==Only warning and sanction==

If you [[WP:EW|edit war]] again on [[People's Mujahedin of Iran]], no matter what the reason is, you will be blocked from editing, immediately and without further notice. Also, you are not to revert that article, at all, for at least one week. Next time, please heed the warnings or the sanctions are going to be ''much more'' heavy-handed. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 18:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

:{{Ping|El_C}}It is true that I said proposed text by Stefka was suitable but I stressed that other users' opinion was needed. Without waiting for other opinions, Stefka edited the article. My opinion was never changed and my revert was not the Edit war. Of course, I try to be more clear. When I see that the user did not correctly pay attention to my comment and edited the article based on what he guessed, was not it allowed to revert?[[User:Saff V.|Saff V.]] ([[User talk:Saff V.#top|talk]]) 04:50, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

::Not when I [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APeople%27s_Mujahedin_of_Iran&type=revision&diff=913343895&oldid=913340631 ask] for the edit war to cease, no. [[User:El_C|El_C]] 07:39, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

::::{{Ping|El_C}}Yes you are right, you wared us to prevent Edit war, but It didn't seem to me reverting to longstanding Version when users did not get my mean, can be Edit war. I reverted it to that version up to consequence would be gained. As I am trying to improve that article without disruptive contact, I have to say that edit was not done by the aim of Edit war, Anyway I apologize.[[User:Saff V.|Saff V.]] ([[User talk:Saff V.#top|talk]]) 13:16, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

== New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019 ==

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">

[[File:Wikipedia New page reviewer.svg|right|120px]]

Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

;Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic '''300''' as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

;Coordinator

A proposal is taking place [[Wikipedia_talk:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers#Coordinator|'''here''']] to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

;This month's refresher course

''[[Wikipedia:Why I Hate Speedy Deleters|Why I Hate Speedy Deleters]]'', a 2008 essay by long since retired {{U|Ballonman}}, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

;Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

;Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator <u>if appropriate</u>, and submit the issue to [[WP:COIN]] if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

;Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion

*Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for [[WP:ORG|organisations and companies]].

*''Blank-and-Redirect'' is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

;Not English

*A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with [[WP:NPPNE]]. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.

;Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See [[User:SD0001/StubSorter.js]], It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at [[User:Evad37/rater]] makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

{{noping|DannyS712 bot III}} is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?type=patrol&user=DannyS712+bot+III&page=&wpdate=&tagfilter=&subtype= patrol log].

<small>Go [[Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter list|here]] to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.</small>

</div>

[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

<!-- Message sent by User:Kudpung@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=914408718 -->

== ''The Bugle'': Issue CLXI, September 2019 ==

{| style="width: 100%;"

| valign="top" style="border: 1px gray solid; padding: 1em;" |

{|

| [[File:The Bugle.png|250px|link=Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News|alt=Full front page of The Bugle]]

| width="100%" valign="top" | <div style="text-align: center; color: darkslategray;">'''Your Military History Newsletter'''</div>

<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">

* Project news: ''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/September 2019/Project news|From the editors; awards and honours; contest results]]''

* Articles: ''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/September 2019/Articles|Last month's new featured and A-class content]]''

* Book review: ''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/September 2019/Book reviews|Nick-D looks at the legacy of World War II]]''

</div>

|-

|}

|}

<div style="font-size: 85%; margin:0 auto; text-align:center;">

''The Bugle'' is published by the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history|Military history WikiProject]]. To receive it on your talk page, please [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Members|join the project]] or sign up [[User:The ed17/Sandbox3#Non-members who want delivery|here]].<br/>If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from [[User:The ed17/Sandbox3|this page]]. Your editors, [[User:Ian Rose|Ian Rose]] ([[User talk:Ian Rose|talk]]) and [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 09:17, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

</div>

<!-- Message sent by User:Ian Rose@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:The_ed17/sandbox3&oldid=913736300 -->

== Anan Lestaluhu ==

I already add the lead to [[Anan Lestaluhu]]. Can I remove the tag now? I forgot to remove =Anan Lestaluhu= tag. [[User:Wira rhea|Wira rhea]] ([[User talk:Wira rhea|talk]]) 05:30, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

: definitely Yes ![[User:Saff V.|Saff V.]] ([[User talk:Saff V.#top|talk]]) 05:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

:: Thanks. [[User:Wira rhea|Wira rhea]] ([[User talk:Wira rhea|talk]]) 05:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

== Aftab (sunshine) ==

Please explain to me how [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=People%27s_Mujahedin_of_Iran&diff=prev&oldid=916151918 this edit] isn't a violation of [[WP:NOR]] and [[WP:V]]. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User Talk:Vanamonde93|Talk]])</span> 14:36, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

:{{Ping|Vanamonde93}} before press publish change button, I forgot to check to be sure that this [https://theglobepost.com/2018/08/01/mek-unpopular-iran/ source] is there. I thought the source to be there because it might be the Chelcheragh operation had been referred to it. Of course, (before I added it to lead), Aftab operation had been also used on the body of the article, which had the [https://www.iranrights.org/attachments/library/doc_76.pdf source]. Excuse me anyway, I have to be more careful.[[User:Saff V.|Saff V.]] ([[User talk:Saff V.#top|talk]]) 04:55, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

::You do realise the first of those sources is an opinion piece, and the second is a testimonial? Meaning that neither of them are reliable for anything other than the author's opinion? <span style="font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User Talk:Vanamonde93|Talk]])</span> 14:33, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

:::{{ping|Vanamonde93}} if I were aware about their reliability, I never took them to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Two_sources RSN].I really didn’t know they are not reliable.[[User:Saff V.|Saff V.]] ([[User talk:Saff V.#top|talk]]) 18:37, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

::::Well, keep it in mind. A critical part of what makes a source reliable is whether there is some sort of editorial oversight independent of the author. Most news sources have editors; most academic papers have peer review; books from good publishers have the publisher's editorial staff. Opinion pieces don't have that. They are reliable for the authors views, but only occasionally reliable for factual information, and that only when the authors themselves are notable/reliable commentators. <span style="font-family:Papyrus">[[User:Vanamonde93|Vanamonde]] ([[User Talk:Vanamonde93|Talk]])</span> 19:19, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

== Speedy deletion declined: [[:Timeline of computing 2020–29]] ==

Hello Saff V.. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of [[:Timeline of computing 2020–29]], a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''I can't imagine how the context could be any clearer, and similar timelines are linked at the bottom of the page''' Thank you. [[User:Tracy Von Doom|Tracy Von Doom]] ([[User talk:Tracy Von Doom|talk]]) 11:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

== Autopatrolled granted ==

[[File:Wikipedia Autopatrolled.svg|right|80px]]

Hi Saff V., I just wanted to let you know that I have <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3ASaff_V. added]</span> the "{{mono|autopatrolled}}" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on [[WP:NPP|new page patrollers]]. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see [[Wikipedia:Autopatrolled]]. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! [[User:Chetsford|Chetsford]] ([[User talk:Chetsford|talk]]) 16:05, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

== Reply ==

I am blocked indefinitely from Arabic Wikipedia because my username indicates that I am from a place ([[Shara'b As Salam District]]) which is not acceptable in their policies.. Thanks for your work in Persian Wikipedia!. I am really grateful of your work.--[[User:SharabSalam|SharabSalam]] ([[User talk:SharabSalam|talk]]) 07:14, 6 October 2019 (UTC)