Cannabis Ruderalis

Content deleted Content added
DannyS712 bot (talk | contribs)
m →‎New Page Review newsletter December 2019: Task 8: Fix a mass message - lint error, div, and name
Tag: AWB
ClueBot III (talk | contribs)
m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Saff V./Archive 3. (BOT)
 
(104 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown)
Line 8: Line 8:
|box-advert=yes
|box-advert=yes
}}
}}


==Orphaned non-free image File:Baha Abu al-Ata.jpeg==
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|text-top|left|⚠|link=]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Baha Abu al-Ata.jpeg]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 18:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

== ArbCom 2019 election voter message ==

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2019|2019 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019#Election_timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=926750430 -->

== I have unreviewed a page you curated ==

Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, [[Bridge21]], and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on [[User_talk:Barkeep49|my talk page]]. Thank you.

<small>(Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Unreviewednonote-NPF -->

[[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 16:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
:Saff - I didn't intentionally unreview this page you had done. I had been looking at reviews of someone who was doing UPE and grew alarmed when I saw a crypto related topic. So sorry about that. But I am skeptical, after having now looked into it, that this is a notable topic. What did you find that led you to mark it reviewed? Best, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 18:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

==You've got mail!==
{{you've got mail|subject=WP:RX|ts=17:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)}}
[[User:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">'''——'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">''SN''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:#8B0000">54129</span>]] 17:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

==Puah Rakovsky==
Hi {{ping|Saff V.}} I am contributing to Wikipedia Asia Month and also combining it with the Women in Red campaign. I have been writing a biographical article on Puah Rakovsky and she was a 19th century feminist. The references I have tagged are from journals and libraries and the person is notable. Can you review the references once again and help me understand why you think the article lacks notability? Thanks!--[[User:ParulThakur|Parul Thakur]] ([[User talk:ParulThakur|talk]]) 10:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
::{{ping|ParulThakur}}, Thanks for the description and creating the article. Yes, the used sources seem to be independent and credible, but they are all sources belongs to Jewish. I wonder if you try adding some neutral sources to the article?[[User:Saff V.|Saff V.]] ([[User talk:Saff V.#top|talk]]) 06:49, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

== Why ==
Why did you add a notable tag ?? [[User:Bivashmaji|Bivash Maji]] ([[User talk:Bivashmaji|talk]]) 13:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
:{{ping|Bivashmaji}} which article?[[User:Saff V.|Saff V.]] ([[User talk:Saff V.#top|talk]]) 06:26, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

== Women in the Quran ==

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article [[Women in the Quran]] has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

[[User:Twofingered Typist|Twofingered Typist]] ([[User talk:Twofingered Typist|talk]]) 12:48, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

== I have unreviewed a page you curated ==

Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, [[Puja Sharma]], and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on [[User_talk:Arthistorian1977|my talk page]]. Thank you.

<small>(Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Unreviewednonote-NPF -->

[[User:Arthistorian1977|Arthistorian1977]] ([[User talk:Arthistorian1977|talk]]) 09:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

==Women's rights in Iran==
{{GOCEtb|article=Women's rights in Iran|sign=Cheers, '''[[User talk:Baffle gab1978|<span style="color:#191960">Baffle☿''gab''</span>]]''' 03:26, 12 December 2019 (UTC)}}
:Hi Saff V., I should tell you there was a sizeable copyright violation in the article and much of its history has been revision deleted. Some of the text was directly copied from copyrighted sources and because of earlier rev-deletions, I couldn't pinpoint the editor responsible. Since you're a prolific editor there, please report any further copyvios you might detect to an administrator and ask for revdel of the relevant material. Cheers, '''[[User talk:Baffle gab1978|<span style="color:#191960">Baffle☿''gab''</span>]]''' 03:26, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

