This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  04:46, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z33

Hey, in order to use the Persian translation of an English word, you may use the template {{lang-fa|ترجمه کلمه}}. Regards. --Mhhossein ^talk 11:18, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mhhossein: such as the brilliant and useful point. Thanks! Saff V. (talk) 11:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you added Ruhollah Khomeini to Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/October 6, but his article is already included as an observance on June 4. Per the rules, articles may only be featured once a year, so you have to pick a day for him. He can't be on both days. Thanks. —howcheng {chat} 22:28, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your military history newsletter – Issue CL, October 2018 Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Article news: The month's new featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the use of so-called "substandard" manpower in armies Interview: On the Bugle turning 150 (issues that is!) Op-ed: TomStar81 on the collapse of empires at the end of World War I Timeline: This month in World War I • Published by the Military history WikiProject • • About the project • Newsroom • Subscribe • Archives •

Hello Saff V. Since I had to close an edit warring complaint about People's Mujahedin of Iran recently, I've been looking at RfCs on the talk page to see how far they got. Check out this RfC about 'violent' that you opened on 14 October. The comments so far suggest a slight inclination to remove 'violent', but there is no activity on this RfC since 16 October. If you don't think anyone else will comment, do you want to propose that this get closed by an uninvolved person, for instance at WP:AN/RFC? But if some movement is still possible, can you propose a more targeted rewording that would enlist support from the other side? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@EdJohnston:, I really appreciate you for helping me to solve the issue and apologize for the delay in response. Would you explaine about " a more targeted rewording that would enlist support from the other side " and how should I conduct it? Regards.Saff V. (talk) 07:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]