NOTE: IF YOU ARE ANONYMOUS, AND POST ANYTHING ON THIS PAGE, YOUR POST WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT CONSIDERATION.

Rick, I have a confession to make. Can we discuss it at my private talk page VosConclavo? It's very important; concerns hoaxes and vandalism, please reply at the said talk page ASAP. Regards - 84.154.113.120 22:46, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Hello Rick, User:Albanau is engaging once more in behavior that I consider vandalism. I have proven once again that an argument he continues to post is bogus, but he continues to revert it. See Talk:Origin of Albanians, the last section. It is like arguing with a retarded child trying to convince Albanau that his arguments are not admissable in an Encyclopedia. He is spreading misinformation, because sites such as Nationmaster have already transcribed his bullshit across the net. Decius 05:24, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Really in my opinion, if Wikipedia does not put an end to his actions on the Origin of Albanians page, I think the article might as well be deleted (I don't even care if one of his desires---to see the article deleted--would thus be fulfilled, because all the information in the article against the Illyrian idea is already known), to avoid spreading misinformation constantly added by "Albanau". Or perhaps I should erase all his bogus edits and have the page locked. Decius 05:28, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Albanau should be blocked from editing the Origin of Albanians page---I don't need him to be banned from Wikipedia (though that would be fine), but at least blocked from that page. I plan on posting a complaint against him at Arbitrations. Decius 06:35, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Note that he accuses me of also engaging in his type of edit behavior, but the History of the article shows that the only mistake I made was suggesting that Albanians might be descended from the ancient Paionians---this is very possible, but it can be considered original research. At the time I added the sentence I thought it might qualify as demonstratably admissable, but I agree that I shouldn't add my own theories, so I erased that direct Paionian suggestion months ago---what mention of Paionians remains in the text is just the geographical fact that they once lived north of Macedon, east of Albania. That's as far as I went, which in no way compares to his "actions" in the article. Decius 05:42, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

I see that from Talk:Finno-Ugric languages, it is possible for a User to be banned from a certain page. This case is worse than the Finno-Ugric case, which got User:Antifinnugor banned from that page. Anyway, the reason I contacted you is to get some input on what steps should be taken. Decius 06:13, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Your help and common sense is needed. User:Kelisi, has been producing some maps and trying to replace the CIA maps for several Caribbean and South American countries. In my opinion these new maps (which have more detail than the CIA maps) are vastly inferior. They use garish colours, terrible decorative fonts, use a horribly large pixel size and are generally ugly and crowded, and look terribly amateurish and like they were produced on a Commodore 64 or something. Here is a list of maps he has produced . http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AContributions&target=Kelisi&hideminor=0&namespace=6. Perhaps the worst example is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Brazilmap.gif . Bizarrly these maps seems to have support from a few people who have been trying to push through their inclusion on several pages. Please see talk:Panama and talk:Honduras. Jooler 09:17, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Salutations. RickK, you are being summoned to a discussion with an anonymous user who calls himself the Fort Bleakeley vandal. He says it is very important. You would do best to join the discussion at my talk page immediately. Please hurry. VosConclavo 11:46, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC)