NOTE: IF YOU POST ANYTHING ON THIS PAGE WITHOUT A SIGNATURE, YOUR POST WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT CONSIDERATION.

Thanks for dealing with the Calles loco vandal. Thank you again. - Ken Bogan 22:36, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Block User:Tj raza - Ken Bogan 22:48, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I think Dr. Zoidberg is extremely silly in that he gives people the right to vandalize his user page. What do you think?? Georgia guy 23:01, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Why did you remove the "Gay, lesbian or bisexual people" category from the Paris Hilton page. She's clearly bisexual, therefore belongs in that category. -- TrojanMan 23:59, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

You were too quick to just delete the paragraph on the Chicken Kiev speech. A simple Google search turns verifies the information provided about this speech, so why characterize it as nonsense? If you disagree with its portrayal of the event, maybe add another perspective, don't just delete. -- Kevin Saff 15:25, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Monicavereana

User:Monicavereana e-mailed me this morning saying that you blocked him for vandalism. I cannot find this block on the block list, nor anything on his talk page about his vandalism,b locking or possible unblocking. He probably e-mailed me because I sent him a welcome message when he first came here a few weeks ago. His edits seem fine, and some have not even been reverted. I am thinking that he was never actually blocked and may be joking. Do you know anything about this? Academic Challenger 20:07, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

You're working very hard. If you want to discuss this, please email me. (Click my sig.) — Xiong熊talk 07:50, 2005 Apr 16 (UTC)

HenkvD 11:29, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

My apolagies. Somebody else is vandalising user talk pages in your name. HenkvD 11:32, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Very funny. Thanks. --Roo72 11:29, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

... could you think that I did that vandalism & block me!! Look at mny history on this thing; one of reversal of vandalism, never adding any sort of "attachments" like that, and of discussion and reasoning. For these reasons I was nominated and accepted as admin. It should be obvious to you & everyone else that I am being "spoofed" and would never do such a thing. Please help me in determing who this vandal really is and stopping him?her, and block anything that you need to do in the process, but please do not assume that garbage was from me! Sincerely, Rlquall 11:32, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Rlquall, I left a message on your user page regarding this. -- John Fader (talk | contribs) 11:35, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Good show. I shouldn't have bought into your being spoofed, andwill be more careful in the future.

Rlquall 11:40, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

why was my question deleted from the wikipedia NPOV page before it could be answered? and can you asnwer it? [[User:GabrielSimon|GabrielSimon]

so ill assume you know not what the acashic record ( spelling) is?

GabrielSimon

just because your prescious sceince can not see or explain something , it HAS to be fiction yes? if thats how you think, then your really not as open minded as you wish to be.

Gabrielsimon 23:43, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Gained knowledge isnt faith, it is practicality.

Gabrielsimon 00:17, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hello Rick: Thank you for making it to the end of my proposal and out-put example. I'm aware that my gross lack of formating creates difficulties for people to follow through. I have a home based email project that is less then 48 hours old. This is absolutely catching on fire and I desperately seek help to formulate and edit this into a wiki environment. I do not harbor any proprietary claim over this material. If it can be launched global, many people have already expressed great interest, and could more easily interact from the active wiki site. (I can't even figure out how to get my "signature" to post) Please look for User, "TTlightningRod" Take care, hope you can help.

Rick, old pal, what in the heck can we do about this? Another of his articles is on VfD and he's been nominated for administrator status by a brand-new user, as you know. I have been on this site too long. - Lucky 6.9 00:38, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Thank God for some small favors. I went through hell three times on that page and if this guy would have made the cut, that would have been it for me. Cold turkey. Glad you're up late. Android suspects that a new user, User:SuperDude115 may be a sockpuppet. The very first edit from this account was a bizarre comment on SamuraiClinton's talk page. After I warned the user off from making such comments, he replied on my talk page in a writing style very much like Samurai's. Add to that a brand-new user running him up the admin flagpole and you have all the element of a real stinkfest. - Lucky 6.9 07:08, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

You may be right about the admin nominator, but did you sneak a look-see at SuperDude115's comment on my talk page? Classic Clinton. Even if Level Check and Samurai aren't the same person, there's either some duplicity going on between the two to make Samurai look better...or s/he is the worst possible kind of troll who nominated him in order to humiliate him. I'm ticked off at Samurai, but I won't allow anyone to step in and humiliate the guy. - Lucky 6.9 07:15, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• I concur with Lucky. SuperDude115's contribution history is very suspect, and his writing style even looks very similar to SamuraiClinton's. Also, the timestamps match up just right &ndash SuperDude starts editing when Samurai stops. I have a strong suspiscion that there is sockpuppetry afoot (and if it's not that, it's some very stupid trolling). android↔talk 15:18, Apr 17, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks, for the word of advice, I wasn't sure how long the block should be set, this gives me a good reference point--nixie 08:11, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)