Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
Tag: 2017 wikitext editor
Line 93: Line 93:


Hi Saff, Many thanks for this new article. It seems, however, that most of the contents of the article is already covered in another article. Your new creation does not seem to be an article split, but rather a [[WP:POVFORK]]. You are welcome to work on the main article if you believe the contents presented there is unbalanced. Pls also see [[WP:SPLIT]] on creation of article splits. <sub>pseudonym</sub> [[User:Jake Brockman|Jake Brockman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jake Brockman|talk]]</sup> 09:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi Saff, Many thanks for this new article. It seems, however, that most of the contents of the article is already covered in another article. Your new creation does not seem to be an article split, but rather a [[WP:POVFORK]]. You are welcome to work on the main article if you believe the contents presented there is unbalanced. Pls also see [[WP:SPLIT]] on creation of article splits. <sub>pseudonym</sub> [[User:Jake Brockman|Jake Brockman]] <sup>[[User talk:Jake Brockman|talk]]</sup> 09:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
::{{ping|Jake Brockman}}, I am confused! You merged my article just a moment after its creation. As you mentioned, splitting or merging needs to knowing other user opinions. The subject is notable and will be developed, why do you say it covers material from another article without giving time![[User:Saff V.|Saff V.]] ([[User talk:Saff V.#top|talk]]) 10:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:15, 16 April 2019


Scientific names

Thank you for the review of Rhycherus filamentosus at DYK. Please note that by convention, the scientific names of animals and plants are always written in italics. Look at Euryoryzomys emmonsae, a featured article, for example. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cwmhiraeth: such a brilliant point! Thanks!Saff V. (talk) 06:20, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 WBGconverse 14:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please STOP. You are editing in one of the most volatile areas of the encyclopedia and I have precisely zero confidence that you have enough competency. Their's weird synthesis; weird language and what not. WBGconverse 14:15, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
for your information, Picking up unsourced material is nothing to do with POV.Regards!Saff V. (talk) 06:26, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for 2019 Khash–Zahedan suicide bombing

On 7 March 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 2019 Khash–Zahedan suicide bombing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2019 Khash–Zahedan suicide bombing, which caused the death of 27 Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, has been reported as one of the deadliest attacks in Iran in years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2019 Khash–Zahedan suicide bombing. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, 2019 Khash–Zahedan suicide bombing), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ANI thread closed

I have closed the ANI thread you were involved with. You are strongly warned to avoid making personal attacks, to stop treating Wikipedia as a battleground, to seek consensus rather than edit-warring over contentious material, and to be mindful of our policies about maintaining a neutral point of view." Please read through the comments there, and keep them in mind, so that a sanction does not prove necessary. Regards, Vanamonde (Talk) 06:47, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Finished your article


Khums

Hello:

I went through the article Khums recently copy edited by a new member of the Guild of Copy Editors. I fixed a number of issues with the wording, fonts, and Wikilinks etc... One thing I did notice is that the citations are inconsistent and really need some work. In the "India" section I used this incredibly useful tool https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ProveIt ProveIt and fixed a couple of the citations. When you select the template, Journal, for example it automatically places the article in quotation marks and the journal name in italics etc... You might want to install it an go through the citations and fix them.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:50, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 21:59, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MEK designation as terrorist organization

Hi Saff, Many thanks for this new article. It seems, however, that most of the contents of the article is already covered in another article. Your new creation does not seem to be an article split, but rather a WP:POVFORK. You are welcome to work on the main article if you believe the contents presented there is unbalanced. Pls also see WP:SPLIT on creation of article splits. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 09:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jake Brockman:, I am confused! You merged my article just a moment after its creation. As you mentioned, splitting or merging needs to knowing other user opinions. The subject is notable and will be developed, why do you say it covers material from another article without giving time!Saff V. (talk) 10:15, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Reply