NOTE: IF YOU ARE ANONYMOUS, AND POST ANYTHING ON THIS PAGE, YOU WILL BE DELETED WITHOUT CONSIDERATION.

Hiya I saw you recent post at the village pump, and thought I'd come an teach you how you could have done it.

Firstly do a reverse DNS check to see the internet provider. If it's AOL give up. AOL is far too large, has far too many computers for you to ba able to block the vandal.You'll sucseed in blocking loads of legit users and probably won't get the actual vandal.

Assuming it's not AOL then proceed as follows,

64.12.116.10 through 64.12.117.22

Set the last digits to 0 64.12.116.0 ->> 64.12.117.0

do two /24 blocks 64.12.116.0/24 and 64.12.117.0/24 that will block a total of 512 IPs

Stick to /24 only if you are at all unsure about what you are doing. Note that /31 will block fewer than /24 and /16 will block a lot more. Never go lower than /16 ( I don't you you can in actual fact anyway) Also since range blocks catch innocents as well as vandals keep them short. Policy is 24 hours only I think.

HTH theresa knott 22:28, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)

You always seem to be under a lot of stress, what with dealing with trolls and vandals and people who just don't get it. Relax and have a cookie. You'll feel better (food allergies excepted). -- Cyrius|✎ 06:18, 7 Aug 2004 (UTC)

The official EU site says:

   © European Communities, 1995-2004
   Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated.
   Where prior permission must be obtained for the reproduction or use of textual and multimedia information (sound, images, software, etc.), such permission shall cancel the above-mentioned general permission and shall clearly indicate any restrictions on use.

We should perhaps add a Template:EUCopyright for material copied from EU web sites. (I'm unsure as to whether this copyright applies to actual texts of laws and directives.) David.Monniaux 07:11, 19 Aug 2004 (UTC)

You asked:

Hi. Why did you remove the disambiguation notice from Ulysses? RickK 02:45, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)

I really do not remember doing that. I glad you fixed it. --chemica 02:03, 20 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Sleepy Hollow falls under the steampunk category because of the wacky and far out equipment that Ichabod Crane uses. From his telescoping glasses to his numerous wire and pulley worked cutting devices, the movie is full of quirky little devices of his that in no way reflect the 1799 time period of the movie.

A film doesn't have to have a Nautilus (20,000 Leagues/League of Extraordinary Gentlemen)or a giant steam-spider (Wild Wild West) to be steam punk. It has to have technology unavailable at the time. If Van Helsing can sit in that list because of a couple of spinning blades and a rapid fire bowgun, then Sleepy Hollow fits in with it's odd implements, and I will place it back, or you should also delete Van Helsing if the only viable definition of steampunk is a film with a huge mechanical monstosity gallivanting about. --Gnrlotto