Content deleted Content added
ParulThakur (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
ClueBot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Saff V./Archive 3. (BOT) Tag: Manual revert |
||
(122 intermediate revisions by 34 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
|box-advert=yes |
|box-advert=yes |
||
}} |
}} |
||
== Warning == |
|||
Saff V., In [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruhollah_Khomeini&diff=922852022&oldid=922850118 this] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruhollah_Khomeini&diff=922853484&oldid=922852022 this] edit, you removed a reliable source and well-sourced statements from the [[Ruhollah Khomeini]] article. Please stop or you'll be reported. [[User:Stefka Bulgaria|Stefka Bulgaria]] ([[User talk:Stefka Bulgaria|talk]]) 19:25, 24 October 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:{{re|Stefka Bulgaria}} - Pray explain to me about how [[Amir Taheri]]'s or Marvin Yakos' self-published work is a RS. I am inches away from dragging you to AE for a TBan. [[User:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style="color: red">∯</span><span style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:#070">WBG</b></span>]][[User talk:Winged Blades of Godric|<sup><span style="color:#00F">converse</span></sup>]] 12:52, 26 October 2019 (UTC) |
|||
{{outdent}} |
|||
{{re|Winged Blades of Godric}} When Saff V. pointed out that the Xulon publication was self-published (which I didn't know when I included the source in the article), then I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ruhollah_Khomeini&diff=922856887&oldid=922856439 removed] the source. As for the Adler & Adler publication, as far as I know, that's not a self-published source. Both sources were used to support the following statement: |
|||
{{talk quote|"One of Khomeini's first acts when he took power was to lower the age of marriage from eighteen to nine years old for girls, and down to fifteen years old for boys. Khomeini told the Muslim faithful that marrying a girl before she begins menstruation was a “divine blessing.” “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” These new laws also encourage polygamy and prevented women from leaving abusive husbands."|}} |
|||
In addition to those two sources, I also included the following sources to support that statement (and, as far as I can see, they are not self-published): |
|||
* {{tq|"Under Khomeini, child marriage was allowed once more, with the age of marriage being reduced from 18 to nine for girls (revised, after protests, to 13) and 15 for boys. New laws encourage polygamy and prevented women from leaving abusive husbands. The husband’s right of unilateral divorce was reinstated. New policies encouraged temporary marriage as ‘morally sanctioned substitute for Western dating’, with trial ‘sigheh’ marriages recommended for high-school students, and sex workers being invited to enter short-term marriage contracts with returning war veterans."|}}[https://books.google.com/books?id=dBoj3c5VPAMC&pg=PA166&dq=khomeini+child+marriage&hl=es&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjT0I6u8q_lAhWx6uAKHeGcB70Q6AEIPDAC#v=onepage&q=khomeini%20child%20marriage&f=false I.B. Tauris ] |
|||
* {{tq|"Khomeini called marriage to a girl before her first menstrual period “a diving blessing,” and he advised the faithful: “Do your best to ensure that your daughters do not see their first blood in your house.” This practice continues to this day, despite the severe injuries girls often incur from early intercourse and childbirth.|}} [https://books.google.com/books?id=eanFm7hiM1cC&pg=PA48&lpg=PA48&dq=khomeini+children+bride&source=bl&ots=qesrR0VfWr&sig=ACfU3U1DBTomKEamRum9I1FhdujI-qcalg&hl=es&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjB48TJ76_lAhWSEBQKHSnXDXs4ChDoATAJegQICBAB#v=onepage&q=khomeini%20children%20bride&f=false Encounter Books] |
|||
[[User:Stefka Bulgaria|Stefka Bulgaria]] ([[User talk:Stefka Bulgaria|talk]]) 17:08, 26 October 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== New Page Review newsletter November 2019 == |
|||
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px"> |
|||
{| style="float: right; border: 1px solid #BBB; background: #FFFFFF; |
|||
|- style="font-size: 86%;" |
|||
|} |
|||
[[File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg|right|100px]] |
|||
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}, |
|||
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon. |
|||
;Getting the queue to 0 |
|||
There are now {{NUMBERINGROUP:patroller}} holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.<br> |
|||
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If ''each'' reviewer soon does '''only 2 reviews a day''' over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by ''every'' reviewer doing '''only 1 review every 2 days''' - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.<br> |
|||
Want to join? Consider adding the [[Template:User NPP Pledge|'''NPP Pledge userbox''']].<br> |
|||
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Awards|'''really cool awards''']]. |
|||
; Coordinator |
|||
Admin {{U|Barkeep49}} has been officially invested as [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Coordination#New_Page_Review_Coordinators|NPP/NPR coordinator]] by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers. |
|||
;This month's refresher course |
|||
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: [[WP:LTA/OM|This official Wikipedia article]] will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol#Conflict_of_Interest_(COI),_paid_editing|The Hallmarks]] to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources. |
|||
;Tools |
|||
*It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list. |
|||
*It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar. |
|||
;Reviewer Feedback |
|||
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/School#New Reviewer Mentorship|New Reviewer mentorship]] will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional [[Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/School#Peer review cohort|peer review cohort]] for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch ''November 13''. |
|||
;Second set of eyes |
|||
*Not only are ''New Page Reviewers'' the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the [[WP:NPP#Monitoring the system|'''Monitoring the system''']] section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing ''good'' work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR. |
|||
*Do be sure to have [[WT:NPR|'''our talk page ''']] on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers. |
|||
;Arbitration Committee |
|||
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights. |
|||
;Community Wish list |
|||
There is to be no [[:meta:wikimedia.org/wiki/Community_Wishlist_Survey_2020|wish list]] for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion. |
|||
<hr> |
|||
<small>To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here]] |
|||
</small> |
|||
</div>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=924341675 --> |
|||
==Orphaned non-free image File:Baha Abu al-Ata.jpeg== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|35px|text-top|left|⚠|link=]] Thanks for uploading '''[[:File:Baha Abu al-Ata.jpeg]]'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a [[WP:FU|claim of fair use]]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see [[Wikipedia:Non-free content#Policy|our policy for non-free media]]). |
|||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --[[User:B-bot|B-bot]] ([[User talk:B-bot|talk]]) 18:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== ArbCom 2019 election voter message == |
|||
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;"> |
|||
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2019|2019 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019#Election_timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. |
|||
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. |
|||
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2019/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
</td></tr> |
|||
</table> |
|||
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/06&oldid=926750430 --> |
|||
== I have unreviewed a page you curated == |
|||
Hi, I'm Barkeep49. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, [[Bridge21]], and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on [[User_talk:Barkeep49|my talk page]]. Thank you. |
|||
<small>(Message delivered via the [[Wikipedia:Page Curation/Help|Page Curation]] tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Unreviewednonote-NPF --> |
|||
[[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 16:46, 21 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
:Saff - I didn't intentionally unreview this page you had done. I had been looking at reviews of someone who was doing UPE and grew alarmed when I saw a crypto related topic. So sorry about that. But I am skeptical, after having now looked into it, that this is a notable topic. What did you find that led you to mark it reviewed? Best, [[User:Barkeep49|Barkeep49]] ([[User_talk:Barkeep49|talk]]) 18:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==You've got mail!== |
|||
{{you've got mail|subject=WP:RX|ts=17:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC)}} |
|||
[[User:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">'''——'''</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:black">''SN''</span>]][[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="color:#8B0000">54129</span>]] 17:14, 22 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==Puah Rakovsky== |
|||
Hi {{ping|Saff V.}} I am contributing to Wikipedia Asia Month and also combining it with the Women in Red campaign. I have been writing a biographical article on Puah Rakovsky and she was a 19th century feminist. The references I have tagged are from journals and libraries and the person is notable. Can you review the references once again and help me understand why you think the article lacks notability? Thanks!--[[User:ParulThakur|Parul Thakur]] ([[User talk:ParulThakur|talk]]) 10:26, 28 November 2019 (UTC) |