::{{ping|Baffle gab1978}} I really appreciate for efforts, the article definitely looks much better. I thought the article could suffer from copyvio, Do you investigate this issue during doing copy edit? As well as did you removed the unrelated content of the article? [[User:Saff V.|Saff V.]] ([[User talk:Saff V.#top|talk]]) 06:29, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Iran Action Group]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Iran Action Group]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>Doesn't seem notable enough for stand-alone page. Simply warrants mention on [[United States withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action]], [[Iran–United States relations]], etc. [[User:Loksmythe|Loksmythe]] ([[User talk:Loksmythe|talk]]) 17:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC)</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Iran Action Group|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> [[User:Loksmythe|Loksmythe]] ([[User talk:Loksmythe|talk]]) 17:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:Iran Action Group]] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Iran Action Group]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran Action Group]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> [[User:Loksmythe|Loksmythe]] ([[User talk:Loksmythe|talk]]) 17:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

== New Page Review newsletter December 2019 ==

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
[[File:2019 NPP Backlog.png|800px|A graph showing the number of articles in the page curation feed from 12/21/18 - 12/20/19]]
<!-- [[File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg|right|120px]] -->
;Reviewer of the Year
[[File:New page reviewer of the year cup.svg|right|200px]]
This year's Reviewer of the Year is {{noping|Rosguill}}. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to {{noping|Onel5969}} who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to {{noping| Boleyn}} and {{noping|JTtheOG}} who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with [[User:CAPTAIN MEDUSA|CAPTAIN MEDUSA]] and [[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

{| class="wikitable sortable"
|+Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
!Rank
!Username
!Num reviews
!Log
|-
|1
|[[User:Rosguill|Rosguill]] ([[User talk:Rosguill|talk]])
| data-sort-value="Onel5969" |47,395
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|2
|[[User:Onel5969|Onel5969]] ([[User talk:Onel5969|talk]])
| data-sort-value="Rosguill" |41,883
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|3
|[[User:JTtheOG|JTtheOG]] ([[User talk:JTtheOG|talk]])
| data-sort-value="JTtheOG" |11,493
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|4
|[[User:Arthistorian1977|Arthistorian1977]] ([[User talk:Arthistorian1977|talk]])
| data-sort-value="Arthistorian1977" |5,562
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|5
|[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]])
| data-sort-value="Boleyn" |4,866
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|6
|[[User:CAPTAIN MEDUSA|CAPTAIN MEDUSA]] ([[User talk:CAPTAIN MEDUSA|talk]])
| data-sort-value="DannyS712" |3,995
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|7
|[[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DragonflySixtyseven]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]])
| data-sort-value="Cwmhiraeth" |3,812
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|8
|[[User:Boleyn|Boleyn]] ([[User talk:Boleyn|talk]])
| data-sort-value="Ymblanter" |3,655
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|9
|[[User:Ymblanter|Ymblanter]] ([[User talk:Ymblanter|talk]])
| data-sort-value="CAPTAIN" |3,553
|Patrol Page Curation
|-
|10
|[[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]])
|3,522
|Patrol Page Curation
|}
(''The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found '''[[wikipedia:Database_reports/Top_new_article_reviewers#Last_365_days|here]]''''')

;Redirect autopatrol
A recent [[Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Redirect_autopatrol#RfC_on_autopatrolling_redirects|Request for Comment]] on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was [[WP:SNOW|closed early]]. New Page Reviewers are now able to [[Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist|nominate editors]] who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Redirect_whitelist#Editors_whose_redirects_are_whitelisted|list of users]] whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by {{noping|DannyS712 bot III}}.

;Source Guide Discussion
Set to launch early in the new year is our first [[WP:NPPSG|New Page Patrol Source Guide]] discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a [[WP:BEFORE]] prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the [[WT:NPR|New Page Patrol talk page]] for more information.

;This month's refresher course
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on [[Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features)]]. Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
</div>Delivered by [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Barkeep49@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=931696676 -->

Latest revision as of 03:58, 27 February 2023

Leave a Reply