ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Saff V./Archive 2. (BOT) |
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussions to User talk:Saff V./Archive 2. (BOT) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[User:Arthistorian1977|Arthistorian1977]] ([[User talk:Arthistorian1977|talk]]) 09:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC) |
[[User:Arthistorian1977|Arthistorian1977]] ([[User talk:Arthistorian1977|talk]]) 09:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Iran Action Group]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The article [[:Iran Action Group]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
<blockquote>Doesn't seem notable enough for stand-alone page. Simply warrants mention on [[United States withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action]], [[Iran–United States relations]], etc. [[User:Loksmythe|Loksmythe]] ([[User talk:Loksmythe|talk]]) 17:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC)</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Iran Action Group|the article's talk page]]. |
|||
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Loksmythe|Loksmythe]] ([[User talk:Loksmythe|talk]]) 17:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== Nomination of [[:Iran Action Group]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Iran Action Group]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran Action Group]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> [[User:Loksmythe|Loksmythe]] ([[User talk:Loksmythe|talk]]) 17:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== New Page Review newsletter December 2019 == |
== New Page Review newsletter December 2019 == |
||
Revision as of 22:06, 31 January 2020
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Puja Sharma, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Arthistorian1977 (talk) 09:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter December 2019
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rosguill (talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Onel5969 (talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | JTtheOG (talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Arthistorian1977 (talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | DannyS712 (talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Boleyn (talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Ymblanter (talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Cwmhiraeth (talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
- Redirect autopatrol
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
- Source Guide Discussion
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
- This month's refresher course
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:15, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Stop
Please stop deleting sourced material. You are violating Wikipedia rules this.I'll have to report you if this is continued. Alex-h (talk) 14:50, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you reviewed
Hello, Saff V.
Thank you for creating Funeral of Qasem Soleimani.
User:Prof tpms, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good work
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Prof tpms}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Prof TPMS (talk) 14:23, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Saff V.
Thank you for creating Funeral of Qasem Soleimani.
User:Prof tpms, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Good work
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Prof tpms}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)