busy with the fr FA), but do they have something on Gndevank? Sardur (talk) 21:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Serouj Just in case you didn't see this. Sardur (talk) 21:59, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"That Brandt is a funny guy..." I completely agree

"Especially since he has no case for the Church of Kish article" it seems you're not aware that he has been topic-banned from all pages related to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran, and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area (all broadly construed) for 6 months. You also may be interested by this post of mine. Sardur (talk) 23:06, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! something completely different: did you notice this? Sardur (talk) 23:25, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then I suggest you look at my contributions on Commons, as I'm trying to organise all those files. A difficult task, any help welcome Sardur (talk) 00:04, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Church of the Holy Cross here[1], the same church mentioned and pictured here[2]?? The book Lonely Planet Georgia Armenia & Azerbaijan mentions an Armenian Norasheni Church, but makes no mention of the Church of the Holy Cross. --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. There were several intermediate edits by an anonymous editor that were vandalism - I inadvertently went too far. My fault. --Manway (talk) 21:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The source cannot be called 'incorrect' just because you feel like disagreeing with it. Please refrain from removing it until you have a valid proof of it being incorrect. Parishan (talk) 06:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Serouj (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The reason for the reversions was due to the controversial changes of a user to the article that amounted to vandalism. Adding information blatantly out of context to the article as well as controversial info CAN be reverted! That is what keeps quality in Wikipedia. Also let me clarify that the controversial information was initiated by the user Parishan, and the onus was on HIM to prove the controversial points. In any case, the issue was resolved long ago, and I'm rather surprised that user Grandmaster (same guy as Parishan?) initiated this action. I ask that you swiftly remove this ban.

Decline reason:

No, this is a content dispute, not a matter of reverting vandalism. "I am right" is not a reason to violate WP:3RR. See also the warning below.  Sandstein  20:28, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia-Azerbaijan and related ethnic conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision.

 Sandstein  20:30, 18 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]